Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the rate of bacterial contamination of reused and new unused burs after different sterilization sessions. Materials and Methods: The test group consisted of 40 used fissure burs, and the control group of 40 unused new fissure burs (tot...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical Principles and Practice 2016-01, Vol.25 (2), p.159-162 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 162 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 159 |
container_title | Medical Principles and Practice |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Al-Jandan, Badr A. Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman Farooq, Imran |
description | Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the rate of bacterial contamination of reused and new unused burs after different sterilization sessions. Materials and Methods: The test group consisted of 40 used fissure burs, and the control group of 40 unused new fissure burs (total n = 80). The burs from both groups were precleaned according to standard protocols and then subjected to two sterilization sessions (high- and low-steam pressure autoclaving). After each sterilization session, the burs were transferred into incubation tubes which contained thioglycollate culture medium and were monitored daily for a period of 48 h to detect any bacterial growth. Data were collected and statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test. Results: Of the 40 burs of the test group, 2 burs (5%) showed positive bacterial growth, whereas no bur from the control group showed any sign of bacterial growth after high-pressure autoclaving. The colony structure and Gram staining were compatible with the growth of Staphylococcus epidermis. After a second sterilization session at low-pressure steam autoclaving, no bacterial growth was observed for the test group, but 1 bur (2.5%) from the control group showed bacterial growth and Gram-positive staining matched well with the growth of Brevibacterium species. Conclusions: The new and unused burs were 100% sterile after high-pressure steam autoclaving, whereas 5% of the reused burs appeared positive with bacterial contamination. After low-pressure steam autoclaving, reused burs were 100% sterile, but 1 new bur demonstrated bacterial contamination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000442166 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762968356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A637293131</galeid><sourcerecordid>A637293131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-98d46656e0d4810efab4703f22494c1500ec47af1f770d67431d5007f037e7bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0EoqVw4I6Qj3BIseOv5ALahq9KlTgsPVtee5wavHFrJyv13-PVLiuQD2PPPPNqPC9Crym5pFT0HwghnLdUyifonPKWNYQK-rTeCaWNEoqeoRel_KpYxxh5js5aKZjoOnWOzPouLdHh9ZLHYE3EV0su-ArwbQGHTcHrMI0RmvrEn2EXLBQ8J7zapeDwkFMp-HryYOeQpk94hQdToBnSNOcU8Xpe3ONL9MybWODVMV6g269ffg7fm5sf366H1U1jBWNz03eOSykkEMc7SsCbDVeE-bblPbdUEAKWK-OpV4o4qTijriaVJ0yB2mzYBfp40L1fNltwFuoMJur7HLYmP-pkgv6_MoU7PaadFnUTjNMq8O4okNPDAmXW21AsxGgmSEvRVMm2lx0TsqKXB3Q0EXSYfKqKth4H22DTBD7U_Eoy1faMsr32-0OD3a8sgz_NRYnee6hPHlb27b8fOZF_TavAmwPw2-QR8gk49v8BTSueCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1762968356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Karger Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Al-Jandan, Badr A. ; Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar ; Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman ; Farooq, Imran</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Jandan, Badr A. ; Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar ; Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman ; Farooq, Imran</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the rate of bacterial contamination of reused and new unused burs after different sterilization sessions. Materials and Methods: The test group consisted of 40 used fissure burs, and the control group of 40 unused new fissure burs (total n = 80). The burs from both groups were precleaned according to standard protocols and then subjected to two sterilization sessions (high- and low-steam pressure autoclaving). After each sterilization session, the burs were transferred into incubation tubes which contained thioglycollate culture medium and were monitored daily for a period of 48 h to detect any bacterial growth. Data were collected and statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test. Results: Of the 40 burs of the test group, 2 burs (5%) showed positive bacterial growth, whereas no bur from the control group showed any sign of bacterial growth after high-pressure autoclaving. The colony structure and Gram staining were compatible with the growth of Staphylococcus epidermis. After a second sterilization session at low-pressure steam autoclaving, no bacterial growth was observed for the test group, but 1 bur (2.5%) from the control group showed bacterial growth and Gram-positive staining matched well with the growth of Brevibacterium species. Conclusions: The new and unused burs were 100% sterile after high-pressure steam autoclaving, whereas 5% of the reused burs appeared positive