EDGE- AND AREA-SENSITIVITY OF SHRUBLAND BIRDS
Populations of shrubland birds in eastern North America have consistently declined since the 1960s, but conservation is hampered by an inadequate understanding of the area requirements of most species. We examined the sensitivity of shrubland specialists to (a) the area of shrub stands and (b) proxi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2005-04, Vol.69 (2), p.681-688 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 688 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 681 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | RODEWALD, AMANDA D VITZ, ANDREW C |
description | Populations of shrubland birds in eastern North America have consistently declined since the 1960s, but conservation is hampered by an inadequate understanding of the area requirements of most species. We examined the sensitivity of shrubland specialists to (a) the area of shrub stands and (b) proximity to mature-forest edges, and we evaluated whether habitat characteristics, food resources, or productivity of bird populations could have caused the relationships we identified. In 2002–2003, we used constant-effort mist-netting on 6 small (4–8 ha) and 6 large (13–16 ha) regenerating clearcuts that were 4–6 years post-harvest in southern Ohio, USA. We placed 3 nets at 20, 50, and 80 m from the mature-forest edge (n = 9 nets per site), and we sampled vegetation, fruit, and arthropods at each net. Seven of 8 shrubland specialists, particularly blue-winged warbler, prairie warbler, yellow-breasted chat, indigo bunting, and field sparrow, avoided mature-forest edges, with twice as many birds caught 80 m from edges compared to 20 m. Abundances of most species, especially yellow-breasted chats, were positively correlated with area, though the combined area effect was not statistically significant. We found no evidence of reduced avian productivity in small stands. Neither area nor edge was associated with habitat characteristics, fruit abundance, or arthropod biomass. Our results suggest shrubland birds avoid habitat edges. Thus, small or narrow cuts may not provide optimal habitat for this suite of declining species, and managers should consider options to minimize edge and provide larger patches of shrubland habitats in landscape-scale planning efforts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0681:EAAOSB]2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17640012</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3803739</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3803739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5627-3664255da74f7bccbf5ff562d5336680213dba6766117a9fb3ff9a0549f0df1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkMGO0zAURSMEEmXgD5CoWCBYpPOeHdsJrNI2kwZ1GtS0DAihJ6eNUUqnGeJWMH-Po6AuWM7Ki3N8bR3Pu0QYMYz4JQBjvgjwy1sGIN6BjL6BDPF9Esd5Mf7ORjCa5B_YI2_gbOWzENVjb3C-9dR7Zu0OgCOGcuD5yTRN_GG8mA7jZRL7RbIoslX2OVt9HeZXw2K2XI_nHR1ny2nx3Hti9N5WL_6dF976KllNZv48T7NJPPdLIZnyuZQBE2KrVWBUudmURhjjyFZwh0JgyLellkpKRKUjU3JjIg0iiAxsDVb8wnvT7961za9TZY90W9tNtd_rQ9WcLKGSAQAyJ77-T9w1p_bg_kaMBxiKQKGT0l7atI21bWXorq1vdXtPCNQ1pa4OdXWoa0quKXVNqW9KjIAmOXXPXfdLv-t9df_QGfp4c50iR-X2XvZ7O3ts2vMeD4ErHjns97i2x-rPGev2J0nFlaCbRUri06pIQcxo4vxXvW90Q_pHW1taFwyQAwILRMCdkfRGWTfNoXpwiL_9ELL_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234185471</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EDGE- AND AREA-SENSITIVITY OF SHRUBLAND BIRDS</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>RODEWALD, AMANDA D ; VITZ, ANDREW C</creator><contributor>Mills</contributor><creatorcontrib>RODEWALD, AMANDA D ; VITZ, ANDREW C ; Mills</creatorcontrib><description>Populations of shrubland birds in eastern North America have consistently declined since the 1960s, but conservation is hampered by an inadequate understanding of the area requirements of most species. We examined the sensitivity of shrubland specialists to (a) the area of shrub stands and (b) proximity to mature-forest edges, and we evaluated whether habitat characteristics, food resources, or productivity of bird populations could have caused the relationships we identified. In 2002–2003, we used constant-effort mist-netting on 6 small (4–8 ha) and 6 large (13–16 ha) regenerating clearcuts that were 4–6 years post-harvest in southern Ohio, USA. We placed 3 nets at 20, 50, and 80 m from the mature-forest edge (n = 9 nets per site), and we sampled vegetation, fruit, and arthropods at each net. Seven of 8 shrubland specialists, particularly blue-winged warbler, prairie warbler, yellow-breasted chat, indigo bunting, and field sparrow, avoided mature-forest edges, with twice as many birds caught 80 m from edges compared to 20 m. Abundances of most species, especially yellow-breasted chats, were positively correlated with area, though the combined area effect was not statistically significant. We found no evidence of reduced avian productivity in small stands. Neither area nor