Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision

Introduction In operative treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, in certain cases proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion contracture remains after fasciectomy which can be corrected by a supplementary arthrolysis, but few data comparing primary and revision surgery are available. Materials and meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2016-03, Vol.136 (3), p.435-439
Hauptverfasser: Hohendorff, Bernd, Spies, C. K., Müller, L. P., Ries, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 439
container_issue 3
container_start_page 435
container_title Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
container_volume 136
creator Hohendorff, Bernd
Spies, C. K.
Müller, L. P.
Ries, C.
description Introduction In operative treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, in certain cases proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion contracture remains after fasciectomy which can be corrected by a supplementary arthrolysis, but few data comparing primary and revision surgery are available. Materials and methods Fifteen patients who had a fasciectomy and supplementary PIP arthrolysis at the affected finger for the first time were compared to 13 patients who had a revision fasciectomy with a supplementary PIP arthrolysis. Upon follow-up at 22 months, flexion contracture was measured and data were compared to the preoperative values. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of the operation was determined and patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure questionnaire. Results Fingers of patients with Dupuytren’s disease that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP for the first time had a median residual PIP flexion contracture of 30° compared 39° of fingers that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP as a revision. The patients of both groups were equally satisfied with the outcome of the operation, while their DASH scores were nearly identical. Conclusion After a mean follow-up of 2 years, the outcome of recurrent PIP contracture is comparable in patients with Dupuytren’s disease that were treated by partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis for the first time and as a revision.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768558851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261892847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b47635c09e9592a9634cccf475cdc1dd357ab2241a645aef05d14b8ca007c793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0ESoaQA7CJLLHJpsF22912digJP1IkFmRvedzVTI962h3_RDM7VtyB63ESajRDkJBYlUr16rNfPUJec_aWM9a-S4xJJirGVSVqzartM7LgspZVbXjznCyYqZtKM8VPycuU1oxxoQ07IaeiabmUrVqQH1_LPI-wgSm7uKMu5lUM4y4NiYae5hXQOYbtsHEjHaYMcV650U3fAPt-wBrpOuAAh_SmzGWXI0y_vv9M1IcpR-dziXCFDCQgPswQXR7CRB8hppJohMchYf-KvOjdmOD8WM_I_Yfb--tP1d2Xj5-v399VXkqRq6Vsm1p5ZsAoI5xpaum979GJ7zzvulq1bimE5K6RykHPVMflUnuH1_Ktqc_I5QGLph4KpGw3Q_IwoiUIJVneNloprRVH6Zt_pOtQ4oSfs0I0XBuhZYsqflD5GFKK0NujVcuZ3WdkDxlZzMjuM7Jb3Lk4kstyA93Txp9QUCAOgoSj_Y3_Pv1_6m9Y4aF7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261892847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Hohendorff, Bernd ; Spies, C. K. ; Müller, L. P. ; Ries, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hohendorff, Bernd ; Spies, C. K. ; Müller, L. P. ; Ries, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction In operative treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, in certain cases proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion contracture remains after fasciectomy which can be corrected by a supplementary arthrolysis, but few data comparing primary and revision surgery are available. Materials and methods Fifteen patients who had a fasciectomy and supplementary PIP arthrolysis at the affected finger for the first time were compared to 13 patients who had a revision fasciectomy with a supplementary PIP arthrolysis. Upon follow-up at 22 months, flexion contracture was measured and data were compared to the preoperative values. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of the operation was determined and patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure questionnaire. Results Fingers of patients with Dupuytren’s disease that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP for the first time had a median residual PIP flexion contracture of 30° compared 39° of fingers that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP as a revision. The patients of both groups were equally satisfied with the outcome of the operation, while their DASH scores were nearly identical. Conclusion After a mean follow-up of 2 years, the outcome of recurrent PIP contracture is comparable in patients with Dupuytren’s disease that were treated by partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis for the first time and as a revision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-8051</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-3916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26714475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Dupuytren Contracture - surgery ; Fasciotomy ; Female ; Finger Joint - surgery ; Handsurgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic Procedures ; Orthopedics ; Patient Satisfaction ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Time Factors ; Tissue Adhesions - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2016-03, Vol.136 (3), p.435-439</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015</rights><rights>Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery is a copyright of Springer, (2015). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b47635c09e9592a9634cccf475cdc1dd357ab2241a645aef05d14b8ca007c793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b47635c09e9592a9634cccf475cdc1dd357ab2241a645aef05d14b8ca007c793</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26714475$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hohendorff, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spies, C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, L. