The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals
the aim of this research is to review the content, and describe the structural and contextual discourse around planned birthplace in six clinical practice manuals used to care for pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia׳s remote Northern Territory. The purpose is to better understand where, how and w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Midwifery 2015-10, Vol.31 (10), p.993-999 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 999 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 993 |
container_title | Midwifery |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Ireland, Sarah Belton, Suzanne Saggers, Sherry |
description | the aim of this research is to review the content, and describe the structural and contextual discourse around planned birthplace in six clinical practice manuals used to care for pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia׳s remote Northern Territory. The purpose is to better understand where, how and why planned birthplaces for Aboriginal women have changed over time.
content and discourse analysis was applied to the written texts pertaining to maternal health care and the results placed within a theoretical framework of Daviss׳s Logic.
the manuals demonstrate the use of predominantly scientific and clinical logic to sanction birthplace. Planned birthplace choices have declined over time, with hospital now represented as the only place to give birth. This is in opposition to Aboriginal women׳s longstanding requests and is not supported by robust scientific evidence.
despite scientific and clinical logics dominating the sanctioning of birthplace for Aboriginal women, conjecture is apparent between assumed logics and evidence. There needs to be further critical reflection on why Aboriginal women do not have planned birthplace choices, and these reasons, once identified, debated and addressed both in research agendas and policy re-development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764146426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266613815001850</els_id><sourcerecordid>1764146426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e63e4e65cd2be297f59a054678be13399f5e722e3c055433942467516898c2fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERYeWF2CBvGST4P_EiM2o4k-q1E27thznpvUosQfboZq34VHrYQpLxOr62ud817oHobeUtJRQ9WHXLn58bBmhsiWqJUS-QBsqOWs40fol2hCmVKMo78_R65x3hBAtSPcKnTNFe64Z2aBftw-A53jvXcZxwvvZhgAjHnwqD7VxgKeYcIIlFsDbNZdkZ28D3g4x-Xsf7Iwf4wIB-4BLRYVYjZBqAyn5EtPhI97i0WcX15QB2zBiF0OBUOrZzofsfw92sw_eVdo-WVd8nbvYsNo5X6KzqRZ481wv0N2Xz7dX35rrm6_fr7bXjRN9XxpQHAQo6UY2ANPdJLUlUqiuH4ByrvUkoWMMuCNSinohWH2UVPW6d2yy_AK9P3H3Kf5YIRez1E_DXBcCcc2GdkpQoQRT_yGlvaaMaVKl7CR1KeacYDL75BebDoYScwzR7MwxRHMM0RBlaojV9O6Zvw4LjH8tf1Krgk8nAdSF_PSQTHYegoPRJ3DFjNH_i_8EHdqvvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718912290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ireland, Sarah ; Belton, Suzanne ; Saggers, Sherry</creator><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Sarah ; Belton, Suzanne ; Saggers, Sherry</creatorcontrib><description>the aim of this research is to review the content, and describe the structural and contextual discourse around planned birthplace in six clinical practice manuals used to care for pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia׳s remote Northern Territory. The purpose is to better understand where, how and why planned birthplaces for Aboriginal women have changed over time.
content and discourse analysis was applied to the written texts pertaining to maternal health care and the results placed within a theoretical framework of Daviss׳s Logic.
the manuals demonstrate the use of predominantly scientific and clinical logic to sanction birthplace. Planned birthplace choices have declined over time, with hospital now represented as the only place to give birth. This is in opposition to Aboriginal women׳s longstanding requests and is not supported by robust scientific evidence.
despite scientific and clinical logics dominating the sanctioning of birthplace for Aboriginal women, conjecture is apparent between assumed logics and evidence. There needs to be further critical reflection on why Aboriginal women do not have planned birthplace choices, and these reasons, once identified, debated and addressed both in research agendas and policy re-development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-6138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-3099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26183920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aboriginal women ; Australia ; Birthing Centers ; Birthplace ; Choice Behavior ; Discourse analysis ; Female ; Home Childbirth ; Humans ; Manuals as Topic - standards ; Maternal Health Services - standards ; Medically Underserved Area ; Midwifery ; Midwifery - standards ; Northern Territory ; Nurse-Patient Relations ; Patient Care Planning - standards ; Pregnancy ; Remote</subject><ispartof>Midwifery, 2015-10, Vol.31 (10), p.993-999</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e63e4e65cd2be297f59a054678be13399f5e722e3c055433942467516898c2fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e63e4e65cd2be297f59a054678be13399f5e722e3c055433942467516898c2fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4215-2091</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613815001850$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26183920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belton, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saggers, Sherry</creatorcontrib><title>The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals</title><title>Midwifery</title><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><description>the aim of this research is to review the content, and describe the structural and contextual discourse around planned birthplace in six clinical practice manuals used to care for pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia׳s remote Northern Territory. The purpose is to better understand where, how and why planned birthplaces for Aboriginal women have changed over time.
content and discourse analysis was applied to the written texts pertaining to maternal health care and the results placed within a theoretical framework of Daviss׳s Logic.
