Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis
Summary Background Induction of a clinical complete response with chemoradiotherapy, followed by observation via a watch-and-wait approach, has emerged as a management option for patients with rectal cancer. We aimed to address the shortage of evidence regarding the safety of the watch-and-wait appr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The lancet oncology 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.174-183 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 183 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 174 |
container_title | The lancet oncology |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Renehan, Andrew G, Prof Malcomson, Lee, BSc Emsley, Richard, PhD Gollins, Simon, DPhil Maw, Andrew, MBBS Myint, Arthur Sun, Prof Rooney, Paul S, DM Susnerwala, Shabbir, MD Blower, Anthony, MD Saunders, Mark P, PhD Wilson, Malcolm S, MD Scott, Nigel, MD O'Dwyer, Sarah T, Prof |
description | Summary Background Induction of a clinical complete response with chemoradiotherapy, followed by observation via a watch-and-wait approach, has emerged as a management option for patients with rectal cancer. We aimed to address the shortage of evidence regarding the safety of the watch-and-wait approach by comparing oncological outcomes between patients managed by watch and wait who achieved a clinical complete response and those who had surgical resection (standard care). Methods Oncological Outcomes after Clinical Complete Response in Patients with Rectal Cancer (OnCoRe) was a propensity-score matched cohort analysis study, that included patients of all ages diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastases who had received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 daily fractions with concurrent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy) at a tertiary cancer centre in Manchester, UK, between Jan 14, 2011, and April 15, 2013. Patients who had a clinical complete response were offered management with the watch-and-wait approach, and patients who did not have a complete clinical response were offered surgical resection if eligible. We also included patients with a clinical complete response managed by watch and wait between March 10, 2005, and Jan 21, 2015, across three neighbouring UK regional cancer centres, whose details were obtained through a registry. For comparative analyses, we derived one-to-one paired cohorts of watch and wait versus surgical resection using propensity-score matching (including T stage, age, and performance status). The primary endpoint was non-regrowth disease-free survival from the date that chemoradiotherapy was started, and secondary endpoints were overall survival, and colostomy-free survival. We used a conservative p value of less than 0·01 to indicate statistical significance in the comparative analyses. Findings 259 patients were included in our Manchester tertiary cancer centre cohort, 228 of whom underwent surgical resection at referring hospitals and 31 of whom had a clinical complete response, managed by watch and wait. A further 98 patients were added to the watch-and-wait group via the registry. Of the 129 patients managed by watch and wait (median follow-up 33 months [IQR 19–43]), 44 (34%) had local regrowths (3-year actuarial rate 38% [95% CI 30–48]); 36 (88%) of 41 patients with non-metastatic local regrowths were salvaged. In the matched analyses (109 patients in each treatment group), no differences i |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00467-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765115022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1470204515004672</els_id><sourcerecordid>3945807931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-abc2469e618385fba415ebb95a7af4d14cc0ea3df7c766f8d5e240febc3686543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkt2K1TAUhYsozjj6CErAmzMX1SRN0h4vFDn4BwMD_uBlSNNdm2NPU7PTGfpKPqXp6agwIF4lJN9ee2WvZNljRp8xytTzT0yUNOdUyA2T55QKVeb8TnaajkUuRVXdPe5X5CR7gLinlJWMyvvZCVcllZUUp9nPrybaLjdDk18bF4kZx-CN7cgVBJyQ4BS-OWt6EgDBRucHYtoIgdgODj6YxvnYQTDjTFofyGiigyEiuXaxSzU2plJrBpsqNgkkl8POfwSSmuzT5fkLYpb9CAO6OOdofQByWCxBQ6zvfEiWBtPP6PBhdq81PcKjm_Us-_L2zefd-_zi8t2H3euL3EpexdzUlgu1BcWqopJtbQSTUNdbaUrTioYJaymYomlLWyrVVo0ELmgLtS1UpaQozrLNqpuM_ZgAoz44tND3ZgA_oWalkoxJynlCn95C934KyS9qznjJKrYK_pNKWkXKbnuk5ErZ4BEDtHoM7mDCrBnVS-T6GLle8tRM6mPkevHw5EZ9qg_Q_Kn6nXECXq0ApKFdOQgabQrJQuOWgHTj3X9bvLylYHs3LN_iO8yAf1-jkWu6iiwaaUiLAi9-ASXk0rU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1763004954</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Renehan, Andrew G, Prof ; Malcomson, Lee, BSc ; Emsley, Richard, PhD ; Gollins, Simon, DPhil ; Maw, Andrew, MBBS ; Myint, Arthur Sun, Prof ; Rooney, Paul S, DM ; Susnerwala, Shabbir, MD ; Blower, Anthony, MD ; Saunders, Mark P, PhD ; Wilson, Malcolm S, MD ; Scott, Nigel, MD ; O'Dwyer, Sarah