Clinical Relevance of the SRS-Schwab Classification for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE.The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of the SRS-Schwab classification for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.The SRS-Schwab classification has been presented and validated as a useful tool for adu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2016-03, Vol.41 (5), p.E282-E288
Hauptverfasser: Ha, Kee-Yong, Jang, Won-Hee, Kim, Young-Hoon, Park, Dong-Chul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page E288
container_issue 5
container_start_page E282
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 41
creator Ha, Kee-Yong
Jang, Won-Hee
Kim, Young-Hoon
Park, Dong-Chul
description STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE.The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of the SRS-Schwab classification for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.The SRS-Schwab classification has been presented and validated as a useful tool for adult spinal deformity (ASD). This classification includes various types of ASD (degenerative de novo scoliosis or adult form of idiopathic scoliosis). However, DLS has different clinical characteristics and pathophysiology compared with other forms of ASD. METHODS.In this retrospective cohort study, 216 (146 conservatively treated and 70 surgically treated) DLS patients were enrolled. The average patient age was 72.1 ± 7.4 years. Clinical parameters for disability were measured using Oswestry disability index (ODI) and back and leg pain numerical rating scale. Radiographic parameters included SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers (pelvic tilt [PT]; sagittal vertical axis [SVA];pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL]), T1 pelvic angle, and coronal parameters (Cobbʼs angle [CA]; coronal imbalance [CI]; coronal deviation distance [CDD]; tilting angle [TA]). Correlations between clinical parameters and radiographic parameters were assessed and surgical rates along the SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers were evaluated. RESULTS.Only PI-LL as a sagittal radiographic parameter showed a weak correlation with clinical parameters (r = 0.137–0.176) (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001229
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768558083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1768558083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4269-42a8f2c302fd2b64bd270dd9bf062e3b8e910f9204caaaf490c129a22444eac73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A5EcvVSTafqRo66fsCBs9VzSdGKr2UaTdhf_vZVVEQ_OZWB43nfgIeSIs1POZHZ2sShO2a_hAHKLTHgCecR5IrfJhMUpRCDidI_sh_A8QmnM5S7ZgzTJOM-yCXmc2bZrtbJ0gRZXqtNInaF9g7RYFFGhm7Wq6MyqEFozcn3rOmqcp5f4hB368bBCOh-WlfK00M62LrThgOwYZQMefu0peby-epjdRvP7m7vZ-TzSAlIZCVC5AR0zMDVUqahqyFhdy8qwFDCucpScGQlMaKWUEZJpDlIBCCFQ6SyekpNN76t3bwOGvly2QaO1qkM3hJJnaZ4kOcvjERUbVHsXgkdTvvp2qfx7yVn5KbQchZZ_hY6x468PQ7XE-if0bXAE8g2wdrZHH17ssEZfNqhs3_zf_QFTGoGP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768558083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Relevance of the SRS-Schwab Classification for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Ha, Kee-Yong ; Jang, Won-Hee ; Kim, Young-Hoon ; Park, Dong-Chul</creator><creatorcontrib>Ha, Kee-Yong ; Jang, Won-Hee ; Kim, Young-Hoon ; Park, Dong-Chul</creatorcontrib><description>STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE.The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of the SRS-Schwab classification for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.The SRS-Schwab classification has been presented and validated as a useful tool for adult spinal deformity (ASD). This classification includes various types of ASD (degenerative de novo scoliosis or adult form of idiopathic scoliosis). However, DLS has different clinical characteristics and pathophysiology compared with other forms of ASD. METHODS.In this retrospective cohort study, 216 (146 conservatively treated and 70 surgically treated) DLS patients were enrolled. The average patient age was 72.1 ± 7.4 years. Clinical parameters for disability were measured using Oswestry disability index (ODI) and back and leg pain numerical rating scale. Radiographic parameters included SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers (pelvic tilt [PT]; sagittal vertical axis [SVA];pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL]), T1 pelvic angle, and coronal parameters (Cobbʼs angle [CA]; coronal imbalance [CI]; coronal deviation distance [CDD]; tilting angle [TA]). Correlations between clinical parameters and radiographic parameters were assessed and surgical rates along the SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers were evaluated. RESULTS.Only PI-LL as a sagittal radiographic parameter showed a weak correlation with clinical parameters (r = 0.137–0.176) (P &lt; 0.05). Coronal parameters such as CA, CI, CDD, and TA also showed weak correlation with clinical parameters (r = 0.137–0.202) (P &lt; 0.05). Multiple regression analysis identified CA, CI, CDD, and PI-LL to be correlated with clinical parameters. On analysis for clinical outcomes (surgical rates and patient self-reported disability) along the grades of the SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers, PT and SVA were not related to higher surgical rates or disability. CONCLUSION.Even though some radiological parameters showed statistically significant results, correlation between radiological and clinical parameters was weak. Not only deformity but also other clinical factors should be considered when evaluating DLS.Level of Evidence4</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001229</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26571177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Scoliosis - classification ; Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2016-03, Vol.41 (5), p.E282-E288</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4269-42a8f2c302fd2b64bd270dd9bf062e3b8e910f9204caaaf490c129a22444eac73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4269-42a8f2c302fd2b64bd270dd9bf062e3b8e910f9204caaaf490c129a22444eac73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26571177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ha, Kee-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Won-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Dong-Chul</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Relevance of the SRS-Schwab Classification for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE.The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of the SRS-Schwab classification for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.The SRS-Schwab classification has been presented and validated as a useful tool for adult spinal deformity (ASD). This classification includes various types of ASD (degenerative de novo scoliosis or adult form of idiopathic scoliosis). However, DLS has different clinical