Understanding dabs

Cannabis concentrates are gaining rapid popularity in the California medical cannabis market. These extracts are increasingly being consumed via a new inhalation method called 'dabbing'. The act of consuming one dose is colloquially referred to as "doing a dab". This paper invest...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of toxicological sciences 2015-11, Vol.40 (6), p.797-797
Hauptverfasser: C. Raber, Jeffrey, Elzinga, Sytze, Kaplan, Charles
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 797
container_issue 6
container_start_page 797
container_title Journal of toxicological sciences
container_volume 40
creator C. Raber, Jeffrey
Elzinga, Sytze
Kaplan, Charles
description Cannabis concentrates are gaining rapid popularity in the California medical cannabis market. These extracts are increasingly being consumed via a new inhalation method called 'dabbing'. The act of consuming one dose is colloquially referred to as "doing a dab". This paper investigates cannabinoid transfer efficiency, chemical composition and contamination of concentrated cannabis extracts used for dabbing. The studied concentrates represent material available in the California medical cannabis market. Fifty seven (57) concentrate samples were screened for cannabinoid content and the presence of residual solvents or pesticides. Considerable residual solvent and pesticide contamination were found in these concentrates. Over 80% of the concentrate samples were contaminated in some form. THC max concentrations ranged from 23.7% to 75.9% with the exception of one outlier containing 2.7% THC and 47.7% CBD. Up to 40% of the theoretically available THC could be captured in the vapor stream of a dab during inhalation experiments. Dabbing offers immediate physiological relief to patients in need but may also be more prone to abuse by recreational users seeking a more rapid and intense physiological effect.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765992670</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3905893301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p610-be5e2b9ae37fdb798d8fafb18d4007ffb601f91e1de74b4e5693465ece67a6813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdzk1LAzEUheEgFhxrN_4CwY2bwL35vFlK8QsKbuq6JM2NtIyZOun8fwd05epsHg7vheiQCKQOFC5FB5pIorZwJa5bOwIoD9Z04vajZh7bOdZ8qJ93OaZ2IxYl9o1Xf7sU2-en7fpVbt5f3taPG3lyCDKxZZVCZO1LTj5QphJLQsoGwJeSHGAJyJjZm2TYuqCNs7xn56Mj1Evx8Ht7Gofvidt593Voe-77WHmY2g69syEo52Gm9__ocZjGOsfNyipAVErpH7sbQy0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1752011222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding dabs</title><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>C. Raber, Jeffrey ; Elzinga, Sytze ; Kaplan, Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>C. Raber, Jeffrey ; Elzinga, Sytze ; Kaplan, Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Cannabis concentrates are gaining rapid popularity in the California medical cannabis market. These extracts are increasingly being consumed via a new inhalation method called 'dabbing'. The act of consuming one dose is colloquially referred to as "doing a dab". This paper investigates cannabinoid transfer efficiency, chemical composition and contamination of concentrated cannabis extracts used for dabbing. The studied concentrates represent material available in the California medical cannabis market. Fifty seven (57) concentrate samples were screened for cannabinoid content and the presence of residual solvents or pesticides. Considerable residual solvent and pesticide contamination were found in these concentrates. Over 80% of the concentrate samples were contaminated in some form. THC max concentrations ranged from 23.7% to 75.9% with the exception of one outlier containing 2.7% THC and 47.7% CBD. Up to 40% of the theoretically available THC could be captured in the vapor stream of a dab during inhalation experiments. Dabbing offers immediate physiological relief to patients in need but may also be more prone to abuse by recreational users seeking a more rapid and intense physiological effect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0388-1350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1880-3989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Suita: Japan Science and Technology Agency</publisher><ispartof>Journal of toxicological sciences, 2015-11, Vol.40 (6), p.797-797</ispartof><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2015</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>C. Raber, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzinga, Sytze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding dabs</title><title>Journal of toxicological sciences</title><description>Cannabis concentrates