Is There an Inherent Risk to Damage the Popliteus Tendon by Femoral Component With Inbuilt External Rotation? A Pilot Study in Indian Knees
Abstract Introduction Femoral components with inbuilt rotation require thicker flexion resection of the lateral femoral condyle and could have a potential risk of damaging the popliteus tendon, especially in the smaller Asian knees. Materials and Methods We prospectively evaluated 10 patients with b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2016-02, Vol.31 (2), p.406-409 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 409 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 406 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Chouhan, Dervendra Kumar, MS Dhillon, Mandeep S., MS |
description | Abstract Introduction Femoral components with inbuilt rotation require thicker flexion resection of the lateral femoral condyle and could have a potential risk of damaging the popliteus tendon, especially in the smaller Asian knees. Materials and Methods We prospectively evaluated 10 patients with bilateral varus osteoarthritis knee to size the cuts and their location in relation to the popliteus tendon. Two different types of implant were used on either side; one side requires resection in 3° external rotation (group A) and the other side requires a femoral component with inbuilt external rotation (group B). We observed the incidence of injury to the popliteus tendon and distance between flexion cut to its attachment over the lateral femoral condyle between both groups. Results We had popliteus tendon injury in 3 knees all from group B. Risk of damaging the popliteus tendon was found higher in group B, as the distance between flexion cut to popliteus tendon attachment was significantly low. Conclusion Femoral component with inbuilt external rotation has more risk of injuring the popliteus tendon because flexion cut takes out more bone from the lateral femoral condyle. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.037 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762680905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0883540315008517</els_id><sourcerecordid>1762680905</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-c460aa0fb5330ece1b88c40426c69845010285cf0c35986d99ddc33ef655d54c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhi0EokvhBTggH7lsGMexN5EQqFpaWFGJqi3iaDnOhPU2sbe2g9hn4KVxtIUDBy62Jf__N5r5h5CXDAoGTL7ZFTqkbVECEwU0BfDVI7JggpfLugL5mCygrvlSVMBPyLMYdwCMCVE9JSellBnA-YL82kR6u8WAVDu6cfPLJXpt4x1Nnn7Qo_6ONG2RXvn9YBNOWY6u8462B3qBow96oGs_7r2bjd9s2mZMO9kh0fOfCYPL_9c-6WS9e0_P6JUdfKI3aeoO1M4lO5srf3aI8Tl50ush4ouH-5R8vTi_XX9aXn75uFmfXS5NxcuUTwlaQ98KzgENsrauTQVVKY1s6koAg7IWpgfDRVPLrmm6znCOvRSiE5Xhp-T1kbsP_n7CmNRoo8Fh0A79FBVbyVLW0IDI0vIoNcHHGLBX-2BHHQ6KgZpDUDs1h6DmEBQ0KoeQTa8e-FM7YvfX8mfqWfD2KMDc5Q-LQUVj0RnsbECTVOft__nv_rGbwTpr9HCHB4w7P81Tz32oWCpQN_MazFvABEAt2Ir_BjexrRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1762680905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is There an Inherent Risk to Damage the Popliteus Tendon by Femoral Component With Inbuilt External Rotation? A Pilot Study in Indian Knees</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Chouhan, Dervendra Kumar, MS ; Dhillon, Mandeep S., MS</creator><creatorcontrib>Chouhan, Dervendra Kumar, MS ; Dhillon, Mandeep S., MS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Femoral components with inbuilt rotation require thicker flexion resection of the lateral femoral condyle and could have a potential risk of damaging the popliteus tendon, especially in the smaller Asian knees. Materials and Methods We prospectively evaluated 10 patients with bilateral varus osteoarthritis knee to size the cuts and their location in relation to the popliteus tendon. Two different types of implant were used on either side; one side requires resection in 3° external rotation (group A) and the other side requires a femoral component with inbuilt external rotation (group B). We observed the incidence of injury to the popliteus tendon and distance between flexion cut to its attachment over the lateral femoral condyle between both groups. Results We had popliteus tendon injury in 3 knees all from group B. Risk of damaging the popliteus tendon was found higher in group B, as the distance between flexion cut to popliteus tendon attachment was significantly low. Conclusion Femoral component with inbuilt external rotation has more risk of injuring the popliteus tendon because flexion cut takes out more bone from the lateral femoral condyle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.037</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26601633</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects ; Female ; femoral cut ; Femur - surgery ; Humans ; India ; Knee - surgery ; knee arthroplasty ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Pilot Projects ; popliteus tendon injury ; Prospective Studies ; Prosthesis Design - adverse effects ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Rotation ; small size Asian knee ; Tendon Injuries - etiology ; tendon injury ; Tendons - surgery</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2016-02, Vol.31 (2), p.406-409</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-c460aa0fb5330ece1b88c40426c69845010285cf0c35986d99ddc33ef655d54c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.037$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26601633$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chouhan, Dervendra Kumar, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, Mandeep S., MS</creatorcontrib><title>Is There an Inherent Risk to Damage the Popliteus Tendon by Femoral Component With Inbuilt External Rotation? A Pilot Study in Indian Knees</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Femoral components with inbuilt rotation require thicker flexion resection of the lateral femoral condyle and could have a potential risk of damaging the popliteus tendon, especially in the smaller Asian knees. Materials and Methods We prospectively evaluated 10 patients with bilateral varus osteoarthritis knee to size the cuts and their location in relation to the popliteus tendon. Two different types of implant were used on either side; one side requires resection in 3° external rotation (group A) and the other side requires a femoral component with inbuilt external rotation (group B). We observed the incidence of injury to the popliteus tendon and distance between flexion cut to its attachment over the lateral femoral condyle between both groups. Results We had popliteus tendon injury in 3 knees all from group B. Risk of damaging the popliteus tendon was found higher in group B, as the distance between flexion cut to popliteus tendon attachment was significantly low. Conclusion Femoral component with inbuilt external rotation has more risk of injuring the popliteus tendon because flexion cut takes out more bone from the lateral femoral condyle.