T, Prof</creator><creatorcontrib>Renehan, Andrew G, Prof ; Malcomson, Lee, BSc ; Emsley, Richard, PhD ; Gollins, Simon, DPhil ; Maw, Andrew, MBBS ; Myint, Arthur Sun, Prof ; Rooney, Paul S, DM ; Susnerwala, Shabbir, MD ; Blower, Anthony, MD ; Saunders, Mark P, PhD ; Wilson, Malcolm S, MD ; Scott, Nigel, MD ; O'Dwyer, Sarah T, Prof</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Induction of a clinical complete response with chemoradiotherapy, followed by observation via a watch-and-wait approach, has emerged as a management option for patients with rectal cancer. We aimed to address the shortage of evidence regarding the safety of the watch-and-wait approach by comparing oncological outcomes between patients managed by watch and wait who achieved a clinical complete response and those who had surgical resection (standard care). Methods Oncological Outcomes after Clinical Complete Response in Patients with Rectal Cancer (OnCoRe) was a propensity-score matched cohort analysis study, that included patients of all ages diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastases who had received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 daily fractions with concurrent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy) at a tertiary cancer centre in Manchester, UK, between Jan 14, 2011, and April 15, 2013. Patients who had a clinical complete response were offered management with the watch-and-wait approach, and patients who did not have a complete clinical response were offered surgical resection if eligible. We also included patients with a clinical complete response managed by watch and wait between March 10, 2005, and Jan 21, 2015, across three neighbouring UK regional cancer centres, whose details were obtained through a registry. For comparative analyses, we derived one-to-one paired cohorts of watch and wait versus surgical resection using propensity-score matching (including T stage, age, and performance status). The primary endpoint was non-regrowth disease-free survival from the date that chemoradiotherapy was started, and secondary endpoints were overall survival, and colostomy-free survival. We used a conservative p value of less than 0·01 to indicate statistical significance in the comparative analyses. Findings 259 patients were included in our Manchester tertiary cancer centre cohort, 228 of whom underwent surgical resection at referring hospitals and 31 of whom had a clinical complete response, managed by watch and wait. A further 98 patients were added to the watch-and-wait group via the registry. Of the 129 patients managed by watch and wait (median follow-up 33 months [IQR 19–43]), 44 (34%) had local regrowths (3-year actuarial rate 38% [95% CI 30–48]); 36 (88%) of 41 patients with non-metastatic local regrowths were salvaged. In the matched analyses (109 patients in each treatment group), no differences in 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival were noted between watch and wait and surgical resection (88% [95% CI 75–94] with watch and wait vs 78% [63–87] with surgical resection; time-varying p=0·043). Similarly, no difference in 3-year overall survival was noted (96% [88–98] vs 87% [77–93]; time-varying p=0·024). By contrast, patients managed by watch and wait had significantly better 3-year colostomy-free survival than did those who had surgical resection (74% [95% CI 64–82] vs 47% [37–57]; hazard ratio 0·445 [95% CI 0·31–0·63; p<0·0001), with a 26% (95% CI 13–39) absolute difference in patients who avoided permanent colostomy at 3 years between treatment groups. Interpretation A substantial proportion of patients with rectal cancer managed by watch and wait avoided major surgery and averted permanent colostomy without loss of oncological safety at 3 years. These findings should inform decision making at the outset of chemoradiotherapy. Funding Bowel Disease Research Foundation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-2045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00467-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26705854</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma ; Adenocarcinoma - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adenocarcinoma - therapy ; Aged ; Cancer therapies ; Case-Control Studies ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant ; Chemotherapy ; Clinical decision making ; Cohort analysis ; Colorectal cancer ; Colostomy ; Decision making ; Disease-Free Survival ; Dose Fractionation ; Female ; Fluorouracil - therapeutic use ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Intestine ; Male ; Metastases ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy ; Ostomy ; Ovarian cancer ; Patients ; Propensity Score ; Radiation therapy ; Rectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Rectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Rectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Rectum ; Remission Induction ; Studies ; Surgery ; Survival ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome ; Watchful Waiting</subject><ispartof>The lancet oncology, 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.174-183</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-abc2469e618385fba415ebb95a7af4d14cc0ea3df7c766f8d5e240febc3686543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-abc2469e618385fba415ebb95a7af4d14cc0ea3df7c766f8d5e240febc3686543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470204515004672$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26705854$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Renehan, Andrew G, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malcomson, Lee, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emsley, Richard, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gollins, Simon, DPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maw, Andrew, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myint, Arthur Sun, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, Paul S, DM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susnerwala, Shabbir, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blower, Anthony, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Mark P, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Malcolm S, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Nigel, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Dwyer, Sarah T, Prof</creatorcontrib><title>Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis</title><title>The lancet oncology</title><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><description>Summary Background Induction of a clinical complete response with chemoradiotherapy, followed by observation via a watch-and-wait approach, has emerged as a management option for patients with rectal cancer. We aimed to address the shortage of evidence regarding the safety of the watch-and-wait approach by comparing oncological outcomes between patients managed by watch and wait who achieved a clinical complete response and those who had surgical resection (standard care). Methods Oncological Outcomes after Clinical Complete Response in Patients with Rectal Cancer (OnCoRe) was a propensity-score matched cohort analysis study, that included patients of all ages diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastases who had received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 daily fractions with concurrent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy) at a tertiary cancer centre in Manchester, UK, between Jan 14, 2011, and April 15, 2013. Patients who had a clinical complete response were offered management with the watch-and-wait approach, and patients who did not have a complete clinical response were offered surgical resection if eligible. We also included patients with a clinical complete response managed by watch and wait between March 10, 2005, and Jan 21, 2015, across three neighbouring UK regional cancer centres, whose details were obtained through a registry. For comparative analyses, we derived one-to-one paired cohorts of watch and wait versus surgical resection using propensity-score matching (including T stage, age, and performance status). The primary endpoint was non-regrowth disease-free survival from the date that chemoradiotherapy was started, and secondary endpoints were overall survival, and colostomy-free survival. We used a conservative p value of less than 0·01 to indicate statistical significance in the comparative analyses. Findings 259 patients were included in our Manchester tertiary cancer centre cohort, 228 of whom underwent surgical resection at referring hospitals and 31 of whom had a clinical complete response, managed by watch and wait. A further 98 patients were added to the watch-and-wait group via the registry. Of the 129 patients managed by watch and wait (median follow-up 33 months [IQR 19–43]), 44 (34%) had local regrowths (3-year actuarial rate 38% [95% CI 30–48]); 36 (88%) of 41 patients with non-metastatic local regrowths were salvaged. In the matched analyses (109 patients in each treatment group), no differences in 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival were noted between watch and wait and surgical resection (88% [95% CI 75–94] with watch and wait vs 78% [63–87] with surgical resection; time-varying p=0·043). Similarly, no difference in 3-year overall survival was noted (96% [88–98] vs 87% [77–93]; time-varying p=0·024). By contrast, patients managed by watch and wait had significantly better 3-year colostomy-free survival than did those who had surgical resection (74% [95% CI 64–82] vs 47% [37–57]; hazard ratio 0·445 [95% CI 0·31–0·63; p<0·0001), with a 26% (95% CI 13–39) absolute difference in patients who avoided permanent colostomy at 3 years between treatment groups. Interpretation A substantial proportion of patients with rectal cancer managed by watch and wait avoided major surgery and averted permanent colostomy without loss of oncological safety at 3 years. These findings should inform decision making at the outset of chemoradiotherapy. Funding Bowel Disease Research Foundation.