Timescales for detection of trends in the ocean carbon sink
A climate modelling experiment is used to identify where ocean carbon uptake should change as a result of anthropogenic climate change and to distinguish these changes from internal climate variability; we may be able to detect changing uptake in some oceanic regions between 2020 and 2050, but until...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature (London) 2016-02, Vol.530 (7591), p.469-472 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 472 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7591 |
container_start_page | 469 |
container_title | Nature (London) |
container_volume | 530 |
creator | McKinley, Galen A. Pilcher, Darren J. Fay, Amanda R. Lindsay, Keith Long, Matthew C. Lovenduski, Nicole S. |
description | A climate modelling experiment is used to identify where ocean carbon uptake should change as a result of anthropogenic climate change and to distinguish these changes from internal climate variability; we may be able to detect changing uptake in some oceanic regions between 2020 and 2050, but until then, internal climate variability will preclude such detection.
The oceanic carbon sink over time
The world's oceans have taken up vast amounts of amount of carbon produced by fossil fuel burning during the industrial era. These authors use a large ensemble of a single Earth system climate model, the Community Earth System Model–Large Ensemble (CESM–LE), to assess variability and change in the ocean carbon cycle in recent decades and through to 2100. This approach allows for a separation between trends in the air–sea carbon flux due to anthropogenic climate change and those due to internal climate variability. The study reveals how the ocean carbon sink may be expected to change throughout this century in different oceanic regions. The findings suggest that a large internal climate variability makes it unlikely that changes in the rate of anthropogenic carbon uptake can be directly observed in most oceanic regions at present, but that this may become possible between 2020 and 2050 in some regions.
The ocean has absorbed 41 per cent of all anthropogenic carbon emitted as a result of fossil fuel burning and cement manufacture
1
,
2
. The magnitude and the large-scale distribution of the ocean carbon sink is well quantified for recent decades
3
,
4
. In contrast, temporal changes in the oceanic carbon sink remain poorly understood
5
,
6
,
7
. It has proved difficult to distinguish between air-to-sea carbon flux trends that are due to anthropogenic climate change and those due to internal climate variability
5
,
6
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
. Here we use a modelling approach that allows for this separation
14
, revealing how the ocean carbon sink may be expected to change throughout this century in different oceanic regions. Our findings suggest that, owing to large internal climate variability, it is unlikely that changes in the rate of anthropogenic carbon uptake can be directly observed in most oceanic regions at present, but that this may become possible between 2020 and 2050 in some regions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nature16958 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768563144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A444595394</galeid><sourcerecordid>A444595394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-6e40951a8ae677379b4f74eac6edc238c717fb6e8de0a3cb40c9c77a96f296163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10kFvFCEUB3BiNHatnrybiV5s7FSYYYCJp83GapNGE13jkTDMY6XOwBaYRL-9rK1214zhQML78Q-8PISeEnxGcC1eO5WmAIS1jbiHFoRyVlIm-H20wLgSJRY1O0KPYrzCGDeE04foqGItIVxUC_RmbUeIWg0QC-ND0UMCnax3hTdFCuD6WFhXpG9QeA3KFVqFLlejdd8fowdGDRGe3O7H6Mv52_XqfXn58d3FanlZ6qZhqWRAcdsQJRQwzmvedtRwCkoz6HVVC80JNx0D0QNWte4o1q3mXLXMVC0jrD5GL29yt8FfTxCTHG3UMAzKgZ-iJJyJhtWE0kxf_EOv_BRcft1vJXJgxe7UJv9bWmd8CkrvQuWSUtq0Td3ussoZtQEHQQ3egbH5-MA_n_F6a6_lPjqbQXn1MFo9m3pycCGbBD_SRk0xyovPnw7tq__b5frr6sOs1sHHGMDIbbCjCj8lwXI3WXJvsrJ-dtvZqRuh_2v_jFIGpzcg5pLbQNhr_UzeL2mq0sY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768829626</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Timescales for detection of trends in the ocean carbon sink</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Nature Journals Online</source><creator>McKinley, Galen A. ; Pilcher, Darren J. ; Fay, Amanda R. ; Lindsay, Keith ; Long, Matthew C. ; Lovenduski, Nicole S.</creator><creatorcontrib>McKinley, Galen A. ; Pilcher, Darren J. ; Fay, Amanda R. ; Lindsay, Keith ; Long, Matthew C. ; Lovenduski, Nicole S.</creatorcontrib><description>A climate modelling experiment is used to identify where ocean carbon uptake should change as a result of anthropogenic climate change and to distinguish these changes from internal climate variability; we may be able to detect changing uptake in some oceanic regions between 2020 and 2050, but until then, internal climate variability will preclude such detection.
