Abdominal sacral colpopexy versus sacrospinous ligament fixation: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Introduction and hypothesis For the surgical correction of apical prolapse the abdominal approach is associated with better outcomes; however, it is more expensive than the transvaginal approach. This cost-effectiveness analysis compares abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) with sacrospinous ligament fi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	International Urogynecology Journal 2016-02, Vol.27 (2), p.233-237
Hauptverfasser:	Ohno, Mika S., Richardson, Monica L., Sokol, Eric R.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Cost-Benefit Analysis Decision Support Techniques Dyspareunia - etiology Female Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - economics Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods Gynecology Humans Ligaments - surgery Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Pelvic Organ Prolapse - economics Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery Quality-Adjusted Life Years Recurrence Sensitivity analysis Suburethral Slings - adverse effects Suburethral Slings - economics Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology Urology Vagina - surgery
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!