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colostomy</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Dose Fractionation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intestine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Remission Induction</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Watchful Waiting</subject><issn>1470-2045</issn><issn>1474-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkt2K1TAUhYsozjj6CErAmzMX1SRN0h4vFDn4BwMD_uBlSNNdm2NPU7PTGfpKPqXp6agwIF4lJN9ee2WvZNljRp8xytTzT0yUNOdUyA2T55QKVeb8TnaajkUuRVXdPe5X5CR7gLinlJWMyvvZCVcllZUUp9nPrybaLjdDk18bF4kZx-CN7cgVBJyQ4BS-OWt6EgDBRucHYtoIgdgODj6YxvnYQTDjTFofyGiigyEiuXaxSzU2plJrBpsqNgkkl8POfwSSmuzT5fkLYpb9CAO6OOdofQByWCxBQ6zvfEiWBtPP6PBhdq81PcKjm_Us-_L2zefd-_zi8t2H3euL3EpexdzUlgu1BcWqopJtbQSTUNdbaUrTioYJaymYomlLWyrVVo0ELmgLtS1UpaQozrLNqpuM_ZgAoz44tND3ZgA_oWalkoxJynlCn95C934KyS9qznjJKrYK_pNKWkXKbnuk5ErZ4BEDtHoM7mDCrBnVS-T6GLle8tRM6mPkevHw5EZ9qg_Q_Kn6nXECXq0ApKFdOQgabQrJQuOWgHTj3X9bvLylYHs3LN_iO8yAf1-jkWu6iiwaaUiLAi9-ASXk0rU</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Renehan, Andrew G, Prof</creator><creator>Malcomson, Lee, BSc</creator><creator>Emsley, Richard, PhD</creator><creator>Gollins, Simon, DPhil</creator><creator>Maw, Andrew, MBBS</creator><creator>Myint, Arthur Sun, Prof</creator><creator>Rooney, Paul S, DM</creator><creator>Susnerwala, Shabbir, MD</creator><creator>Blower, Anthony, MD</creator><creator>Saunders, Mark P, PhD</creator><creator>Wilson, Malcolm S, MD</creator><creator>Scott, Nigel, MD</creator><creator>O'Dwyer, Sarah T, Prof</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis</title><author>Renehan, Andrew G, Prof ; Malcomson, Lee, BSc ; Emsley, Richard, PhD ; Gollins, Simon, DPhil ; Maw, Andrew, MBBS ; Myint, Arthur Sun, Prof ; Rooney, Paul S, DM ; Susnerwala, Shabbir, MD ; Blower, Anthony, MD ; Saunders, Mark P, PhD ; Wilson, Malcolm S, MD ; Scott, Nigel, MD ; O'Dwyer, Sarah T, Prof</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c528t-abc2469e618385fba415ebb95a7af4d14cc0ea3df7c766f8d5e240febc3686543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colostomy</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Dose Fractionation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorouracil - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intestine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Remission Induction</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Watchful Waiting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Renehan, Andrew G, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malcomson, Lee, BSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emsley, Richard, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gollins, Simon, DPhil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maw, Andrew, MBBS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myint, Arthur Sun, Prof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, Paul S, DM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Susnerwala, Shabbir, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blower, Anthony, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Mark P, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Malcolm S, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Nigel, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Dwyer, Sarah T, Prof</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Renehan, Andrew G, Prof</au><au>Malcomson, Lee, BSc</au><au>Emsley, Richard, PhD</au><au>Gollins, Simon, DPhil</au><au>Maw, Andrew, MBBS</au><au>Myint, Arthur Sun, Prof</au><au>Rooney, Paul S, DM</au><au>Susnerwala, Shabbir, MD</au><au>Blower, Anthony, MD</au><au>Saunders, Mark P, PhD</au><au>Wilson, Malcolm S, MD</au><au>Scott, Nigel, MD</au><au>O'Dwyer, Sarah T, Prof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis</atitle><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>174-183</pages><issn>1470-2045</issn><eissn>1474-5488</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>Summary Background Induction of a clinical complete response with chemoradiotherapy, followed by observation via a watch-and-wait approach, has emerged as a management option for patients with rectal cancer. We aimed to address the shortage of evidence regarding the safety of the watch-and-wait approach by comparing oncological outcomes between patients managed by watch and wait who achieved a clinical complete response and those who had surgical resection (standard care). Methods Oncological Outcomes after Clinical Complete Response in Patients with Rectal Cancer (OnCoRe) was a propensity-score matched cohort