The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals

the aim of this research is to review the content, and describe the structural and contextual discourse around planned birthplace in six clinical practice manuals used to care for pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia׳s remote Northern Territory. The purpose is to better understand where, how and w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Midwifery 2015-10, Vol.31 (10), p.993-999
Hauptverfasser: Ireland, Sarah, Belton, Suzanne, Saggers, Sherry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 999
container_issue 10
container_start_page 993
container_title Midwifery
container_volume 31
creator Ireland, Sarah
Belton, Suzanne
Saggers, Sherry
description the aim of this research is to review the content, and describe the structural and contextual discourse around planned birthplace in six clinical practice manuals used to care for pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia׳s remote Northern Territory. The purpose is to better understand where, how and why planned birthplaces for Aboriginal women have changed over time. content and discourse analysis was applied to the written texts pertaining to maternal health care and the results placed within a theoretical framework of Daviss׳s Logic. the manuals demonstrate the use of predominantly scientific and clinical logic to sanction birthplace. Planned birthplace choices have declined over time, with hospital now represented as the only place to give birth. This is in opposition to Aboriginal women׳s longstanding requests and is not supported by robust scientific evidence. despite scientific and clinical logics dominating the sanctioning of birthplace for Aboriginal women, conjecture is apparent between assumed logics and evidence. There needs to be further critical reflection on why Aboriginal women do not have planned birthplace choices, and these reasons, once identified, debated and addressed both in research agendas and policy re-development.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764146426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0266613815001850</els_id><sourcerecordid>1764146426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e63e4e65cd2be297f59a054678be13399f5e722e3c055433942467516898c2fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERYeWF2CBvGST4P_EiM2o4k-q1E27thznpvUosQfboZq34VHrYQpLxOr62ud817oHobeUtJRQ9WHXLn58bBmhsiWqJUS-QBsqOWs40fol2hCmVKMo78_R65x3hBAtSPcKnTNFe64Z2aBftw-A53jvXcZxwvvZhgAjHnwqD7VxgKeYcIIlFsDbNZdkZ28D3g4x-Xsf7Iwf4wIB-4BLRYVYjZBqAyn5EtPhI97i0WcX15QB2zBiF0OBUOrZzofsfw92sw_eVdo-WVd8nbvYsNo5X6KzqRZ481wv0N2Xz7dX35rrm6_fr7bXjRN9XxpQHAQo6UY2ANPdJLUlUqiuH4ByrvUkoWMMuCNSinohWH2UVPW6d2yy_AK9P3H3Kf5YIRez1E_DXBcCcc2GdkpQoQRT_yGlvaaMaVKl7CR1KeacYDL75BebDoYScwzR7MwxRHMM0RBlaojV9O6Zvw4LjH8tf1Krgk8nAdSF_PSQTHYegoPRJ3DFjNH_i_8EHdqvvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1718912290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ireland, Sarah ; Belton, Suzanne ; Saggers, Sherry</creator><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Sarah ; Belton, Suzanne ; Saggers, Sherry</creatorcontrib><description>the aim of this research is to review the content, and describe the structural and contextual discourse around planned birthplace in six clinical practice manuals used to care for pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia׳s remote Northern Territory. The purpose is to better understand where, how and why planned birthplaces for Aboriginal women have changed over time. content and discourse analysis was applied to the written texts pertaining to maternal health care and the results placed within a theoretical framework of Daviss׳s Logic. the manuals demonstrate the use of predominantly scientific and clinical logic to sanction birthplace. Planned birthplace choices have declined over time, with hospital now represented as the only place to give birth. This is in opposition to Aboriginal women׳s longstanding requests and is not supported by robust scientific evidence. despite scientific and clinical logics dominating the sanctioning of birthplace for Aboriginal women, conjecture is apparent between assumed logics and evidence. There needs to be further critical reflection on why Aboriginal women do not have planned birthplace choices, and these reasons, once identified, debated and addressed both in research agendas and policy re-development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-6138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-3099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-3099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26183920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aboriginal women ; Australia ; Birthing Centers ; Birthplace ; Choice Behavior ; Discourse analysis ; Female ; Home Childbirth ; Humans ; Manuals as Topic - standards ; Maternal Health Services - standards ; Medically Underserved Area ; Midwifery ; Midwifery - standards ; Northern Territory ; Nurse-Patient Relations ; Patient Care Planning - standards ; Pregnancy ; Remote</subject><ispartof>Midwifery, 2015-10, Vol.31 (10), p.993-999</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e63e4e65cd2be297f59a054678be13399f5e722e3c055433942467516898c2fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e63e4e65cd2be297f59a054678be13399f5e722e3c055433942467516898c2fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4215-2091</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613815001850$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26183920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belton, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saggers, Sherry</creatorcontrib><title>The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals</title><title>Midwifery</title><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><description>the aim of this research is to review the content, and describe the structural and contextual discourse around planned birthplace in six clinical practice manuals used to care for pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia׳s remote Northern Territory. The purpose is to better understand where, how and why planned birthplaces for Aboriginal women have changed over time. content and discourse analysis was applied to the written texts pertaining to maternal health care and the results placed within a theoretical framework of Daviss׳s Logic. the manuals demonstrate the use of predominantly scientific and clinical logic to sanction birthplace. Planned birthplace choices have declined over time, with hospital now represented as the only place to give birth. This is in opposition to Aboriginal women׳s longstanding requests and is not supported by robust scientific evidence. despite scientific and clinical logics dominating the sanctioning of birthplace for Aboriginal women, conjecture is apparent between assumed logics and evidence. There needs to be further critical reflection on why Aboriginal women do not have planned birthplace choices, and these reasons, once identified, debated and addressed both in research agendas and policy re-development.