Comparison of anthropometric measurements of adiposity in relation to cancer risk: a systematic review of prospective studies
Purpose In epidemiology, the relationship between increased adiposity and cancer risk has long been recognized. However, whether the association is the same for measures of abdominal or whole body adiposity is unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to compare cancer risk, associated with body...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer causes & control 2016-03, Vol.27 (3), p.291-300 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 300 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 291 |
| container_title | Cancer causes & control |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | De Ridder, Josefine Julián-Almárcegui, Cristina Mullee, Amy Rinaldi, Sabina Van Herck, Koen Vicente-Rodríguez, German Huybrechts, Inge |
| description | Purpose
In epidemiology, the relationship between increased adiposity and cancer risk has long been recognized. However, whether the association is the same for measures of abdominal or whole body adiposity is unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to compare cancer risk, associated with body mass index (BMI), an indicator of whole body adiposity, with indicators of abdominal adiposity in studies in which these indicators have been directly measured.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search from 1974 (EMBASE) and 1988 (PubMed) to September 2015 with keywords related to adiposity and cancer. Included studies were limited to cohort studies reporting directly measured anthropometry and performing mutually adjusted analyses.
Results
Thirteen articles were identified, with two reporting on breast cancer, three on colorectal cancer, three on endometrial cancer, two on gastro-oesophageal cancer, two on renal cancer, one on ovarian cancer, one on bladder cancer, one on liver and biliary tract cancer and one on leukaemia. Evidence suggests that abdominal adiposity is a stronger predictor than whole body adiposity for gastro-oesophageal, leukaemia and liver and biliary tract cancer in men and women and for renal cancer in women. Abdominal adiposity was a stronger predictor for bladder and colorectal cancer in women, while only BMI was a predictor in men. In contrast, BMI appears to be a stronger predictor for ovarian cancer. For breast and endometrial cancer, both measures were predictors for cancer risk in postmenopausal women.
Conclusions
Only few studies used mutually adjusted and measured anthropometric indicators when studying adiposity–cancer associations. Further research investigating cancer risk and adiposity should include more accurate non-invasive indicators of body fat deposition and focus on the understudied cancer types, namely leukaemia, ovarian, bladder and liver and biliary tract cancer. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10552-015-0709-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1767067611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48691789</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48691789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-26235933ac0c1a80cbbdec0b6bf6ad53ab6c4f8f02f19820b2b4838ddbe01bd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-AA9KwYuX6iRpkvYoi18giKDnkKSpdt02NUkP--_NWhXx4GkO87zvDA9CRxjOMYC4CBgYIzlgloOAKl9voRlmguaCELaNZlAxkTNS0D20H8ISABgnsIv2CBesopTO0OPCdYPybXB95ppM9fHVu8F1NvrWZJ1VYfS2s30Mn-u6HVxo4zpr-8zblYptykWXGdUb67PU83aAdhq1Cvbwa87R8_XV0-I2v3-4uVtc3uem4EXMCSd084MyYLAqwWhdWwOa64armlGluSmasgHS4KokoIkuSlrWtbaAdQ10js6m3sG799GGKLs2GLtaqd66MUgsuAAuOMYJPf2DLt3o-_RdogQmpGTFhsITZbwLwdtGDr7tlF9LDHLjW06-ZfItN77lOmVOvppH3dn6J_EtOAFkAkJa9S_W_zr9T-vxFFqG6PxPaVHyCouyoh_SrZXe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1771228541</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of anthropometric measurements of adiposity in relation to cancer risk: a systematic review of prospective studies</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>De Ridder, Josefine ; Julián-Almárcegui, Cristina ; Mullee, Amy ; Rinaldi, Sabina ; Van Herck, Koen ; Vicente-Rodríguez, German ; Huybrechts, Inge</creator><creatorcontrib>De Ridder, Josefine ; Julián-Almárcegui, Cristina ; Mullee, Amy ; Rinaldi, Sabina ; Van Herck, Koen ; Vicente-Rodríguez, German ; Huybrechts, Inge</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
In epidemiology, the relationship between increased adiposity and cancer risk has long been recognized. However, whether the association is the same for measures of abdominal or whole body adiposity is unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to compare cancer risk, associated with body mass index (BMI), an indicator of whole body adiposity, with indicators of abdominal adiposity in studies in which these indicators have been directly measured.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search from 1974 (EMBASE) and 1988 (PubMed) to September 2015 with keywords related to adiposity and cancer. Included studies were limited to cohort studies reporting directly measured anthropometry and performing mutually adjusted analyses.