The oceanic carbon sink over time
The world's oceans have taken up vast amounts of amount of carbon produced by fossil fuel burning during the industrial era. These authors use a large ensemble of a single Earth system climate model, the Community Earth System Model–Large Ensemble (CESM–LE), to assess variability and change in the ocean carbon cycle in recent decades and through to 2100. This approach allows for a separation between trends in the air–sea carbon flux due to anthropogenic climate change and those due to internal climate variability. The study reveals how the ocean carbon sink may be expected to change throughout this century in different oceanic regions. The findings suggest that a large internal climate variability makes it unlikely that changes in the rate of anthropogenic carbon uptake can be directly observed in most oceanic regions at present, but that this may become possible between 2020 and 2050 in some regions.
The ocean has absorbed 41 per cent of all anthropogenic carbon emitted as a result of fossil fuel burning and cement manufacture
1
,
2
. The magnitude and the large-scale distribution of the ocean carbon sink is well quantified for recent decades
3
,
4
. In contrast, temporal changes in the oceanic carbon sink remain poorly understood
5
,
6
,
7
. It has proved difficult to distinguish between air-to-sea carbon flux trends that are due to anthropogenic climate change and those due to internal climate variability
5
,
6
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
. Here we use a modelling approach that allows for this separation
14
, revealing how the ocean carbon sink may be expected to change throughout this century in different oceanic regions. Our findings suggest that, owing to large internal climate variability, it is unlikely that changes in the rate of anthropogenic carbon uptake can be directly observed in most oceanic regions at present, but that this may become possible between 2020 and 2050 in some regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0836</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-4687</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nature16958</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26911782</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NATUAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>704/106/47 ; 704/106/829/827 ; Anthropogenic factors ; Atmosphere - chemistry ; Carbon Cycle ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Carbon Sequestration ; Carbon sinks ; Climate change ; Climate Change - statistics & numerical data ; Climate variability ; Ecosystem ; Environmental aspects ; Human Activities ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; letter ; Models, Theoretical ; multidisciplinary ; Observation ; Ocean ; Ocean circulation ; Oceans ; Oceans and Seas ; Science ; Seawater - chemistry ; Time Factors ; Time series ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Nature (London), 2016-02, Vol.530 (7591), p.469-472</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Feb 25, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-6e40951a8ae677379b4f74eac6edc238c717fb6e8de0a3cb40c9c77a96f296163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-6e40951a8ae677379b4f74eac6edc238c717fb6e8de0a3cb40c9c77a96f296163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/nature16958$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/nature16958$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26911782$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKinley, Galen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilcher, Darren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Amanda R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindsay, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovenduski, Nicole S.</creatorcontrib><title>Timescales for detection of trends in the ocean carbon sink</title><title>Nature (London)</title><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><description>A climate modelling experiment is used to identify where ocean carbon uptake should change as a result of anthropogenic climate change and to distinguish these changes from internal climate variability; we may be able to detect changing uptake in some oceanic regions between 2020 and 2050, but until then, internal climate variability will preclude such detection.