characteristics and pathophysiology compared with other forms of ASD. METHODS.In this retrospective cohort study, 216 (146 conservatively treated and 70 surgically treated) DLS patients were enrolled. The average patient age was 72.1 ± 7.4 years. Clinical parameters for disability were measured using Oswestry disability index (ODI) and back and leg pain numerical rating scale. Radiographic parameters included SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers (pelvic tilt [PT]; sagittal vertical axis [SVA];pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL]), T1 pelvic angle, and coronal parameters (Cobbʼs angle [CA]; coronal imbalance [CI]; coronal deviation distance [CDD]; tilting angle [TA]). Correlations between clinical parameters and radiographic parameters were assessed and surgical rates along the SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers were evaluated. RESULTS.Only PI-LL as a sagittal radiographic parameter showed a weak correlation with clinical parameters (r = 0.137–0.176) (P &lt; 0.05). Coronal parameters such as CA, CI, CDD, and TA also showed weak correlation with clinical parameters (r = 0.137–0.202) (P &lt; 0.05). Multiple regression analysis identified CA, CI, CDD, and PI-LL to be correlated with clinical parameters. On analysis for clinical outcomes (surgical rates and patient self-reported disability) along the grades of the SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers, PT and SVA were not related to higher surgical rates or disability. CONCLUSION.Even though some radiological parameters showed statistically significant results, correlation between radiological and clinical parameters was weak. Not only deformity but also other clinical factors should be considered when evaluating DLS.Level of Evidence4</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scoliosis - classification</subject><subject>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A5EcvVSTafqRo66fsCBs9VzSdGKr2UaTdhf_vZVVEQ_OZWB43nfgIeSIs1POZHZ2sShO2a_hAHKLTHgCecR5IrfJhMUpRCDidI_sh_A8QmnM5S7ZgzTJOM-yCXmc2bZrtbJ0gRZXqtNInaF9g7RYFFGhm7Wq6MyqEFozcn3rOmqcp5f4hB368bBCOh-WlfK00M62LrThgOwYZQMefu0peby-epjdRvP7m7vZ-TzSAlIZCVC5AR0zMDVUqahqyFhdy8qwFDCucpScGQlMaKWUEZJpDlIBCCFQ6SyekpNN76t3bwOGvly2QaO1qkM3hJJnaZ4kOcvjERUbVHsXgkdTvvp2qfx7yVn5KbQchZZ_hY6x468PQ7XE-if0bXAE8g2wdrZHH17ssEZfNqhs3_zf_QFTGoGP</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Ha, Kee-Yong</creator><creator>Jang, Won-Hee</creator><creator>Kim, Young-Hoon</creator><creator>Park, Dong-Chul</creator><general>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Clinical Relevance of the SRS-Schwab Classification for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis</title><author>Ha, Kee-Yong ; Jang, Won-Hee ; Kim, Young-Hoon ; Park, Dong-Chul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4269-42a8f2c302fd2b64bd270dd9bf062e3b8e910f9204caaaf490c129a22444eac73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scoliosis - classification</topic><topic>Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ha, Kee-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Won-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Hoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Dong-Chul</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ha, Kee-Yong</au><au>Jang, Won-Hee</au><au>Kim, Young-Hoon</au><au>Park, Dong-Chul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Relevance of the SRS-Schwab Classification for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>E282</spage><epage>E288</epage><pages>E282-E288</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><abstract>STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE.The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of the SRS-Schwab classification for degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.The SRS-Schwab classification has been presented and validated as a useful tool for adult spinal deformity (ASD). This classification includes various types of ASD (degenerative de novo scoliosis or adult form of idiopathic scoliosis). However, DLS has different clinical characteristics and pathophysiology compared with other forms of ASD. METHODS.In this retrospective cohort study, 216 (146 conservatively treated and 70 surgically treated) DLS patients were enrolled. The average patient age was 72.1 ± 7.4 years. Clinical parameters for disability were measured using Oswestry disability index (ODI) and back and leg pain numerical rating scale. Radiographic parameters included SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers (pelvic tilt [PT]; sagittal vertical axis [SVA];pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [PI-LL]), T1 pelvic angle, and coronal parameters (Cobbʼs angle [CA]; coronal imbalance [CI]; coronal deviation distance [CDD]; tilting angle [TA]). Correlations between clinical parameters and radiographic parameters were assessed and surgical rates along the SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers were evaluated. RESULTS.Only PI-LL as a sagittal radiographic parameter showed a weak correlation with clinical parameters (r = 0.137–0.176) (P &lt; 0.05). Coronal parameters such as CA, CI, CDD, and TA also showed weak correlation with clinical parameters (r = 0.137–0.202) (P &lt; 0.05). Multiple regression analysis identified CA, CI, CDD, and PI-LL to be correlated with clinical parameters. On analysis for clinical outcomes (surgical rates and patient self-reported disability) along the grades of the SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers, PT and SVA were not related to higher surgical rates or disability. CONCLUSION.Even though some radiological parameters showed statistically significant results, correlation between radiological and clinical parameters was weak. Not only deformity but also other clinical factors should be considered when evaluating DLS.Level of Evidence4</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved</pub><pmid>26571177</pmid><doi>10.1097/BRS.0000000000001229</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2016-03, Vol.41 (5), p.E282-E288
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768558083
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Humans
Lumbar Vertebrae - diagnostic imaging
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
Scoliosis - classification
Scoliosis - diagnostic imaging
title Clinical Relevance of the SRS-Schwab Classification for Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A40%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Relevance%20of%20the%20SRS-Schwab%20Classification%20for%20Degenerative%20Lumbar%20Scoliosis&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=Ha,%20Kee-Yong&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=E282&rft.epage=E288&rft.pages=E282-E288&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001229&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1768558083%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768558083&rft_id=info:pmid/26571177&rfr_iscdi=true