Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients
This study explores the ways in which patients make sense of ‘safety’ in the context of primary medical care. Drawing on qualitative interviews with primary care patients, we reveal patients’ conceptualisation of safety as fluid, contingent, multi‐dimensional, and negotiated. Participant accounts dr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociology of health & illness 2016-02, Vol.38 (2), p.270-285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 270 |
container_title | Sociology of health & illness |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Rhodes, Penny McDonald, Ruth Campbell, Stephen Daker‐White, Gavin Sanders, Caroline |
description | This study explores the ways in which patients make sense of ‘safety’ in the context of primary medical care. Drawing on qualitative interviews with primary care patients, we reveal patients’ conceptualisation of safety as fluid, contingent, multi‐dimensional, and negotiated. Participant accounts drew attention to a largely invisible and inaccessible (but taken for granted) architecture of safety, the importance of psycho‐social as well as physical dimensions and the interactions between them, informal strategies for negotiating safety, and the moral dimension of safety. Participants reported being proactive in taking action to protect themselves from potential harm. The somewhat routinised and predictable nature of the primary medical care consultation, which is very different from ‘one off’ inpatient spells, meant that patients were not passive recipients of care. Instead they had a stock of accumulated knowledge and experience to inform their actions. In addition to highlighting the differences and similarities between hospital and primary care settings, the study suggests that a broad conceptualisation of patient safety is required, which encompasses the safety concerns of patients in primary care settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1467-9566.12368 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765601339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1762341211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4468-85c0db9860e120063bc4ef830cfb8e00ebc589b104f5784d0b6eda21c8888b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb9OwzAQhy0EgvJnZkOWWFgCd4njOGyoAopUiaHsluNcIJAmJU5A3XgEnpEnwaGFgQVuOcn3-ZN9P8YOEU7R1xkKmQRpLOUphpFUG2z0c7LJRoACg1SpdIftOvcIACiTaJvthDIWSQrJiNkZ1Y7m5qms77mpc949ELfNx9v7om3y3nZlU_Om4M4U1C3PueHPvanKznTlC3HX9flyGC_acm7aJZ9TXlpTcWta4gsPUd25fbZVmMrRwbrvsbury7vxJJjeXt-ML6aBFUKqQMUW8ixVEghDABllVlChIrBFpgiAMhurNEMQRZwokUMmKTchWuUri6M9drLS-pc_9-Q6PS-dpaoyNTW905jIWAJGUfofNIwEhogePf6FPjZ9W_t_DBRKr1Ohp85WlG0b51oq9HojGkEPSekhFz3kor-S8jeO1t4-81v74b-j8YBcAa9lRcu_fHo2uZmuzJ9JV538</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761633982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Rhodes, Penny ; McDonald, Ruth ; Campbell, Stephen ; Daker‐White, Gavin ; Sanders, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Penny ; McDonald, Ruth ; Campbell, Stephen ; Daker‐White, Gavin ; Sanders, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores the ways in which patients make sense of ‘safety’ in the context of primary medical care. Drawing on qualitative interviews with primary care patients, we reveal patients’ conceptualisation of safety as fluid, contingent, multi‐dimensional, and negotiated. Participant accounts drew attention to a largely invisible and inaccessible (but taken for granted) architecture of safety, the importance of psycho‐social as well as physical dimensions and the interactions between them, informal strategies for negotiating safety, and the moral dimension of safety. Participants reported being proactive in taking action to protect themselves from potential harm. The somewhat routinised and predictable nature of the primary medical care consultation, which is very different from ‘one off’ inpatient spells, meant that patients were not passive recipients of care. Instead they had a stock of accumulated knowledge and experience to inform their actions. In addition to highlighting the differences and similarities between hospital and primary care settings, the study suggests that a broad conceptualisation of patient safety is required, which encompasses the safety concerns of patients in primary care settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-9889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9566</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12368</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26547907</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Architecture ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Chronic Disease - psychology ; Clinical Competence ; Environment ; Ethics ; Female ; Health services ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Medicine ; Patient Safety ; Patients ; Patients - psychology ; Perception ; Primary care ; Primary health care ; Primary Health Care - organization & administration ; Psychosocial factors ; Qualitative Research ; quality of care ; safety ; Sociology, Medical</subject><ispartof>Sociology of health & illness, 2016-02, Vol.38 (2), p.270-285</ispartof><rights>2015 The Authors. Sociology of Health & Illness published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation for SHIL.