Results
Thirteen articles were identified, with two reporting on breast cancer, three on colorectal cancer, three on endometrial cancer, two on gastro-oesophageal cancer, two on renal cancer, one on ovarian cancer, one on bladder cancer, one on liver and biliary tract cancer and one on leukaemia. Evidence suggests that abdominal adiposity is a stronger predictor than whole body adiposity for gastro-oesophageal, leukaemia and liver and biliary tract cancer in men and women and for renal cancer in women. Abdominal adiposity was a stronger predictor for bladder and colorectal cancer in women, while only BMI was a predictor in men. In contrast, BMI appears to be a stronger predictor for ovarian cancer. For breast and endometrial cancer, both measures were predictors for cancer risk in postmenopausal women.
Conclusions
Only few studies used mutually adjusted and measured anthropometric indicators when studying adiposity–cancer associations. Further research investigating cancer risk and adiposity should include more accurate non-invasive indicators of body fat deposition and focus on the understudied cancer types, namely leukaemia, ovarian, bladder and liver and biliary tract cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-5243</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7225</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10552-015-0709-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26759333</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCCNEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Adiposity ; Anthropometry ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Body Mass Index ; Cancer Research ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Hematology ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Obesity - epidemiology ; Obesity, Abdominal - epidemiology ; Oncology ; Public Health ; REVIEW ARTICLE ; Risk</subject><ispartof>Cancer causes & control, 2016-03, Vol.27 (3), p.291-300</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-26235933ac0c1a80cbbdec0b6bf6ad53ab6c4f8f02f19820b2b4838ddbe01bd03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-26235933ac0c1a80cbbdec0b6bf6ad53ab6c4f8f02f19820b2b4838ddbe01bd03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48691789$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48691789$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,799,27899,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Ridder, Josefine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Julián-Almárcegui, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullee, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Herck, Koen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente-Rodríguez, German</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huybrechts, Inge</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of anthropometric measurements of adiposity in relation to cancer risk: a systematic review of prospective studies</title><title>Cancer causes & control</title><addtitle>Cancer Causes Control</addtitle><addtitle>Cancer Causes Control</addtitle><description>Purpose
In epidemiology, the relationship between increased adiposity and cancer risk has long been recognized. However, whether the association is the same for measures of abdominal or whole body adiposity is unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to compare cancer risk, associated with body mass index (BMI), an indicator of whole body adiposity, with indicators of abdominal adiposity in studies in which these indicators have been directly measured.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search from 1974 (EMBASE) and 1988 (PubMed) to September 2015 with keywords related to adiposity and cancer. Included studies were limited to cohort studies reporting directly measured anthropometry and performing mutually adjusted analyses.
Results
Thirteen articles were identified, with two reporting on breast cancer, three on colorectal cancer, three on endometrial cancer, two on gastro-oesophageal cancer, two on renal cancer, one on ovarian cancer, one on bladder cancer, one on liver and biliary tract cancer and one on leukaemia. Evidence suggests that abdominal adiposity is a stronger predictor than whole body adiposity for gastro-oesophageal, leukaemia and liver and biliary tract cancer in men and women and for renal cancer in women. Abdominal adiposity was a stronger predictor for bladder and colorectal cancer in women, while only BMI was a predictor in men. In contrast, BMI appears to be a stronger predictor for ovarian cancer. For breast and endometrial cancer, both measures were predictors for cancer risk in postmenopausal women.
