Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma
Abstract Objectives Acute elbow injuries are common in the acute care setting. A previous study observed that limited active range of motion (ROM) was highly sensitive for radiographic injuries after blunt trauma. Our aim was to validate these findings in patients ≥ 5 years old with an acute (< 2...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of emergency medicine 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.235-239 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 239 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 235 |
container_title | The American journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Vinson, David R., MD Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc Gaona, Samuel D., BS Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH |
description | Abstract Objectives Acute elbow injuries are common in the acute care setting. A previous study observed that limited active range of motion (ROM) was highly sensitive for radiographic injuries after blunt trauma. Our aim was to validate these findings in patients ≥ 5 years old with an acute (< 24 hours) nonpenetrating elbow injury. Methods This prospective study included a convenience sample of patients undergoing plain radiographs of an injured elbow in 3 emergency departments. Before imaging, treating clinicians completed a standardized data collection sheet including mechanism of injury and 4-way ROM findings (full extension, flexion to 90°, full pronation and supination). Radiographic interpretation by a staff radiologist was used to ascertain the presence of fracture or joint effusion. Results The median age of the 251 patients was 24 years. Ninety-two patients (36.7%) had active 4-way ROM, and 159 patients (63.3%) demonstrated limited ROM. Negative radiographs were present in 152 patients (60.6%), whereas 99 patients (39.4%) had abnormal radiographs: 75 with explicit fractures and 24 with only joint effusions. The 4-way ROM elbow test had a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.00), specificity of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.68), positive predictive value of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.54-0.69), and negative predictive value of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Conclusions Active 4-way ROM test is 99% sensitive for all radiographic injures following blunt elbow trauma and 100% sensitive for injuries requiring surgical intervention. Caution should be used in relying on this test in the pediatric population until it is validated in a larger cohort. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765108676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0735675715009171</els_id><sourcerecordid>1765108676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-42bff32e6f11ab5b10b360e89c26b63231274858ca0a2237b52e3fcb384b67ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGPFCEUhInRuLOrf8CD4eilRx400JMYE7PR1WQTTdQzAvN6l7a7GYF2M_9e2lk9ePBEUlRV4CtCngHbAgP1ctjaAactZyCrsGUCHpANSMGbDjQ8JBumhWyUlvqMnOc8MAbQyvYxOeNK7nS7kxvy7ROmPqbJzh5p7Gm5Rdo2d_ZIk51vfktTLCHOtGAutFrrxT7Em2QPt8HTMA9LCpip7Qsm6sZlLhRHF-9oSXaZ7BPyqLdjxqf35wX5-u7tl8v3zfXHqw-Xb64b3wKUpuWu7wVH1QNYJx0wJxTDbue5ckpwAVy3ney8ZZZzoZ3kKHrvRNc6pT2KC_Li1HtI8cdS32qmkD2Oo50xLtmAVhJYp7SqVn6y-hRzTtibQwqTTUcDzKxkzWBWsmYlu2qVbA09v-9f3IT7v5E_KKvh1cmA9Zc_AyaTfcCKdR8S-mL2Mfy___U_cT-GOXg7fscj5iEuaa78DJjMDTOf123XaUEytqtzi1-RZZ62</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765108676</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Vinson, David R., MD ; Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc ; Gaona, Samuel D., BS ; Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Vinson, David R., MD ; Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc ; Gaona, Samuel D., BS ; Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives Acute elbow injuries are common in the acute care setting. A previous study observed that limited active range of motion (ROM) was highly sensitive for radiographic injuries after blunt trauma. Our aim was to validate these findings in patients ≥ 5 years old with an acute (< 24 hours) nonpenetrating elbow injury. Methods This prospective study included a convenience sample of patients undergoing plain radiographs of an injured elbow in 3 emergency departments. Before imaging, treating clinicians completed a standardized data collection sheet including mechanism of injury and 4-way ROM findings (full extension, flexion to 90°, full pronation and supination). Radiographic interpretation by a staff radiologist was used to ascertain the presence of fracture or joint effusion. Results The median age of the 251 patients was 24 years. Ninety-two patients (36.7%) had active 4-way ROM, and 159 patients (63.3%) demonstrated limited ROM. Negative radiographs were present in 152 patients (60.6%), whereas 99 patients (39.4%) had abnormal radiographs: 75 with explicit fractures and 24 with only joint effusions. The 4-way ROM elbow test had a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.00), specificity of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.68), positive predictive value of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.54-0.69), and negative predictive value of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Conclusions Active 4-way ROM test is 99% sensitive for all radiographic injures following blunt elbow trauma and 100% sensitive for injuries requiring surgical intervention. Caution should be used in relying on this test in the pediatric population until it is validated in a larger cohort.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-6757</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8171</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26597495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Elbow Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Elbow Joint - injuries ; Emergency ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Radiography ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging ; Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>The American journal of emergency medicine, 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.235-239</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-42bff32e6f11ab5b10b360e89c26b63231274858ca0a2237b52e3fcb384b67ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-42bff32e6f11ab5b10b360e89c26b63231274858ca0a2237b52e3fcb384b67ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993,64385</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26597495$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vinson, David R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaona, Samuel D., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma</title><title>The American journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives Acute elbow injuries are common in the acute care setting. A previous study observed that limited active range of motion (ROM) was highly sensitive for radiographic injuries after blunt trauma. Our aim was to validate these findings in patients ≥ 5 years old with an acute (< 24 hours) nonpenetrating elbow injury. Methods This prospective study included a convenience sample of patients undergoing plain radiographs of an injured elbow in 3 emergency departments. Before imaging, treating clinicians completed a standardized data collection sheet including mechanism of injury and 4-way ROM findings (full extension, flexion to 90°, full pronation and supination). Radiographic interpretation by a staff radiologist was used to ascertain the presence of fracture or joint effusion. Results The median age of the 251 patients was 24 years. Ninety-two patients (36.7%) had active 4-way ROM, and 159 patients (63.3%) demonstrated limited ROM. Negative radiographs were present in 152 patients (60.6%), whereas 99 patients (39.4%) had abnormal radiographs: 75 with explicit fractures and 24 with only joint effusions. The 4-way ROM elbow test had a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.00), specificity of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.68), positive predictive value of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.54-0.69), and negative predictive value of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Conclusions Active 4-way ROM test is 99% sensitive for all radiographic injures following blunt elbow trauma and 100% sensitive for injuries requiring surgical intervention. Caution should be used in relying on this test in the pediatric population until it is validated in a larger cohort.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Elbow Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Elbow Joint - injuries</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology</subject><issn>0735-6757</issn><issn>1532-8171</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUGPFCEUhInRuLOrf8CD4eilRx400JMYE7PR1WQTTdQzAvN6l7a7GYF2M_9e2lk9ePBEUlRV4CtCngHbAgP1ctjaAactZyCrsGUCHpANSMGbDjQ8JBumhWyUlvqMnOc8MAbQyvYxOeNK7nS7kxvy7ROmPqbJzh5p7Gm5Rdo2d_ZIk51vfktTLCHOtGAutFrrxT7Em2QPt8HTMA9LCpip7Qsm6sZlLhRHF-9oSXaZ7BPyqLdjxqf35wX5-u7tl8v3zfXHqw-Xb64b3wKUpuWu7wVH1QNYJx0wJxTDbue5ckpwAVy3ney8ZZZzoZ3kKHrvRNc6pT2KC_Li1HtI8cdS32qmkD2Oo50xLtmAVhJYp7SqVn6y-hRzTtibQwqTTUcDzKxkzWBWsmYlu2qVbA09v-9f3IT7v5E_KKvh1cmA9Zc_AyaTfcCKdR8S-mL2Mfy___U_cT-GOXg7fscj5iEuaa78DJjMDTOf123XaUEytqtzi1-RZZ62</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Vinson, David R., MD</creator><creator>Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc</creator><creator>Gaona, Samuel D., BS</creator><creator>Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma</title><author>Vinson, David R., MD ; Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc ; Gaona, Samuel D., BS ; Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-42bff32e6f11ab5b10b360e89c26b63231274858ca0a2237b52e3fcb384b67ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Elbow Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Elbow Joint - injuries</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vinson, David R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaona, Samuel D., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vinson, David R., MD</au><au>Kann, Gregory S., MD, MSc</au><au>Gaona, Samuel D., BS</au><au>Panacek, Edward A., MD, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>235-239</pages><issn>0735-6757</issn><eissn>1532-8171</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives Acute elbow injuries are common in the acute care setting. A previous study observed that limited active range of motion (ROM) was highly sensitive for radiographic injuries after blunt trauma. Our aim was to validate these findings in patients ≥ 5 years old with an acute (< 24 hours) nonpenetrating elbow injury. Methods This prospective study included a convenience sample of patients undergoing plain radiographs of an injured elbow in 3 emergency departments. Before imaging, treating clinicians completed a standardized data collection sheet including mechanism of injury and 4-way ROM findings (full extension, flexion to 90°, full pronation and supination). Radiographic interpretation by a staff radiologist was used to ascertain the presence of fracture or joint effusion. Results The median age of the 251 patients was 24 years. Ninety-two patients (36.7%) had active 4-way ROM, and 159 patients (63.3%) demonstrated limited ROM. Negative radiographs were present in 152 patients (60.6%), whereas 99 patients (39.4%) had abnormal radiographs: 75 with explicit fractures and 24 with only joint effusions. The 4-way ROM elbow test had a sensitivity of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.00), specificity of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.52-0.68), positive predictive value of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.54-0.69), and negative predictive value of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Conclusions Active 4-way ROM test is 99% sensitive for all radiographic injures following blunt elbow trauma and 100% sensitive for injuries requiring surgical intervention. Caution should be used in relying on this test in the pediatric population until it is validated in a larger cohort.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26597495</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-6757 |
ispartof | The American journal of emergency medicine, 2016-02, Vol.34 (2), p.235-239 |
issn | 0735-6757 1532-8171 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765108676 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Child Child, Preschool Elbow Joint - diagnostic imaging Elbow Joint - injuries Emergency Emergency Service, Hospital Female Humans Male Middle Aged Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Radiography Range of Motion, Articular - physiology Sensitivity and Specificity Wounds, Nonpenetrating - diagnostic imaging Wounds, Nonpenetrating - physiopathology |
title | Performance of the 4-way range of motion test for radiographic injuries after blunt elbow trauma |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A42%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20the%204-way%20range%20of%20motion%20test%20for%20radiographic%20injuries%20after%20blunt%20elbow%20trauma&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Vinson,%20David%20R.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=235-239&rft.issn=0735-6757&rft.eissn=1532-8171&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1765108676%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765108676&rft_id=info:pmid/26597495&rft_els_id=S0735675715009171&rfr_iscdi=true |