A Delphi consensus study on salvage brachytherapy for prostate cancer relapse after radiotherapy, a Uro-GEC study
Abstract Background and purpose Patients treated with low radiotherapy dose or treated at young age are at a risk of developing local relapse. Although data are preliminary, brachytherapy seems an attractive treatment option for recurrent prostate cancer after previous radiotherapy. Therefore, the U...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiotherapy and oncology 2016-01, Vol.118 (1), p.122-130 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 130 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 122 |
container_title | Radiotherapy and oncology |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Kaljouw, Emmie Pieters, Bradley R Kovács, György Hoskin, Peter J |
description | Abstract Background and purpose Patients treated with low radiotherapy dose or treated at young age are at a risk of developing local relapse. Although data are preliminary, brachytherapy seems an attractive treatment option for recurrent prostate cancer after previous radiotherapy. Therefore, the UroGEC group of the GEC-ESTRO conducted a Delphi study, to explore expert opinion on the management of salvage prostate brachytherapy. Material and methods For this study, a series of digital questionnaires were sent, which enabled data collection from an international group of experienced participants. Consensus was defined as 80% agreement for each question. Results Eighteen experts completed all rounds of the Delphi study. After the final round consensus was reached on 17 out of 38 (45%) questions. Consensus was reached in 52% of questions about patient selection, in 50% of the questions about diagnostic tests and in 22% of the questions on performing salvage prostate brachytherapy. Conclusions The group was able to find consensus on less than half of the questions. Most consensus was reached on topics involving patient selection and diagnostic tests, where participants could build on their experience of daily practice. However, the way to perform the salvage treatment is less established and results in more disagreement between participants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.10.021 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1767624580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0167814015005708</els_id><sourcerecordid>1767624580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-768ea1dfc2c906dfd2b1d9970401607cd2989cf5d0949a26dcf2bdbcde3d69e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhHyDkIweyjL1JbF-Qqm0pSJU4QM-WY09YL9k4tZNK-fc4ypZDL5wsj968mfcNIe8ZbBmw-vNxG40Lvd1yYFUubYGzF2TDpFAFSClekk2WiUKyEi7Im5SOAMBhJ16TC15XpZJ1tSEPV_Qau-HgqQ19wj5NiaZxcjMNPU2mezS_kTbR2MM8HjCaYaZtiHSIIY1mRGpNbzHSiJ0ZElLTjsvPOB_O8k_U0PsYitub_Wr8lrxqTZfw3fm9JPdfb37tvxV3P26_76_uCltKMRailmiYay23CmrXOt4wp5SAMqcCYR1XUtm2cqBKZXjtbMsb11iHO1crZLtL8nH1zbs-TJhGffLJYteZHsOUNBO1qHlZScjScpXaHCtFbPUQ_cnEWTPQC2x91CtsvcBeqhl2bvtwnjA1J3T_mp7oZsGXVYA556PHqJP1mIE5H9GO2gX_vwnPDWzne29N9wdnTMcwxT4z1EwnrkH_XA6-3JtVAJUAufsLQdGotQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1767624580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Delphi consensus study on salvage brachytherapy for prostate cancer relapse after radiotherapy, a Uro-GEC study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kaljouw, Emmie ; Pieters, Bradley R ; Kovács, György ; Hoskin, Peter J</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaljouw, Emmie ; Pieters, Bradley R ; Kovács, György ; Hoskin, Peter J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background and purpose Patients treated with low radiotherapy dose or treated at young age are at a risk of developing local relapse. Although data are preliminary, brachytherapy seems an attractive treatment option for recurrent prostate cancer after previous radiotherapy. Therefore, the UroGEC group of the GEC-ESTRO conducted a Delphi study, to explore expert opinion on the management of salvage prostate brachytherapy. Material and methods For this study, a series of digital questionnaires were sent, which enabled data collection from an international group of experienced participants. Consensus was defined as 80% agreement for each question. Results Eighteen experts completed all rounds of the Delphi study. After the final round consensus was reached on 17 out of 38 (45%) questions. Consensus was reached in 52% of questions about patient selection, in 50% of the questions about diagnostic tests and in 22% of the questions on performing salvage prostate brachytherapy. Conclusions The group was able to find consensus on less than half of the questions. Most consensus was reached on topics involving patient selection and diagnostic tests, where participants could build on their experience of daily practice. However, the way to perform the salvage treatment is less established and results in more disagreement between participants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.10.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26549865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Brachytherapy - methods ; Consensus ; Delphi study ; Delphi Technique ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy ; Patient Selection ; Prostate neoplasms ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Recurrent prostate cancer ; Salvage brachytherapy ; Salvage Therapy - methods</subject><ispartof>Radiotherapy and oncology, 2016-01, Vol.118 (1), p.122-130</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-768ea1dfc2c906dfd2b1d9970401607cd2989cf5d0949a26dcf2bdbcde3d69e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-768ea1dfc2c906dfd2b1d9970401607cd2989cf5d0949a26dcf2bdbcde3d69e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7427-8836</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.10.