Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision
Introduction In operative treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, in certain cases proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion contracture remains after fasciectomy which can be corrected by a supplementary arthrolysis, but few data comparing primary and revision surgery are available. Materials and meth...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2016-03, Vol.136 (3), p.435-439 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 439 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 435 |
container_title | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Hohendorff, Bernd Spies, C. K. Müller, L. P. Ries, C. |
description | Introduction
In operative treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, in certain cases proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion contracture remains after fasciectomy which can be corrected by a supplementary arthrolysis, but few data comparing primary and revision surgery are available.
Materials and methods
Fifteen patients who had a fasciectomy and supplementary PIP arthrolysis at the affected finger for the first time were compared to 13 patients who had a revision fasciectomy with a supplementary PIP arthrolysis. Upon follow-up at 22 months, flexion contracture was measured and data were compared to the preoperative values. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of the operation was determined and patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure questionnaire.
Results
Fingers of patients with Dupuytren’s disease that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP for the first time had a median residual PIP flexion contracture of 30° compared 39° of fingers that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP as a revision. The patients of both groups were equally satisfied with the outcome of the operation, while their DASH scores were nearly identical.
Conclusion
After a mean follow-up of 2 years, the outcome of recurrent PIP contracture is comparable in patients with Dupuytren’s disease that were treated by partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis for the first time and as a revision. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768558851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261892847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b47635c09e9592a9634cccf475cdc1dd357ab2241a645aef05d14b8ca007c793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0ESoaQA7CJLLHJpsF22912digJP1IkFmRvedzVTI962h3_RDM7VtyB63ESajRDkJBYlUr16rNfPUJec_aWM9a-S4xJJirGVSVqzartM7LgspZVbXjznCyYqZtKM8VPycuU1oxxoQ07IaeiabmUrVqQH1_LPI-wgSm7uKMu5lUM4y4NiYae5hXQOYbtsHEjHaYMcV650U3fAPt-wBrpOuAAh_SmzGWXI0y_vv9M1IcpR-dziXCFDCQgPswQXR7CRB8hppJohMchYf-KvOjdmOD8WM_I_Yfb--tP1d2Xj5-v399VXkqRq6Vsm1p5ZsAoI5xpaum979GJ7zzvulq1bimE5K6RykHPVMflUnuH1_Ktqc_I5QGLph4KpGw3Q_IwoiUIJVneNloprRVH6Zt_pOtQ4oSfs0I0XBuhZYsqflD5GFKK0NujVcuZ3WdkDxlZzMjuM7Jb3Lk4kstyA93Txp9QUCAOgoSj_Y3_Pv1_6m9Y4aF7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261892847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Hohendorff, Bernd ; Spies, C. K. ; Müller, L. P. ; Ries, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hohendorff, Bernd ; Spies, C. K. ; Müller, L. P. ; Ries, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
In operative treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, in certain cases proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion contracture remains after fasciectomy which can be corrected by a supplementary arthrolysis, but few data comparing primary and revision surgery are available.
Materials and methods
Fifteen patients who had a fasciectomy and supplementary PIP arthrolysis at the affected finger for the first time were compared to 13 patients who had a revision fasciectomy with a supplementary PIP arthrolysis. Upon follow-up at 22 months, flexion contracture was measured and data were compared to the preoperative values. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of the operation was determined and patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure questionnaire.
Results
Fingers of patients with Dupuytren’s disease that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP for the first time had a median residual PIP flexion contracture of 30° compared 39° of fingers that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP as a revision. The patients of both groups were equally satisfied with the outcome of the operation, while their DASH scores were nearly identical.
Conclusion
After a mean follow-up of 2 years, the outcome of recurrent PIP contracture is comparable in patients with Dupuytren’s disease that were treated by partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis for the first time and as a revision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26714475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Dupuytren Contracture - surgery ; Fasciotomy ; Female ; Finger Joint - surgery ; Handsurgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic Procedures ; Orthopedics ; Patient Satisfaction ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Tissue Adhesions - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2016-03, Vol.136 (3), p.435-439</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><rights>Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2015). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b47635c09e9592a9634cccf475cdc1dd357ab2241a645aef05d14b8ca007c793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b47635c09e9592a9634cccf475cdc1dd357ab2241a645aef05d14b8ca007c793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26714475$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hohendorff, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spies, C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, L. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ries, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction
In operative treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, in certain cases proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion contracture remains after fasciectomy which can be corrected by a supplementary arthrolysis, but few data comparing primary and revision surgery are available.
