Spatial proximity of age-0 walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) to zooplankton near the Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska

Acoustic surveys, conducted in September 1994 and 1995 in the neighbourhood of the Pribilof Islands, Alaska, collected data at three frequencies, making possible the location of pollock shoals and patches of zooplankton along the survey transect. These patches were identified using threshold and mor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ICES journal of marine science 1999-08, Vol.56 (4), p.545-560
Hauptverfasser: Swartzman, G., Brodeur, R., Napp, J., Hunt, G., Demer, D., Hewitt, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 560
container_issue 4
container_start_page 545
container_title ICES journal of marine science
container_volume 56
creator Swartzman, G.
Brodeur, R.
Napp, J.
Hunt, G.
Demer, D.
Hewitt, R.
description Acoustic surveys, conducted in September 1994 and 1995 in the neighbourhood of the Pribilof Islands, Alaska, collected data at three frequencies, making possible the location of pollock shoals and patches of zooplankton along the survey transect. These patches were identified using threshold and morphological filters on echosounder images taken at 38 kHz (fish identification) and 120 and 200 kHz (plankton identification). We checked the morphological methods by comparing the depth distribution of acoustically determined plankton with zooplankton from net surveys and found them in general agreement. Our ability to spatially map patches of plankton and shoals of fish (mostly pollock) along the survey transects led to our examining the spatial proximity between pollock and plankton patches. Results, using both interval- and distance-based measures, suggested that fish–plankton proximity was affected by plankton biomass. When the plankton biomass was low, fish tended to remain close to existing plankton patches, while at high plankton biomass there was no consistent small-scale proximity relationship. At intermediate plankton densities there was no particular distance-based proximity of plankton patches to fish shoals. However, the interval-based fish densities tended to increase with increasing plankton density up to some plankton density threshold, above which there was no clear association between fish and plankton density. These findings suggest the existence of plankton biomass density thresholds, both overall and within plankton patches that may influence pollock feeding strategies. They also suggest a possible method for empirically estimating these thresholds using multi-frequency acoustic survey data.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/jmsc.1999.0480
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17667587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1006/jmsc.1999.0480</oup_id><sourcerecordid>17667587</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ff48255789b4969c1145b89a58fd1c4cd53beed59a112b53f41fd728d6f891de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFP3DAQhaOqSKXQa88-VUUii72xE_sIqCwrrQQSFKFerIkz3jXrrFM7K1gu_HUSbdUrp3nSfO9p5mXZd0YnjNLy7KlNZsKUUhPKJf2UHTKqRK6mUn0eteB5wQr1Jfua0hOltOIlPcze7jroHXjSxfDiWtfvSLAElphT8gze4w5JF7wPZk1-3q8wwjICMSvwJgyqbeGE9IG8htB52Kz7sCEbhEj6FZLb6Grnh7h5GnZNOiUXGN1mSe4QTsm5h7SG4-zAgk_47d88yn5f_bq_vM4XN7P55fkiN5yXfW4tl1MhKqlqrkplGOOilgqEtA0z3DSiqBEboYCxaS0Ky5ltqqlsSisVa7A4yn7sc4c__24x9bp1yaAfDsOwTZpVZVkJWQ3gZA-aGFKKaHUXXQtxpxnVY8967FmPPeux58FwsjeEbfcxm-9Zl3p8-U9DXOuyKiqhrx__aHE14xcPxUzT4h1WvI6o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17667587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial proximity of age-0 walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) to zooplankton near the Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Swartzman, G. ; Brodeur, R. ; Napp, J. ; Hunt, G. ; Demer, D. ; Hewitt, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swartzman, G. ; Brodeur, R. ; Napp, J. ; Hunt, G. ; Demer, D. ; Hewitt, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Acoustic surveys, conducted in September 1994 and 1995 in the neighbourhood of the Pribilof Islands, Alaska, collected data at three frequencies, making possible the location of pollock shoals and patches of zooplankton along the survey transect. These patches were identified using threshold and morphological filters on echosounder images taken at 38 kHz (fish identification) and 120 and 200 kHz (plankton identification). We checked the morphological methods by comparing the depth distribution of acoustically determined plankton with zooplankton from net surveys and found them in general agreement. Our ability to spatially map patches of plankton and shoals of fish (mostly pollock) along the survey transects led to our examining the