Response functions for arbitrary weight functions and data distributions. Part I: Framework for interpreting the response function
The response function is a commonly used measure of analysis scheme properties. Its use in the interpretation of analyses of real-valued data, however, is unnecessarily complicated by the structure of the standard form of the Fourier transform. Specifically, interpretation using this form of the Fou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Monthly weather review 2005-08, Vol.133 (8), p.2117-2131 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2131 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2117 |
container_title | Monthly weather review |
container_volume | 133 |
creator | ASKELSON, Mark A STRAKA, Jerry M |
description | The response function is a commonly used measure of analysis scheme properties. Its use in the interpretation of analyses of real-valued data, however, is unnecessarily complicated by the structure of the standard form of the Fourier transform. Specifically, interpretation using this form of the Fourier transform requires knowledge of the relationship between Fourier transform values that are symmetric about the origin. Here, these relationships are used to simplify the application of the response function to the interpretation of analysis scheme properties.
In doing so, Fourier transforms are used because they can be applied to studying effects that both data sampling and weight functions have upon analyses. A complication arises, however, in the treatment of constant and sinusoidal input since they do not have Fourier transforms in the traditional sense. To handle these highly useful forms, distribution theory is used to generalize Fourier transform theory. This extension enables Fourier transform theory to handle both functions that have Fourier transforms in the traditional sense and functions that can be represented using Fourier series.
The key step in simplifying the use of the response function is the expression of the inverse Fourier transform in a magnitude and phase form, which involves folding the integration domain onto itself so that integration is performed over only half of the domain. Once this is accomplished, interpretation of the response function is in terms of amplitude and phase modulations, which indicate how amplitudes and phases of input waves are affected by an analysis scheme. This interpretation is quite elegant since its formulation in terms of properties of input waves results in a one-to-one input-to-output wave interpretation of analysis scheme effects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/MWR2961.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17641212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>895966291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-dee507941c0d79c3c70e852f14d5f6a2bda1276072197eec7b9c206bf46d46c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1LJEEMhgtxwdH14D8oBAUPPZtUV1dNe5PBL1B2kRWPTXV1WktnusdUNbLX_eW2OqB4SkievHlJhNhDmCLa4tf13Y0qDU5xQ0ywUJCBLvNNMQFQNgOj9ZbYjvERAIzRaiL-31Bc9V0k2Q6dT2FMZduzdFyHxI7_yRcK9w_pS9t1jWxccrIJMXGoh_fyVP5xnOTlsTxjt6SXnp_ehUKXiFdMKXT3Mj2Q5O8Lf4ofrVtE2l3HHXF7dvp3fpFd_T6_nJ9cZT4vVMoaogJsqdFDY0ufews0K1SLuila41TdOFTWgFVYWiJv69IrMHWrTaONL_Mdcfihu-L-eaCYqmWInhYL11E_xAqt0ahQjeD-N_CxH7gbvVVYztDYAooROvqAPPcxMrXVisNyPFiFUL29olq_osKRPVgLuujdomXX-RA_ByyMRu0sfwU6Z4rC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198167505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response functions for arbitrary weight functions and data distributions. Part I: Framework for interpreting the response function</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>ASKELSON, Mark A ; STRAKA, Jerry M</creator><creatorcontrib>ASKELSON, Mark A ; STRAKA, Jerry M</creatorcontrib><description>The response function is a commonly used measure of analysis scheme properties. Its use in the interpretation of analyses of real-valued data, however, is unnecessarily complicated by the structure of the standard form of the Fourier transform. Specifically, interpretation using this form of the Fourier transform requires knowledge of the relationship between Fourier transform values that are symmetric about the origin. Here, these relationships are used to simplify the application of the response function to the interpretation of analysis scheme properties.
In doing so, Fourier transforms are used because they can be applied to studying effects that both data sampling and weight functions have upon analyses. A complication arises, however, in the treatment of constant and sinusoidal input since they do not have Fourier transforms in the traditional sense. To handle these highly useful forms, distribution theory is used to generalize Fourier transform theory. This extension enables Fourier transform theory to handle both functions that have Fourier transforms in the traditional sense and functions that can be represented using Fourier series.
The key step in simplifying the use of the response function is the expression of the inverse Fourier transform in a magnitude and phase form, which involves folding the integration domain onto itself so that integration is performed over only half of the domain. Once this is accomplished, interpretation of the response function is in terms of amplitude and phase modulations, which indicate how amplitudes and phases of input waves are affected by an analysis scheme. This interpretation is quite elegant since its formulation in terms of properties of input waves results in a one-to-one input-to-output wave interpretation of analysis scheme effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/MWR2961.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MWREAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Earth, ocean, space ; Economic models ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Fourier transforms ; Mathematical functions ; Meteorology ; Waves ; Weather analysis and prediction</subject><ispartof>Monthly weather review, 2005-08, Vol.133 (8), p.2117-2131</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Aug 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-dee507941c0d79c3c70e852f14d5f6a2bda1276072197eec7b9c206bf46d46c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-dee507941c0d79c3c70e852f14d5f6a2bda1276072197eec7b9c206bf46d46c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3668,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17020678$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ASKELSON, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STRAKA, Jerry M</creatorcontrib><title>Response functions for arbitrary weight functions and data distributions. Part I: Framework for interpreting the response function</title><title>Monthly weather review</title><description>The response function is a commonly used measure of analysis scheme properties. Its use in the interpretation of analyses of real-valued data, however, is unnecessarily complicated by the structure of the standard form of the Fourier transform. Specifically, interpretation using this form of the Fourier transform requires knowledge of the relationship between Fourier transform values that are symmetric about the origin. Here, these relationships are used to simplify the application of the response function to the interpretation of analysis scheme properties.