with bacterial contamination. After low-pressure steam autoclaving, reused burs were 100% sterile, but 1 new bur demonstrated bacterial contamination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1011-7571</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0151</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000442166</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26535887</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Case-Control Studies ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Comparative analysis ; Contamination ; Control ; Cross infection ; Cross Infection - prevention & control ; Dental Cavity Preparation - methods ; Dental Disinfectants - therapeutic use ; Dental equipment and supplies ; Disinfection - methods ; Equipment Contamination - prevention & control ; Humans ; Medical equipment ; Methods ; Microbial contamination ; Nosocomial infections ; Original Paper ; Prevention ; Risk factors ; Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation ; Root Canal Preparation - methods ; Sterilization ; Sterilization - methods</subject><ispartof>Medical Principles and Practice, 2016-01, Vol.25 (2), p.159-162</ispartof><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 S. Karger AG</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by S. Karger AG, Basel 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-98d46656e0d4810efab4703f22494c1500ec47af1f770d67431d5007f037e7bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-98d46656e0d4810efab4703f22494c1500ec47af1f770d67431d5007f037e7bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588341/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5588341/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,27616,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Jandan, Badr A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farooq, Imran</creatorcontrib><title>Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study</title><title>Medical Principles and Practice</title><addtitle>Med Princ Pract</addtitle><description>Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the rate of bacterial contamination of reused and new unused burs after different sterilization sessions. Materials and Methods: The test group consisted of 40 used fissure burs, and the control group of 40 unused new fissure burs (total n = 80). The burs from both groups were precleaned according to standard protocols and then subjected to two sterilization sessions (high- and low-steam pressure autoclaving). After each sterilization session, the burs were transferred into incubation tubes which contained thioglycollate culture medium and were monitored daily for a period of 48 h to detect any bacterial growth. Data were collected and statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test. Results: Of the 40 burs of the test group, 2 burs (5%) showed positive bacterial growth, whereas no bur from the control group showed any sign of bacterial growth after high-pressure autoclaving. The colony structure and Gram staining were compatible with the growth of Staphylococcus epidermis. After a second sterilization session at low-pressure steam autoclaving, no bacterial growth was observed for the test group, but 1 bur (2.5%) from the control group showed bacterial growth and Gram-positive staining matched well with the growth of Brevibacterium species. Conclusions: The new and unused burs were 100% sterile after high-pressure steam autoclaving, whereas 5% of the reused burs appeared positive with bacterial contamination. After low-pressure steam autoclaving, reused burs were 100% sterile, but 1 new bur demonstrated bacterial contamination.</description><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Cross infection</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention & control</subject><subject>Dental Cavity Preparation - methods</subject><subject>Dental Disinfectants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Dental equipment and supplies</subject><subject>Disinfection - methods</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination - prevention & control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Microbial contamination</subject><subject>Nosocomial infections</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - methods</subject><subject>Sterilization</subject><subject>Sterilization - methods</subject><issn>1011-7571</issn><issn>1423-0151</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M--</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1v1DAQhi0EoqVw4I6Qj3BIseOv5ALahq9KlTgsPVtee5wavHFrJyv13-PVLiuQD2PPPPNqPC9Crym5pFT0HwghnLdUyifonPKWNYQK-rTeCaWNEoqeoRel_KpYxxh5js5aKZjoOnWOzPouLdHh9ZLHYE3EV0su-ArwbQGHTcHrMI0RmvrEn2EXLBQ8J7zapeDwkFMp-HryYOeQpk94hQdToBnSNOcU8Xpe3ONL9MybWODVMV6g269ffg7fm5sf366H1U1jBWNz03eOSykkEMc7SsCbDVeE-bblPbdUEAKWK-OpV4o4qTijriaVJ0yB2mzYBfp40L1fNltwFuoMJur7HLYmP-pkgv6_MoU7PaadFnUTjNMq8O4okNPDAmXW21AsxGgmSEvRVMm2lx0TsqKXB3Q0EXSYfKqKth4H22DTBD7U_Eoy1faMsr32-0OD3a8sgz_NRYnee6hPHlb27b8fOZF_TavAmwPw2-QR8gk49v8BTSueCA</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Al-Jandan, Badr A.