Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators

Objectives Biomonitoring of pesticide residues in urine offers the advantages of integrating exposure due to all routes of entry and accounting for individual differences in several factors such as pharmacokinetics. The study was designed to measure the body burden of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health Environment & Health, 2005-01, Vol.31 (1), p.90-97
Hauptverfasser: Arbuckle, Tye E, Cole, Donald C, Ritter, Len, Ripley, Brian D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue 1
container_start_page 90
container_title Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
container_volume 31
creator Arbuckle, Tye E
Cole, Donald C
Ritter, Len
Ripley, Brian D
description Objectives Biomonitoring of pesticide residues in urine offers the advantages of integrating exposure due to all routes of entry and accounting for individual differences in several factors such as pharmacokinetics. The study was designed to measure the body burden of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in farm applicators and to measure compliance with label recommendations regarding the use of personal protective gear and the impact of such use on exposure. Methods Farmers (N=126) from Ontario, Canada, collected a preexposure spot sample of urine and then two consecutive 24-hour urine samples immediately following the fanners' first use of these herbicides during 1996. Details on the pesticides used and handling practices were collected by questionnaire. Results For the farmers who reported using 2,4-D, the mean urinary concentration was 27.6 μg/l in the day-1 sample and 40.8 μg/l in the day-2 sample. The comparable figures for MCPA were 44.4 μg/l and 58.0 μg/l, respectively. Adherence to all of the recommended personal protective gear was rare (3%). Wearing goggles or a face shield during mixing and loading was associated with the lowest exposures. Conclusions The urinary concentrations of 2,4-D and MCPA of these farm applicators were of the same order of magnitude as those published in the past decade, but lower than earlier studies, indicating that improvements in education, equipment, and labeling have likely had an impact on the degree of exposure in occupational settings.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17654982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>03553140_200512_201012010072_201012010072_90_97</airiti_id><jstor_id>40967442</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40967442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a255t-7746310359e74f517b00adcde1049e477be06bcbdc777dc898cbfb20bb1befdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-BCUnb4HZZDfTPdZirVDoRcHbsv8iW5Js3U0OfnsTWj14mcfwfjzmzQWZUxQ8FwI-LskcSs7zkjKYkZuUDgCF4AVekxmtqADK2Zzgkw9t6Hwfou8-s1BnWxe1N966lPku23e9ij5kGxXbbHU8Nt6okU235KpWTXJ3Z12Q983z23qb7_Yvr-vVLlcF532OyKqSjncIh6zmFDWAssY6Ckw4hqgdVNpoaxDRmqVYGl3rArSm2tXWlgvyeMo9xvA1uNTL1ifjmkZ1LgxJUqw4E8tiBB_O4KBbZ-Ux-lbFb_lbdQTuT8AhjQX-fAaiQsamgM3JVz763stDGGI3VpPTF6cnygKA02IUCnQagP8WAVJg-QP2x21W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17654982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Arbuckle, Tye E ; Cole, Donald C ; Ritter, Len ; Ripley, Brian D</creator><creatorcontrib>Arbuckle, Tye E ; Cole, Donald C ; Ritter, Len ; Ripley, Brian D</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Biomonitoring of pesticide residues in urine offers the advantages of integrating exposure due to all routes of entry and accounting for individual differences in several factors such as pharmacokinetics. The study was designed to measure the body burden of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in farm applicators and to measure compliance with label recommendations regarding the use of personal protective gear and the impact of such use on exposure. Methods Farmers (N=126) from Ontario, Canada, collected a preexposure spot sample of urine and then two consecutive 24-hour urine samples immediately following the fanners' first use of these herbicides during 1996. Details on the pesticides used and handling practices were collected by questionnaire. Results For the farmers who reported using 2,4-D, the mean urinary concentration was 27.6 μg/l in the day-1 sample and 40.8 μg/l in the day-2 sample. The comparable figures for MCPA were 44.4 μg/l and 58.0 μg/l, respectively. Adherence to all of the recommended personal protective gear was rare (3%). Wearing goggles or a face shield during mixing and loading was associated with the lowest exposures. Conclusions The urinary concentrations of 2,4-D and MCPA of these farm applicators were of the same order of magnitude as those published in the past decade, but lower than earlier studies, indicating that improvements in education, equipment, and labeling have likely had an impact on the degree of exposure in occupational settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0355-3140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1795-990X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16190154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Finland: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Chemical hazards ; Crop science ; Crops ; Dosage ; Environmental Monitoring ; Guideline Adherence ; Herbicides ; Herbicides - urine ; Humans ; Ontario ; Pesticides ; Sample mean ; Sessions on exposure assessment ; Statistical median ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2005-01, Vol.31 (1), p.90-97</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40967442$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40967442$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16190154$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arbuckle, Tye E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Donald C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Len</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripley, Brian D</creatorcontrib><title>Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators</title><title>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</title><addtitle>Scand J Work Environ Health</addtitle><description>Objectives Biomonitoring of pesticide residues in urine offers the advantages of integrating exposure due to all routes of entry and accounting for individual differences in several factors such as pharmacokinetics. The study was designed to measure the body burden of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in farm applicators and to measure