Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis

Abstract Background Studies have demonstrated low rates of emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis patients, suggestive of ED undertreatment of anaphylaxis. Our study assessed the appropriateness of ED epinephrine administration in anaphylaxis management. Methods A prosp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of emergency medicine 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.174-179
Hauptverfasser: Baalmann, Damian V., MD, Hagan, John B., MD, Li, James T.C., MD, PhD, Hess, Erik P., MD, Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 2
container_start_page 174
container_title The American journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 34
creator Baalmann, Damian V., MD
Hagan, John B., MD
Li, James T.C., MD, PhD
Hess, Erik P., MD
Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD
description Abstract Background Studies have demonstrated low rates of emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis patients, suggestive of ED undertreatment of anaphylaxis. Our study assessed the appropriateness of ED epinephrine administration in anaphylaxis management. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted involving ED patients presenting with possible allergic reactions. Patients and ED providers completed questionnaires regarding the suspected trigger, signs and symptoms, and prehospital treatment. Two board-certified allergists-immunologists independently reviewed the questionnaires, as well as electronic health records, to determine whether the cases represented anaphylaxis and whether ED epinephrine administration was appropriate. Results Among 174 patients enrolled in the study, 61 (35%) were confirmed to have anaphylaxis. Overall, 47 anaphylaxis patients (77%) received epinephrine either before ED arrival or in the ED. In the latter situation, 24 anaphylaxis patients (39%) received epinephrine and 37 (61%) did not. Of the patients who received ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that its administration was appropriate in all cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%). Among the 37 patients who did not receive ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that nonadministration of epinephrine was appropriate in 36 patients (97%; 95% CI, 84%-100%). The allergists-immunologists determined that overall, ED management was appropriate for 60 (98%) of 61 patients with anaphylaxis (95% CI, 90%-100%). Conclusions Although more than 60% of anaphylaxis patients did not receive epinephrine in the ED, the allergists-immunologists deemed ED management appropriate in 98% of total cases. Previous retrospective studies may underestimate the appropriateness of ED anaphylaxis management, particularly when prehospital epinephrine administration is not reported.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765110255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S073567571500844X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1765110255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b5f2df88c2b1ce4d4db2b20d4902ef7e82a7560e535428400d959e1e41c070c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpaDZpXyCHYuilF29mZMmyIRTSNG0CgRzaQm9ClsesXK_tSnbbffvI3aSBHHKRYPj-YeYbxk4Q1giYn7Zr09J2zQFlLKwBshdshTLjaYEKX7IVqEymuZLqkB2F0AIgCilesUOeS8FVKVfs4_k4-mH0zkzUUwjJ0CQ0up7GjY9vMgdKXJ9cfkpGMznqp5D8cdMmMb0ZN7vO_HXhNTtoTBfozf1_zL5_vvx2cZXe3H65vji_Sa3IyimtZMPrpigsr9CSqEVd8YpDLUrg1CgquFEyB5JZnK0QAHUpS0ISaEGBLbNj9n7fNw78a6Yw6a0LlrrO9DTMQaPKJSJwKSP67gnaDrPv43T_KFnyHBaK7ynrhxA8NTp62Bq_0wh6MaxbvRjWi-GlFg3H0Nv71nO1pfp_5EFpBM72AEUXvx15HWwUZ6l2nuyk68E93__Dk7jtXO-s6X7SjsLjHjpwDfrrcuPlxCgBCiF-ZHc9yJ_m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765592605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Baalmann, Damian V., MD ; Hagan, John B., MD ; Li, James T.C., MD, PhD ; Hess, Erik P., MD ; Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Baalmann, Damian V., MD ; Hagan, John B., MD ; Li, James T.C., MD, PhD ; Hess, Erik P., MD ; Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Studies have demonstrated low rates of emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis patients, suggestive of ED undertreatment of anaphylaxis. Our study assessed the appropriateness of ED epinephrine administration in anaphylaxis management. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted involving ED patients presenting with possible allergic reactions. Patients and ED providers completed questionnaires regarding the suspected trigger, signs and symptoms, and prehospital treatment. Two board-certified allergists-immunologists independently reviewed the questionnaires, as well as electronic health records, to determine whether the cases represented anaphylaxis and whether ED epinephrine administration was appropriate. Results Among 174 patients enrolled in the study, 61 (35%) were confirmed to have anaphylaxis. Overall, 47 anaphylaxis patients (77%) received epinephrine either before ED arrival or in the ED. In the latter situation, 24 anaphylaxis patients (39%) received epinephrine and 37 (61%) did not. Of the patients who received ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that its administration was appropriate in all cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%). Among the 37 patients who did not receive ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that nonadministration of epinephrine was appropriate in 36 patients (97%; 95% CI, 84%-100%). The allergists-immunologists determined that overall, ED management was appropriate for 60 (98%) of 61 patients with anaphylaxis (95% CI, 90%-100%). Conclusions Although more than 60% of anaphylaxis patients did not receive epinephrine in the ED, the allergists-immunologists deemed ED management appropriate in 98% of total cases. Previous retrospective studies may underestimate the appropriateness of ED anaphylaxis management, particularly when prehospital epinephrine administration is not reported.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26542795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Aged ; Agreements ; Allergies ; Anaphylaxis ; Anaphylaxis - drug therapy ; Asthma ; Caregivers ; Confidence intervals ; Emergency ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Epinephrine - therapeutic use ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Immunology ; Intensive care ; Male ; Maximum likelihood method ; Middle Aged ; Observational studies ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.174-179</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b5f2df88c2b1ce4d4db2b20d4902ef7e82a7560e535428400d959e1e41c070c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b5f2df88c2b1ce4d4db2b20d4902ef7e82a7560e535428400d959e1e41c070c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1765592605?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26542795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baalmann, Damian V., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagan, John B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, James T.C., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Erik P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Studies have demonstrated low rates of emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis patients, suggestive of ED undertreatment of anaphylaxis. Our study assessed the appropriateness of ED epinephrine administration in anaphylaxis management. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted involving ED patients presenting with possible allergic reactions. Patients and ED providers completed questionnaires regarding the suspected trigger, signs and symptoms, and prehospital treatment. Two board-certified allergists-immunologists independently reviewed the questionnaires, as well as electronic health records, to determine whether the cases represented anaphylaxis and whether ED epinephrine administration was appropriate. Results Among 174 patients enrolled in the study, 61 (35%) were confirmed to have anaphylaxis. Overall, 47 anaphylaxis patients (77%) received epinephrine either before ED arrival or in the ED. In the latter situation, 24 anaphylaxis patients (39%) received epinephrine and 37 (61%) did not. Of the patients who received ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that its administration was appropriate in all cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%). Among the 37 patients who did not receive ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that nonadministration of epinephrine was appropriate in 36 patients (97%; 95% CI, 84%-100%). The allergists-immunologists determined that overall, ED management was appropriate for 60 (98%) of 61 patients with anaphylaxis (95% CI, 90%-100%). Conclusions Although more than 60% of anaphylaxis patients did not receive epinephrine in the ED, the allergists-immunologists deemed ED management appropriate in 98% of total cases. Previous retrospective studies may underestimate the appropriateness of ED anaphylaxis management, particularly when prehospital epinephrine administration is not reported.