Conclusions
Only few studies used mutually adjusted and measured anthropometric indicators when studying adiposity–cancer associations. Further research investigating cancer risk and adiposity should include more accurate non-invasive indicators of body fat deposition and focus on the understudied cancer types, namely leukaemia, ovarian, bladder and liver and biliary tract cancer.</description><subject>Adiposity</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Obesity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obesity, Abdominal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>REVIEW ARTICLE</subject><subject>Risk</subject><issn>0957-5243</issn><issn>1573-7225</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-AA9KwYuX6iRpkvYoi18giKDnkKSpdt02NUkP--_NWhXx4GkO87zvDA9CRxjOMYC4CBgYIzlgloOAKl9voRlmguaCELaNZlAxkTNS0D20H8ISABgnsIv2CBesopTO0OPCdYPybXB95ppM9fHVu8F1NvrWZJ1VYfS2s30Mn-u6HVxo4zpr-8zblYptykWXGdUb67PU83aAdhq1Cvbwa87R8_XV0-I2v3-4uVtc3uem4EXMCSd084MyYLAqwWhdWwOa64armlGluSmasgHS4KokoIkuSlrWtbaAdQ10js6m3sG799GGKLs2GLtaqd66MUgsuAAuOMYJPf2DLt3o-_RdogQmpGTFhsITZbwLwdtGDr7tlF9LDHLjW06-ZfItN77lOmVOvppH3dn6J_EtOAFkAkJa9S_W_zr9T-vxFFqG6PxPaVHyCouyoh_SrZXe</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>De Ridder, Josefine</creator><creator>Julián-Almárcegui, Cristina</creator><creator>Mullee, Amy</creator><creator>Rinaldi, Sabina</creator><creator>Van Herck, Koen</creator><creator>Vicente-Rodríguez, German</creator><creator>Huybrechts, Inge</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Comparison of anthropometric measurements of adiposity in relation to cancer risk</title><author>De Ridder, Josefine ; Julián-Almárcegui, Cristina ; Mullee, Amy ; Rinaldi, Sabina ; Van Herck, Koen ; Vicente-Rodríguez, German ; Huybrechts, Inge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-26235933ac0c1a80cbbdec0b6bf6ad53ab6c4f8f02f19820b2b4838ddbe01bd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adiposity</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Obesity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obesity, Abdominal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>REVIEW ARTICLE</topic><topic>Risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Ridder, Josefine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Julián-Almárcegui, Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullee, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinaldi, Sabina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Herck, Koen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vicente-Rodríguez, German</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huybrechts, Inge</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer causes & control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Ridder, Josefine</au><au>Julián-Almárcegui, Cristina</au><au>Mullee, Amy</au><au>Rinaldi, Sabina</au><au>Van Herck, Koen</au><au>Vicente-Rodríguez, German</au><au>Huybrechts, Inge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of anthropometric measurements of adiposity in relation to cancer risk: a systematic review of prospective studies</atitle><jtitle>Cancer causes & control</jtitle><stitle>Cancer Causes Control</stitle><addtitle>Cancer Causes Control</addtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>291</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>291-300</pages><issn>0957-5243</issn><eissn>1573-7225</eissn><coden>CCCNEN</coden><abstract>Purpose
In epidemiology, the relationship between increased adiposity and cancer risk has long been recognized. However, whether the association is the same for measures of abdominal or whole body adiposity is unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to compare cancer risk, associated with body mass index (BMI), an indicator of whole body adiposity, with indicators of abdominal adiposity in studies in which these indicators have been directly measured.
Methods
We conducted a systematic search from 1974 (EMBASE) and 1988 (PubMed) to September 2015 with keywords related to adiposity and cancer. Included studies were limited to cohort studies reporting directly measured anthropometry and performing mutually adjusted analyses.
Results
Thirteen articles were identified, with two reporting on breast cancer, three on colorectal cancer, three on endometrial cancer, two on gastro-oesophageal cancer, two on renal cancer, one on ovarian cancer, one on bladder cancer, one on liver and biliary tract cancer and one on leukaemia. Evidence suggests that abdominal adiposity is a stronger predictor than whole body adiposity for gastro-oesophageal, leukaemia and liver and biliary tract cancer in men and women and for renal cancer in women. Abdominal adiposity was a stronger predictor for bladder and colorectal cancer in women, while only BMI was a predictor in men. In contrast, BMI appears to be a stronger predictor for ovarian cancer. For breast and endometrial cancer, both measures were predictors for cancer risk in postmenopausal women.
Conclusions
Only few studies used mutually adjusted and measured anthropometric indicators when studying adiposity–cancer associations. Further research investigating cancer risk and adiposity should include more accurate non-invasive indicators of body fat deposition and focus on the understudied cancer types, namely leukaemia, ovarian, bladder and liver and biliary tract cancer.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><pmid>26759333</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10552-015-0709-y</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0957-5243 |
| ispartof | Cancer causes & control, 2016-03, Vol.27 (3), p.291-300 |
| issn | 0957-5243 1573-7225 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1767067611 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Adiposity Anthropometry Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Body Mass Index Cancer Research Epidemiology Female Hematology Humans Male Neoplasms - epidemiology Neoplasms - pathology Obesity - epidemiology Obesity, Abdominal - epidemiology Oncology Public Health REVIEW ARTICLE Risk |
| title | Comparison of anthropometric measurements of adiposity in relation to cancer risk: a systematic review of prospective studies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T04%3A39%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20anthropometric%20measurements%20of%20adiposity%20in%20relation%20to%20cancer%20risk:%20a%20systematic%20review%20of%20prospective%20studies&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20causes%20&%20control&rft.au=De%20Ridder,%20Josefine&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=291&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=291-300&rft.issn=0957-5243&rft.eissn=1573-7225&rft.coden=CCCNEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10552-015-0709-y&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48691789%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1771228541&rft_id=info:pmid/26759333&rft_jstor_id=48691789&rfr_iscdi=true |