the manuals demonstrate the use of predominantly scientific and clinical logic to sanction birthplace. Planned birthplace choices have declined over time, with hospital now represented as the only place to give birth. This is in opposition to Aboriginal women׳s longstanding requests and is not supported by robust scientific evidence.
despite scientific and clinical logics dominating the sanctioning of birthplace for Aboriginal women, conjecture is apparent between assumed logics and evidence. There needs to be further critical reflection on why Aboriginal women do not have planned birthplace choices, and these reasons, once identified, debated and addressed both in research agendas and policy re-development.</description><subject>Aboriginal women</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Birthing Centers</subject><subject>Birthplace</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Home Childbirth</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Manuals as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Maternal Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Medically Underserved Area</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Midwifery - standards</subject><subject>Northern Territory</subject><subject>Nurse-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning - standards</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Remote</subject><issn>0266-6138</issn><issn>1532-3099</issn><issn>1532-3099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERYeWF2CBvGST4P_EiM2o4k-q1E27thznpvUosQfboZq34VHrYQpLxOr62ud817oHobeUtJRQ9WHXLn58bBmhsiWqJUS-QBsqOWs40fol2hCmVKMo78_R65x3hBAtSPcKnTNFe64Z2aBftw-A53jvXcZxwvvZhgAjHnwqD7VxgKeYcIIlFsDbNZdkZ28D3g4x-Xsf7Iwf4wIB-4BLRYVYjZBqAyn5EtPhI97i0WcX15QB2zBiF0OBUOrZzofsfw92sw_eVdo-WVd8nbvYsNo5X6KzqRZ481wv0N2Xz7dX35rrm6_fr7bXjRN9XxpQHAQo6UY2ANPdJLUlUqiuH4ByrvUkoWMMuCNSinohWH2UVPW6d2yy_AK9P3H3Kf5YIRez1E_DXBcCcc2GdkpQoQRT_yGlvaaMaVKl7CR1KeacYDL75BebDoYScwzR7MwxRHMM0RBlaojV9O6Zvw4LjH8tf1Krgk8nAdSF_PSQTHYegoPRJ3DFjNH_i_8EHdqvvA</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Ireland, Sarah</creator><creator>Belton, Suzanne</creator><creator>Saggers, Sherry</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4215-2091</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals</title><author>Ireland, Sarah ; Belton, Suzanne ; Saggers, Sherry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e63e4e65cd2be297f59a054678be13399f5e722e3c055433942467516898c2fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aboriginal women</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Birthing Centers</topic><topic>Birthplace</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Home Childbirth</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Manuals as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Maternal Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Medically Underserved Area</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Midwifery - standards</topic><topic>Northern Territory</topic><topic>Nurse-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning - standards</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Remote</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belton, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saggers, Sherry</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ireland, Sarah</au><au>Belton, Suzanne</au><au>Saggers, Sherry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals</atitle><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>993</spage><epage>999</epage><pages>993-999</pages><issn>0266-6138</issn><issn>1532-3099</issn><eissn>1532-3099</eissn><abstract>the aim of this research is to review the content, and describe the structural and contextual discourse around planned birthplace in six clinical practice manuals used to care for pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia׳s remote Northern Territory. The purpose is to better understand where, how and why planned birthplaces for Aboriginal women have changed over time.
content and discourse analysis was applied to the written texts pertaining to maternal health care and the results placed within a theoretical framework of Daviss׳s Logic.
the manuals demonstrate the use of predominantly scientific and clinical logic to sanction birthplace. Planned birthplace choices have declined over time, with hospital now represented as the only place to give birth. This is in opposition to Aboriginal women׳s longstanding requests and is not supported by robust scientific evidence.
despite scientific and clinical logics dominating the sanctioning of birthplace for Aboriginal women, conjecture is apparent between assumed logics and evidence. There needs to be further critical reflection on why Aboriginal women do not have planned birthplace choices, and these reasons, once identified, debated and addressed both in research agendas and policy re-development.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26183920</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4215-2091</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-6138 |
ispartof | Midwifery, 2015-10, Vol.31 (10), p.993-999 |
issn | 0266-6138 1532-3099 1532-3099 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764146426 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aboriginal women Australia Birthing Centers Birthplace Choice Behavior Discourse analysis Female Home Childbirth Humans Manuals as Topic - standards Maternal Health Services - standards Medically Underserved Area Midwifery Midwifery - standards Northern Territory Nurse-Patient Relations Patient Care Planning - standards Pregnancy Remote |
title | The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A01%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20logics%20of%20planned%20birthplace%20for%20remote%20Australian%20Aboriginal%20women%20in%20the%20northern%20territory:%20A%20discourse%20and%20content%20analysis%20of%20clinical%20practice%20manuals&rft.jtitle=Midwifery&rft.au=Ireland,%20Sarah&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=993&rft.epage=999&rft.pages=993-999&rft.issn=0266-6138&rft.eissn=1532-3099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1764146426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718912290&rft_id=info:pmid/26183920&rft_els_id=S0266613815001850&rfr_iscdi=true |