spatial proximity between pollock and plankton patches. Results, using both interval- and distance-based measures, suggested that fish–plankton proximity was affected by plankton biomass. When the plankton biomass was low, fish tended to remain close to existing plankton patches, while at high plankton biomass there was no consistent small-scale proximity relationship. At intermediate plankton densities there was no particular distance-based proximity of plankton patches to fish shoals. However, the interval-based fish densities tended to increase with increasing plankton density up to some plankton density threshold, above which there was no clear association between fish and plankton density. These findings suggest the existence of plankton biomass density thresholds, both overall and within plankton patches that may influence pollock feeding strategies. They also suggest a possible method for empirically estimating these thresholds using multi-frequency acoustic survey data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-3139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.1999.0480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>acoustics ; distance-based proximity ; Generalized Additive models ; Marine ; predator–prey relationships ; Theragra chalcogramma ; walleye pollock ; zooplankton patchiness</subject><ispartof>ICES journal of marine science, 1999-08, Vol.56 (4), p.545-560</ispartof><rights>1999 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ff48255789b4969c1145b89a58fd1c4cd53beed59a112b53f41fd728d6f891de3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swartzman, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodeur, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Napp, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial proximity of age-0 walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) to zooplankton near the Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska</title><title>ICES journal of marine science</title><description>Acoustic surveys, conducted in September 1994 and 1995 in the neighbourhood of the Pribilof Islands, Alaska, collected data at three frequencies, making possible the location of pollock shoals and patches of zooplankton along the survey transect. These patches were identified using threshold and morphological filters on echosounder images taken at 38 kHz (fish identification) and 120 and 200 kHz (plankton identification). We checked the morphological methods by comparing the depth distribution of acoustically determined plankton with zooplankton from net surveys and found them in general agreement. Our ability to spatially map patches of plankton and shoals of fish (mostly pollock) along the survey transects led to our examining the spatial proximity between pollock and plankton patches. Results, using both interval- and distance-based measures, suggested that fish–plankton proximity was affected by plankton biomass. When the plankton biomass was low, fish tended to remain close to existing plankton patches, while at high plankton biomass there was no consistent small-scale proximity relationship. At intermediate plankton densities there was no particular distance-based proximity of plankton patches to fish shoals. However, the interval-based fish densities tended to increase with increasing plankton density up to some plankton density threshold, above which there was no clear association between fish and plankton density. These findings suggest the existence of plankton biomass density thresholds, both overall and within plankton patches that may influence pollock feeding strategies. They also suggest a possible method for empirically estimating these thresholds using multi-frequency acoustic survey data.</description><subject>acoustics</subject><subject>distance-based proximity</subject><subject>Generalized Additive models</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>predator–prey relationships</subject><subject>Theragra chalcogramma</subject><subject>walleye pollock</subject><subject>zooplankton patchiness</subject><issn>1054-3139</issn><issn>1095-9289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFP3DAQhaOqSKXQa88-VUUii72xE_sIqCwrrQQSFKFerIkz3jXrrFM7K1gu_HUSbdUrp3nSfO9p5mXZd0YnjNLy7KlNZsKUUhPKJf2UHTKqRK6mUn0eteB5wQr1Jfua0hOltOIlPcze7jroHXjSxfDiWtfvSLAElphT8gze4w5JF7wPZk1-3q8wwjICMSvwJgyqbeGE9IG8htB52Kz7sCEbhEj6FZLb6Grnh7h5GnZNOiUXGN1mSe4QTsm5h7SG4-zAgk_47d88yn5f_bq_vM4XN7P55fkiN5yXfW4tl1MhKqlqrkplGOOilgqEtA0z3DSiqBEboYCxaS0Ky5ltqqlsSisVa7A4yn7sc4c__24x9bp1yaAfDsOwTZpVZVkJWQ3gZA-aGFKKaHUXXQtxpxnVY8967FmPPeux58FwsjeEbfcxm-9Zl3p8-U9DXOuyKiqhrx__aHE14xcPxUzT4h1WvI6o</recordid><startdate>19990801</startdate><enddate>19990801</enddate><creator>Swartzman, G.</creator><creator>Brodeur, R.</creator><creator>Napp, J.