Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma

Abstract Objectives Acute elbow injuries are common in the acute care setting. A previous study observed that limited active range of motion (ROM) was highly sensitive for radiographic injuries after blunt trauma. Our aim was to validate these findings in patients ≥ 5 years old with an acute (< 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of emergency medicine 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.235-239
Hauptverfasser: Vinson, David R., MD, Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc, Gaona, Samuel D., BS, Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 239
container_issue 2
container_start_page 235
container_title The American journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 34
creator Vinson, David R., MD
Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc
Gaona, Samuel D., BS
Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH
description Abstract Objectives Acute elbow injuries are common in the acute care setting. A previous study observed that limited active range of motion (ROM) was highly sensitive for radiographic injuries after blunt trauma. Our aim was to validate these findings in patients ≥ 5 years old with an acute (< 24 hours) nonpenetrating elbow injury. Methods This prospective study included a convenience sample of patients undergoing plain radiographs of an injured elbow in 3 emergency departments. Before imaging, treating clinicians completed a standardized data collection sheet including mechanism of injury and 4-way ROM findings (full extension, flexion to 90°, full pronation and supination). Radiographic interpretation by a staff radiologist was used to ascertain the presence of fracture or joint effusion. Results The median age of the 251 patients was 24 years. Ninety-two patients (36.7%) had active 4-way ROM, and 159 patients (63.3%) demonstrated limited ROM. Negative radiographs were present in 152 patients (60.6%), whereas 99 patients (39.4%) had abnormal radiographs: 75 with explicit fractures and 24 with only joint effusions. The 4-way ROM elbow test had a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.00), specificity of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.68), positive predictive value of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.54-0.69), and negative predictive value of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Conclusions Active 4-way ROM test is 99% sensitive for all radiographic injures following blunt elbow trauma and 100% sensitive for injuries requiring surgical intervention. Caution should be used in relying on this test in the pediatric population until it is validated in a larger cohort.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765108676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735675715009171</els_id><sourcerecordid>1765108676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-42bff32e6f11ab5b10b360e89c26b63231274858ca0a2237b52e3fcb384b67ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGPFCEUhInRuLOrf8CD4eilRx400JMYE7PR1WQTTdQzAvN6l7a7GYF2M_9e2lk9ePBEUlRV4CtCngHbAgP1ctjaAactZyCrsGUCHpANSMGbDjQ8JBumhWyUlvqMnOc8MAbQyvYxOeNK7nS7kxvy7ROmPqbJzh5p7Gm5Rdo2d_ZIk51vfktTLCHOtGAutFrrxT7Em2QPt8HTMA9LCpip7Qsm6sZlLhRHF-9oSXaZ7BPyqLdjxqf35wX5-u7tl8v3zfXHqw-Xb64b3wKUpuWu7wVH1QNYJx0wJxTDbue5ckpwAVy3ney8ZZZzoZ3kKHrvRNc6pT2KC_Li1HtI8cdS32qmkD2Oo50xLtmAVhJYp7SqVn6y-hRzTtibQwqTTUcDzKxkzWBWsmYlu2qVbA09v-9f3IT7v5E_KKvh1cmA9Zc_AyaTfcCKdR8S-mL2Mfy___U_cT-GOXg7fscj5iEuaa78DJjMDTOf123XaUEytqtzi1-RZZ62</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765108676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Vinson, David R., MD ; Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc ; Gaona, Samuel D., BS ; Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Vinson, David R., MD ; Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc ; Gaona, Samuel D., BS ; Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives Acute elbow injuries are common in the acute care setting. A previous study observed that limited active range of motion (ROM) was highly sensitive for radiographic injuries after blunt trauma. Our aim was to validate these findings in patients ≥ 5 years old with an acute (&lt; 24 hours) nonpenetrating elbow injury. Methods This prospective study included a convenience sample of patients undergoing plain radiographs of an injured elbow in 3 emergency departments. Before imaging, treating clinicians completed a standardized data collection sheet including mechanism of injury and 4-way ROM findings (full extension, flexion to 90°, full pronation and supination). Radiographic interpretation by a staff radiologist was used to ascertain the presence of fracture or joint effusion. Results The median age of the 251 patients was 24 years. Ninety-two patients (36.7%) had active 4-way ROM, and 159 patients (63.3%) demonstrated limited ROM. Negative radiographs were present in 152 patients (60.6%), whereas 99 patients (39.4%) had abnormal radiographs: 75 with explicit fractures and 24 with only joint effusions. The 4-way ROM elbow test had a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.00), specificity of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.68), positive predictive value of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.54-0.69), and negative predictive value of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Conclusions Active 4-way ROM test is 99% sensitive for all radiographic injures following blunt elbow trauma and 100% sensitive for injuries requiring surgical intervention. Caution should be used in relying on this test in the pediatric population until it is validated in a larger cohort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26597495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Elbow Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Elbow Joint - injuries ; Emergency ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.235-239</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-42bff32e6f11ab5b10b360e89c26b63231274858ca0a2237b52e3fcb384b67ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-42bff32e6f11ab5b10b360e89c26b63231274858ca0a2237b52e3fcb384b67ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993,64385</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597495$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vinson, David R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaona, Samuel D., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives Acute elbow injuries are common in the acute care setting. A previous study observed that limited active range of motion (ROM) was highly sensitive for radiographic injuries after blunt trauma. Our aim was to validate these findings in patients ≥ 5 years old with an acute (&lt; 24 hours) nonpenetrating elbow injury. Methods This prospective study included a convenience sample of patients undergoing plain radiographs of an injured elbow in 3 emergency departments. Before imaging, treating clinicians completed a standardized data collection sheet including mechanism of injury and 4-way ROM findings (full extension, flexion to 90°, full pronation and supination). Radiographic interpretation by a staff radiologist was used to ascertain the presence of fracture or joint effusion. Results The median age of the 251 patients was 24 years. Ninety-two patients (36.7%) had active 4-way ROM, and 159 patients (63.3%) demonstrated limited ROM. Negative radiographs were present in 152 patients (60.6%), whereas 99 patients (39.4%) had abnormal radiographs: 75 with explicit fractures and 24 with only joint effusions. The 4-way ROM elbow test had a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.00), specificity of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.68), positive predictive value of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.54-0.69), and negative predictive value of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Conclusions Active 4-way ROM test is 99% sensitive for all radiographic injures following blunt elbow trauma and 100% sensitive for injuries requiring surgical intervention. Caution should be used in relying on this test in the pediatric population until it is validated in a larger cohort.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Elbow Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Elbow Joint - injuries</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGPFCEUhInRuLOrf8CD4eilRx400JMYE7PR1WQTTdQzAvN6l7a7GYF2M_9e2lk9ePBEUlRV4CtCngHbAgP1ctjaAactZyCrsGUCHpANSMGbDjQ8JBumhWyUlvqMnOc8MAbQyvYxOeNK7nS7kxvy7ROmPqbJzh5p7Gm5Rdo2d_ZIk51vfktTLCHOtGAutFrrxT7Em2QPt8HTMA9LCpip7Qsm6sZlLhRHF-9oSXaZ7BPyqLdjxqf35wX5-u7tl8v3zfXHqw-Xb64b3wKUpuWu7wVH1QNYJx0wJxTDbue5ckpwAVy3ney8ZZZzoZ3kKHrvRNc6pT2KC_Li1HtI8cdS32qmkD2Oo50xLtmAVhJYp7SqVn6y-hRzTtibQwqTTUcDzKxkzWBWsmYlu2qVbA09v-9f3IT7v5E_KKvh1cmA9Zc_AyaTfcCKdR8S-mL2Mfy___U_cT-GOXg7fscj5iEuaa78DJjMDTOf123XaUEytqtzi1-RZZ62</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Vinson, David R., MD</creator><creator>Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Gaona, Samuel D., BS</creator><creator>Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma</title><author>Vinson, David R., MD ; Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc ; Gaona, Samuel D., BS ; Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-42bff32e6f11ab5b10b360e89c26b63231274858ca0a2237b52e3fcb384b67ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Elbow Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Elbow Joint - injuries</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vinson, David R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaona, Samuel D., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vinson, David R., MD</au><au>Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc</au><au>Gaona, Samuel D., BS</au><au>Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>235-239</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives Acute elbow injuries are common in the acute care setting. A previous study observed that limited active range of motion (ROM) was highly sensitive for radiographic injuries after blunt trauma. Our aim was to validate these findings in patients ≥ 5 years old with an acute (&lt; 24 hours) nonpenetrating elbow injury. Methods This prospective study included a convenience sample of patients undergoing plain radiographs of an injured elbow in 3 emergency departments. Before imaging, treating clinicians completed a standardized data collection sheet including mechanism of injury and 4-way ROM findings (full extension, flexion to 90°, full pronation and supination). Radiographic interpretation by a staff radiologist was used to ascertain the presence of fracture or joint effusion. Results The median age of the 251 patients was 24 years. Ninety-two patients (36.7%) had active 4-way ROM, and 159 patients (63.3%) demonstrated limited ROM. Negative radiographs were present in 152 patients (60.6%), whereas 99 patients (39.4%) had abnormal radiographs: 75 with explicit fractures and 24 with only joint effusions. The 4-way ROM elbow test had a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.00), specificity of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.68), positive predictive value of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.54-0.69), and negative predictive value of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Conclusions Active 4-way ROM test is 99% sensitive for all radiographic injures following blunt elbow trauma and 100% sensitive for injuries requiring surgical intervention. Caution should be used in relying on this test in the pediatric population until it is validated in a larger cohort.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26597495</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-6757
ispartof The American journal of emergency medicine, 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.235-239
issn 0735-6757
1532-8171
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765108676
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Child, Preschool
Elbow Joint - diagnostic imaging
Elbow Joint - injuries
Emergency
Emergency Service, Hospital
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Radiography
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging
Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology
title Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A42%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20the%204-way%20range%20of%20motion%20test%20for%20radiographic%20injuries%20after%20blunt%20elbow%20trauma&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Vinson,%20David%20R.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=235-239&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1765108676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765108676&rft_id=info:pmid/26597495&rft_els_id=S0735675715009171&rfr_iscdi=true