compliance with label recommendations regarding the use of personal protective gear and the impact of such use on exposure. Methods Farmers (N=126) from Ontario, Canada, collected a preexposure spot sample of urine and then two consecutive 24-hour urine samples immediately following the fanners' first use of these herbicides during 1996. Details on the pesticides used and handling practices were collected by questionnaire. Results For the farmers who reported using 2,4-D, the mean urinary concentration was 27.6 μg/l in the day-1 sample and 40.8 μg/l in the day-2 sample. The comparable figures for MCPA were 44.4 μg/l and 58.0 μg/l, respectively. Adherence to all of the recommended personal protective gear was rare (3%). Wearing goggles or a face shield during mixing and loading was associated with the lowest exposures. Conclusions The urinary concentrations of 2,4-D and MCPA of these farm applicators were of the same order of magnitude as those published in the past decade, but lower than earlier studies, indicating that improvements in education, equipment, and labeling have likely had an impact on the degree of exposure in occupational settings.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Chemical hazards</subject><subject>Crop science</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Herbicides - urine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Sample mean</subject><subject>Sessions on exposure assessment</subject><subject>Statistical median</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0355-3140</issn><issn>1795-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-BCUnb4HZZDfTPdZirVDoRcHbsv8iW5Js3U0OfnsTWj14mcfwfjzmzQWZUxQ8FwI-LskcSs7zkjKYkZuUDgCF4AVekxmtqADK2Zzgkw9t6Hwfou8-s1BnWxe1N966lPku23e9ij5kGxXbbHU8Nt6okU235KpWTXJ3Z12Q983z23qb7_Yvr-vVLlcF532OyKqSjncIh6zmFDWAssY6Ckw4hqgdVNpoaxDRmqVYGl3rArSm2tXWlgvyeMo9xvA1uNTL1ifjmkZ1LgxJUqw4E8tiBB_O4KBbZ-Ux-lbFb_lbdQTuT8AhjQX-fAaiQsamgM3JVz763stDGGI3VpPTF6cnygKA02IUCnQagP8WAVJg-QP2x21W</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Arbuckle, Tye E</creator><creator>Cole, Donald C</creator><creator>Ritter, Len</creator><creator>Ripley, Brian D</creator><general>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</general><general>National Institute for Working Life</general><general>Finnish Institute of Occupational Health</general><general>National Institute of Occupational Health (Denmark)</general><general>National Institute of Occupational Health (Norway)</general><scope>188</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators</title><author>Arbuckle, Tye E ; Cole, Donald C ; Ritter, Len ; Ripley, Brian D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a255t-7746310359e74f517b00adcde1049e477be06bcbdc777dc898cbfb20bb1befdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Chemical hazards</topic><topic>Crop science</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Herbicides - urine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Sample mean</topic><topic>Sessions on exposure assessment</topic><topic>Statistical median</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arbuckle, Tye E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Donald C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritter, Len</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripley, Brian D</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arbuckle, Tye E</au><au>Cole, Donald C</au><au>Ritter, Len</au><au>Ripley, Brian D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Work Environ Health</addtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>90-97</pages><issn>0355-3140</issn><eissn>1795-990X</eissn><abstract>Objectives Biomonitoring of pesticide residues in urine offers the advantages of integrating exposure due to all routes of entry and accounting for individual differences in several factors such as pharmacokinetics. The study was designed to measure the body burden of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in farm applicators and to measure compliance with label recommendations regarding the use of personal protective gear and the impact of such use on exposure. Methods Farmers (N=126) from Ontario, Canada, collected a preexposure spot sample of urine and then two consecutive 24-hour urine samples immediately following the fanners' first use of these herbicides during 1996. Details on the pesticides used and handling practices were collected by questionnaire. Results For the farmers who reported using 2,4-D, the mean urinary concentration was 27.6 μg/l in the day-1 sample and 40.8 μg/l in the day-2 sample. The comparable figures for MCPA were 44.4 μg/l and 58.0 μg/l, respectively. Adherence to all of the recommended personal protective gear was rare (3%). Wearing goggles or a face shield during mixing and loading was associated with the lowest exposures. Conclusions The urinary concentrations of 2,4-D and MCPA of these farm applicators were of the same order of magnitude as those published in the past decade, but lower than earlier studies, indicating that improvements in education, equipment, and labeling have likely had an impact on the degree of exposure in occupational settings.</abstract><cop>Finland</cop><pub>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</pub><pmid>16190154</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0355-3140
ispartof Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2005-01, Vol.31 (1), p.90-97
issn 0355-3140
1795-990X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17654982
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agriculture
Chemical hazards
Crop science
Crops
Dosage
Environmental Monitoring
Guideline Adherence
Herbicides
Herbicides - urine
Humans
Ontario
Pesticides
Sample mean
Sessions on exposure assessment
Statistical median
Urine
title Biomonitoring of Herbicides in Ontario Farm Applicators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A31%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomonitoring%20of%20Herbicides%20in%20Ontario%20Farm%20Applicators&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20Journal%20of%20Work,%20Environment%20%EF%BC%86%20Health&rft.au=Arbuckle,%20Tye%20E&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=90-97&rft.issn=0355-3140&rft.eissn=1795-990X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40967442%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17654982&rft_id=info:pmid/16190154&rft_airiti_id=03553140_200512_201012010072_201012010072_90_97&rft_jstor_id=40967442&rfr_iscdi=true