Materials and methods
Fifteen patients who had a fasciectomy and supplementary PIP arthrolysis at the affected finger for the first time were compared to 13 patients who had a revision fasciectomy with a supplementary PIP arthrolysis. Upon follow-up at 22 months, flexion contracture was measured and data were compared to the preoperative values. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of the operation was determined and patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure questionnaire.
Results
Fingers of patients with Dupuytren’s disease that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP for the first time had a median residual PIP flexion contracture of 30° compared 39° of fingers that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP as a revision. The patients of both groups were equally satisfied with the outcome of the operation, while their DASH scores were nearly identical.
Conclusion
After a mean follow-up of 2 years, the outcome of recurrent PIP contracture is comparable in patients with Dupuytren’s disease that were treated by partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis for the first time and as a revision.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Dupuytren Contracture - surgery</subject><subject>Fasciotomy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finger Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Handsurgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0ESoaQA7CJLLHJpsF22912digJP1IkFmRvedzVTI962h3_RDM7VtyB63ESajRDkJBYlUr16rNfPUJec_aWM9a-S4xJJirGVSVqzartM7LgspZVbXjznCyYqZtKM8VPycuU1oxxoQ07IaeiabmUrVqQH1_LPI-wgSm7uKMu5lUM4y4NiYae5hXQOYbtsHEjHaYMcV650U3fAPt-wBrpOuAAh_SmzGWXI0y_vv9M1IcpR-dziXCFDCQgPswQXR7CRB8hppJohMchYf-KvOjdmOD8WM_I_Yfb--tP1d2Xj5-v399VXkqRq6Vsm1p5ZsAoI5xpaum979GJ7zzvulq1bimE5K6RykHPVMflUnuH1_Ktqc_I5QGLph4KpGw3Q_IwoiUIJVneNloprRVH6Zt_pOtQ4oSfs0I0XBuhZYsqflD5GFKK0NujVcuZ3WdkDxlZzMjuM7Jb3Lk4kstyA93Txp9QUCAOgoSj_Y3_Pv1_6m9Y4aF7</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Hohendorff, Bernd</creator><creator>Spies, C. K.</creator><creator>Müller, L. P.</creator><creator>Ries, C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision</title><author>Hohendorff, Bernd ; Spies, C. K. ; Müller, L. P. ; Ries, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b47635c09e9592a9634cccf475cdc1dd357ab2241a645aef05d14b8ca007c793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Dupuytren Contracture - surgery</topic><topic>Fasciotomy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finger Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Handsurgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hohendorff, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spies, C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, L. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ries, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hohendorff, Bernd</au><au>Spies, C. K.</au><au>Müller, L. P.</au><au>Ries, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>435-439</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Introduction
In operative treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, in certain cases proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion contracture remains after fasciectomy which can be corrected by a supplementary arthrolysis, but few data comparing primary and revision surgery are available.
Materials and methods
Fifteen patients who had a fasciectomy and supplementary PIP arthrolysis at the affected finger for the first time were compared to 13 patients who had a revision fasciectomy with a supplementary PIP arthrolysis. Upon follow-up at 22 months, flexion contracture was measured and data were compared to the preoperative values. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of the operation was determined and patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure questionnaire.
Results
Fingers of patients with Dupuytren’s disease that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP for the first time had a median residual PIP flexion contracture of 30° compared 39° of fingers that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP as a revision. The patients of both groups were equally satisfied with the outcome of the operation, while their DASH scores were nearly identical.
Conclusion
After a mean follow-up of 2 years, the outcome of recurrent PIP contracture is comparable in patients with Dupuytren’s disease that were treated by partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis for the first time and as a revision.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26714475</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0936-8051 |
ispartof | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2016-03, Vol.136 (3), p.435-439 |
issn | 0936-8051 1434-3916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768558851 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Dupuytren Contracture - surgery Fasciotomy Female Finger Joint - surgery Handsurgery Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Orthopedic Procedures Orthopedics Patient Satisfaction Range of Motion, Articular Reoperation Retrospective Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Time Factors Tissue Adhesions - surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T05%3A01%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supplementary%20arthrolysis%20of%20the%20proximal%20interphalangeal%20finger%20joint%20in%20Dupuytren%E2%80%99s%20contracture:%20primary%20operation%20versus%20revision&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Hohendorff,%20Bernd&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=435-439&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261892847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261892847&rft_id=info:pmid/26714475&rfr_iscdi=true |