The influence of size on striped bass foraging
Striped bass Morone saxatilis is an abundant piscivorous fish in estuaries and coastal systems along the US Atlantic coast and has also been stocked into systems in California and the continental US. Despite the widespread distribution of striped bass and their relative importance as a predator in t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) 2000-03, Vol.194, p.263-268 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 268 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 263 |
container_title | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek) |
container_volume | 194 |
creator | Hartman, K. J. |
description | Striped bass Morone saxatilis is an abundant piscivorous fish in estuaries and coastal systems along the US Atlantic coast and has also been stocked into systems in California and the continental US. Despite the widespread distribution of striped bass and their relative importance as a predator in these systems, little is known about how relative size of prey affects their prey capture success. This study measured the capture success and handling times of striped bass fed live shiners Notropis atherinoides and N. chrysocephalus and the results are expressed in terms of size (prey-to-predator size ration, PPR). Striped bass capture success declined with increasing PPR. It was best described (p < 0.01) by the equation: attack success = 0.861—1.82PPR. Handling time (h) increased with increasing PPR (p < 0.01) and was described by the equation: h = 0.339e11.9PPR. Comparison of prey profitability curves showed that the relative size of prey suggested as most profitable (mass/time) was similar to that found in the stomachs of wild striped bass in Chesapeake Bay from 1990 to 1992. The peak in frequency of PPR from stomachs occurred at PPR = 0.12 (mean PPR = 0.14) and was identical to the peak in profitability from model results (PPR = 0.12), although both the diet PPR and model profitability distributions were skewed towards larger relative prey sizes. Comparison of the results of this study with a similar study for small bluefish suggests that profitable prey sizes for striped bass overlap with those of much smaller bluefish. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3354/meps194263 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17644911</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24855670</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24855670</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e31a21430dc8e60f005105c07514bcded677823528f49a160a84222f7bd23c6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVi3chB_EgpM7sd45S_IKCl3oO281uTUmTuJMe9NcbqdirMPAe5pk5vIxdIsyEUPJuG3rCQnItjtgENeocVVEcswmgwdxqAafsjGgDgFoaPWGz5XvI6jY2u9D6kHUxo_przDajIdV9qLKVI8pil9y6btfn7CS6hsLFb07Z2-PDcv6cL16fXub3i9wLY4c8CHQcpYDK26AhAigE5cEolCtfhUobY7lQ3EZZONTgrOScR7OquPDaiym72f_tU_exCzSU25p8aBrXhm5HJRotZYH4D6gKCVaO8HYPfeqIUohln-qtS58lQvnTXXnobsTXv18dedfE5Fpf0-FCShhnZFd7tqGhS39rLq1S2oD4BkV7dd0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17594084</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of size on striped bass foraging</title><source>Inter-Research</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Complete Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hartman, K. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hartman, K. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Striped bass Morone saxatilis is an abundant piscivorous fish in estuaries and coastal systems along the US Atlantic coast and has also been stocked into systems in California and the continental US. Despite the widespread distribution of striped bass and their relative importance as a predator in these systems, little is known about how relative size of prey affects their prey capture success. This study measured the capture success and handling times of striped bass fed live shiners Notropis atherinoides and N. chrysocephalus and the results are expressed in terms of size (prey-to-predator size ration, PPR). Striped bass capture success declined with increasing PPR. It was best described (p < 0.01) by the equation: attack success = 0.861—1.82PPR. Handling time (h) increased with increasing PPR (p < 0.01) and was described by the equation: h = 0.339e11.9PPR. Comparison of prey profitability curves showed that the relative size of prey suggested as most profitable (mass/time) was similar to that found in the stomachs of wild striped bass in Chesapeake Bay from 1990 to 1992. The peak in frequency of PPR from stomachs occurred at PPR = 0.12 (mean PPR = 0.14) and was identical to the peak in profitability from model results (PPR = 0.12), although both the diet PPR and model profitability distributions were skewed towards larger relative prey sizes. Comparison of the results of this study with a similar study for small bluefish suggests that profitable prey sizes for striped bass overlap with those of much smaller bluefish.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-8630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-1599</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3354/meps194263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oldendorf: Inter-Research</publisher><subject>Agnatha. Pisces ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diet ; Emeralds ; Experimentation ; Foraging ; Freshwater bass ; Freshwater fishes ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Luxilus chrysocephalus ; Marine ; Marine fishes ; Morone saxatilis ; Notropis atherinoides ; Predators ; Profitability ratios ; Stomach ; USA ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2000-03, Vol.194, p.263-268</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Inter-Research 2000</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e31a21430dc8e60f005105c07514bcded677823528f49a160a84222f7bd23c6c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24855670$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24855670$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3746,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1440440$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hartman, K. J.</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of size on striped bass foraging</title><title>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</title><description>Striped bass Morone saxatilis is an abundant piscivorous fish in estuaries and coastal systems along the US Atlantic coast and has also been stocked into systems in California and the continental US. Despite the widespread distribution of striped bass and their relative importance as a predator in these systems, little is known about how relative size of prey affects their prey capture success. This study measured the capture success and handling times of striped bass fed live shiners Notropis atherinoides and N. chrysocephalus and the results are expressed in terms of size (prey-to-predator size ration, PPR). Striped bass capture success declined with increasing PPR. It was best described (p < 0.01) by the equation: attack success = 0.861—1.82PPR. Handling time (h) increased with increasing PPR (p < 0.01) and was described by the equation: h = 0.339e11.9PPR. Comparison of prey profitability curves showed that the relative size of prey suggested as most profitable (mass/time) was similar to that found in the stomachs of wild striped bass in Chesapeake Bay from 1990 to 1992. The peak in frequency of PPR from stomachs occurred at PPR = 0.12 (mean PPR = 0.14) and was identical to the peak in profitability from model results (PPR = 0.12), although both the diet PPR and model profitability distributions were skewed towards larger relative prey sizes. Comparison of the results of this study with a similar study for small bluefish suggests that profitable prey sizes for striped bass overlap with those of much smaller bluefish.</description><subject>Agnatha. Pisces</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Emeralds</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Freshwater bass</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Luxilus chrysocephalus</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Morone saxatilis</subject><subject>Notropis atherinoides</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Profitability ratios</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0171-8630</issn><issn>1616-1599</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVi3chB_EgpM7sd45S_IKCl3oO281uTUmTuJMe9NcbqdirMPAe5pk5vIxdIsyEUPJuG3rCQnItjtgENeocVVEcswmgwdxqAafsjGgDgFoaPWGz5XvI6jY2u9D6kHUxo_przDajIdV9qLKVI8pil9y6btfn7CS6hsLFb07Z2-PDcv6cL16fXub3i9wLY4c8CHQcpYDK26AhAigE5cEolCtfhUobY7lQ3EZZONTgrOScR7OquPDaiym72f_tU_exCzSU25p8aBrXhm5HJRotZYH4D6gKCVaO8HYPfeqIUohln-qtS58lQvnTXXnobsTXv18dedfE5Fpf0-FCShhnZFd7tqGhS39rLq1S2oD4BkV7dd0</recordid><startdate>20000317</startdate><enddate>20000317</enddate><creator>Hartman, K. J.</creator><general>Inter-Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000317</creationdate><title>The influence of size on striped bass foraging</title><author>Hartman, K. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e31a21430dc8e60f005105c07514bcded677823528f49a160a84222f7bd23c6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Agnatha. Pisces</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Emeralds</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Freshwater bass</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Luxilus chrysocephalus</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Morone saxatilis</topic><topic>Notropis atherinoides</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Profitability ratios</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hartman, K. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hartman, K. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of size on striped bass foraging</atitle><jtitle>Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek)</jtitle><date>2000-03-17</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>194</volume><spage>263</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>263-268</pages><issn>0171-8630</issn><eissn>1616-1599</eissn><abstract>Striped bass Morone saxatilis is an abundant piscivorous fish in estuaries and coastal systems along the US Atlantic coast and has also been stocked into systems in California and the continental US. Despite the widespread distribution of striped bass and their relative importance as a predator in these systems, little is known about how relative size of prey affects their prey capture success. This study measured the capture success and handling times of striped bass fed live shiners Notropis atherinoides and N. chrysocephalus and the results are expressed in terms of size (prey-to-predator size ration, PPR). Striped bass capture success declined with increasing PPR. It was best described (p < 0.01) by the equation: attack success = 0.861—1.82PPR. Handling time (h) increased with increasing PPR (p < 0.01) and was described by the equation: h = 0.339e11.9PPR. Comparison of prey profitability curves showed that the relative size of prey suggested as most profitable (mass/time) was similar to that found in the stomachs of wild striped bass in Chesapeake Bay from 1990 to 1992. The peak in frequency of PPR from stomachs occurred at PPR = 0.12 (mean PPR = 0.14) and was identical to the peak in profitability from model results (PPR = 0.12), although both the diet PPR and model profitability distributions were skewed towards larger relative prey sizes. Comparison of the results of this study with a similar study for small bluefish suggests that profitable prey sizes for striped bass overlap with those of much smaller bluefish.</abstract><cop>Oldendorf</cop><pub>Inter-Research</pub><doi>10.3354/meps194263</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-8630 |
ispartof | Marine ecology. Progress series (Halstenbek), 2000-03, Vol.194, p.263-268 |
issn | 0171-8630 1616-1599 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17644911 |
source | Inter-Research; EZB Free E-Journals; JSTOR Complete Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agnatha. Pisces Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Autoecology Biological and medical sciences Diet Emeralds Experimentation Foraging Freshwater bass Freshwater fishes Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Luxilus chrysocephalus Marine Marine fishes Morone saxatilis Notropis atherinoides Predators Profitability ratios Stomach USA Vertebrata |
title | The influence of size on striped bass foraging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T18%3A55%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20size%20on%20striped%20bass%20foraging&rft.jtitle=Marine%20ecology.%20Progress%20series%20(Halstenbek)&rft.au=Hartman,%20K.%20J.&rft.date=2000-03-17&rft.volume=194&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=263-268&rft.issn=0171-8630&rft.eissn=1616-1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354/meps194263&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24855670%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17594084&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24855670&rfr_iscdi=true |