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Epinephrine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximum likelihood method</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpaDZpXyCHYuilF29mZMmyIRTSNG0CgRzaQm9ClsesXK_tSnbbffvI3aSBHHKRYPj-YeYbxk4Q1giYn7Zr09J2zQFlLKwBshdshTLjaYEKX7IVqEymuZLqkB2F0AIgCilesUOeS8FVKVfs4_k4-mH0zkzUUwjJ0CQ0up7GjY9vMgdKXJ9cfkpGMznqp5D8cdMmMb0ZN7vO_HXhNTtoTBfozf1_zL5_vvx2cZXe3H65vji_Sa3IyimtZMPrpigsr9CSqEVd8YpDLUrg1CgquFEyB5JZnK0QAHUpS0ISaEGBLbNj9n7fNw78a6Yw6a0LlrrO9DTMQaPKJSJwKSP67gnaDrPv43T_KFnyHBaK7ynrhxA8NTp62Bq_0wh6MaxbvRjWi-GlFg3H0Nv71nO1pfp_5EFpBM72AEUXvx15HWwUZ6l2nuyk68E93__Dk7jtXO-s6X7SjsLjHjpwDfrrcuPlxCgBCiF-ZHc9yJ_m</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Baalmann, Damian V., MD</creator><creator>Hagan, John B., MD</creator><creator>Li, James T.C., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Hess, Erik P., MD</creator><creator>Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis</title><author>Baalmann, Damian V., MD ; Hagan, John B., MD ; Li, James T.C., MD, PhD ; Hess, Erik P., MD ; Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b5f2df88c2b1ce4d4db2b20d4902ef7e82a7560e535428400d959e1e41c070c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Epinephrine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximum likelihood method</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baalmann, Damian V., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagan, John B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, James T.C., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Erik P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baalmann, Damian V., MD</au><au>Hagan, John B., MD</au><au>Li, James T.C., MD, PhD</au><au>Hess, Erik P., MD</au><au>Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>174-179</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Studies have demonstrated low rates of emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis patients, suggestive of ED undertreatment of anaphylaxis. Our study assessed the appropriateness of ED epinephrine administration in anaphylaxis management. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted involving ED patients presenting with possible allergic reactions. Patients and ED providers completed questionnaires regarding the suspected trigger, signs and symptoms, and prehospital treatment. Two board-certified allergists-immunologists independently reviewed the questionnaires, as well as electronic health records, to determine whether the cases represented anaphylaxis and whether ED epinephrine administration was appropriate. Results Among 174 patients enrolled in the study, 61 (35%) were confirmed to have anaphylaxis. Overall, 47 anaphylaxis patients (77%) received epinephrine either before ED arrival or in the ED. In the latter situation, 24 anaphylaxis patients (39%) received epinephrine and 37 (61%) did not. Of the patients who received ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that its administration was appropriate in all cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%). Among the 37 patients who did not receive ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that nonadministration of epinephrine was appropriate in 36 patients (97%; 95% CI, 84%-100%). The allergists-immunologists determined that overall, ED management was appropriate for 60 (98%) of 61 patients with anaphylaxis (95% CI, 90%-100%). Conclusions Although more than 60% of anaphylaxis patients did not receive epinephrine in the ED, the allergists-immunologists deemed ED management appropriate in 98% of total cases. Previous retrospective studies may underestimate the appropriateness of ED anaphylaxis management, particularly when prehospital epinephrine administration is not reported.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26542795</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-6757
ispartof The American journal of emergency medicine, 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.174-179
issn 0735-6757
1532-8171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765110255
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Age
Aged
Agreements
Allergies
Anaphylaxis
Anaphylaxis - drug therapy
Asthma
Caregivers
Confidence intervals
Emergency
Emergency medical care
Emergency medical services
Emergency Service, Hospital
Epinephrine - therapeutic use
Female
Hospitals
Humans
Immunology
Intensive care
Male
Maximum likelihood method
Middle Aged
Observational studies
Prospective Studies
Risk Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A19%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appropriateness%20of%20epinephrine%20use%20in%20ED%20patients%20with%20anaphylaxis&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Baalmann,%20Damian%20V.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=174-179&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1765110255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765592605&rft_id=info:pmid/26542795&rft_els_id=S073567571500844X&rfr_iscdi=true