Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect
We studied host plant abundance, host use, and oviposition preference in metapopulations of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia within an area of 3500 km2in the Aland islands, southwestern Finland. In the study area, M. cinxia has ∼ 400 small local populations on dry meadows with the larval host plants, P...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology (Durham) 2000-08, Vol.81 (8), p.2177-2187 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2187 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2177 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Kuussaari, Mikko Singer, Michael Hanski, Ilkka |
description | We studied host plant abundance, host use, and oviposition preference in metapopulations of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia within an area of 3500 km2in the Aland islands, southwestern Finland. In the study area, M. cinxia has ∼ 400 small local populations on dry meadows with the larval host plants, Plantago lanceolata and Veronica spicata. Plantago lanceolata occurs in practically all meadows otherwise suitable for the butterfly, whereas the distribution of V. spicata is largely restricted to the northwestern part of the study area. Based on observations of 6500 prediapause larval groups during 1993-1996, we document spatial variation in host plant use in relation to their abundance (electivity). The fraction of larval groups found on V. spicata increased disproportionally with the relative cover of V. spicata in the habitat patches. Additionally, the probability of Veronica use in a population increased with increasing number of larval groups found on Veronica in the surrounding populations but decreased with increasing use of Plantago in the neighborhood. This regional effect on host use at the scale of migrating butterflies could be caused either by spatial variation in the insect (in either preference or performance) or by spatial variation in plants (in resistance to attack by the butterflies). To study the first possibility, we conducted oviposition preference experiments using butterflies from five metapopulations located 2-55 km from each other and characterized by differences in host plant availability and host use. We found clear genetic differences in oviposition preference between the five metapopulations consistent with the observed host use patterns in the field. We conclude that the spatial host use patterns of M. cinxia in the study area are driven both by direct effects of local host abundance and by indirect effects mediated through metapopulation-level adaptation to the regionally more abundant host plant. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2177:LSALLI]2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17623902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A65197823</galeid><jstor_id>177106</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A65197823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5537-bf4b70925570472eb8a39f78723a3fddf1c76c131b762e09275f423ca6e246363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkV2LEzEUhgdRsK7-h0FFFJxuPmYmGb0qw7otDPSiLiIiIU1PlpQ06SbTlfXXmzCLiuyVBBJInvPmJE9RnGM0x7xD5whhUnVtw98ShNA7xPE3ghn7MGwWw7D6TuZo3q8_kkfFDHe0qzrM0ONi9rvqafEsxn2qRLjms-LL4JW05eYIykhrfsrReFdKtyuHNEUlj1ANcAu2XDltT-AUlAlY-jiWVxFKk-FyCWFrbn3wp5i4CGp8XjzR0kZ4cb-eFVefLj73y2pYX676xVCppqGs2up6y1BHmoahmhHYckk7zTgjVFK922msWKswxVvWEkgga3RNqJItkLqlLT0r3ky5x-BvThBHcTBRgbXSQepG4FRHO0QS-PIfcO9PwaXeBEn_ypuW5LT3E3QtLQjjtB-DVNfgIEjrHWiTthdtgzvGCU149QCexg4ORj3EX068Cj7GAFocgznIcCcwElmuyJpE1iSyXJHkiixXTHIFEUj0a5Ff8_r-NTI5sjpIp0z8E1dz1rGMbSbsR2rk7n9vExf91wxwzPNxSn01pe7j6MPfqYQilr6cYdTSX0bWyAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218985626</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kuussaari, Mikko ; Singer, Michael ; Hanski, Ilkka</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuussaari, Mikko ; Singer, Michael ; Hanski, Ilkka</creatorcontrib><description>We studied host plant abundance, host use, and oviposition preference in metapopulations of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia within an area of 3500 km2in the Aland islands, southwestern Finland. In the study area, M. cinxia has ∼ 400 small local populations on dry meadows with the larval host plants, Plantago lanceolata and Veronica spicata. Plantago lanceolata occurs in practically all meadows otherwise suitable for the butterfly, whereas the distribution of V. spicata is largely restricted to the northwestern part of the study area. Based on observations of 6500 prediapause larval groups during 1993-1996, we document spatial variation in host plant use in relation to their abundance (electivity). The fraction of larval groups found on V. spicata increased disproportionally with the relative cover of V. spicata in the habitat patches. Additionally, the probability of Veronica use in a population increased with increasing number of larval groups found on Veronica in the surrounding populations but decreased with increasing use of Plantago in the neighborhood. This regional effect on host use at the scale of migrating butterflies could be caused either by spatial variation in the insect (in either preference or performance) or by spatial variation in plants (in resistance to attack by the butterflies). To study the first possibility, we conducted oviposition preference experiments using butterflies from five metapopulations located 