Social Contexts of Infant Feeding and Infant Feeding Decisions
Background: Infant feeding takes place within a network of social relationships. However, the social context in which infant feeding advice is received remains underresearched. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the social contexts of infant feeding by examining individual and re...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of human lactation 2016-02, Vol.32 (1), p.132-140 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 140 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 132 |
| container_title | Journal of human lactation |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Schafer, Ellen J. Williams, Natalie A. Digney, Siri Hare, Marion E. Ashida, Sato |
| description | Background:
Infant feeding takes place within a network of social relationships. However, the social context in which infant feeding advice is received remains underresearched.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the social contexts of infant feeding by examining individual and relationship characteristics of mothers and network members associated with advice to exclusively breastfeed, exclusively formula feed, or use a combination of breast milk and formula.
Methods:
Information about 287 network members was reported by 80 low-income mothers during a one-time survey. Characteristics of relationships associated with mothers receiving advice (exclusively breastfeed/formula feed, combination feed) from each network member were identified using 2-level logistic regression analyses.
Results:
Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively breastfeed from network members who help make feeding decisions (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-4.42), exclusively breastfed their own child or children (OR, 6.99; 95% CI, 2.96-16.51), and were health care providers (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.70-13.67). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to breastfeed in combination with formula from network members who provided emotional support (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.31-4.55), combination fed their own child or children (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 1.80-13.05), and had an opinion that was important to the mother (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.13-6.33). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively formula feed from network members who exclusively formula fed their own child or children (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.07-4.66) than those who did not.
Conclusion:
Social relationship characteristics and network members’ infant feeding experiences may have implications for the advice new mothers receive. Future research should investigate social contexts of infant feeding longitudinally to inform interventions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0890334415592850 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764146319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0890334415592850</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1764146319</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-4e3270e0e7789264b9de0a0acca4f72b57b63c61dc6c4f1b85a472d60c829fed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLw0AQRhdRbK3ePUmOXqKzm81O9iJItVooeFDPYbOZlJR0t2YT0H9vSquHguBphvnefIfH2CWHG84RbyHTkCRS8jTVIkvhiI2HVcQpJuKYjbdxvM1H7CyEFQDXgPyUjYRCKaXGMbt79bY2TTT1rqPPLkS-iuauMq6LZkRl7ZaRceXh6YFsHWrvwjk7qUwT6GI_J-x99vg2fY4XL0_z6f0itpKLLpaUCAQCQsy0ULLQJYEBY62RFYoixUIlVvHSKisrXmSpkShKBTYTuqIymbDrXe-m9R89hS5f18FS0xhHvg85RyW5VAnX_0EhQ0BUAwo71LY-hJaqfNPWa9N-5RzyreD8UPDwcrVv74s1lb8PP0YHIN4BwSwpX_m-dYOYvwu_AWn5gKE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760870776</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Contexts of Infant Feeding and Infant Feeding Decisions</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Schafer, Ellen J. ; Williams, Natalie A. ; Digney, Siri ; Hare, Marion E. ; Ashida, Sato</creator><contributor>Gill, Sara L ; Marinelli, Kathleen A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schafer, Ellen J. ; Williams, Natalie A. ; Digney, Siri ; Hare, Marion E. ; Ashida, Sato ; Gill, Sara L ; Marinelli, Kathleen A</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Infant feeding takes place within a network of social relationships. However, the social context in which infant feeding advice is received remains underresearched.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the social contexts of infant feeding by examining individual and relationship characteristics of mothers and network members associated with advice to exclusively breastfeed, exclusively formula feed, or use a combination of breast milk and formula.
Methods:
Information about 287 network members was reported by 80 low-income mothers during a one-time survey. Characteristics of relationships associated with mothers receiving advice (exclusively breastfeed/formula feed, combination feed) from each network member were identified using 2-level logistic regression analyses.
Results:
Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively breastfeed from network members who help make feeding decisions (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-4.42), exclusively breastfed their own child or children (OR, 6.99; 95% CI, 2.96-16.51), and were health care providers (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.70-13.67). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to breastfeed in combination with formula from network members who provided emotional support (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.31-4.55), combination fed their own child or children (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 1.80-13.05), and had an opinion that was important to the mother (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.13-6.33). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively formula feed from network members who exclusively formula fed their own child or children (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.07-4.66) than those who did not.
Conclusion:
Social relationship characteristics and network members’ infant feeding experiences may have implications for the advice new mothers receive. Future research should investigate social contexts of infant feeding longitudinally to inform interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-3344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0890334415592850</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26744497</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Bottle Feeding - psychology ; Breast Feeding - psychology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Interpersonal Relations ; Logistic Models ; Maternal Behavior - psychology ; Mothers - psychology ; Nursing ; Social Environment ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tennessee ; Urban Population ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of human lactation, 2016-02, Vol.32 (1), p.132-140</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-4e3270e0e7789264b9de0a0acca4f72b57b63c61dc6c4f1b85a472d60c829fed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-4e3270e0e7789264b9de0a0acca4f72b57b63c61dc6c4f1b85a472d60c829fed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0890334415592850$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0890334415592850$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26744497$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Gill, Sara L</contributor><contributor>Marinelli, Kathleen A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Schafer, Ellen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Natalie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Digney, Siri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, Marion E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashida, Sato</creatorcontrib><title>Social Contexts of Infant Feeding and Infant Feeding Decisions</title><title>Journal of human lactation</title><addtitle>J Hum Lact</addtitle><description>Background:
Infant feeding takes place within a network of social relationships. However, the social context in which infant feeding advice is received remains underresearched.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the social contexts of infant feeding by examining individual and relationship characteristics of mothers and network members associated with advice to exclusively breastfeed, exclusively formula feed, or use a combination of breast milk and formula.
