Do psychological job demands, decision control and social support predictreturn to work three months after a return-to-work (RTW) programme? The rapid-RTW cohort study
BACKGROUND: Long-term sickness absence is a considerable health and economic problem in the industrialised world. Factors that might predict return to work (RTW) are therefore of interest. OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of psychosocial work characteristics on RTW three months after the end of a RT...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Work (Reading, Mass.) Mass.), 2016, Vol.53 (1), p.61-71 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 71 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 61 |
| container_title | Work (Reading, Mass.) |
| container_volume | 53 |
| creator | Haveraaen, Lise A. Skarpaas, Lisebet S. Berg, John E. Aas, Randi W. |
| description | BACKGROUND:
Long-term sickness absence is a considerable health and economic problem in the industrialised world. Factors that might predict return to work (RTW) are therefore of interest.
OBJECTIVE:
To examine the impact of psychosocial work characteristics on RTW three months after the end of a RTW programme.
METHODS:
A cohort study of 251 sick-listed employees from 40 different treatment and rehabilitation services in Norway recruited from February to December 2012. The Job Content Questionnaire was used to gather information on the psychosocial work conditions. Full or partial RTW was measured three months after the end of the RTW programme, using data from the national sickness absence register. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between the psychosocial work characteristics and RTW.
RESULTS:
Having low psychological job demands (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.9), high co-worker- (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.5–5.8), and supervisor support (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6–7.3), and being in a low-strain job (low job demands and high control) (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.1–18.6) were predictive of being in work three months after the end of the RTW programme, after adjusting for several potential prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION:
Interventions aimed at returning people to work might benefit from putting more emphasise on psychosocial work characteristics in the future. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3233/WOR-152216 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1767077997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3233_WOR-152216</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1767077997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-38b0cc0ebd4d27adca8871a1cceefed3ea9f4b2d81d483cae3de2e7c823fadf43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkd1u1DAQhS0Eou3CDQ-ALHFBQRj8k8TOFULlV6pUqVrUy8ixJ5ssSZzajtC-zd73LfbJcJuCEFx55PnmnBkdhJ4x-lZwId5dXVwSlnPOigfomCmZk5JL-jDVNGekVCw_QichbCmlnNPyMTriRaEySfNjdPPR4SnsTOt6t-mM7vHW1djCoEcb3qTCdKFzIzZujN71OH3j4EyXwDBPk_MRTx5sZ6KHOPsRR3fY_3T-B46tB8BDmmsD1k0Ejw97fdgvHImO3GGnl-urV0nDbbweBniP1y1gr6fOktRJvu2tR4iz3T1BjxrdB3h6_67Q98-f1mdfyfnFl29nH86J4QWPRKiaGkOhtpnlUlujlZJMM2MAGrACdNlkNbeK2UwJo0FY4CCN4qLRtsnECp0uummr6xlCrIYuGOh7PYKbQ8VkIamUZSkT-uIfdOvSdWm7O6ooRJE8Vuj1QhnvQvDQVJPvBu13FaPVbYRVirBaIkzw83vJuR7A_kF_Z5aAlwsQ9Ab-8vtf6hfd16mA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1767663648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do psychological job demands, decision control and social support predictreturn to work three months after a return-to-work (RTW) programme? The rapid-RTW cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Haveraaen, Lise A. ; Skarpaas, Lisebet S. ; Berg, John E. ; Aas, Randi W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haveraaen, Lise A. ; Skarpaas, Lisebet S. ; Berg, John E. ; Aas, Randi W.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND:
Long-term sickness absence is a considerable health and economic problem in the industrialised world. Factors that might predict return to work (RTW) are therefore of interest.
OBJECTIVE:
To examine the impact of psychosocial work characteristics on RTW three months after the end of a RTW programme.
METHODS:
A cohort study of 251 sick-listed employees from 40 different treatment and rehabilitation services in Norway recruited from February to December 2012. The Job Content Questionnaire was used to gather information on the psychosocial work conditions. Full or partial RTW was measured three months after the end of the RTW programme, using data from the national sickness absence register. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between the psychosocial work characteristics and RTW.
RESULTS:
Having low psychological job demands (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.9), high co-worker- (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.5–5.8), and supervisor support (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6–7.3), and being in a low-strain job (low job demands and high control) (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.1–18.6) were predictive of being in work three months after the end of the RTW programme, after adjusting for several potential prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION:
Interventions aimed at returning people to work might benefit from putting more emphasise on psychosocial work characteristics in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-9815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-9270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3233/WOR-152216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26684705</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Cohort analysis ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Norway ; Occupational psychology ; Occupational stress ; Professional Autonomy ; Regression analysis ; Return to Work - psychology ; Return to work programs ; Sick Leave ; Social psychology ; Social Support ; Studies ; Time Factors ; Workload - psychology</subject><ispartof>Work (Reading, Mass.), 2016, Vol.53 (1), p.61-71</ispartof><rights>IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved</rights><rights>Copyright IOS Press 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-38b0cc0ebd4d27adca8871a1cceefed3ea9f4b2d81d483cae3de2e7c823fadf43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-38b0cc0ebd4d27adca8871a1cceefed3ea9f4b2d81d483cae3de2e7c823fadf43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26684705$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haveraaen, Lise A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skarpaas, Lisebet S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aas, Randi W.</creatorcontrib><title>Do psychological job demands, decision control and social support predictreturn to work three months after a return-to-work (RTW) programme? The rapid-RTW cohort study</title><title>Work (Reading, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Work</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND:
Long-term sickness absence is a considerable health and economic problem in the industrialised world. Factors that might predict return to work (RTW) are therefore of interest.
OBJECTIVE:
To examine the impact of psychosocial work characteristics on RTW three months after the end of a RTW programme.
