Comparison of morphological and DNA metabarcoding analyses of diets in exploited marine fishes

Ecosystem-based management (EBM) is a framework for managing marine resources. EBM strategies can be evaluated with ecosystem models that represent functional components of ecosystems, including anthropogenic factors. Foodwebs are at the core of ecosystem models, but because dietary data can be diff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2015-11, Vol.540, p.167-181
Hauptverfasser: Berry, Oliver, Bulman, Cathy, Bunce, Michael, Coghlan, Megan, Murray, Dáithí C., Ward, Robert D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 181
container_issue
container_start_page 167
container_title Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)
container_volume 540
creator Berry, Oliver
Bulman, Cathy
Bunce, Michael
Coghlan, Megan
Murray, Dáithí C.
Ward, Robert D.
description Ecosystem-based management (EBM) is a framework for managing marine resources. EBM strategies can be evaluated with ecosystem models that represent functional components of ecosystems, including anthropogenic factors. Foodwebs are at the core of ecosystem models, but because dietary data can be difficult to obtain, they are often coarsely characterised. High-throughput DNA sequencing (HTS) of diets is a rapid way to parameterise foodwebs at enhanced taxonomic resolution, and potentially, to optimise the functioning of ecosystem models. We evaluated the relative merits of microscopic and HTS analyses of the diets of 8 fish species harvested in Australia’s most intensive fishery, viz. the southeast trawl fishery. We compare the taxonomic resolution and phylogenetic breadth of diets yielded by these methods and include a comparison of 3 DNA barcoding markers (mtDNA COX1 Minibar, mtDNA 16S Chord-cephA, nDNA 18S Bilateria). Using paired individual gut samples (n = 151), we demonstrate that HTS typically identified similar taxon richness but at significantly higher taxonomic resolution than microscopy. However, DNA barcode selection significantly affected both the resolution and phylogenetic breadth of estimated diets. Both COX1 Minibar and 16S Chord-cephA barcodes provided higher taxonomic resolution than morphological analysis, but the resolution varied between taxonomic groups primarily due to availabilities of reference data. However, neither barcode recovered the full dietary spectrum revealed by the 18S Bilateria barcode. HTS also revealed the presence of dietary items not previously recorded for target species, and diverse parasite assemblages. We conclude that HTS has the potential to improve structure and function of ecosystem models and to facilitate best-practice EBM.
doi_str_mv 10.3354/meps11524
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765979475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24896648</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24896648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e6fd752e7a882cd6bcf04c9fcfd04da75535cc1a0ae8d2bb33473bb3e0e7ed813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90EtLw0AUBeBBFKzVhT9AmKUuojOZV7Is9QlFN7o1TGdu2ilJJs5Nwf57UypdHbh8HC6HkGvO7oVQ8qGFHjlXuTwhE665zrgqy1MyYdzwrNCCnZMLxA1jXEujJ-R7HtvepoCxo7GmbUz9OjZxFZxtqO08fXyf0RYGu7TJRR-61Xi1zQ4B994HGJCGjsJv38QwgKft2NYBrQOuAS_JWW0bhKv_nJKv56fP-Wu2-Hh5m88WmRO8HDLQtTcqB2OLIndeL13NpCtrV3smvTVKCeUct8xC4fPlUghpxBjAwIAvuJiS20Nvn-LPFnCo2oAOmsZ2ELdYcaNVaUpp1EjvDtSliJigrvoUxqd3FWfVfsPquOFobw52g0NMR5jLotRaFuIPahVwfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765979475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of morphological and DNA metabarcoding analyses of diets in exploited marine fishes</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Inter-Research</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berry, Oliver ; Bulman, Cathy ; Bunce, Michael ; Coghlan, Megan ; Murray, Dáithí C. ; Ward, Robert D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berry, Oliver ; Bulman, Cathy ; Bunce, Michael ; Coghlan, Megan ; Murray, Dáithí C. ; Ward, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecosystem-based management (EBM) is a framework for managing marine resources. EBM strategies can be evaluated with ecosystem models that represent functional components of ecosystems, including anthropogenic factors. Foodwebs are at the core of ecosystem models, but because dietary data can be difficult to obtain, they are often coarsely characterised. High-throughput DNA sequencing (HTS) of diets is a rapid way to parameterise foodwebs at enhanced taxonomic resolution, and potentially, to optimise the functioning of ecosystem models. We evaluated the relative merits of microscopic and HTS analyses of the diets of 