Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators
Objectives Biomonitoring of pesticide residues in urine offers the advantages of integrating exposure due to all routes of entry and accounting for individual differences in several factors such as pharmacokinetics. The study was designed to measure the body burden of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health Environment & Health, 2005-01, Vol.31 (1), p.90-97 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 97 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 90 |
container_title | Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Arbuckle, Tye E Cole, Donald C Ritter, Len Ripley, Brian D |
description | Objectives Biomonitoring of pesticide residues in urine offers the advantages of integrating exposure due to all routes of entry and accounting for individual differences in several factors such as pharmacokinetics. The study was designed to measure the body burden of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in farm applicators and to measure compliance with label recommendations regarding the use of personal protective gear and the impact of such use on exposure. Methods Farmers (N=126) from Ontario, Canada, collected a preexposure spot sample of urine and then two consecutive 24-hour urine samples immediately following the fanners' first use of these herbicides during 1996. Details on the pesticides used and handling practices were collected by questionnaire. Results For the farmers who reported using 2,4-D, the mean urinary concentration was 27.6 μg/l in the day-1 sample and 40.8 μg/l in the day-2 sample. The comparable figures for MCPA were 44.4 μg/l and 58.0 μg/l, respectively. Adherence to all of the recommended personal protective gear was rare (3%). Wearing goggles or a face shield during mixing and loading was associated with the lowest exposures. Conclusions The urinary concentrations of 2,4-D and MCPA of these farm applicators were of the same order of magnitude as those published in the past decade, but lower than earlier studies, indicating that improvements in education, equipment, and labeling have likely had an impact on the degree of exposure in occupational settings. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17654982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>03553140_200512_201012010072_201012010072_90_97</airiti_id><jstor_id>40967442</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40967442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a255t-7746310359e74f517b00adcde1049e477be06bcbdc777dc898cbfb20bb1befdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-BCUnb4HZZDfTPdZirVDoRcHbsv8iW5Js3U0OfnsTWj14mcfwfjzmzQWZUxQ8FwI-LskcSs7zkjKYkZuUDgCF4AVekxmtqADK2Zzgkw9t6Hwfou8-s1BnWxe1N966lPku23e9ij5kGxXbbHU8Nt6okU235KpWTXJ3Z12Q983z23qb7_Yvr-vVLlcF532OyKqSjncIh6zmFDWAssY6Ckw4hqgdVNpoaxDRmqVYGl3rArSm2tXWlgvyeMo9xvA1uNTL1ifjmkZ1LgxJUqw4E8tiBB_O4KBbZ-Ux-lbFb_lbdQTuT8AhjQX-fAaiQsamgM3JVz763stDGGI3VpPTF6cnygKA02IUCnQagP8WAVJg-QP2x21W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17654982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Arbuckle, Tye E ; Cole, Donald C ; Ritter, Len ; Ripley, Brian D</creator><creatorcontrib>Arbuckle, Tye E ; Cole, Donald C ; Ritter, Len ; Ripley, Brian D</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Biomonitoring of pesticide residues in urine offers the advantages of integrating exposure due to all routes of entry and accounting for individual differences in several factors such as pharmacokinetics. The study was designed to measure the body burden of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in farm applicators and to measure compliance with label recommendations regarding the use of personal protective gear and the impact of such use on exposure. Methods Farmers (N=126) from Ontario, Canada, collected a preexposure spot sample of urine and then two consecutive 24-hour urine samples immediately following the fanners' first use of these herbicides during 1996. Details on the pesticides used and handling practices were collected by questionnaire. Results For the farmers who reported using 2,4-D, the mean urinary concentration was 27.6 μg/l in the day-1 sample and 40.8 μg/l in the day-2 sample. The comparable figures for MCPA were 44.4 μg/l and 58.0 μg/l, respectively. Adherence to all of the recommended personal protective gear was rare (3%). Wearing goggles or a face shield during mixing and loading was associated with the lowest exposures. Conclusions The urinary concentrations of 2,4-D and MCPA of these farm applicators were of the same order of magnitude as those published in the past decade, but lower than earlier studies, indicating that improvements in education, equipment, and labeling have likely had an impact on the degree of exposure in occupational settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0355-3140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1795-990X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16190154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Finland: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Chemical hazards ; Crop science ; Crops ; Dosage ; Environmental Monitoring ; Guideline Adherence ; Herbicides ; Herbicides - urine ; Humans ; Ontario ; Pesticides ; Sample mean ; Sessions on exposure assessment ; Statistical median ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2005-01, Vol.31 (1), p.90-97</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40967442$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40967442$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16190154$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arbuckle, Tye E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Donald C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Len</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripley, Brian D</creatorcontrib><title>Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators</title><title>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</title><addtitle>Scand J Work Environ Health</addtitle><description>Objectives Biomonitoring of pesticide residues in urine offers the advantages of integrating exposure due to all routes of entry and accounting for individual differences in several factors such as pharmacokinetics. The study was designed to measure the body burden of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in farm applicators and to measure compliance