METHODS:
A cohort study of 251 sick-listed employees from 40 different treatment and rehabilitation services in Norway recruited from February to December 2012. The Job Content Questionnaire was used to gather information on the psychosocial work conditions. Full or partial RTW was measured three months after the end of the RTW programme, using data from the national sickness absence register. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between the psychosocial work characteristics and RTW.
RESULTS:
Having low psychological job demands (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.9), high co-worker- (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.5–5.8), and supervisor support (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6–7.3), and being in a low-strain job (low job demands and high control) (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.1–18.6) were predictive of being in work three months after the end of the RTW programme, after adjusting for several potential prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION:
Interventions aimed at returning people to work might benefit from putting more emphasise on psychosocial work characteristics in the future.</description><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Norway</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Professional Autonomy</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Return to Work - psychology</subject><subject>Return to work programs</subject><subject>Sick Leave</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Workload - psychology</subject><issn>1051-9815</issn><issn>1875-9270</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkd1u1DAQhS0Eou3CDQ-ALHFBQRj8k8TOFULlV6pUqVrUy8ixJ5ssSZzajtC-zd73LfbJcJuCEFx55PnmnBkdhJ4x-lZwId5dXVwSlnPOigfomCmZk5JL-jDVNGekVCw_QichbCmlnNPyMTriRaEySfNjdPPR4SnsTOt6t-mM7vHW1djCoEcb3qTCdKFzIzZujN71OH3j4EyXwDBPk_MRTx5sZ6KHOPsRR3fY_3T-B46tB8BDmmsD1k0Ejw97fdgvHImO3GGnl-urV0nDbbweBniP1y1gr6fOktRJvu2tR4iz3T1BjxrdB3h6_67Q98-f1mdfyfnFl29nH86J4QWPRKiaGkOhtpnlUlujlZJMM2MAGrACdNlkNbeK2UwJo0FY4CCN4qLRtsnECp0uummr6xlCrIYuGOh7PYKbQ8VkIamUZSkT-uIfdOvSdWm7O6ooRJE8Vuj1QhnvQvDQVJPvBu13FaPVbYRVirBaIkzw83vJuR7A_kF_Z5aAlwsQ9Ab-8vtf6hfd16mA</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Haveraaen, Lise A.</creator><creator>Skarpaas, Lisebet S.</creator><creator>Berg, John E.</creator><creator>Aas, Randi W.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>IOS Press BV</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Do psychological job demands, decision control and social support predictreturn to work three months after a return-to-work (RTW) programme? The rapid-RTW cohort study</title><author>Haveraaen, Lise A. ; Skarpaas, Lisebet S. ; Berg, John E. ; Aas, Randi W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c262t-38b0cc0ebd4d27adca8871a1cceefed3ea9f4b2d81d483cae3de2e7c823fadf43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Norway</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Professional Autonomy</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Return to Work - psychology</topic><topic>Return to work programs</topic><topic>Sick Leave</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Workload - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haveraaen, Lise A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skarpaas, Lisebet S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aas, Randi W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Work (Reading, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haveraaen, Lise A.</au><au>Skarpaas, Lisebet S.</au><au>Berg, John E.</au><au>Aas, Randi W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do psychological job demands, decision control and social support predictreturn to work three months after a return-to-work (RTW) programme? The rapid-RTW cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Work (Reading, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Work</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>61-71</pages><issn>1051-9815</issn><eissn>1875-9270</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND:
Long-term sickness absence is a considerable health and economic problem in the industrialised world. Factors that might predict return to work (RTW) are therefore of interest.
OBJECTIVE:
To examine the impact of psychosocial work characteristics on RTW three months after the end of a RTW programme.
METHODS:
A cohort study of 251 sick-listed employees from 40 different treatment and rehabilitation services in Norway recruited from February to December 2012. The Job Content Questionnaire was used to gather information on the psychosocial work conditions. Full or partial RTW was measured three months after the end of the RTW programme, using data from the national sickness absence register. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between the psychosocial work characteristics and RTW.
RESULTS:
Having low psychological job demands (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.2–0.9), high co-worker- (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.5–5.8), and supervisor support (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6–7.3), and being in a low-strain job (low job demands and high control) (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.1–18.6) were predictive of being in work three months after the end of the RTW programme, after adjusting for several potential prognostic factors.
CONCLUSION:
Interventions aimed at returning people to work might benefit from putting more emphasise on psychosocial work characteristics in the future.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26684705</pmid><doi>10.3233/WOR-152216</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1051-9815 |
| ispartof | Work (Reading, Mass.), 2016, Vol.53 (1), p.61-71 |
| issn | 1051-9815 1875-9270 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1767077997 |
| source | MEDLINE; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Cohort analysis Cohort Studies Female Humans Male Norway Occupational psychology Occupational stress Professional Autonomy Regression analysis Return to Work - psychology Return to work programs Sick Leave Social psychology Social Support Studies Time Factors Workload - psychology |
| title | Do psychological job demands, decision control and social support predictreturn to work three months after a return-to-work (RTW) programme? The rapid-RTW cohort study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T22%3A34%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20psychological%20job%20demands,%20decision%20control%20and%20social%20support%20predictreturn%20to%C2%A0work%20three%20months%20after%20%C2%A0a%C2%A0return-to-work%20(RTW)%20programme?%20The%20rapid-RTW%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Work%20(Reading,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Haveraaen,%20Lise%20A.&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=61-71&rft.issn=1051-9815&rft.eissn=1875-9270&rft_id=info:doi/10.3233/WOR-152216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1767077997%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1767663648&rft_id=info:pmid/26684705&rft_sage_id=10.3233_WOR-152216&rfr_iscdi=true |