analysis study, that included patients of all ages diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma without distant metastases who had received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 daily fractions with concurrent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy) at a tertiary cancer centre in Manchester, UK, between Jan 14, 2011, and April 15, 2013. Patients who had a clinical complete response were offered management with the watch-and-wait approach, and patients who did not have a complete clinical response were offered surgical resection if eligible. We also included patients with a clinical complete response managed by watch and wait between March 10, 2005, and Jan 21, 2015, across three neighbouring UK regional cancer centres, whose details were obtained through a registry. For comparative analyses, we derived one-to-one paired cohorts of watch and wait versus surgical resection using propensity-score matching (including T stage, age, and performance status). The primary endpoint was non-regrowth disease-free survival from the date that chemoradiotherapy was started, and secondary endpoints were overall survival, and colostomy-free survival. We used a conservative p value of less than 0·01 to indicate statistical significance in the comparative analyses. Findings 259 patients were included in our Manchester tertiary cancer centre cohort, 228 of whom underwent surgical resection at referring hospitals and 31 of whom had a clinical complete response, managed by watch and wait. A further 98 patients were added to the watch-and-wait group via the registry. Of the 129 patients managed by watch and wait (median follow-up 33 months [IQR 19–43]), 44 (34%) had local regrowths (3-year actuarial rate 38% [95% CI 30–48]); 36 (88%) of 41 patients with non-metastatic local regrowths were salvaged. In the matched analyses (109 patients in each treatment group), no differences in 3-year non-regrowth disease-free survival were noted between watch and wait and surgical resection (88% [95% CI 75–94] with watch and wait vs 78% [63–87] with surgical resection; time-varying p=0·043). Similarly, no difference in 3-year overall survival was noted (96% [88–98] vs 87% [77–93]; time-varying p=0·024). By contrast, patients managed by watch and wait had significantly better 3-year colostomy-free survival than did those who had surgical resection (74% [95% CI 64–82] vs 47% [37–57]; hazard ratio 0·445 [95% CI 0·31–0·63; p<0·0001), with a 26% (95% CI 13–39) absolute difference in patients who avoided permanent colostomy at 3 years between treatment groups. Interpretation A substantial proportion of patients with rectal cancer managed by watch and wait avoided major surgery and averted permanent colostomy without loss of oncological safety at 3 years. These findings should inform decision making at the outset of chemoradiotherapy. Funding Bowel Disease Research Foundation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26705854</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00467-2</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-2045 |
ispartof | The lancet oncology, 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.174-183 |
issn | 1470-2045 1474-5488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765115022 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma Adenocarcinoma - mortality Adenocarcinoma - surgery Adenocarcinoma - therapy Aged Cancer therapies Case-Control Studies Chemoradiotherapy Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant Chemotherapy Clinical decision making Cohort analysis Colorectal cancer Colostomy Decision making Disease-Free Survival Dose Fractionation Female Fluorouracil - therapeutic use Follow-Up Studies Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Intestine Male Metastases Middle Aged Mortality Neoadjuvant Therapy Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy Ostomy Ovarian cancer Patients Propensity Score Radiation therapy Rectal Neoplasms - mortality Rectal Neoplasms - surgery Rectal Neoplasms - therapy Rectum Remission Induction Studies Surgery Survival Survival Rate Treatment Outcome Watchful Waiting |
title | Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A29%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Watch-and-wait%20approach%20versus%20surgical%20resection%20after%20chemoradiotherapy%20for%20patients%20with%20rectal%20cancer%20(the%20OnCoRe%20project):%20a%20propensity-score%20matched%20cohort%20analysis&rft.jtitle=The%20lancet%20oncology&rft.au=Renehan,%20Andrew%20G,%20Prof&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=174-183&rft.issn=1470-2045&rft.eissn=1474-5488&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00467-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3945807931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1763004954&rft_id=info:pmid/26705854&rft_els_id=S1470204515004672&rfr_iscdi=true |