8 fish species harvested in Australia’s most intensive fishery, viz. the southeast trawl fishery. We compare the taxonomic resolution and phylogenetic breadth of diets yielded by these methods and include a comparison of 3 DNA barcoding markers (mtDNA COX1 Minibar, mtDNA 16S Chord-cephA, nDNA 18S Bilateria). Using paired individual gut samples (n = 151), we demonstrate that HTS typically identified similar taxon richness but at significantly higher taxonomic resolution than microscopy. However, DNA barcode selection significantly affected both the resolution and phylogenetic breadth of estimated diets. Both COX1 Minibar and 16S Chord-cephA barcodes provided higher taxonomic resolution than morphological analysis, but the resolution varied between taxonomic groups primarily due to availabilities of reference data. However, neither barcode recovered the full dietary spectrum revealed by the 18S Bilateria barcode. HTS also revealed the presence of dietary items not previously recorded for target species, and diverse parasite assemblages. We conclude that HTS has the potential to improve structure and function of ecosystem models and to facilitate best-practice EBM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps11524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Bilateria ; Marine ; Pisces</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2015-11, Vol.540, p.167-181</ispartof><rights>Inter-Research and Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e6fd752e7a882cd6bcf04c9fcfd04da75535cc1a0ae8d2bb33473bb3e0e7ed813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e6fd752e7a882cd6bcf04c9fcfd04da75535cc1a0ae8d2bb33473bb3e0e7ed813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24896648$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24896648$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3746,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berry, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulman, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunce, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coghlan, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Dáithí C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of morphological and DNA metabarcoding analyses of diets in exploited marine fishes</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>Ecosystem-based management (EBM) is a framework for managing marine resources. EBM strategies can be evaluated with ecosystem models that represent functional components of ecosystems, including anthropogenic factors. Foodwebs are at the core of ecosystem models, but because dietary data can be difficult to obtain, they are often coarsely characterised. High-throughput DNA sequencing (HTS) of diets is a rapid way to parameterise foodwebs at enhanced taxonomic resolution, and potentially, to optimise the functioning of ecosystem models. We evaluated the relative merits of microscopic and HTS analyses of the diets of 8 fish species harvested in Australia’s most intensive fishery, viz. the southeast trawl fishery. We compare the taxonomic resolution and phylogenetic breadth of diets yielded by these methods and include a comparison of 3 DNA barcoding markers (mtDNA COX1 Minibar, mtDNA 16S Chord-cephA, nDNA 18S Bilateria). Using paired individual gut samples (n = 151), we demonstrate that HTS typically identified similar taxon richness but at significantly higher taxonomic resolution than microscopy. However, DNA barcode selection significantly affected both the resolution and phylogenetic breadth of estimated diets. Both COX1 Minibar and 16S Chord-cephA barcodes provided higher taxonomic resolution than morphological analysis, but the resolution varied between taxonomic groups primarily due to availabilities of reference data. However, neither barcode recovered the full dietary spectrum revealed by the 18S Bilateria barcode. HTS also revealed the presence of dietary items not previously recorded for target species, and diverse parasite assemblages. We conclude that HTS has the potential to improve structure and function of ecosystem models and to facilitate best-practice EBM.</description><subject>Bilateria</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Pisces</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo90EtLw0AUBeBBFKzVhT9AmKUuojOZV7Is9QlFN7o1TGdu2ilJJs5Nwf57UypdHbh8HC6HkGvO7oVQ8qGFHjlXuTwhE665zrgqy1MyYdzwrNCCnZMLxA1jXEujJ-R7HtvepoCxo7GmbUz9OjZxFZxtqO08fXyf0RYGu7TJRR-61Xi1zQ4B994HGJCGjsJv38QwgKft2NYBrQOuAS_JWW0bhKv_nJKv56fP-Wu2-Hh5m88WmRO8HDLQtTcqB2OLIndeL13NpCtrV3smvTVKCeUct8xC4fPlUghpxBjAwIAvuJiS20Nvn-LPFnCo2oAOmsZ2ELdYcaNVaUpp1EjvDtSliJigrvoUxqd3FWfVfsPquOFobw52g0NMR5jLotRaFuIPahVwfg</recordid><startdate>20151126</startdate><enddate>20151126</enddate><creator>Berry, Oliver</creator><creator>Bulman, Cathy</creator><creator>Bunce, Michael</creator><creator>Coghlan, Megan</creator><creator>Murray, Dáithí C.