</description><subject>Aboriginal women</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Birthing Centers</subject><subject>Birthplace</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Home Childbirth</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Manuals as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Maternal Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Medically Underserved Area</subject><subject>Midwifery</subject><subject>Midwifery - standards</subject><subject>Northern Territory</subject><subject>Nurse-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning - standards</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Remote</subject><issn>0266-6138</issn><issn>1532-3099</issn><issn>1532-3099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1ERYeWF2CBvGST4P_EiM2o4k-q1E27thznpvUosQfboZq34VHrYQpLxOr62ud817oHobeUtJRQ9WHXLn58bBmhsiWqJUS-QBsqOWs40fol2hCmVKMo78_R65x3hBAtSPcKnTNFe64Z2aBftw-A53jvXcZxwvvZhgAjHnwqD7VxgKeYcIIlFsDbNZdkZ28D3g4x-Xsf7Iwf4wIB-4BLRYVYjZBqAyn5EtPhI97i0WcX15QB2zBiF0OBUOrZzofsfw92sw_eVdo-WVd8nbvYsNo5X6KzqRZ481wv0N2Xz7dX35rrm6_fr7bXjRN9XxpQHAQo6UY2ANPdJLUlUqiuH4ByrvUkoWMMuCNSinohWH2UVPW6d2yy_AK9P3H3Kf5YIRez1E_DXBcCcc2GdkpQoQRT_yGlvaaMaVKl7CR1KeacYDL75BebDoYScwzR7MwxRHMM0RBlaojV9O6Zvw4LjH8tf1Krgk8nAdSF_PSQTHYegoPRJ3DFjNH_i_8EHdqvvA</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Ireland, Sarah</creator><creator>Belton, Suzanne</creator><creator>Saggers, Sherry</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4215-2091</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals</title><author>Ireland, Sarah ; Belton, Suzanne ; Saggers, Sherry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-e63e4e65cd2be297f59a054678be13399f5e722e3c055433942467516898c2fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aboriginal women</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Birthing Centers</topic><topic>Birthplace</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Home Childbirth</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Manuals as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Maternal Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Medically Underserved Area</topic><topic>Midwifery</topic><topic>Midwifery - standards</topic><topic>Northern Territory</topic><topic>Nurse-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning - standards</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Remote</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ireland, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belton, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saggers, Sherry</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ireland, Sarah</au><au>Belton, Suzanne</au><au>Saggers, Sherry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals</atitle><jtitle>Midwifery</jtitle><addtitle>Midwifery</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>993</spage><epage>999</epage><pages>993-999</pages><issn>0266-6138</issn><issn>1532-3099</issn><eissn>1532-3099</eissn><abstract>the aim of this research is to review the content, and describe the structural and contextual discourse around planned birthplace in six clinical practice manuals used to care for pregnant Aboriginal women in Australia׳s remote Northern Territory. The purpose is to better understand where, how and why planned birthplaces for Aboriginal women have changed over time. content and discourse analysis was applied to the written texts pertaining to maternal health care and the results placed within a theoretical framework of Daviss׳s Logic. the manuals demonstrate the use of predominantly scientific and clinical logic to sanction birthplace. Planned birthplace choices have declined over time, with hospital now represented as the only place to give birth. This is in opposition to Aboriginal women׳s longstanding requests and is not supported by robust scientific evidence. despite scientific and clinical logics dominating the sanctioning of birthplace for Aboriginal women, conjecture is apparent between assumed logics and evidence. There needs to be further critical reflection on why Aboriginal women do not have planned birthplace choices, and these reasons, once identified, debated and addressed both in research agendas and policy re-development.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26183920</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.005</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4215-2091</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-6138
ispartof Midwifery, 2015-10, Vol.31 (10), p.993-999
issn 0266-6138
1532-3099
1532-3099
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764146426
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aboriginal women
Australia
Birthing Centers
Birthplace
Choice Behavior
Discourse analysis
Female
Home Childbirth
Humans
Manuals as Topic - standards
Maternal Health Services - standards
Medically Underserved Area
Midwifery
Midwifery - standards
Northern Territory
Nurse-Patient Relations
Patient Care Planning - standards
Pregnancy
Remote
title The logics of planned birthplace for remote Australian Aboriginal women in the northern territory: A discourse and content analysis of clinical practice manuals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A01%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20logics%20of%20planned%20birthplace%20for%20remote%20Australian%20Aboriginal%20women%20in%20the%20northern%20territory:%20A%20discourse%20and%20content%20analysis%20of%20clinical%20practice%20manuals&rft.jtitle=Midwifery&rft.au=Ireland,%20Sarah&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=993&rft.epage=999&rft.pages=993-999&rft.issn=0266-6138&rft.eissn=1532-3099&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1764146426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1718912290&rft_id=info:pmid/26183920&rft_els_id=S0266613815001850&rfr_iscdi=true