Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients

This study explores the ways in which patients make sense of ‘safety’ in the context of primary medical care. Drawing on qualitative interviews with primary care patients, we reveal patients’ conceptualisation of safety as fluid, contingent, multi‐dimensional, and negotiated. Participant accounts dr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociology of health & illness 2016-02, Vol.38 (2), p.270-285
Hauptverfasser: Rhodes, Penny, McDonald, Ruth, Campbell, Stephen, Daker‐White, Gavin, Sanders, Caroline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 285
container_issue 2
container_start_page 270
container_title Sociology of health & illness
container_volume 38
creator Rhodes, Penny
McDonald, Ruth
Campbell, Stephen
Daker‐White, Gavin
Sanders, Caroline
description This study explores the ways in which patients make sense of ‘safety’ in the context of primary medical care. Drawing on qualitative interviews with primary care patients, we reveal patients’ conceptualisation of safety as fluid, contingent, multi‐dimensional, and negotiated. Participant accounts drew attention to a largely invisible and inaccessible (but taken for granted) architecture of safety, the importance of psycho‐social as well as physical dimensions and the interactions between them, informal strategies for negotiating safety, and the moral dimension of safety. Participants reported being proactive in taking action to protect themselves from potential harm. The somewhat routinised and predictable nature of the primary medical care consultation, which is very different from ‘one off’ inpatient spells, meant that patients were not passive recipients of care. Instead they had a stock of accumulated knowledge and experience to inform their actions. In addition to highlighting the differences and similarities between hospital and primary care settings, the study suggests that a broad conceptualisation of patient safety is required, which encompasses the safety concerns of patients in primary care settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-9566.12368
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765601339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1762341211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4468-85c0db9860e120063bc4ef830cfb8e00ebc589b104f5784d0b6eda21c8888b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb9OwzAQhy0EgvJnZkOWWFgCd4njOGyoAopUiaHsluNcIJAmJU5A3XgEnpEnwaGFgQVuOcn3-ZN9P8YOEU7R1xkKmQRpLOUphpFUG2z0c7LJRoACg1SpdIftOvcIACiTaJvthDIWSQrJiNkZ1Y7m5qms77mpc949ELfNx9v7om3y3nZlU_Om4M4U1C3PueHPvanKznTlC3HX9flyGC_acm7aJZ9TXlpTcWta4gsPUd25fbZVmMrRwbrvsbury7vxJJjeXt-ML6aBFUKqQMUW8ixVEghDABllVlChIrBFpgiAMhurNEMQRZwokUMmKTchWuUri6M9drLS-pc_9-Q6PS-dpaoyNTW905jIWAJGUfofNIwEhogePf6FPjZ9W_t_DBRKr1Ohp85WlG0b51oq9HojGkEPSekhFz3kor-S8jeO1t4-81v74b-j8YBcAa9lRcu_fHo2uZmuzJ9JV538</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761633982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Rhodes, Penny ; McDonald, Ruth ; Campbell, Stephen ; Daker‐White, Gavin ; Sanders, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Penny ; McDonald, Ruth ; Campbell, Stephen ; Daker‐White, Gavin ; Sanders, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores the ways in which patients make sense of ‘safety’ in the context of primary medical care. Drawing on qualitative interviews with primary care patients, we reveal patients’ conceptualisation of safety as fluid, contingent, multi‐dimensional, and negotiated. Participant accounts drew attention to a largely invisible and inaccessible (but taken for granted) architecture of safety, the importance of psycho‐social as well as physical dimensions and the interactions between them, informal strategies for negotiating safety, and the moral dimension of safety. Participants reported being proactive in taking action to protect themselves from potential harm. The somewhat routinised and predictable nature of the primary medical care consultation, which is very different from ‘one off’ inpatient spells, meant that patients were not passive recipients of care. Instead they had a stock of accumulated knowledge and experience to inform their actions. In addition to highlighting the differences and similarities between hospital and primary care settings, the study suggests that a broad conceptualisation of patient safety is required, which encompasses the safety concerns of patients in primary care settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-9889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9566</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12368</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26547907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Architecture ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Chronic Disease - psychology ; Clinical Competence ; Environment ; Ethics ; Female ; Health services ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Medicine ; Patient Safety ; Patients ; Patients - psychology ; Perception ; Primary care ; Primary health care ; Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration ; Psychosocial factors ; Qualitative Research ; quality of care ; safety ; Sociology, Medical</subject><ispartof>Sociology of health &amp; illness, 2016-02, Vol.38 (2), p.270-285</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. Sociology of Health &amp; Illness published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for SHIL.