edge was associated with habitat characteristics, fruit abundance, or arthropod biomass. Our results suggest shrubland birds avoid habitat edges. Thus, small or narrow cuts may not provide optimal habitat for this suite of declining species, and managers should consider options to minimize edge and provide larger patches of shrubland habitats in landscape-scale planning efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0681:EAAOSB]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal populations ; area sensitivity ; Arthropods ; Bird nesting ; Bird populations ; Birds ; clearcut ; Clearcutting ; CONTENTS ; early-successional forest ; ecotones ; edge ; Food resources ; Forest ecology ; Forest habitats ; forest management ; forest succession ; Forestry ; Fruits ; Habitat conservation ; habitat preferences ; Habitats ; Mist ; shrubland ; Shrublands ; Shrubs ; Warblers ; wild birds ; wildlife habitats ; Wildlife management ; wildlife-habitat relationships</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2005-04, Vol.69 (2), p.681-688</ispartof><rights>The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2005 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5627-3664255da74f7bccbf5ff562d5336680213dba6766117a9fb3ff9a0549f0df1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b5627-3664255da74f7bccbf5ff562d5336680213dba6766117a9fb3ff9a0549f0df1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3803739$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3803739$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Mills</contributor><creatorcontrib>RODEWALD, AMANDA D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VITZ, ANDREW C</creatorcontrib><title>EDGE- AND AREA-SENSITIVITY OF SHRUBLAND BIRDS</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Populations of shrubland birds in eastern North America have consistently declined since the 1960s, but conservation is hampered by an inadequate understanding of the area requirements of most species. We examined the sensitivity of shrubland specialists to (a) the area of shrub stands and (b) proximity to mature-forest edges, and we evaluated whether habitat characteristics, food resources, or productivity of bird populations could have caused the relationships we identified. In 2002–2003, we used constant-effort mist-netting on 6 small (4–8 ha) and 6 large (13–16 ha) regenerating clearcuts that were 4–6 years post-harvest in southern Ohio, USA. We placed 3 nets at 20, 50, and 80 m from the mature-forest edge (n = 9 nets per site), and we sampled vegetation, fruit, and arthropods at each net. Seven of 8 shrubland specialists, particularly blue-winged warbler, prairie warbler, yellow-breasted chat, indigo bunting, and field sparrow, avoided mature-forest edges, with twice as many birds caught 80 m from edges compared to 20 m. Abundances of most species, especially yellow-breasted chats, were positively correlated with area, though the combined area effect was not statistically significant. We found no evidence of reduced avian productivity in small stands. Neither area nor edge was associated with habitat characteristics, fruit abundance, or arthropod biomass. Our results suggest shrubland birds avoid habitat edges. Thus, small or narrow cuts may not provide optimal habitat for this suite of declining species, and managers should consider options to minimize edge and provide larger patches of shrubland habitats in landscape-scale planning efforts.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>area sensitivity</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Bird populations</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>clearcut</subject><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>CONTENTS</subject><subject>early-successional forest</subject><subject>ecotones</subject><subject>edge</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>forest management</subject><subject>forest succession</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>habitat preferences</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Mist</subject><subject>shrubland</subject><subject>Shrublands</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>Warblers</subject><subject>wild birds</subject><subject>wildlife habitats</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><subject>wildlife-habitat relationships</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkMGO0zAURSMEEmXgD5CoWCBYpPOeHdsJrNI2kwZ1GtS0DAihJ6eNUUqnGeJWMH-Po6AuWM7Ki3N8bR3Pu0QYMYz4JQBjvgjwy1sGIN6BjL6BDPF9Esd5Mf7ORjCa5B_YI2_gbOWzENVjb3C-9dR7Zu0OgCOGcuD5yTRN_GG8mA7jZRL7RbIoslX2OVt9HeZXw2K2XI_nHR1ny2nx3Hti9N5WL_6dF976KllNZv48T7NJPPdLIZnyuZQBE2KrVWBUudmURhjjyFZwh0JgyLellkpKRKUjU3JjIg0iiAxsDVb8wnvT7961za9TZY90W9tNtd_rQ9WcLKGSAQAyJ77-T9w1p_bg_kaMBxiKQKGT0l7atI21bWXorq1vdXtPCNQ1pa4OdXWoa0quKXVNqW9KjIAmOXXPXfdLv-t9df_QGfp4c50iR-X2XvZ7O3ts2vMeD4ErHjns97i2x-rPGev2J0nFlaCbRUri06pIQcxo4vxXvW90Q_pHW1taFwyQAwILRMCdkfRGWTfNoXpwiL_9ELL_</recordid><startdate>200504</startdate><enddate>200504</enddate><creator>RODEWALD, AMANDA