</creator><creator>Hunt, G.</creator><creator>Demer, D.</creator><creator>Hewitt, R.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990801</creationdate><title>Spatial proximity of age-0 walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) to zooplankton near the Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska</title><author>Swartzman, G. ; Brodeur, R. ; Napp, J. ; Hunt, G. ; Demer, D. ; Hewitt, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ff48255789b4969c1145b89a58fd1c4cd53beed59a112b53f41fd728d6f891de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>acoustics</topic><topic>distance-based proximity</topic><topic>Generalized Additive models</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>predator–prey relationships</topic><topic>Theragra chalcogramma</topic><topic>walleye pollock</topic><topic>zooplankton patchiness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swartzman, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodeur, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Napp, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demer, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swartzman, G.</au><au>Brodeur, R.</au><au>Napp, J.</au><au>Hunt, G.</au><au>Demer, D.</au><au>Hewitt, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial proximity of age-0 walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) to zooplankton near the Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska</atitle><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle><date>1999-08-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>560</epage><pages>545-560</pages><issn>1054-3139</issn><eissn>1095-9289</eissn><abstract>Acoustic surveys, conducted in September 1994 and 1995 in the neighbourhood of the Pribilof Islands, Alaska, collected data at three frequencies, making possible the location of pollock shoals and patches of zooplankton along the survey transect. These patches were identified using threshold and morphological filters on echosounder images taken at 38 kHz (fish identification) and 120 and 200 kHz (plankton identification). We checked the morphological methods by comparing the depth distribution of acoustically determined plankton with zooplankton from net surveys and found them in general agreement. Our ability to spatially map patches of plankton and shoals of fish (mostly pollock) along the survey transects led to our examining the spatial proximity between pollock and plankton patches. Results, using both interval- and distance-based measures, suggested that fish–plankton proximity was affected by plankton biomass. When the plankton biomass was low, fish tended to remain close to existing plankton patches, while at high plankton biomass there was no consistent small-scale proximity relationship. At intermediate plankton densities there was no particular distance-based proximity of plankton patches to fish shoals. However, the interval-based fish densities tended to increase with increasing plankton density up to some plankton density threshold, above which there was no clear association between fish and plankton density. These findings suggest the existence of plankton biomass density thresholds, both overall and within plankton patches that may influence pollock feeding strategies. They also suggest a possible method for empirically estimating these thresholds using multi-frequency acoustic survey data.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1006/jmsc.1999.0480</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1054-3139
ispartof ICES journal of marine science, 1999-08, Vol.56 (4), p.545-560
issn 1054-3139
1095-9289
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17667587
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects acoustics
distance-based proximity
Generalized Additive models
Marine
predator–prey relationships
Theragra chalcogramma
walleye pollock
zooplankton patchiness
title Spatial proximity of age-0 walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) to zooplankton near the Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A52%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20proximity%20of%20age-0%20walleye%20pollock%20(Theragra%20chalcogramma)%20to%20zooplankton%20near%20the%20Pribilof%20Islands,%20Bering%20Sea,%20Alaska&rft.jtitle=ICES%20journal%20of%20marine%20science&rft.au=Swartzman,%20G.&rft.date=1999-08-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=560&rft.pages=545-560&rft.issn=1054-3139&rft.eissn=1095-9289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0480&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17667587%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17667587&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1006/jmsc.1999.0480&rfr_iscdi=true