Professional Success and Gender in Family Medicine: Design of Scales and Examination of Gender Differences in Subjective and Objective Success Among Family Physicians

Two components of professional success have been defined: objective career success (OCS) and subjective career success (SCS). Despite the increasing number of women practicing medicine, gender inequalities persist. The objectives of this descriptive, cross-sectional, and multicenter study were (a) t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Evaluation & the health professions 2016-03, Vol.39 (1), p.87-99
Hauptverfasser: Delgado, Ana, Saletti-Cuesta, Lorena, López-Fernández, Luis Andrés, Toro-Cárdenas, Silvia, Luna del Castillo, Juan de Dios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 99
container_issue 1
container_start_page 87
container_title Evaluation & the health professions
container_volume 39
creator Delgado, Ana
Saletti-Cuesta, Lorena
López-Fernández, Luis Andrés
Toro-Cárdenas, Silvia
Luna del Castillo, Juan de Dios
description Two components of professional success have been defined: objective career success (OCS) and subjective career success (SCS). Despite the increasing number of women practicing medicine, gender inequalities persist. The objectives of this descriptive, cross-sectional, and multicenter study were (a) to construct and validate OCS and SCS scales, (b) to determine the relationships between OCS and SCS and between each scale and professional/family characteristics, and (c) to compare these associations between male and female family physicians (FPs). The study sample comprised 250 female and 250 male FPs from urban health centers in Andalusia (Spain). Data were gathered over 6 months on gender, age, care load, professional/family variables, and family–work balance, using a self-administered questionnaire. OSC and SCS scales were examined by using exploratory factorial analysis and Cronbach’s α, and scores were compared by gender-stratified bivariate and multiple regression analyses. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated using a multilevel analysis. The response rate was 73.6%. We identified three OCS factors and two SCS factors. Lower scores were obtained by female versus male FPs in the OCS dimensions, but there were no gender differences in either SCS dimension.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0163278714543686
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764700116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0163278714543686</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1764700116</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-3404d94663616bcfac02532ab15f529fd6a7d0d9c570b61668dc64266b3785fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLA0EQhAdRTIzePcmCFy-r8-yZPYqYKEQU1PMyOw_ZsI84kz3k3zsxUSTgqWn6q2qqEDon-JoQKW8wAUalkoQLzkDBARoTIWjOCqIO0Xhzzjf3ETqJcYExoULIYzSiAvOCAYwRfQm9dzHWfaeb7HUwJi2Z7mw2c511Iau7bKrbullnT87Wpu7cKTryuonubDcn6H16_3b3kM-fZ493t_PcMKJWOeOY24IDMCBQGa8NpoJRXRHhBS28BS0ttoURElcJAWUNcApQMamEr9gEXW19l6H_HFxclW0djWsa3bl-iCWRwGXKlEJO0OUeuuiHkBJ9U4ooSSlNFN5SJvQxBufLZahbHdYlweWmz3K_zyS52BkPVevsr-CnwATkWyDqD_fn63-GXxJweYk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768187222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Professional Success and Gender in Family Medicine: Design of Scales and Examination of Gender Differences in Subjective and Objective Success Among Family Physicians</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Delgado, Ana ; Saletti-Cuesta, Lorena ; López-Fernández, Luis Andrés ; Toro-Cárdenas, Silvia ; Luna del Castillo, Juan de Dios</creator><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Ana ; Saletti-Cuesta, Lorena ; López-Fernández, Luis Andrés ; Toro-Cárdenas, Silvia ; Luna del Castillo, Juan de Dios</creatorcontrib><description>Two components of professional success have been defined: objective career success (OCS) and subjective career success (SCS). Despite the increasing number of women practicing medicine, gender inequalities persist. The objectives of this descriptive, cross-sectional, and multicenter study were (a) to construct and validate OCS and SCS scales, (b) to determine the relationships between OCS and SCS and between each scale and professional/family characteristics, and (c) to compare these associations between male and female family physicians (FPs). The study sample comprised 250 female and 250 male FPs from urban health centers in Andalusia (Spain). Data were gathered over 6 months on gender, age, care load, professional/family variables, and family–work balance, using a self-administered questionnaire. OSC and SCS scales were examined by using exploratory factorial analysis and Cronbach’s α, and scores were compared by gender-stratified bivariate and multiple regression analyses. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated using a multilevel analysis. The response rate was 73.6%. We identified three OCS factors and two SCS factors. Lower scores were obtained by female versus male FPs in the OCS dimensions, but there were no gender differences in either SCS dimension.