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Foundation for the Sociology of Health &amp; Illness</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4468-85c0db9860e120063bc4ef830cfb8e00ebc589b104f5784d0b6eda21c8888b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4468-85c0db9860e120063bc4ef830cfb8e00ebc589b104f5784d0b6eda21c8888b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-9566.12368$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-9566.12368$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27923,27924,33773,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26547907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daker‐White, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients</title><title>Sociology of health &amp; illness</title><addtitle>Sociol Health Illn</addtitle><description>This study explores the ways in which patients make sense of ‘safety’ in the context of primary medical care. Drawing on qualitative interviews with primary care patients, we reveal patients’ conceptualisation of safety as fluid, contingent, multi‐dimensional, and negotiated. Participant accounts drew attention to a largely invisible and inaccessible (but taken for granted) architecture of safety, the importance of psycho‐social as well as physical dimensions and the interactions between them, informal strategies for negotiating safety, and the moral dimension of safety. Participants reported being proactive in taking action to protect themselves from potential harm. The somewhat routinised and predictable nature of the primary medical care consultation, which is very different from ‘one off’ inpatient spells, meant that patients were not passive recipients of care. Instead they had a stock of accumulated knowledge and experience to inform their actions. In addition to highlighting the differences and similarities between hospital and primary care settings, the study suggests that a broad conceptualisation of patient safety is required, which encompasses the safety concerns of patients in primary care settings.</description><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - psychology</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Patients - psychology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>quality of care</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>Sociology, Medical</subject><issn>0141-9889</issn><issn>1467-9566</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkb9OwzAQhy0EgvJnZkOWWFgCd4njOGyoAopUiaHsluNcIJAmJU5A3XgEnpEnwaGFgQVuOcn3-ZN9P8YOEU7R1xkKmQRpLOUphpFUG2z0c7LJRoACg1SpdIftOvcIACiTaJvthDIWSQrJiNkZ1Y7m5qms77mpc949ELfNx9v7om3y3nZlU_Om4M4U1C3PueHPvanKznTlC3HX9flyGC_acm7aJZ9TXlpTcWta4gsPUd25fbZVmMrRwbrvsbury7vxJJjeXt-ML6aBFUKqQMUW8ixVEghDABllVlChIrBFpgiAMhurNEMQRZwokUMmKTchWuUri6M9drLS-pc_9-Q6PS-dpaoyNTW905jIWAJGUfofNIwEhogePf6FPjZ9W_t_DBRKr1Ohp85WlG0b51oq9HojGkEPSekhFz3kor-S8jeO1t4-81v74b-j8YBcAa9lRcu_fHo2uZmuzJ9JV538</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Rhodes, Penny</creator><creator>McDonald, Ruth</creator><creator>Campbell, Stephen</creator><creator>Daker‐White, Gavin</creator><creator>Sanders, Caroline</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients</title><author>Rhodes, Penny ; McDonald, Ruth ; Campbell, Stephen ; Daker‐White, Gavin ; Sanders, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4468-85c0db9860e120063bc4ef830cfb8e00ebc589b104f5784d0b6eda21c8888b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - psychology</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Patients - psychology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>quality of care</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>Sociology, Medical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daker‐White, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sociology of health &amp; illness</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rhodes, Penny</au><au>McDonald, Ruth</au><au>Campbell, Stephen</au><au>Daker‐White, Gavin</au><au>Sanders, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients</atitle><jtitle>Sociology of health &amp; illness</jtitle><addtitle>Sociol Health Illn</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>270</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>270-285</pages><issn>0141-9889</issn><eissn>1467-9566</eissn><abstract>This study explores the ways in which patients make sense of ‘safety’ in the context of primary medical care. Drawing on qualitative interviews with primary care patients, we reveal patients’ conceptualisation of safety as fluid, contingent, multi‐dimensional, and negotiated. Participant accounts drew attention to a largely invisible and inaccessible (but taken for granted) architecture of safety, the importance of psycho‐social as well as physical dimensions and the interactions between them, informal strategies for negotiating safety, and the moral dimension of safety. Participants reported being proactive in taking action to protect themselves from potential harm. The somewhat routinised and predictable nature of the primary medical care consultation, which is very different from ‘one off’ inpatient spells, meant that patients were not passive recipients of care. Instead they had a stock of accumulated knowledge and experience to inform their actions. In addition to highlighting the differences and similarities between hospital and primary care settings, the study suggests that a broad conceptualisation of patient safety is required, which encompasses the safety concerns of patients in primary care settings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26547907</pmid><doi>10.1111/1467-9566.12368</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-9889
ispartof Sociology of health & illness, 2016-02, Vol.38 (2), p.270-285
issn 0141-9889
1467-9566
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765601339
source MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Architecture
Attitude of Health Personnel
Chronic Disease - psychology
Clinical Competence
Environment
Ethics
Female
Health services
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Male
Medicine
Patient Safety
Patients
Patients - psychology
Perception
Primary care
Primary health care
Primary Health Care - organization & administration
Psychosocial factors
Qualitative Research
quality of care
safety
Sociology, Medical
title Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A13%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensemaking%20and%20the%20co%E2%80%90production%20of%20safety:%20a%20qualitative%20study%20of%20primary%20medical%20care%20patients&rft.jtitle=Sociology%20of%20health%20&%20illness&rft.au=Rhodes,%20Penny&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=270&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=270-285&rft.issn=0141-9889&rft.eissn=1467-9566&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-9566.12368&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1762341211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761633982&rft_id=info:pmid/26547907&rfr_iscdi=true