Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis
Abstract Background Studies have demonstrated low rates of emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis patients, suggestive of ED undertreatment of anaphylaxis. Our study assessed the appropriateness of ED epinephrine administration in anaphylaxis management. Methods A prosp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of emergency medicine 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.174-179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 174 |
container_title | The American journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Baalmann, Damian V., MD Hagan, John B., MD Li, James T.C., MD, PhD Hess, Erik P., MD Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD |
description | Abstract Background Studies have demonstrated low rates of emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis patients, suggestive of ED undertreatment of anaphylaxis. Our study assessed the appropriateness of ED epinephrine administration in anaphylaxis management. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted involving ED patients presenting with possible allergic reactions. Patients and ED providers completed questionnaires regarding the suspected trigger, signs and symptoms, and prehospital treatment. Two board-certified allergists-immunologists independently reviewed the questionnaires, as well as electronic health records, to determine whether the cases represented anaphylaxis and whether ED epinephrine administration was appropriate. Results Among 174 patients enrolled in the study, 61 (35%) were confirmed to have anaphylaxis. Overall, 47 anaphylaxis patients (77%) received epinephrine either before ED arrival or in the ED. In the latter situation, 24 anaphylaxis patients (39%) received epinephrine and 37 (61%) did not. Of the patients who received ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that its administration was appropriate in all cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%). Among the 37 patients who did not receive ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that nonadministration of epinephrine was appropriate in 36 patients (97%; 95% CI, 84%-100%). The allergists-immunologists determined that overall, ED management was appropriate for 60 (98%) of 61 patients with anaphylaxis (95% CI, 90%-100%). Conclusions Although more than 60% of anaphylaxis patients did not receive epinephrine in the ED, the allergists-immunologists deemed ED management appropriate in 98% of total cases. Previous retrospective studies may underestimate the appropriateness of ED anaphylaxis management, particularly when prehospital epinephrine administration is not reported. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765110255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S073567571500844X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1765110255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b5f2df88c2b1ce4d4db2b20d4902ef7e82a7560e535428400d959e1e41c070c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpaDZpXyCHYuilF29mZMmyIRTSNG0CgRzaQm9ClsesXK_tSnbbffvI3aSBHHKRYPj-YeYbxk4Q1giYn7Zr09J2zQFlLKwBshdshTLjaYEKX7IVqEymuZLqkB2F0AIgCilesUOeS8FVKVfs4_k4-mH0zkzUUwjJ0CQ0up7GjY9vMgdKXJ9cfkpGMznqp5D8cdMmMb0ZN7vO_HXhNTtoTBfozf1_zL5_vvx2cZXe3H65vji_Sa3IyimtZMPrpigsr9CSqEVd8YpDLUrg1CgquFEyB5JZnK0QAHUpS0ISaEGBLbNj9n7fNw78a6Yw6a0LlrrO9DTMQaPKJSJwKSP67gnaDrPv43T_KFnyHBaK7ynrhxA8NTp62Bq_0wh6MaxbvRjWi-GlFg3H0Nv71nO1pfp_5EFpBM72AEUXvx15HWwUZ6l2nuyk68E93__Dk7jtXO-s6X7SjsLjHjpwDfrrcuPlxCgBCiF-ZHc9yJ_m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765592605</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Baalmann, Damian V., MD ; Hagan, John B., MD ; Li, James T.C., MD, PhD ; Hess, Erik P., MD ; Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Baalmann, Damian V., MD ; Hagan, John B., MD ; Li, James T.C., MD, PhD ; Hess, Erik P., MD ; Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Studies have demonstrated low rates of emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis patients, suggestive of ED undertreatment of anaphylaxis. Our study assessed the appropriateness of ED epinephrine administration in anaphylaxis management. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted involving ED patients presenting with possible allergic reactions. Patients and ED providers completed questionnaires regarding the suspected trigger, signs and symptoms, and prehospital treatment. Two board-certified allergists-immunologists independently reviewed the questionnaires, as well as electronic health records, to determine whether the cases represented anaphylaxis and whether ED epinephrine administration was appropriate. Results Among 174 patients enrolled in the study, 61 (35%) were confirmed to have anaphylaxis. Overall, 47 anaphylaxis patients (77%) received epinephrine either before ED arrival or in the ED. In the latter situation, 24 anaphylaxis patients (39%) received epinephrine and 37 (61%) did not. Of the patients who received ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that its administration was appropriate in all cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%). Among the 37 patients who did not receive ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that nonadministration of epinephrine was appropriate in 36 patients (97%; 95% CI, 84%-100%). The allergists-immunologists determined that overall, ED management was appropriate for 60 (98%) of 61 patients with anaphylaxis (95% CI, 90%-100%). Conclusions Although more than 60% of anaphylaxis patients did not receive epinephrine in the ED, the allergists-immunologists deemed ED management appropriate in 98% of total cases. Previous retrospective studies may underestimate the appropriateness of ED anaphylaxis management, particularly when prehospital epinephrine administration is not reported.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26542795</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Aged ; Agreements ; Allergies ; Anaphylaxis ; Anaphylaxis - drug therapy ; Asthma ; Caregivers ; Confidence intervals ; Emergency ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Epinephrine - therapeutic use ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Immunology ; Intensive care ; Male ; Maximum likelihood method ; Middle Aged ; Observational studies ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.174-179</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b5f2df88c2b1ce4d4db2b20d4902ef7e82a7560e535428400d959e1e41c070c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b5f2df88c2b1ce4d4db2b20d4902ef7e82a7560e535428400d959e1e41c070c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1765592605?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26542795$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baalmann, Damian V., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagan, John B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, James T.C., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Erik P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Studies have demonstrated low rates of emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis patients, suggestive of ED undertreatment of anaphylaxis. Our study assessed the appropriateness of ED epinephrine administration in anaphylaxis management. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted involving ED patients presenting with possible allergic reactions. Patients and ED providers completed questionnaires regarding the suspected trigger, signs and symptoms, and prehospital treatment. Two board-certified allergists-immunologists independently reviewed the questionnaires, as well as electronic health records, to determine whether the cases represented anaphylaxis and whether ED epinephrine administration was appropriate. Results Among 174 patients enrolled in the study, 61 (35%) were confirmed to have anaphylaxis. Overall, 47 anaphylaxis patients (77%) received epinephrine either before ED arrival or in the ED. In the latter situation, 24 anaphylaxis patients (39%) received epinephrine and 37 (61%) did not. Of the patients who received ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that its administration was appropriate in all cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%). Among the 37 patients who did not receive ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that nonadministration of epinephrine was appropriate in 36 patients (97%; 95% CI, 84%-100%). The allergists-immunologists determined that overall, ED management was appropriate for 60 (98%) of 61 patients with anaphylaxis (95% CI, 90%-100%). Conclusions Although more than 60% of anaphylaxis patients did not receive epinephrine in the ED, the allergists-immunologists deemed ED management appropriate in 98% of total cases. Previous retrospective studies may underestimate the appropriateness of ED anaphylaxis management, particularly when prehospital epinephrine administration is not reported.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Epinephrine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximum likelihood method</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpaDZpXyCHYuilF29mZMmyIRTSNG0CgRzaQm9ClsesXK_tSnbbffvI3aSBHHKRYPj-YeYbxk4Q1giYn7Zr09J2zQFlLKwBshdshTLjaYEKX7IVqEymuZLqkB2F0AIgCilesUOeS8FVKVfs4_k4-mH0zkzUUwjJ0CQ0up7GjY9vMgdKXJ9cfkpGMznqp5D8cdMmMb0ZN7vO_HXhNTtoTBfozf1_zL5_vvx2cZXe3H65vji_Sa3IyimtZMPrpigsr9CSqEVd8YpDLUrg1CgquFEyB5JZnK0QAHUpS0ISaEGBLbNj9n7fNw78a6Yw6a0LlrrO9DTMQaPKJSJwKSP67gnaDrPv43T_KFnyHBaK7ynrhxA8NTp62Bq_0wh6MaxbvRjWi-GlFg3H0Nv71nO1pfp_5EFpBM72AEUXvx15HWwUZ6l2nuyk68E93__Dk7jtXO-s6X7SjsLjHjpwDfrrcuPlxCgBCiF-ZHc9yJ_m</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Baalmann, Damian V., MD</creator><creator>Hagan, John B., MD</creator><creator>Li, James T.C., MD, PhD</creator><creator>Hess, Erik P., MD</creator><creator>Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis</title><author>Baalmann, Damian V., MD ; Hagan, John B., MD ; Li, James T.C., MD, PhD ; Hess, Erik P., MD ; Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-b5f2df88c2b1ce4d4db2b20d4902ef7e82a7560e535428400d959e1e41c070c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Epinephrine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximum likelihood method</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baalmann, Damian V., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagan, John B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, James T.C., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hess, Erik P., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baalmann, Damian V., MD</au><au>Hagan, John B., MD</au><au>Li, James T.C., MD, PhD</au><au>Hess, Erik P., MD</au><au>Campbell, Ronna L., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>174-179</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Studies have demonstrated low rates of emergency department (ED) epinephrine administration for anaphylaxis patients, suggestive of ED undertreatment of anaphylaxis. Our study assessed the appropriateness of ED epinephrine administration in anaphylaxis management. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted involving ED patients presenting with possible allergic reactions. Patients and ED providers completed questionnaires regarding the suspected trigger, signs and symptoms, and prehospital treatment. Two board-certified allergists-immunologists independently reviewed the questionnaires, as well as electronic health records, to determine whether the cases represented anaphylaxis and whether ED epinephrine administration was appropriate. Results Among 174 patients enrolled in the study, 61 (35%) were confirmed to have anaphylaxis. Overall, 47 anaphylaxis patients (77%) received epinephrine either before ED arrival or in the ED. In the latter situation, 24 anaphylaxis patients (39%) received epinephrine and 37 (61%) did not. Of the patients who received ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that its administration was appropriate in all cases (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-100%). Among the 37 patients who did not receive ED epinephrine, the allergists-immunologists determined that nonadministration of epinephrine was appropriate in 36 patients (97%; 95% CI, 84%-100%). The allergists-immunologists determined that overall, ED management was appropriate for 60 (98%) of 61 patients with anaphylaxis (95% CI, 90%-100%). Conclusions Although more than 60% of anaphylaxis patients did not receive epinephrine in the ED, the allergists-immunologists deemed ED management appropriate in 98% of total cases. Previous retrospective studies may underestimate the appropriateness of ED anaphylaxis management, particularly when prehospital epinephrine administration is not reported.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26542795</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-6757 |
ispartof | The American journal of emergency medicine, 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.174-179 |
issn | 0735-6757 1532-8171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765110255 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Age Aged Agreements Allergies Anaphylaxis Anaphylaxis - drug therapy Asthma Caregivers Confidence intervals Emergency Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Emergency Service, Hospital Epinephrine - therapeutic use Female Hospitals Humans Immunology Intensive care Male Maximum likelihood method Middle Aged Observational studies Prospective Studies Risk Factors Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Appropriateness of epinephrine use in ED patients with anaphylaxis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A19%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appropriateness%20of%20epinephrine%20use%20in%20ED%20patients%20with%20anaphylaxis&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Baalmann,%20Damian%20V.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=174-179&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1765110255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765592605&rft_id=info:pmid/26542795&rft_els_id=S073567571500844X&rfr_iscdi=true |