The oceanic carbon sink over time
The world's oceans have taken up vast amounts of amount of carbon produced by fossil fuel burning during the industrial era. These authors use a large ensemble of a single Earth system climate model, the Community Earth System Model–Large Ensemble (CESM–LE), to assess variability and change in the ocean carbon cycle in recent decades and through to 2100. This approach allows for a separation between trends in the air–sea carbon flux due to anthropogenic climate change and those due to internal climate variability. The study reveals how the ocean carbon sink may be expected to change throughout this century in different oceanic regions. The findings suggest that a large internal climate variability makes it unlikely that changes in the rate of anthropogenic carbon uptake can be directly observed in most oceanic regions at present, but that this may become possible between 2020 and 2050 in some regions.
The ocean has absorbed 41 per cent of all anthropogenic carbon emitted as a result of fossil fuel burning and cement manufacture
1
,
2
. The magnitude and the large-scale distribution of the ocean carbon sink is well quantified for recent decades
3
,
4
. In contrast, temporal changes in the oceanic carbon sink remain poorly understood
5
,
6
,
7
. It has proved difficult to distinguish between air-to-sea carbon flux trends that are due to anthropogenic climate change and those due to internal climate variability
5
,
6
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
. Here we use a modelling approach that allows for this separation
14
, revealing how the ocean carbon sink may be expected to change throughout this century in different oceanic regions. Our findings suggest that, owing to large internal climate variability, it is unlikely that changes in the rate of anthropogenic carbon uptake can be directly observed in most oceanic regions at present, but that this may become possible between 2020 and 2050 in some regions.</description><subject>704/106/47</subject><subject>704/106/829/827</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Atmosphere - chemistry</subject><subject>Carbon Cycle</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon Sequestration</subject><subject>Carbon sinks</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate Change - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Climate variability</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Human Activities</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>letter</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Ocean</subject><subject>Ocean circulation</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Oceans and Seas</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Seawater - chemistry</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0028-0836</issn><issn>1476-4687</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10kFvFCEUB3BiNHatnrybiV5s7FSYYYCJp83GapNGE13jkTDMY6XOwBaYRL-9rK1214zhQML78Q-8PISeEnxGcC1eO5WmAIS1jbiHFoRyVlIm-H20wLgSJRY1O0KPYrzCGDeE04foqGItIVxUC_RmbUeIWg0QC-ND0UMCnax3hTdFCuD6WFhXpG9QeA3KFVqFLlejdd8fowdGDRGe3O7H6Mv52_XqfXn58d3FanlZ6qZhqWRAcdsQJRQwzmvedtRwCkoz6HVVC80JNx0D0QNWte4o1q3mXLXMVC0jrD5GL29yt8FfTxCTHG3UMAzKgZ-iJJyJhtWE0kxf_EOv_BRcft1vJXJgxe7UJv9bWmd8CkrvQuWSUtq0Td3ussoZtQEHQQ3egbH5-MA_n_F6a6_lPjqbQXn1MFo9m3pycCGbBD_SRk0xyovPnw7tq__b5frr6sOs1sHHGMDIbbCjCj8lwXI3WXJvsrJ-dtvZqRuh_2v_jFIGpzcg5pLbQNhr_UzeL2mq0sY</recordid><startdate>20160225</startdate><enddate>20160225</enddate><creator>McKinley, Galen A.</creator><creator>Pilcher, Darren J.</creator><creator>Fay, Amanda R.</creator><creator>Lindsay, Keith</creator><creator>Long, Matthew C.</creator><creator>Lovenduski, Nicole S.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ATWCN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160225</creationdate><title>Timescales for detection of trends in the ocean carbon sink</title><author>McKinley, Galen A. ; Pilcher, Darren J. ; Fay, Amanda R. ; Lindsay, Keith ; Long, Matthew C. ; Lovenduski, Nicole S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c556t-6e40951a8ae677379b4f74eac6edc238c717fb6e8de0a3cb40c9c77a96f296163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>704/106/47</topic><topic>704/106/829/827</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Atmosphere - chemistry</topic><topic>Carbon Cycle</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon Sequestration</topic><topic>Carbon sinks</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate Change - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Climate variability</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Human Activities</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>letter</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Ocean</topic><topic>Ocean circulation</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Oceans and Seas</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Seawater - chemistry</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKinley, Galen A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilcher, Darren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Amanda R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindsay, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Matthew C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovenduski, Nicole S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Middle School</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKinley, Galen A.</au><au>Pilcher, Darren J.</au><au>Fay, Amanda R.</au><au>Lindsay, Keith</au><au>Long, Matthew C.</au><au>Lovenduski, Nicole S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Timescales for detection of trends in the ocean carbon sink</atitle><jtitle>Nature (London)</jtitle><stitle>Nature</stitle><addtitle>Nature</addtitle><date>2016-02-25</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>530</volume><issue>7591</issue><spage>469</spage><epage>472</epage><pages>469-472</pages><issn>0028-0836</issn><eissn>1476-4687</eissn><coden>NATUAS</coden><abstract>A climate modelling experiment is used to identify where ocean carbon uptake should change as a result of anthropogenic climate change and to distinguish these changes from internal climate variability; we may be able to detect changing uptake in some oceanic regions between 2020 and 2050, but until then, internal climate variability will preclude such detection.