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2787</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0163278714543686</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25049366</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EHPRDK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Correlation ; Correlation coefficients ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Family characteristics ; Family physicians ; Family Relations ; Family work relationship ; Female ; Females ; Formulae ; Gender ; Gender differences ; Gender inequality ; Health administration ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Inequality ; Job Satisfaction ; Male ; Males ; Medicine ; Middle Aged ; Multilevel analysis ; Multiple Regression Analysis ; Physicians ; Physicians, Family - psychology ; Physicians, Women - psychology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Response rates ; Sex Factors ; Spain ; Success ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Urban Health Services ; Women ; Workload</subject><ispartof>Evaluation &amp; the health professions, 2016-03, Vol.39 (1), p.87-99</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2014</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2014.</rights><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Mar 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-3404d94663616bcfac02532ab15f529fd6a7d0d9c570b61668dc64266b3785fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0163278714543686$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0163278714543686$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25049366$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saletti-Cuesta, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Fernández, Luis Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toro-Cárdenas, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna del Castillo, Juan de Dios</creatorcontrib><title>Professional Success and Gender in Family Medicine: Design of Scales and Examination of Gender Differences in Subjective and Objective Success Among Family Physicians</title><title>Evaluation &amp; the health professions</title><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><description>Two components of professional success have been defined: objective career success (OCS) and subjective career success (SCS). Despite the increasing number of women practicing medicine, gender inequalities persist. The objectives of this descriptive, cross-sectional, and multicenter study were (a) to construct and validate OCS and SCS scales, (b) to determine the relationships between OCS and SCS and between each scale and professional/family characteristics, and (c) to compare these associations between male and female family physicians (FPs). The study sample comprised 250 female and 250 male FPs from urban health centers in Andalusia (Spain). Data were gathered over 6 months on gender, age, care load, professional/family variables, and family–work balance, using a self-administered questionnaire. OSC and SCS scales were examined by using exploratory factorial analysis and Cronbach’s α, and scores were compared by gender-stratified bivariate and multiple regression analyses. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated using a multilevel analysis. The response rate was 73.6%. We identified three OCS factors and two SCS factors. Lower scores were obtained by female versus male FPs in the OCS dimensions, but there were no gender differences in either SCS dimension.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Family characteristics</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Family Relations</subject><subject>Family work relationship</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Formulae</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multilevel analysis</subject><subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians, Family - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians, Women - psychology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Spain</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Urban Health Services</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Workload</subject><issn>0163-2787</issn><issn>1552-3918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLA0EQhAdRTIzePcmCFy-r8-yZPYqYKEQU1PMyOw_ZsI84kz3k3zsxUSTgqWn6q2qqEDon-JoQKW8wAUalkoQLzkDBARoTIWjOCqIO0Xhzzjf3ETqJcYExoULIYzSiAvOCAYwRfQm9dzHWfaeb7HUwJi2Z7mw2c511Iau7bKrbullnT87Wpu7cKTryuonubDcn6H16_3b3kM-fZ493t_PcMKJWOeOY24IDMCBQGa8NpoJRXRHhBS28BS0ttoURElcJAWUNcApQMamEr9gEXW19l6H_HFxclW0djWsa3bl-iCWRwGXKlEJO0OUeuuiHkBJ9U4ooSSlNFN5SJvQxBufLZahbHdYlweWmz3K_zyS52BkPVevsr-CnwATkWyDqD_fn63-GXxJweYk</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Delgado, Ana</creator><creator>Saletti-Cuesta, Lorena</creator><creator>López-Fernández, Luis Andrés</creator><creator>Toro-Cárdenas, Silvia</creator><creator>Luna del Castillo, Juan de Dios</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Professional Success and Gender in Family Medicine</title><author>Delgado, Ana ; Saletti-Cuesta, Lorena ; López-Fernández, Luis Andrés ; Toro-Cárdenas, Silvia ; Luna del Castillo, Juan de