</creator><creator>Ward, Robert D.</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151126</creationdate><title>Comparison of morphological and DNA metabarcoding analyses of diets in exploited marine fishes</title><author>Berry, Oliver ; Bulman, Cathy ; Bunce, Michael ; Coghlan, Megan ; Murray, Dáithí C. ; Ward, Robert D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e6fd752e7a882cd6bcf04c9fcfd04da75535cc1a0ae8d2bb33473bb3e0e7ed813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bilateria</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Pisces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berry, Oliver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bulman, Cathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunce, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coghlan, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Dáithí C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ward, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berry, Oliver</au><au>Bulman, Cathy</au><au>Bunce, Michael</au><au>Coghlan, Megan</au><au>Murray, Dáithí C.</au><au>Ward, Robert D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of morphological and DNA metabarcoding analyses of diets in exploited marine fishes</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>2015-11-26</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>540</volume><spage>167</spage><epage>181</epage><pages>167-181</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>Ecosystem-based management (EBM) is a framework for managing marine resources. EBM strategies can be evaluated with ecosystem models that represent functional components of ecosystems, including anthropogenic factors. Foodwebs are at the core of ecosystem models, but because dietary data can be difficult to obtain, they are often coarsely characterised. High-throughput DNA sequencing (HTS) of diets is a rapid way to parameterise foodwebs at enhanced taxonomic resolution, and potentially, to optimise the functioning of ecosystem models. We evaluated the relative merits of microscopic and HTS analyses of the diets of 8 fish species harvested in Australia’s most intensive fishery, viz. the southeast trawl fishery. We compare the taxonomic resolution and phylogenetic breadth of diets yielded by these methods and include a comparison of 3 DNA barcoding markers (mtDNA COX1 Minibar, mtDNA 16S Chord-cephA, nDNA 18S Bilateria). Using paired individual gut samples (n = 151), we demonstrate that HTS typically identified similar taxon richness but at significantly higher taxonomic resolution than microscopy. However, DNA barcode selection significantly affected both the resolution and phylogenetic breadth of estimated diets. Both COX1 Minibar and 16S Chord-cephA barcodes provided higher taxonomic resolution than morphological analysis, but the resolution varied between taxonomic groups primarily due to availabilities of reference data. However, neither barcode recovered the full dietary spectrum revealed by the 18S Bilateria barcode. HTS also revealed the presence of dietary items not previously recorded for target species, and diverse parasite assemblages. We conclude that HTS has the potential to improve structure and function of ecosystem models and to facilitate best-practice EBM.</abstract><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps11524</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-8630
ispartof Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2015-11, Vol.540, p.167-181
issn 0171-8630
1616-1599
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765979475
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Inter-Research; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bilateria
Marine
Pisces
title Comparison of morphological and DNA metabarcoding analyses of diets in exploited marine fishes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A10%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20morphological%20and%20DNA%20metabarcoding%20analyses%20of%20diets%20in%20exploited%20marine%20fishes&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Berry,%20Oliver&rft.date=2015-11-26&rft.volume=540&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=181&rft.pages=167-181&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps11524&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24896648%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765979475&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24896648&rfr_iscdi=true