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ries, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision</title><title>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</title><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction In operative treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, in certain cases proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion contracture remains after fasciectomy which can be corrected by a supplementary arthrolysis, but few data comparing primary and revision surgery are available. Materials and methods Fifteen patients who had a fasciectomy and supplementary PIP arthrolysis at the affected finger for the first time were compared to 13 patients who had a revision fasciectomy with a supplementary PIP arthrolysis. Upon follow-up at 22 months, flexion contracture was measured and data were compared to the preoperative values. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of the operation was determined and patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure questionnaire. Results Fingers of patients with Dupuytren’s disease that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP for the first time had a median residual PIP flexion contracture of 30° compared 39° of fingers that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP as a revision. The patients of both groups were equally satisfied with the outcome of the operation, while their DASH scores were nearly identical. Conclusion After a mean follow-up of 2 years, the outcome of recurrent PIP contracture is comparable in patients with Dupuytren’s disease that were treated by partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis for the first time and as a revision.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Dupuytren Contracture - surgery</subject><subject>Fasciotomy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finger Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Handsurgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0936-8051</issn><issn>1434-3916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0ESoaQA7CJLLHJpsF22912digJP1IkFmRvedzVTI962h3_RDM7VtyB63ESajRDkJBYlUr16rNfPUJec_aWM9a-S4xJJirGVSVqzartM7LgspZVbXjznCyYqZtKM8VPycuU1oxxoQ07IaeiabmUrVqQH1_LPI-wgSm7uKMu5lUM4y4NiYae5hXQOYbtsHEjHaYMcV650U3fAPt-wBrpOuAAh_SmzGWXI0y_vv9M1IcpR-dziXCFDCQgPswQXR7CRB8hppJohMchYf-KvOjdmOD8WM_I_Yfb--tP1d2Xj5-v399VXkqRq6Vsm1p5ZsAoI5xpaum979GJ7zzvulq1bimE5K6RykHPVMflUnuH1_Ktqc_I5QGLph4KpGw3Q_IwoiUIJVneNloprRVH6Zt_pOtQ4oSfs0I0XBuhZYsqflD5GFKK0NujVcuZ3WdkDxlZzMjuM7Jb3Lk4kstyA93Txp9QUCAOgoSj_Y3_Pv1_6m9Y4aF7</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Hohendorff, Bernd</creator><creator>Spies, C. K.</creator><creator>Müller, L. P.</creator><creator>Ries, C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision</title><author>Hohendorff, Bernd ; Spies, C. K. ; Müller, L. P. ; Ries, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-b47635c09e9592a9634cccf475cdc1dd357ab2241a645aef05d14b8ca007c793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Dupuytren Contracture - surgery</topic><topic>Fasciotomy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finger Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Handsurgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hohendorff, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spies, C. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller, L. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ries, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hohendorff, Bernd</au><au>Spies, C. K.</au><au>Müller, L. P.</au><au>Ries, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision</atitle><jtitle>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery</jtitle><stitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</stitle><addtitle>Arch Orthop Trauma Surg</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>435-439</pages><issn>0936-8051</issn><eissn>1434-3916</eissn><abstract>Introduction In operative treatment of Dupuytren’s disease, in certain cases proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexion contracture remains after fasciectomy which can be corrected by a supplementary arthrolysis, but few data comparing primary and revision surgery are available. Materials and methods Fifteen patients who had a fasciectomy and supplementary PIP arthrolysis at the affected finger for the first time were compared to 13 patients who had a revision fasciectomy with a supplementary PIP arthrolysis. Upon follow-up at 22 months, flexion contracture was measured and data were compared to the preoperative values. Patient satisfaction with the outcome of the operation was determined and patients completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure questionnaire. Results Fingers of patients with Dupuytren’s disease that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP for the first time had a median residual PIP flexion contracture of 30° compared 39° of fingers that had a partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis of the PIP as a revision. The patients of both groups were equally satisfied with the outcome of the operation, while their DASH scores were nearly identical. Conclusion After a mean follow-up of 2 years, the outcome of recurrent PIP contracture is comparable in patients with Dupuytren’s disease that were treated by partial fasciectomy and supplementary arthrolysis for the first time and as a revision.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26714475</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-8051
ispartof Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2016-03, Vol.136 (3), p.435-439
issn 0936-8051
1434-3916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768558851
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Dupuytren Contracture - surgery
Fasciotomy
Female
Finger Joint - surgery
Handsurgery
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Orthopedic Procedures
Orthopedics
Patient Satisfaction
Range of Motion, Articular
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Tissue Adhesions - surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Supplementary arthrolysis of the proximal interphalangeal finger joint in Dupuytren’s contracture: primary operation versus revision
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T05%3A01%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supplementary%20arthrolysis%20of%20the%20proximal%20interphalangeal%20finger%20joint%20in%20Dupuytren%E2%80%99s%20contracture:%20primary%20operation%20versus%20revision&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20orthopaedic%20and%20trauma%20surgery&rft.au=Hohendorff,%20Bernd&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=435-439&rft.issn=0936-8051&rft.eissn=1434-3916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00402-015-2380-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261892847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261892847&rft_id=info:pmid/26714475&rfr_iscdi=true