The oceanic carbon sink over time
The world's oceans have taken up vast amounts of amount of carbon produced by fossil fuel burning during the industrial era. These authors use a large ensemble of a single Earth system climate model, the Community Earth System Model–Large Ensemble (CESM–LE), to assess variability and change in the ocean carbon cycle in recent decades and through to 2100. This approach allows for a separation between trends in the air–sea carbon flux due to anthropogenic climate change and those due to internal climate variability. The study reveals how the ocean carbon sink may be expected to change throughout this century in different oceanic regions. The findings suggest that a large internal climate variability makes it unlikely that changes in the rate of anthropogenic carbon uptake can be directly observed in most oceanic regions at present, but that this may become possible between 2020 and 2050 in some regions.
The ocean has absorbed 41 per cent of all anthropogenic carbon emitted as a result of fossil fuel burning and cement manufacture
1
,
2
. The magnitude and the large-scale distribution of the ocean carbon sink is well quantified for recent decades
3
,
4
. In contrast, temporal changes in the oceanic carbon sink remain poorly understood
5
,
6
,
7
. It has proved difficult to distinguish between air-to-sea carbon flux trends that are due to anthropogenic climate change and those due to internal climate variability
5
,
6
,
8
,
9
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
. Here we use a modelling approach that allows for this separation
14
, revealing how the ocean carbon sink may be expected to change throughout this century in different oceanic regions. Our findings suggest that, owing to large internal climate variability, it is unlikely that changes in the rate of anthropogenic carbon uptake can be directly observed in most oceanic regions at present, but that this may become possible between 2020 and 2050 in some regions.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>26911782</pmid><doi>10.1038/nature16958</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-0836 |
ispartof | Nature (London), 2016-02, Vol.530 (7591), p.469-472 |
issn | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768563144 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Nature Journals Online |
subjects | 704/106/47 704/106/829/827 Anthropogenic factors Atmosphere - chemistry Carbon Cycle Carbon dioxide Carbon Dioxide - analysis Carbon Sequestration Carbon sinks Climate change Climate Change - statistics & numerical data Climate variability Ecosystem Environmental aspects Human Activities Humanities and Social Sciences letter Models, Theoretical multidisciplinary Observation Ocean Ocean circulation Oceans Oceans and Seas Science Seawater - chemistry Time Factors Time series Trends |
title | Timescales for detection of trends in the ocean carbon sink |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A57%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Timescales%20for%20detection%20of%20trends%20in%20the%20ocean%20carbon%20sink&rft.jtitle=Nature%20(London)&rft.au=McKinley,%20Galen%20A.&rft.date=2016-02-25&rft.volume=530&rft.issue=7591&rft.spage=469&rft.epage=472&rft.pages=469-472&rft.issn=0028-0836&rft.eissn=1476-4687&rft.coden=NATUAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nature16958&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA444595394%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768829626&rft_id=info:pmid/26911782&rft_galeid=A444595394&rfr_iscdi=true |