D</creator><creator>VITZ, ANDREW C</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>The Wildlife Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200504</creationdate><title>EDGE- AND AREA-SENSITIVITY OF SHRUBLAND BIRDS</title><author>RODEWALD, AMANDA D ; VITZ, ANDREW C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b5627-3664255da74f7bccbf5ff562d5336680213dba6766117a9fb3ff9a0549f0df1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>area sensitivity</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Bird populations</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>clearcut</topic><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>CONTENTS</topic><topic>early-successional forest</topic><topic>ecotones</topic><topic>edge</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>forest management</topic><topic>forest succession</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>habitat preferences</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Mist</topic><topic>shrubland</topic><topic>Shrublands</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>Warblers</topic><topic>wild birds</topic><topic>wildlife habitats</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><topic>wildlife-habitat relationships</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RODEWALD, AMANDA D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VITZ, ANDREW C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RODEWALD, AMANDA D</au><au>VITZ, ANDREW C</au><au>Mills</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EDGE- AND AREA-SENSITIVITY OF SHRUBLAND BIRDS</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2005-04</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>681</spage><epage>688</epage><pages>681-688</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Populations of shrubland birds in eastern North America have consistently declined since the 1960s, but conservation is hampered by an inadequate understanding of the area requirements of most species. We examined the sensitivity of shrubland specialists to (a) the area of shrub stands and (b) proximity to mature-forest edges, and we evaluated whether habitat characteristics, food resources, or productivity of bird populations could have caused the relationships we identified. In 2002–2003, we used constant-effort mist-netting on 6 small (4–8 ha) and 6 large (13–16 ha) regenerating clearcuts that were 4–6 years post-harvest in southern Ohio, USA. We placed 3 nets at 20, 50, and 80 m from the mature-forest edge (n = 9 nets per site), and we sampled vegetation, fruit, and arthropods at each net. Seven of 8 shrubland specialists, particularly blue-winged warbler, prairie warbler, yellow-breasted chat, indigo bunting, and field sparrow, avoided mature-forest edges, with twice as many birds caught 80 m from edges compared to 20 m. Abundances of most species, especially yellow-breasted chats, were positively correlated with area, though the combined area effect was not statistically significant. We found no evidence of reduced avian productivity in small stands. Neither area nor edge was associated with habitat characteristics, fruit abundance, or arthropod biomass. Our results suggest shrubland birds avoid habitat edges. Thus, small or narrow cuts may not provide optimal habitat for this suite of declining species, and managers should consider options to minimize edge and provide larger patches of shrubland habitats in landscape-scale planning efforts.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0681:EAAOSB]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2005-04, Vol.69 (2), p.681-688 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17640012 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal behavior Animal populations area sensitivity Arthropods Bird nesting Bird populations Birds clearcut Clearcutting CONTENTS early-successional forest ecotones edge Food resources Forest ecology Forest habitats forest management forest succession Forestry Fruits Habitat conservation habitat preferences Habitats Mist shrubland Shrublands Shrubs Warblers wild birds wildlife habitats Wildlife management wildlife-habitat relationships |
title | EDGE- AND AREA-SENSITIVITY OF SHRUBLAND BIRDS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T07%3A57%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EDGE-%20AND%20AREA-SENSITIVITY%20OF%20SHRUBLAND%20BIRDS&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=RODEWALD,%20AMANDA%20D&rft.date=2005-04&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=681&rft.epage=688&rft.pages=681-688&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069%5B0681:EAAOSB%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3803739%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234185471&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3803739&rfr_iscdi=true |