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Foundation for the Sociology of Health & Illness</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4468-85c0db9860e120063bc4ef830cfb8e00ebc589b104f5784d0b6eda21c8888b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4468-85c0db9860e120063bc4ef830cfb8e00ebc589b104f5784d0b6eda21c8888b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-9566.12368$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-9566.12368$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27923,27924,33773,45573,45574,46408,46832</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26547907$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daker‐White, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients</title><title>Sociology of health & illness</title><addtitle>Sociol Health Illn</addtitle><description>This study explores the ways in which patients make sense of ‘safety’ in the context of primary medical care. Drawing on qualitative interviews with primary care patients, we reveal patients’ conceptualisation of safety as fluid, contingent, multi‐dimensional, and negotiated. Participant accounts drew attention to a largely invisible and inaccessible (but taken for granted) architecture of safety, the importance of psycho‐social as well as physical dimensions and the interactions between them, informal strategies for negotiating safety, and the moral dimension of safety. Participants reported being proactive in taking action to protect themselves from potential harm. The somewhat routinised and predictable nature of the primary medical care consultation, which is very different from ‘one off’ inpatient spells, meant that patients were not passive recipients of care. Instead they had a stock of accumulated knowledge and experience to inform their actions. In addition to highlighting the differences and similarities between hospital and primary care settings, the study suggests that a broad conceptualisation of patient safety is required, which encompasses the safety concerns of patients in primary care settings.</description><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - psychology</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Patients - psychology</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>quality of care</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>Sociology, Medical</subject><issn>0141-9889</issn><issn>1467-9566</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkb9OwzAQhy0EgvJnZkOWWFgCd4njOGyoAopUiaHsluNcIJAmJU5A3XgEnpEnwaGFgQVuOcn3-ZN9P8YOEU7R1xkKmQRpLOUphpFUG2z0c7LJRoACg1SpdIftOvcIACiTaJvthDIWSQrJiNkZ1Y7m5qms77mpc949ELfNx9v7om3y3nZlU_Om4M4U1C3PueHPvanKznTlC3HX9flyGC_acm7aJZ9TXlpTcWta4gsPUd25fbZVmMrRwbrvsbury7vxJJjeXt-ML6aBFUKqQMUW8ixVEghDABllVlChIrBFpgiAMhurNEMQRZwokUMmKTchWuUri6M9drLS-pc_9-Q6PS-dpaoyNTW905jIWAJGUfofNIwEhogePf6FPjZ9W_t_DBRKr1Ohp85WlG0b51oq9HojGkEPSekhFz3kor-S8jeO1t4-81v74b-j8YBcAa9lRcu_fHo2uZmuzJ9JV538</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Rhodes, Penny</creator><creator>McDonald, Ruth</creator><creator>Campbell, Stephen</creator><creator>Daker‐White, Gavin</creator><creator>Sanders, Caroline</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients</title><author>Rhodes, Penny ; McDonald, Ruth ; Campbell, Stephen ; Daker‐White, Gavin ; Sanders, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4468-85c0db9860e120063bc4ef830cfb8e00ebc589b104f5784d0b6eda21c8888b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - psychology</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Patients - psychology</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>quality of care</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>Sociology, Medical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daker‐White, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sociology of health & illness</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rhodes, Penny</au><au>McDonald, Ruth</au><au>Campbell, Stephen</au><au>Daker‐White, Gavin</au><au>Sanders, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients</atitle><jtitle>Sociology of health & illness</jtitle><addtitle>Sociol Health Illn</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>270</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>270-285</pages><issn>0141-9889</issn><eissn>1467-9566</eissn><abstract>This study explores the ways in which patients make sense of ‘safety’ in the context of primary medical care. Drawing on qualitative interviews with primary care patients, we reveal patients’ conceptualisation of safety as fluid, contingent, multi‐dimensional, and negotiated. Participant accounts drew attention to a largely invisible and inaccessible (but taken for granted) architecture of safety, the importance of psycho‐social as well as physical dimensions and the interactions between them, informal strategies for negotiating safety, and the moral dimension of safety. Participants reported being proactive in taking action to protect themselves from potential harm. The somewhat routinised and predictable nature of the primary medical care consultation, which is very different from ‘one off’ inpatient spells, meant that patients were not passive recipients of care. Instead they had a stock of accumulated knowledge and experience to inform their actions. In addition to highlighting the differences and similarities between hospital and primary care settings, the study suggests that a broad conceptualisation of patient safety is required, which encompasses the safety concerns of patients in primary care settings.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26547907</pmid><doi>10.1111/1467-9566.12368</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0141-9889 |
ispartof | Sociology of health & illness, 2016-02, Vol.38 (2), p.270-285 |
issn | 0141-9889 1467-9566 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765601339 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Architecture Attitude of Health Personnel Chronic Disease - psychology Clinical Competence Environment Ethics Female Health services Humans Interviews as Topic Male Medicine Patient Safety Patients Patients - psychology Perception Primary care Primary health care Primary Health Care - organization & administration Psychosocial factors Qualitative Research quality of care safety Sociology, Medical |
title | Sensemaking and the co‐production of safety: a qualitative study of primary medical care patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T10%3A13%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensemaking%20and%20the%20co%E2%80%90production%20of%20safety:%20a%20qualitative%20study%20of%20primary%20medical%20care%20patients&rft.jtitle=Sociology%20of%20health%20&%20illness&rft.au=Rhodes,%20Penny&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=270&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=270-285&rft.issn=0141-9889&rft.eissn=1467-9566&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-9566.12368&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1762341211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761633982&rft_id=info:pmid/26547907&rfr_iscdi=true |