are gaining rapid popularity in the California medical cannabis market. These extracts are increasingly being consumed via a new inhalation method called 'dabbing'. The act of consuming one dose is colloquially referred to as "doing a dab". This paper investigates cannabinoid transfer efficiency, chemical composition and contamination of concentrated cannabis extracts used for dabbing. The studied concentrates represent material available in the California medical cannabis market. Fifty seven (57) concentrate samples were screened for cannabinoid content and the presence of residual solvents or pesticides. Considerable residual solvent and pesticide contamination were found in these concentrates. Over 80% of the concentrate samples were contaminated in some form. THC max concentrations ranged from 23.7% to 75.9% with the exception of one outlier containing 2.7% THC and 47.7% CBD. Up to 40% of the theoretically available THC could be captured in the vapor stream of a dab during inhalation experiments. Dabbing offers immediate physiological relief to patients in need but may also be more prone to abuse by recreational users seeking a more rapid and intense physiological effect.</description><issn>0388-1350</issn><issn>1880-3989</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdzk1LAzEUheEgFhxrN_4CwY2bwL35vFlK8QsKbuq6JM2NtIyZOun8fwd05epsHg7vheiQCKQOFC5FB5pIorZwJa5bOwIoD9Z04vajZh7bOdZ8qJ93OaZ2IxYl9o1Xf7sU2-en7fpVbt5f3taPG3lyCDKxZZVCZO1LTj5QphJLQsoGwJeSHGAJyJjZm2TYuqCNs7xn56Mj1Evx8Ht7Gofvidt593Voe-77WHmY2g69syEo52Gm9__ocZjGOsfNyipAVErpH7sbQy0</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>C. Raber, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Elzinga, Sytze</creator><creator>Kaplan, Charles</creator><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Understanding dabs</title><author>C. Raber, Jeffrey ; Elzinga, Sytze ; Kaplan, Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p610-be5e2b9ae37fdb798d8fafb18d4007ffb601f91e1de74b4e5693465ece67a6813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>C. Raber, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzinga, Sytze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of toxicological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>C. Raber, Jeffrey</au><au>Elzinga, Sytze</au><au>Kaplan, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding dabs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of toxicological sciences</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>797</spage><epage>797</epage><pages>797-797</pages><issn>0388-1350</issn><eissn>1880-3989</eissn><abstract>Cannabis concentrates are gaining rapid popularity in the California medical cannabis market. These extracts are increasingly being consumed via a new inhalation method called 'dabbing'. The act of consuming one dose is colloquially referred to as "doing a dab". This paper investigates cannabinoid transfer efficiency, chemical composition and contamination of concentrated cannabis extracts used for dabbing. The studied concentrates represent material available in the California medical cannabis market. Fifty seven (57) concentrate samples were screened for cannabinoid content and the presence of residual solvents or pesticides. Considerable residual solvent and pesticide contamination were found in these concentrates. Over 80% of the concentrate samples were contaminated in some form. THC max concentrations ranged from 23.7% to 75.9% with the exception of one outlier containing 2.7% THC and 47.7% CBD. Up to 40% of the theoretically available THC could be captured in the vapor stream of a dab during inhalation experiments. Dabbing offers immediate physiological relief to patients in need but may also be more prone to abuse by recreational users seeking a more rapid and intense physiological effect.</abstract><cop>Suita</cop><pub>Japan Science and Technology Agency</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0388-1350
ispartof Journal of toxicological sciences, 2015-11, Vol.40 (6), p.797-797
issn 0388-1350
1880-3989
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765992670
source J-STAGE Free; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
title Understanding dabs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T11%3A15%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20dabs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20toxicological%20sciences&rft.au=C.%20Raber,%20Jeffrey&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=797&rft.epage=797&rft.pages=797-797&rft.issn=0388-1350&rft.eissn=1880-3989&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3905893301%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1752011222&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true