</creator><creator>Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar</creator><creator>Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman</creator><creator>Farooq, Imran</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>M--</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study</title><author>Al-Jandan, Badr A. ; Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar ; Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman ; Farooq, Imran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c533t-98d46656e0d4810efab4703f22494c1500ec47af1f770d67431d5007f037e7bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Cross infection</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention & control</topic><topic>Dental Cavity Preparation - methods</topic><topic>Dental Disinfectants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Dental equipment and supplies</topic><topic>Disinfection - methods</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination - prevention & control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Microbial contamination</topic><topic>Nosocomial infections</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - methods</topic><topic>Sterilization</topic><topic>Sterilization - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Jandan, Badr A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farooq, Imran</creatorcontrib><collection>Karger Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medical Principles and Practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Jandan, Badr A.</au><au>Ahmed, Mohamed Gafar</au><au>Al-Khalifa, Khalifa Sulaiman</au><au>Farooq, Imran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study</atitle><jtitle>Medical Principles and Practice</jtitle><addtitle>Med Princ Pract</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>159-162</pages><issn>1011-7571</issn><eissn>1423-0151</eissn><abstract>Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the rate of bacterial contamination of reused and new unused burs after different sterilization sessions. Materials and Methods: The test group consisted of 40 used fissure burs, and the control group of 40 unused new fissure burs (total n = 80). The burs from both groups were precleaned according to standard protocols and then subjected to two sterilization sessions (high- and low-steam pressure autoclaving). After each sterilization session, the burs were transferred into incubation tubes which contained thioglycollate culture medium and were monitored daily for a period of 48 h to detect any bacterial growth. Data were collected and statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test. Results: Of the 40 burs of the test group, 2 burs (5%) showed positive bacterial growth, whereas no bur from the control group showed any sign of bacterial growth after high-pressure autoclaving. The colony structure and Gram staining were compatible with the growth of Staphylococcus epidermis. After a second sterilization session at low-pressure steam autoclaving, no bacterial growth was observed for the test group, but 1 bur (2.5%) from the control group showed bacterial growth and Gram-positive staining matched well with the growth of Brevibacterium species. Conclusions: The new and unused burs were 100% sterile after high-pressure steam autoclaving, whereas 5% of the reused burs appeared positive with bacterial contamination. After low-pressure steam autoclaving, reused burs were 100% sterile, but 1 new bur demonstrated bacterial contamination.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>26535887</pmid><doi>10.1159/000442166</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1011-7571 |
ispartof | Medical Principles and Practice, 2016-01, Vol.25 (2), p.159-162 |
issn | 1011-7571 1423-0151 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762968356 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Karger Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Bacteria - isolation & purification Case-Control Studies Colony Count, Microbial Comparative analysis Contamination Control Cross infection Cross Infection - prevention & control Dental Cavity Preparation - methods Dental Disinfectants - therapeutic use Dental equipment and supplies Disinfection - methods Equipment Contamination - prevention & control Humans Medical equipment Methods Microbial contamination Nosocomial infections Original Paper Prevention Risk factors Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation Root Canal Preparation - methods Sterilization Sterilization - methods |
title | Should Surgical Burs Be Used as Single-Use Devices to Avoid Cross Infection? A Case-Control Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A32%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20Surgical%20Burs%20Be%20Used%20as%20Single-Use%20Devices%20to%20Avoid%20Cross%20Infection?%20A%20Case-Control%20Study&rft.jtitle=Medical%20Principles%20and%20Practice&rft.au=Al-Jandan,%20Badr%20A.&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=159-162&rft.issn=1011-7571&rft.eissn=1423-0151&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000442166&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA637293131%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1762968356&rft_id=info:pmid/26535887&rft_galeid=A637293131&rfr_iscdi=true |