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>femoral cut</subject><subject>Femur - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Knee - surgery</subject><subject>knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>popliteus tendon injury</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design - adverse effects</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>small size Asian knee</subject><subject>Tendon Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>tendon injury</subject><subject>Tendons - surgery</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksFu1DAQhi0EokvhBTggH7lsGMexN5EQqFpaWFGJqi3iaDnOhPU2sbe2g9hn4KVxtIUDBy62Jf__N5r5h5CXDAoGTL7ZFTqkbVECEwU0BfDVI7JggpfLugL5mCygrvlSVMBPyLMYdwCMCVE9JSellBnA-YL82kR6u8WAVDu6cfPLJXpt4x1Nnn7Qo_6ONG2RXvn9YBNOWY6u8462B3qBow96oGs_7r2bjd9s2mZMO9kh0fOfCYPL_9c-6WS9e0_P6JUdfKI3aeoO1M4lO5srf3aI8Tl50ush4ouH-5R8vTi_XX9aXn75uFmfXS5NxcuUTwlaQ98KzgENsrauTQVVKY1s6koAg7IWpgfDRVPLrmm6znCOvRSiE5Xhp-T1kbsP_n7CmNRoo8Fh0A79FBVbyVLW0IDI0vIoNcHHGLBX-2BHHQ6KgZpDUDs1h6DmEBQ0KoeQTa8e-FM7YvfX8mfqWfD2KMDc5Q-LQUVj0RnsbECTVOft__nv_rGbwTpr9HCHB4w7P81Tz32oWCpQN_MazFvABEAt2Ir_BjexrRE</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Chouhan, Dervendra Kumar, MS</creator><creator>Dhillon, Mandeep S., MS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Is There an Inherent Risk to Damage the Popliteus Tendon by Femoral Component With Inbuilt External Rotation? A Pilot Study in Indian Knees</title><author>Chouhan, Dervendra Kumar, MS ; Dhillon, Mandeep S., MS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-c460aa0fb5330ece1b88c40426c69845010285cf0c35986d99ddc33ef655d54c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>femoral cut</topic><topic>Femur - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Knee - surgery</topic><topic>knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>popliteus tendon injury</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design - adverse effects</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>small size Asian knee</topic><topic>Tendon Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>tendon injury</topic><topic>Tendons - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chouhan, Dervendra Kumar, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhillon, Mandeep S., MS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chouhan, Dervendra Kumar, MS</au><au>Dhillon, Mandeep S., MS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is There an Inherent Risk to Damage the Popliteus Tendon by Femoral Component With Inbuilt External Rotation? A Pilot Study in Indian Knees</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>406</spage><epage>409</epage><pages>406-409</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Femoral components with inbuilt rotation require thicker flexion resection of the lateral femoral condyle and could have a potential risk of damaging the popliteus tendon, especially in the smaller Asian knees. Materials and Methods We prospectively evaluated 10 patients with bilateral varus osteoarthritis knee to size the cuts and their location in relation to the popliteus tendon. Two different types of implant were used on either side; one side requires resection in 3° external rotation (group A) and the other side requires a femoral component with inbuilt external rotation (group B). We observed the incidence of injury to the popliteus tendon and distance between flexion cut to its attachment over the lateral femoral condyle between both groups. Results We had popliteus tendon injury in 3 knees all from group B. Risk of damaging the popliteus tendon was found higher in group B, as the distance between flexion cut to popliteus tendon attachment was significantly low. Conclusion Femoral component with inbuilt external rotation has more risk of injuring the popliteus tendon because flexion cut takes out more bone from the lateral femoral condyle.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26601633</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.037</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2016-02, Vol.31 (2), p.406-409 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762680905 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Aged Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects Female femoral cut Femur - surgery Humans India Knee - surgery knee arthroplasty Knee Joint - surgery Knee Prosthesis - adverse effects Male Middle Aged Orthopedics Pilot Projects popliteus tendon injury Prospective Studies Prosthesis Design - adverse effects Range of Motion, Articular Rotation small size Asian knee Tendon Injuries - etiology tendon injury Tendons - surgery |
title | Is There an Inherent Risk to Damage the Popliteus Tendon by Femoral Component With Inbuilt External Rotation? A Pilot Study in Indian Knees |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T18%3A52%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20There%20an%20Inherent%20Risk%20to%20Damage%20the%20Popliteus%20Tendon%20by%20Femoral%20Component%20With%20Inbuilt%20External%20Rotation?%20A%20Pilot%20Study%20in%20Indian%20Knees&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Chouhan,%20Dervendra%20Kumar,%20MS&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=406&rft.epage=409&rft.pages=406-409&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.037&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1762680905%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1762680905&rft_id=info:pmid/26601633&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0883540315008517&rfr_iscdi=true |