Dios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-3404d94663616bcfac02532ab15f529fd6a7d0d9c570b61668dc64266b3785fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Family characteristics</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Family Relations</topic><topic>Family work relationship</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Formulae</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multilevel analysis</topic><topic>Multiple Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians, Family - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians, Women - psychology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Spain</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Urban Health Services</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Workload</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saletti-Cuesta, Lorena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Fernández, Luis Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toro-Cárdenas, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna del Castillo, Juan de Dios</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Evaluation &amp; the health professions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Delgado, Ana</au><au>Saletti-Cuesta, Lorena</au><au>López-Fernández, Luis Andrés</au><au>Toro-Cárdenas, Silvia</au><au>Luna del Castillo, Juan de Dios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Professional Success and Gender in Family Medicine: Design of Scales and Examination of Gender Differences in Subjective and Objective Success Among Family Physicians</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation &amp; the health professions</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Health Prof</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>87-99</pages><issn>0163-2787</issn><eissn>1552-3918</eissn><coden>EHPRDK</coden><abstract>Two components of professional success have been defined: objective career success (OCS) and subjective career success (SCS). Despite the increasing number of women practicing medicine, gender inequalities persist. The objectives of this descriptive, cross-sectional, and multicenter study were (a) to construct and validate OCS and SCS scales, (b) to determine the relationships between OCS and SCS and between each scale and professional/family characteristics, and (c) to compare these associations between male and female family physicians (FPs). The study sample comprised 250 female and 250 male FPs from urban health centers in Andalusia (Spain). Data were gathered over 6 months on gender, age, care load, professional/family variables, and family–work balance, using a self-administered questionnaire. OSC and SCS scales were examined by using exploratory factorial analysis and Cronbach’s α, and scores were compared by gender-stratified bivariate and multiple regression analyses. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated using a multilevel analysis. The response rate was 73.6%. We identified three OCS factors and two SCS factors. Lower scores were obtained by female versus male FPs in the OCS dimensions, but there were no gender differences in either SCS dimension.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>25049366</pmid><doi>10.1177/0163278714543686</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-2787
ispartof Evaluation & the health professions, 2016-03, Vol.39 (1), p.87-99
issn 0163-2787
1552-3918
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764700116
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Correlation
Correlation coefficients
Cross-Sectional Studies
Family characteristics
Family physicians
Family Relations
Family work relationship
Female
Females
Formulae
Gender
Gender differences
Gender inequality
Health administration
Health technology assessment
Humans
Inequality
Job Satisfaction
Male
Males
Medicine
Middle Aged
Multilevel analysis
Multiple Regression Analysis
Physicians
Physicians, Family - psychology
Physicians, Women - psychology
Reproducibility of Results
Response rates
Sex Factors
Spain
Success
Surveys and Questionnaires
Urban Health Services
Women
Workload
title Professional Success and Gender in Family Medicine: Design of Scales and Examination of Gender Differences in Subjective and Objective Success Among Family Physicians
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A09%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Professional%20Success%20and%20Gender%20in%20Family%20Medicine:%20Design%20of%20Scales%20and%20Examination%20of%20Gender%20Differences%20in%20Subjective%20and%20Objective%20Success%20Among%20Family%20Physicians&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20&%20the%20health%20professions&rft.au=Delgado,%20Ana&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=87-99&rft.issn=0163-2787&rft.eissn=1552-3918&rft.coden=EHPRDK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0163278714543686&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1764700116%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768187222&rft_id=info:pmid/25049366&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0163278714543686&rfr_iscdi=true