2-55 km from each other and characterized by differences in host plant availability and host use. We found clear genetic differences in oviposition preference between the five metapopulations consistent with the observed host use patterns in the field. We conclude that the spatial host use patterns of M. cinxia in the study area are driven both by direct effects of local host abundance and by indirect effects mediated through metapopulation-level adaptation to the regionally more abundant host plant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2177:LSALLI]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Adaptation (Biology) ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Butterflies ; Butterflies & moths ; Connectivity ; Ecological genetics ; Ecology ; English plantain ; Environmental aspects ; Finland ; Flowers & plants ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; host plant availability ; host plant use ; Host plants ; Insect ecology ; Insect larvae ; Insect-plant relationships ; Insects ; Larvae ; local adaptation ; Melitaea cinxia ; metapopulation ; Metapopulation ecology ; Oviposition ; oviposition preference ; Physiological aspects ; Plantago lanceolata ; Plants ; plant–insect association ; Population ecology ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Veronica spicata</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2000-08, Vol.81 (8), p.2177-2187</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2000 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Aug 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5537-bf4b70925570472eb8a39f78723a3fddf1c76c131b762e09275f423ca6e246363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5537-bf4b70925570472eb8a39f78723a3fddf1c76c131b762e09275f423ca6e246363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/177106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/177106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1487972$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuussaari, Mikko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanski, Ilkka</creatorcontrib><title>Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>We studied host plant abundance, host use, and oviposition preference in metapopulations of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia within an area of 3500 km2in the Aland islands, southwestern Finland. In the study area, M. cinxia has ∼ 400 small local populations on dry meadows with the larval host plants, Plantago lanceolata and Veronica spicata. Plantago lanceolata occurs in practically all meadows otherwise suitable for the butterfly, whereas the distribution of V. spicata is largely restricted to the northwestern part of the study area. Based on observations of 6500 prediapause larval groups during 1993-1996, we document spatial variation in host plant use in relation to their abundance (electivity). The fraction of larval groups found on V. spicata increased disproportionally with the relative cover of V. spicata in the habitat patches. Additionally, the probability of Veronica use in a population increased with increasing number of larval groups found on Veronica in the surrounding populations but decreased with increasing use of Plantago in the neighborhood. This regional effect on host use at the scale of migrating butterflies could be caused either by spatial variation in the insect (in either preference or performance) or by spatial variation in plants (in resistance to attack by the butterflies). To study the first possibility, we conducted oviposition preference experiments using butterflies from five metapopulations located 2-55 km from each other and characterized by differences in host plant availability and host use. We found clear genetic differences in oviposition preference between the five metapopulations consistent with the observed host use patterns in the field. We conclude that the spatial host use patterns of M. cinxia in the study area are driven both by direct effects of local host abundance and by indirect effects mediated through metapopulation-level adaptation to the regionally more abundant host plant.</description><subject>Adaptation (Biology)</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>English plantain</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>host plant availability</subject><subject>host plant use</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Insect larvae</subject><subject>Insect-plant relationships</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>local adaptation</subject><subject>Melitaea cinxia</subject><subject>metapopulation</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>Oviposition</subject><subject>oviposition preference</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Plantago lanceolata</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>plant–insect association</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Veronica spicata</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkV2LEzEUhgdRsK7-h0FFFJxuPmYmGb0qw7otDPSiLiIiIU1PlpQ06SbTlfXXmzCLiuyVBBJInvPmJE9RnGM0x7xD5whhUnVtw98ShNA7xPE3ghn7MGwWw7D6TuZo3q8_kkfFDHe0qzrM0ONi9rvqafEsxn2qRLjms-LL4JW05eYIykhrfsrReFdKtyuHNEUlj1ANcAu2XDltT-AUlAlY-jiWVxFKk-FyCWFrbn3wp5i4CGp8XjzR0kZ4cb-eFVefLj73y2pYX676xVCppqGs2up6y1BHmoahmhHYckk7zTgjVFK922msWKswxVvWEkgga3RNqJItkLqlLT0r3ky5x-BvThBHcTBRgbXSQepG4FRHO0QS-PIfcO9PwaXeBEn_ypuW5LT3E3QtLQjjtB-DVNfgIEjrHWiTthdtgzvGCU149QCexg4ORj3EX068Cj7GAFocgznIcCcwElmuyJpE1iSyXJHkiixXTHIFEUj0a5Ff8_r-NTI5sjpIp0z8E1dz1rGMbSbsR2rk7n9vExf91wxwzPNxSn01pe7j6MPfqYQilr6cYdTSX0bWyAM</recordid><startdate>200008</startdate><enddate>200008</enddate><creator>Kuussaari, Mikko</creator><creator>Singer, Michael</creator><creator>Hanski, Ilkka</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200008</creationdate><title>Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect</title><author>Kuussaari, Mikko ; Singer, Michael ; Hanski, Ilkka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5537-bf4b70925570472eb8a39f78723a3fddf1c76c131b762e09275f423ca6e246363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adaptation (Biology)</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>English plantain</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>host plant availability</topic><topic>host plant use</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Insect larvae</topic><topic>Insect-plant relationships</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>local adaptation</topic><topic>Melitaea cinxia</topic><topic>metapopulation</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>Oviposition</topic><topic>oviposition preference</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Plantago lanceolata</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>plant–insect association</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Veronica spicata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuussaari, Mikko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanski, Ilkka</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuussaari, Mikko</au><au>Singer, Michael</au><au>Hanski, Ilkka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>2000-08</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2177</spage><epage>2187</epage><pages>2177-2187</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>We studied host plant abundance, host use, and oviposition preference in metapopulations of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia within an area of 3500 km2in the Aland islands, southwestern Finland. In the study area, M. cinxia has ∼ 400 small local populations on dry meadows with the larval host plants, Plantago lanceolata and Veronica spicata. Plantago lanceolata occurs in practically all meadows otherwise suitable for the butterfly, whereas the distribution of V. spicata is largely restricted to the northwestern part of the study area. Based on observations of 6500 prediapause larval groups during 1993-1996, we document spatial variation in host plant use in relation to their abundance (electivity). The fraction of larval groups found on V. spicata increased disproportionally with the relative cover of V. spicata in the habitat patches. Additionally, the probability of Veronica use in a population increased with increasing number of larval groups found on Veronica in the surrounding populations but decreased with increasing use of Plantago in the neighborhood. This regional effect on host use at the scale of migrating butterflies could be caused either by spatial variation in the insect (in either preference or performance) or by spatial variation in plants (in resistance to attack by the butterflies). To study the first possibility, we conducted oviposition preference experiments using butterflies from five metapopulations located 2-55 km from each other and characterized by differences in host plant availability and host use. We found clear genetic differences in oviposition preference between the five metapopulations consistent with the observed host use patterns in the field. We conclude that the spatial host use patterns of M. cinxia in the study area are driven both by direct effects of local host abundance and by indirect effects mediated through metapopulation-level adaptation to the regionally more abundant host plant.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2177:LSALLI]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 2000-08, Vol.81 (8), p.2177-2187 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17623902 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adaptation (Biology) Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Autoecology Biological and medical sciences Butterflies Butterflies & moths Connectivity Ecological genetics Ecology English plantain Environmental aspects Finland Flowers & plants Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology host plant availability host plant use Host plants Insect ecology Insect larvae Insect-plant relationships Insects Larvae local adaptation Melitaea cinxia metapopulation Metapopulation ecology Oviposition oviposition preference Physiological aspects Plantago lanceolata Plants plant–insect association Population ecology Protozoa. Invertebrata Veronica spicata |
title | Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T15%3A21%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20Specialization%20and%20Landscape-Level%20Influence%20on%20Host%20Use%20in%20an%20Herbivorous%20Insect&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Kuussaari,%20Mikko&rft.date=2000-08&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2177&rft.epage=2187&rft.pages=2177-2187&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081%5B2177:LSALLI%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA65197823%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218985626&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A65197823&rft_jstor_id=177106&rfr_iscdi=true |