Methods:
Information about 287 network members was reported by 80 low-income mothers during a one-time survey. Characteristics of relationships associated with mothers receiving advice (exclusively breastfeed/formula feed, combination feed) from each network member were identified using 2-level logistic regression analyses.
Results:
Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively breastfeed from network members who help make feeding decisions (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-4.42), exclusively breastfed their own child or children (OR, 6.99; 95% CI, 2.96-16.51), and were health care providers (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.70-13.67). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to breastfeed in combination with formula from network members who provided emotional support (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.31-4.55), combination fed their own child or children (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 1.80-13.05), and had an opinion that was important to the mother (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.13-6.33). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively formula feed from network members who exclusively formula fed their own child or children (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.07-4.66) than those who did not.
Conclusion:
Social relationship characteristics and network members’ infant feeding experiences may have implications for the advice new mothers receive. Future research should investigate social contexts of infant feeding longitudinally to inform interventions.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Bottle Feeding - psychology</subject><subject>Breast Feeding - psychology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Maternal Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Mothers - psychology</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Social Environment</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tennessee</subject><subject>Urban Population</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0890-3344</issn><issn>1552-5732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFLw0AQRhdRbK3ePUmOXqKzm81O9iJItVooeFDPYbOZlJR0t2YT0H9vSquHguBphvnefIfH2CWHG84RbyHTkCRS8jTVIkvhiI2HVcQpJuKYjbdxvM1H7CyEFQDXgPyUjYRCKaXGMbt79bY2TTT1rqPPLkS-iuauMq6LZkRl7ZaRceXh6YFsHWrvwjk7qUwT6GI_J-x99vg2fY4XL0_z6f0itpKLLpaUCAQCQsy0ULLQJYEBY62RFYoixUIlVvHSKisrXmSpkShKBTYTuqIymbDrXe-m9R89hS5f18FS0xhHvg85RyW5VAnX_0EhQ0BUAwo71LY-hJaqfNPWa9N-5RzyreD8UPDwcrVv74s1lb8PP0YHIN4BwSwpX_m-dYOYvwu_AWn5gKE</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Schafer, Ellen J.</creator><creator>Williams, Natalie A.</creator><creator>Digney, Siri</creator><creator>Hare, Marion E.</creator><creator>Ashida, Sato</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Social Contexts of Infant Feeding and Infant Feeding Decisions</title><author>Schafer, Ellen J. ; Williams, Natalie A. ; Digney, Siri ; Hare, Marion E. ; Ashida, Sato</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-4e3270e0e7789264b9de0a0acca4f72b57b63c61dc6c4f1b85a472d60c829fed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Bottle Feeding - psychology</topic><topic>Breast Feeding - psychology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Maternal Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Mothers - psychology</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Social Environment</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tennessee</topic><topic>Urban Population</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schafer, Ellen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Natalie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Digney, Siri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hare, Marion E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashida, Sato</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of human lactation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schafer, Ellen J.</au><au>Williams, Natalie A.</au><au>Digney, Siri</au><au>Hare, Marion E.</au><au>Ashida, Sato</au><au>Gill, Sara L</au><au>Marinelli, Kathleen A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Contexts of Infant Feeding and Infant Feeding Decisions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of human lactation</jtitle><addtitle>J Hum Lact</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>132-140</pages><issn>0890-3344</issn><eissn>1552-5732</eissn><abstract>Background:
Infant feeding takes place within a network of social relationships. However, the social context in which infant feeding advice is received remains underresearched.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the social contexts of infant feeding by examining individual and relationship characteristics of mothers and network members associated with advice to exclusively breastfeed, exclusively formula feed, or use a combination of breast milk and formula.
Methods:
Information about 287 network members was reported by 80 low-income mothers during a one-time survey. Characteristics of relationships associated with mothers receiving advice (exclusively breastfeed/formula feed, combination feed) from each network member were identified using 2-level logistic regression analyses.
Results:
Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively breastfeed from network members who help make feeding decisions (odds ratio [OR], 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-4.42), exclusively breastfed their own child or children (OR, 6.99; 95% CI, 2.96-16.51), and were health care providers (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.70-13.67). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to breastfeed in combination with formula from network members who provided emotional support (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.31-4.55), combination fed their own child or children (OR, 4.85; 95% CI, 1.80-13.05), and had an opinion that was important to the mother (OR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.13-6.33). Mothers had greater odds of receiving advice to exclusively formula feed from network members who exclusively formula fed their own child or children (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.07-4.66) than those who did not.
Conclusion:
Social relationship characteristics and network members’ infant feeding experiences may have implications for the advice new mothers receive. Future research should investigate social contexts of infant feeding longitudinally to inform interventions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26744497</pmid><doi>10.1177/0890334415592850</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0890-3344 |
| ispartof | Journal of human lactation, 2016-02, Vol.32 (1), p.132-140 |
| issn | 0890-3344 1552-5732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764146319 |
| source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Bottle Feeding - psychology Breast Feeding - psychology Cross-Sectional Studies Female Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Interpersonal Relations Logistic Models Maternal Behavior - psychology Mothers - psychology Nursing Social Environment Socioeconomic Factors Surveys and Questionnaires Tennessee Urban Population Young Adult |
| title | Social Contexts of Infant Feeding and Infant Feeding Decisions |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T17%3A44%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Contexts%20of%20Infant%20Feeding%20and%20Infant%20Feeding%20Decisions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20human%20lactation&rft.au=Schafer,%20Ellen%20J.&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=132-140&rft.issn=0890-3344&rft.eissn=1552-5732&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0890334415592850&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1764146319%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760870776&rft_id=info:pmid/26744497&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0890334415592850&rfr_iscdi=true |