In doing so, Fourier transforms are used because they can be applied to studying effects that both data sampling and weight functions have upon analyses. A complication arises, however, in the treatment of constant and sinusoidal input since they do not have Fourier transforms in the traditional sense. To handle these highly useful forms, distribution theory is used to generalize Fourier transform theory. This extension enables Fourier transform theory to handle both functions that have Fourier transforms in the traditional sense and functions that can be represented using Fourier series.
The key step in simplifying the use of the response function is the expression of the inverse Fourier transform in a magnitude and phase form, which involves folding the integration domain onto itself so that integration is performed over only half of the domain. Once this is accomplished, interpretation of the response function is in terms of amplitude and phase modulations, which indicate how amplitudes and phases of input waves are affected by an analysis scheme. This interpretation is quite elegant since its formulation in terms of properties of input waves results in a one-to-one input-to-output wave interpretation of analysis scheme effects.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Mathematical functions</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Waves</subject><subject>Weather analysis and prediction</subject><issn>0027-0644</issn><issn>1520-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1LJEEMhgtxwdH14D8oBAUPPZtUV1dNe5PBL1B2kRWPTXV1WktnusdUNbLX_eW2OqB4SkievHlJhNhDmCLa4tf13Y0qDU5xQ0ywUJCBLvNNMQFQNgOj9ZbYjvERAIzRaiL-31Bc9V0k2Q6dT2FMZduzdFyHxI7_yRcK9w_pS9t1jWxccrIJMXGoh_fyVP5xnOTlsTxjt6SXnp_ehUKXiFdMKXT3Mj2Q5O8Lf4ofrVtE2l3HHXF7dvp3fpFd_T6_nJ9cZT4vVMoaogJsqdFDY0ufews0K1SLuila41TdOFTWgFVYWiJv69IrMHWrTaONL_Mdcfihu-L-eaCYqmWInhYL11E_xAqt0ahQjeD-N_CxH7gbvVVYztDYAooROvqAPPcxMrXVisNyPFiFUL29olq_osKRPVgLuujdomXX-RA_ByyMRu0sfwU6Z4rC</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>ASKELSON, Mark A</creator><creator>STRAKA, Jerry M</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Response functions for arbitrary weight functions and data distributions. Part I: Framework for interpreting the response function</title><author>ASKELSON, Mark A ; STRAKA, Jerry M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-dee507941c0d79c3c70e852f14d5f6a2bda1276072197eec7b9c206bf46d46c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Mathematical functions</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Waves</topic><topic>Weather analysis and prediction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ASKELSON, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STRAKA, Jerry M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ASKELSON, Mark A</au><au>STRAKA, Jerry M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response functions for arbitrary weight functions and data distributions. Part I: Framework for interpreting the response function</atitle><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2117</spage><epage>2131</epage><pages>2117-2131</pages><issn>0027-0644</issn><eissn>1520-0493</eissn><coden>MWREAB</coden><abstract>The response function is a commonly used measure of analysis scheme properties. Its use in the interpretation of analyses of real-valued data, however, is unnecessarily complicated by the structure of the standard form of the Fourier transform. Specifically, interpretation using this form of the Fourier transform requires knowledge of the relationship between Fourier transform values that are symmetric about the origin. Here, these relationships are used to simplify the application of the response function to the interpretation of analysis scheme properties.
In doing so, Fourier transforms are used because they can be applied to studying effects that both data sampling and weight functions have upon analyses. A complication arises, however, in the treatment of constant and sinusoidal input since they do not have Fourier transforms in the traditional sense. To handle these highly useful forms, distribution theory is used to generalize Fourier transform theory. This extension enables Fourier transform theory to handle both functions that have Fourier transforms in the traditional sense and functions that can be represented using Fourier series.
The key step in simplifying the use of the response function is the expression of the inverse Fourier transform in a magnitude and phase form, which involves folding the integration domain onto itself so that integration is performed over only half of the domain. Once this is accomplished, interpretation of the response function is in terms of amplitude and phase modulations, which indicate how amplitudes and phases of input waves are affected by an analysis scheme. This interpretation is quite elegant since its formulation in terms of properties of input waves results in a one-to-one input-to-output wave interpretation of analysis scheme effects.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/MWR2961.1</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-0644 |
ispartof | Monthly weather review, 2005-08, Vol.133 (8), p.2117-2131 |
issn | 0027-0644 1520-0493 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17641212 |
source | American Meteorological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Algorithms Earth, ocean, space Economic models Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Fourier transforms Mathematical functions Meteorology Waves Weather analysis and prediction |
title | Response functions for arbitrary weight functions and data distributions. Part I: Framework for interpreting the response function |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A20%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20functions%20for%20arbitrary%20weight%20functions%20and%20data%20distributions.%20Part%20I:%20Framework%20for%20interpreting%20the%20response%20function&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20weather%20review&rft.au=ASKELSON,%20Mark%20A&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2117&rft.epage=2131&rft.pages=2117-2131&rft.issn=0027-0644&rft.eissn=1520-0493&rft.coden=MWREAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/MWR2961.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E895966291%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198167505&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |