Impact of bladder volume on radiation dose to the rectum in the definitive treatment of prostate cancer
Our group created and routinely reviewed a dedicated prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery program. Previously, a retrospective review of our experience demonstrated that a larger bladder volume reduced radiation dose to the rectum. We conducted an observational study to con...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of community and supportive oncology 2015-08, Vol.13 (8), p.288-291 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 291 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 288 |
container_title | The Journal of community and supportive oncology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Frizzell, Bart Lovato, James Foster, Jennifer Towers, Ashley Lucas, John Able, Charles |
description | Our group created and routinely reviewed a dedicated prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery program. Previously, a retrospective review of our experience demonstrated that a larger bladder volume reduced radiation dose to the rectum. We conducted an observational study to confirm this relationship.
Men receiving definitive radiation for prostate cancer were eligible for the study. Eligible patients received 2 computed axial tomography (CT) scans on the day of their planning CT scan: 1 with a full bladder and 1 with an empty bladder. On each CT data set, the prostate, rectum, bladder, penile bulb, and femoral heads were contoured. 2 IMRT plans were completed on each dataset: 1 by a medical dosimetrist and 1 by a medical physicist. The study plans targeted the prostate to 79.2 Gray (Gy) while respecting predefined dose tolerances to the other contoured structures. Rectal doses were compared on empty and full bladder CT data sets.
From June 29, 2010 to December 14, 2011, 17 full bladder data sets and 15 empty bladder data sets were available for analysis. Median change in bladder volume was 63 ml. Full vs empty bladder set-up was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the mean rectal dose of 25.41 Gy vs 27.6 Gy (P = .031).
Small sample size and small variations in bladder volumes.
A greater bladder volume resulted in a reduced mean dose to the rectum irrespective of planning method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.12788/jcso.0156 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764702273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1764702273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1329-2ce2c938880bb0edff76391647eef7c3149934f2f1fea2374a5163072dd33af83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhnNQbKm9-AMkRxG25mO7SY5S_CgUvOh5ySYTTdnd1CRb8N-7_dDTzDAP7wwPQjeULCgTUj5sTQoLQpfVBZoyzkkhRKkmaJ7SlhBCGZWqkldowiq5VFWlpuhz3e20yTg43LTaWoh4H9qhAxx6HLX1OvuxsyEBzgHnL8ARTB467PvjZMH53me_H_cRdO6gP6btYkhZZ8BG9wbiNbp0uk0wP9cZ-nh-el-9Fpu3l_XqcVMYypkqmAFmFJdSkqYhYJ0TFVe0KgWAE4bTUileOuaoA824KPWSVpwIZi3n2kk-Q3en3PH-9wAp151PBtpW9xCGVFMxZhHGBB_R-xNqxldTBFfvou90_KkpqY8-64PP-uBzhG_PuUPTgf1H_0zyX80jc2c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1764702273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of bladder volume on radiation dose to the rectum in the definitive treatment of prostate cancer</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Frizzell, Bart ; Lovato, James ; Foster, Jennifer ; Towers, Ashley ; Lucas, John ; Able, Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Frizzell, Bart ; Lovato, James ; Foster, Jennifer ; Towers, Ashley ; Lucas, John ; Able, Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Our group created and routinely reviewed a dedicated prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery program. Previously, a retrospective review of our experience demonstrated that a larger bladder volume reduced radiation dose to the rectum. We conducted an observational study to confirm this relationship.
Men receiving definitive radiation for prostate cancer were eligible for the study. Eligible patients received 2 computed axial tomography (CT) scans on the day of their planning CT scan: 1 with a full bladder and 1 with an empty bladder. On each CT data set, the prostate, rectum, bladder, penile bulb, and femoral heads were contoured. 2 IMRT plans were completed on each dataset: 1 by a medical dosimetrist and 1 by a medical physicist. The study plans targeted the prostate to 79.2 Gray (Gy) while respecting predefined dose tolerances to the other contoured structures. Rectal doses were compared on empty and full bladder CT data sets.
From June 29, 2010 to December 14, 2011, 17 full bladder data sets and 15 empty bladder data sets were available for analysis. Median change in bladder volume was 63 ml. Full vs empty bladder set-up was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the mean rectal dose of 25.41 Gy vs 27.6 Gy (P = .031).
Small sample size and small variations in bladder volumes.
A greater bladder volume resulted in a reduced mean dose to the rectum irrespective of planning method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2330-7749</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12788/jcso.0156</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26859669</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>The Journal of community and supportive oncology, 2015-08, Vol.13 (8), p.288-291</ispartof><rights>2015 Frontline Medical Communications.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1329-2ce2c938880bb0edff76391647eef7c3149934f2f1fea2374a5163072dd33af83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26859669$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frizzell, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovato, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Towers, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Able, Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of bladder volume on radiation dose to the rectum in the definitive treatment of prostate cancer</title><title>The Journal of community and supportive oncology</title><addtitle>J Community Support Oncol</addtitle><description>Our group created and routinely reviewed a dedicated prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery program. Previously, a retrospective review of our experience demonstrated that a larger bladder volume reduced radiation dose to the rectum. We conducted an observational study to confirm this relationship.
Men receiving definitive radiation for prostate cancer were eligible for the study. Eligible patients received 2 computed axial tomography (CT) scans on the day of their planning CT scan: 1 with a full bladder and 1 with an empty bladder. On each CT data set, the prostate, rectum, bladder, penile bulb, and femoral heads were contoured. 2 IMRT plans were completed on each dataset: 1 by a medical dosimetrist and 1 by a medical physicist. The study plans targeted the prostate to 79.2 Gray (Gy) while respecting predefined dose tolerances to the other contoured structures. Rectal doses were compared on empty and full bladder CT data sets.
From June 29, 2010 to December 14, 2011, 17 full bladder data sets and 15 empty bladder data sets were available for analysis. Median change in bladder volume was 63 ml. Full vs empty bladder set-up was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the mean rectal dose of 25.41 Gy vs 27.6 Gy (P = .031).
Small sample size and small variations in bladder volumes.
A greater bladder volume resulted in a reduced mean dose to the rectum irrespective of planning method.</description><issn>2330-7749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhnNQbKm9-AMkRxG25mO7SY5S_CgUvOh5ySYTTdnd1CRb8N-7_dDTzDAP7wwPQjeULCgTUj5sTQoLQpfVBZoyzkkhRKkmaJ7SlhBCGZWqkldowiq5VFWlpuhz3e20yTg43LTaWoh4H9qhAxx6HLX1OvuxsyEBzgHnL8ARTB467PvjZMH53me_H_cRdO6gP6btYkhZZ8BG9wbiNbp0uk0wP9cZ-nh-el-9Fpu3l_XqcVMYypkqmAFmFJdSkqYhYJ0TFVe0KgWAE4bTUileOuaoA824KPWSVpwIZi3n2kk-Q3en3PH-9wAp151PBtpW9xCGVFMxZhHGBB_R-xNqxldTBFfvou90_KkpqY8-64PP-uBzhG_PuUPTgf1H_0zyX80jc2c</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Frizzell, Bart</creator><creator>Lovato, James</creator><creator>Foster, Jennifer</creator><creator>Towers, Ashley</creator><creator>Lucas, John</creator><creator>Able, Charles</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Impact of bladder volume on radiation dose to the rectum in the definitive treatment of prostate cancer</title><author>Frizzell, Bart ; Lovato, James ; Foster, Jennifer ; Towers, Ashley ; Lucas, John ; Able, Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1329-2ce2c938880bb0edff76391647eef7c3149934f2f1fea2374a5163072dd33af83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frizzell, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovato, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Towers, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucas, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Able, Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of community and supportive oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frizzell, Bart</au><au>Lovato, James</au><au>Foster, Jennifer</au><au>Towers, Ashley</au><au>Lucas, John</au><au>Able, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of bladder volume on radiation dose to the rectum in the definitive treatment of prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of community and supportive oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Community Support Oncol</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>288</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>288-291</pages><issn>2330-7749</issn><abstract>Our group created and routinely reviewed a dedicated prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery program. Previously, a retrospective review of our experience demonstrated that a larger bladder volume reduced radiation dose to the rectum. We conducted an observational study to confirm this relationship.
Men receiving definitive radiation for prostate cancer were eligible for the study. Eligible patients received 2 computed axial tomography (CT) scans on the day of their planning CT scan: 1 with a full bladder and 1 with an empty bladder. On each CT data set, the prostate, rectum, bladder, penile bulb, and femoral heads were contoured. 2 IMRT plans were completed on each dataset: 1 by a medical dosimetrist and 1 by a medical physicist. The study plans targeted the prostate to 79.2 Gray (Gy) while respecting predefined dose tolerances to the other contoured structures. Rectal doses were compared on empty and full bladder CT data sets.
From June 29, 2010 to December 14, 2011, 17 full bladder data sets and 15 empty bladder data sets were available for analysis. Median change in bladder volume was 63 ml. Full vs empty bladder set-up was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the mean rectal dose of 25.41 Gy vs 27.6 Gy (P = .031).
Small sample size and small variations in bladder volumes.
A greater bladder volume resulted in a reduced mean dose to the rectum irrespective of planning method.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26859669</pmid><doi>10.12788/jcso.0156</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2330-7749 |
ispartof | The Journal of community and supportive oncology, 2015-08, Vol.13 (8), p.288-291 |
issn | 2330-7749 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764702273 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Impact of bladder volume on radiation dose to the rectum in the definitive treatment of prostate cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T00%3A54%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20bladder%20volume%20on%20radiation%20dose%20to%20the%20rectum%20in%20the%20definitive%20treatment%20of%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20community%20and%20supportive%20oncology&rft.au=Frizzell,%20Bart&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=288&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=288-291&rft.issn=2330-7749&rft_id=info:doi/10.12788/jcso.0156&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1764702273%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1764702273&rft_id=info:pmid/26859669&rfr_iscdi=true |