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26549865$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaljouw, Emmie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieters, Bradley R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovács, György</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Peter J</creatorcontrib><title>A Delphi consensus study on salvage brachytherapy for prostate cancer relapse after radiotherapy, a Uro-GEC study</title><title>Radiotherapy and oncology</title><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background and purpose Patients treated with low radiotherapy dose or treated at young age are at a risk of developing local relapse. Although data are preliminary, brachytherapy seems an attractive treatment option for recurrent prostate cancer after previous radiotherapy. Therefore, the UroGEC group of the GEC-ESTRO conducted a Delphi study, to explore expert opinion on the management of salvage prostate brachytherapy. Material and methods For this study, a series of digital questionnaires were sent, which enabled data collection from an international group of experienced participants. Consensus was defined as 80% agreement for each question. Results Eighteen experts completed all rounds of the Delphi study. After the final round consensus was reached on 17 out of 38 (45%) questions. Consensus was reached in 52% of questions about patient selection, in 50% of the questions about diagnostic tests and in 22% of the questions on performing salvage prostate brachytherapy. Conclusions The group was able to find consensus on less than half of the questions. Most consensus was reached on topics involving patient selection and diagnostic tests, where participants could build on their experience of daily practice. However, the way to perform the salvage treatment is less established and results in more disagreement between participants.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - methods</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Delphi study</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Prostate neoplasms</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Recurrent prostate cancer</subject><subject>Salvage brachytherapy</subject><subject>Salvage Therapy - methods</subject><issn>0167-8140</issn><issn>1879-0887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhHyDkIweyjL1JbF-Qqm0pSJU4QM-WY09YL9k4tZNK-fc4ypZDL5wsj968mfcNIe8ZbBmw-vNxG40Lvd1yYFUubYGzF2TDpFAFSClekk2WiUKyEi7Im5SOAMBhJ16TC15XpZJ1tSEPV_Qau-HgqQ19wj5NiaZxcjMNPU2mezS_kTbR2MM8HjCaYaZtiHSIIY1mRGpNbzHSiJ0ZElLTjsvPOB_O8k_U0PsYitub_Wr8lrxqTZfw3fm9JPdfb37tvxV3P26_76_uCltKMRailmiYay23CmrXOt4wp5SAMqcCYR1XUtm2cqBKZXjtbMsb11iHO1crZLtL8nH1zbs-TJhGffLJYteZHsOUNBO1qHlZScjScpXaHCtFbPUQ_cnEWTPQC2x91CtsvcBeqhl2bvtwnjA1J3T_mp7oZsGXVYA556PHqJP1mIE5H9GO2gX_vwnPDWzne29N9wdnTMcwxT4z1EwnrkH_XA6-3JtVAJUAufsLQdGotQ</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Kaljouw, Emmie</creator><creator>Pieters, Bradley R</creator><creator>Kovács, György</creator><creator>Hoskin, Peter J</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7427-8836</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>A Delphi consensus study on salvage brachytherapy for prostate cancer relapse after radiotherapy, a Uro-GEC study</title><author>Kaljouw, Emmie ; Pieters, Bradley R ; Kovács, György ; Hoskin, Peter J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-768ea1dfc2c906dfd2b1d9970401607cd2989cf5d0949a26dcf2bdbcde3d69e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - methods</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Delphi study</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Prostate neoplasms</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Recurrent prostate cancer</topic><topic>Salvage brachytherapy</topic><topic>Salvage Therapy - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaljouw, Emmie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieters, Bradley R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovács, György</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoskin, Peter J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaljouw, Emmie</au><au>Pieters, Bradley R</au><au>Kovács, György</au><au>Hoskin, Peter J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Delphi consensus study on salvage brachytherapy for prostate cancer relapse after radiotherapy, a Uro-GEC study</atitle><jtitle>Radiotherapy and oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiother Oncol</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>122-130</pages><issn>0167-8140</issn><eissn>1879-0887</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background and purpose Patients treated with low radiotherapy dose or treated at young age are at a risk of developing local relapse. Although data are preliminary, brachytherapy seems an attractive treatment option for recurrent prostate cancer after previous radiotherapy. Therefore, the UroGEC group of the GEC-ESTRO conducted a Delphi study, to explore expert opinion on the management of salvage prostate brachytherapy. Material and methods For this study, a series of digital questionnaires were sent, which enabled data collection from an international group of experienced participants. Consensus was defined as 80% agreement for each question. Results Eighteen experts completed all rounds of the Delphi study. After the final round consensus was reached on 17 out of 38 (45%) questions. Consensus was reached in 52% of questions about patient selection, in 50% of the questions about diagnostic tests and in 22% of the questions on performing salvage prostate brachytherapy. Conclusions The group was able to find consensus on less than half of the questions. Most consensus was reached on topics involving patient selection and diagnostic tests, where participants could build on their experience of daily practice. However, the way to perform the salvage treatment is less established and results in more disagreement between participants.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26549865</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.radonc.2015.10.021</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7427-8836</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-8140 |
ispartof | Radiotherapy and oncology, 2016-01, Vol.118 (1), p.122-130 |
issn | 0167-8140 1879-0887 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1767624580 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Brachytherapy - methods Consensus Delphi study Delphi Technique Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - radiotherapy Patient Selection Prostate neoplasms Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy Radiotherapy Dosage Recurrent prostate cancer Salvage brachytherapy Salvage Therapy - methods |
title | A Delphi consensus study on salvage brachytherapy for prostate cancer relapse after radiotherapy, a Uro-GEC study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A20%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Delphi%20consensus%20study%20on%20salvage%20brachytherapy%20for%20prostate%20cancer%20relapse%20after%20radiotherapy,%20a%20Uro-GEC%20study&rft.jtitle=Radiotherapy%20and%20oncology&rft.au=Kaljouw,%20Emmie&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=122-130&rft.issn=0167-8140&rft.eissn=1879-0887&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radonc.2015.10.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1767624580%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1767624580&rft_id=info:pmid/26549865&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0167814015005708&rfr_iscdi=true |