with label recommendations regarding the use of personal protective gear and the impact of such use on exposure. Methods Farmers (N=126) from Ontario, Canada, collected a preexposure spot sample of urine and then two consecutive 24-hour urine samples immediately following the fanners' first use of these herbicides during 1996. Details on the pesticides used and handling practices were collected by questionnaire. Results For the farmers who reported using 2,4-D, the mean urinary concentration was 27.6 μg/l in the day-1 sample and 40.8 μg/l in the day-2 sample. The comparable figures for MCPA were 44.4 μg/l and 58.0 μg/l, respectively. Adherence to all of the recommended personal protective gear was rare (3%). Wearing goggles or a face shield during mixing and loading was associated with the lowest exposures. Conclusions The urinary concentrations of 2,4-D and MCPA of these farm applicators were of the same order of magnitude as those published in the past decade, but lower than earlier studies, indicating that improvements in education, equipment, and labeling have likely had an impact on the degree of exposure in occupational settings.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Chemical hazards</subject><subject>Crop science</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Herbicides - urine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Sample mean</subject><subject>Sessions on exposure assessment</subject><subject>Statistical median</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0355-3140</issn><issn>1795-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-BCUnb4HZZDfTPdZirVDoRcHbsv8iW5Js3U0OfnsTWj14mcfwfjzmzQWZUxQ8FwI-LskcSs7zkjKYkZuUDgCF4AVekxmtqADK2Zzgkw9t6Hwfou8-s1BnWxe1N966lPku23e9ij5kGxXbbHU8Nt6okU235KpWTXJ3Z12Q983z23qb7_Yvr-vVLlcF532OyKqSjncIh6zmFDWAssY6Ckw4hqgdVNpoaxDRmqVYGl3rArSm2tXWlgvyeMo9xvA1uNTL1ifjmkZ1LgxJUqw4E8tiBB_O4KBbZ-Ux-lbFb_lbdQTuT8AhjQX-fAaiQsamgM3JVz763stDGGI3VpPTF6cnygKA02IUCnQagP8WAVJg-QP2x21W</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Arbuckle, Tye E</creator><creator>Cole, Donald C</creator><creator>Ritter, Len</creator><creator>Ripley, Brian D</creator><general>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</general><general>National Institute for Working Life</general><general>Finnish Institute of Occupational Health</general><general>National Institute of Occupational Health (Denmark)</general><general>National Institute of Occupational Health (Norway)</general><scope>188</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators</title><author>Arbuckle, Tye E ; Cole, Donald C ; Ritter, Len ; Ripley, Brian D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a255t-7746310359e74f517b00adcde1049e477be06bcbdc777dc898cbfb20bb1befdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Chemical hazards</topic><topic>Crop science</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Herbicides - urine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Sample mean</topic><topic>Sessions on exposure assessment</topic><topic>Statistical median</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arbuckle, Tye E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Donald C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Len</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripley, Brian D</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arbuckle, Tye E</au><au>Cole, Donald C</au><au>Ritter, Len</au><au>Ripley, Brian D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Work Environ Health</addtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>90-97</pages><issn>0355-3140</issn><eissn>1795-990X</eissn><abstract>Objectives Biomonitoring of pesticide residues in urine offers the advantages of integrating exposure due to all routes of entry and accounting for individual differences in several factors such as pharmacokinetics. The study was designed to measure the body burden of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in farm applicators and to measure compliance with label recommendations regarding the use of personal protective gear and the impact of such use on exposure. Methods Farmers (N=126) from Ontario, Canada, collected a preexposure spot sample of urine and then two consecutive 24-hour urine samples immediately following the fanners' first use of these herbicides during 1996. Details on the pesticides used and handling practices were collected by questionnaire. Results For the farmers who reported using 2,4-D, the mean urinary concentration was 27.6 μg/l in the day-1 sample and 40.8 μg/l in the day-2 sample. The comparable figures for MCPA were 44.4 μg/l and 58.0 μg/l, respectively. Adherence to all of the recommended personal protective gear was rare (3%). Wearing goggles or a face shield during mixing and loading was associated with the lowest exposures. Conclusions The urinary concentrations of 2,4-D and MCPA of these farm applicators were of the same order of magnitude as those published in the past decade, but lower than earlier studies, indicating that improvements in education, equipment, and labeling have likely had an impact on the degree of exposure in occupational settings.</abstract><cop>Finland</cop><pub>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</pub><pmid>16190154</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0355-3140 |
ispartof | Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2005-01, Vol.31 (1), p.90-97 |
issn | 0355-3140 1795-990X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17654982 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agriculture Chemical hazards Crop science Crops Dosage Environmental Monitoring Guideline Adherence Herbicides Herbicides - urine Humans Ontario Pesticides Sample mean Sessions on exposure assessment Statistical median Urine |
title | Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A31%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomonitoring%20of%20Herbicides%20in%20Ontario%20Farm%20Applicators&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20Journal%20of%20Work,%20Environment%20%EF%BC%86%20Health&rft.au=Arbuckle,%20Tye%20E&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=90-97&rft.issn=0355-3140&rft.eissn=1795-990X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40967442%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17654982&rft_id=info:pmid/16190154&rft_airiti_id=03553140_200512_201012010072_201012010072_90_97&rft_jstor_id=40967442&rfr_iscdi=true |