Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect

We studied host plant abundance, host use, and oviposition preference in metapopulations of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia within an area of 3500 km2in the Aland islands, southwestern Finland. In the study area, M. cinxia has ∼ 400 small local populations on dry meadows with the larval host plants, P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 2000-08, Vol.81 (8), p.2177-2187
Hauptverfasser: Kuussaari, Mikko, Singer, Michael, Hanski, Ilkka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2187
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2177
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 81
creator Kuussaari, Mikko
Singer, Michael
Hanski, Ilkka
description We studied host plant abundance, host use, and oviposition preference in metapopulations of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia within an area of 3500 km2in the Aland islands, southwestern Finland. In the study area, M. cinxia has ∼ 400 small local populations on dry meadows with the larval host plants, Plantago lanceolata and Veronica spicata. Plantago lanceolata occurs in practically all meadows otherwise suitable for the butterfly, whereas the distribution of V. spicata is largely restricted to the northwestern part of the study area. Based on observations of 6500 prediapause larval groups during 1993-1996, we document spatial variation in host plant use in relation to their abundance (electivity). The fraction of larval groups found on V. spicata increased disproportionally with the relative cover of V. spicata in the habitat patches. Additionally, the probability of Veronica use in a population increased with increasing number of larval groups found on Veronica in the surrounding populations but decreased with increasing use of Plantago in the neighborhood. This regional effect on host use at the scale of migrating butterflies could be caused either by spatial variation in the insect (in either preference or performance) or by spatial variation in plants (in resistance to attack by the butterflies). To study the first possibility, we conducted oviposition preference experiments using butterflies from five metapopulations located 2-55 km from each other and characterized by differences in host plant availability and host use. We found clear genetic differences in oviposition preference between the five metapopulations consistent with the observed host use patterns in the field. We conclude that the spatial host use patterns of M. cinxia in the study area are driven both by direct effects of local host abundance and by indirect effects mediated through metapopulation-level adaptation to the regionally more abundant host plant.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2177:LSALLI]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17623902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A65197823</galeid><jstor_id>177106</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A65197823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5537-bf4b70925570472eb8a39f78723a3fddf1c76c131b762e09275f423ca6e246363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkV2LEzEUhgdRsK7-h0FFFJxuPmYmGb0qw7otDPSiLiIiIU1PlpQ06SbTlfXXmzCLiuyVBBJInvPmJE9RnGM0x7xD5whhUnVtw98ShNA7xPE3ghn7MGwWw7D6TuZo3q8_kkfFDHe0qzrM0ONi9rvqafEsxn2qRLjms-LL4JW05eYIykhrfsrReFdKtyuHNEUlj1ANcAu2XDltT-AUlAlY-jiWVxFKk-FyCWFrbn3wp5i4CGp8XjzR0kZ4cb-eFVefLj73y2pYX676xVCppqGs2up6y1BHmoahmhHYckk7zTgjVFK922msWKswxVvWEkgga3RNqJItkLqlLT0r3ky5x-BvThBHcTBRgbXSQepG4FRHO0QS-PIfcO9PwaXeBEn_ypuW5LT3E3QtLQjjtB-DVNfgIEjrHWiTthdtgzvGCU149QCexg4ORj3EX068Cj7GAFocgznIcCcwElmuyJpE1iSyXJHkiixXTHIFEUj0a5Ff8_r-NTI5sjpIp0z8E1dz1rGMbSbsR2rk7n9vExf91wxwzPNxSn01pe7j6MPfqYQilr6cYdTSX0bWyAM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218985626</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kuussaari, Mikko ; Singer, Michael ; Hanski, Ilkka</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuussaari, Mikko ; Singer, Michael ; Hanski, Ilkka</creatorcontrib><description>We studied host plant abundance, host use, and oviposition preference in metapopulations of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia within an area of 3500 km2in the Aland islands, southwestern Finland. In the study area, M. cinxia has ∼ 400 small local populations on dry meadows with the larval host plants, Plantago lanceolata and Veronica spicata. Plantago lanceolata occurs in practically all meadows otherwise suitable for the butterfly, whereas the distribution of V. spicata is largely restricted to the northwestern part of the study area. Based on observations of 6500 prediapause larval groups during 1993-1996, we document spatial variation in host plant use in relation to their abundance (electivity). The fraction of larval groups found on V. spicata increased disproportionally with the relative cover of V. spicata in the habitat patches. Additionally, the probability of Veronica use in a population increased with increasing number of larval groups found on Veronica in the surrounding populations but decreased with increasing use of Plantago in the neighborhood. This regional effect on host use at the scale of migrating butterflies could be caused either by spatial variation in the insect (in either preference or performance) or by spatial variation in plants (in resistance to attack by the butterflies). To study the first possibility, we conducted oviposition preference experiments using butterflies from five metapopulations located 2-55 km from each other and characterized by differences in host plant availability and host use. We found clear genetic differences in oviposition preference between the five metapopulations consistent with the observed host use patterns in the field. We conclude that the spatial host use patterns of M. cinxia in the study area are driven both by direct effects of local host abundance and by indirect effects mediated through metapopulation-level adaptation to the regionally more abundant host plant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2177:LSALLI]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Adaptation (Biology) ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Butterflies ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; Connectivity ; Ecological genetics ; Ecology ; English plantain ; Environmental aspects ; Finland ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; host plant availability ; host plant use ; Host plants ; Insect ecology ; Insect larvae ; Insect-plant relationships ; Insects ; Larvae ; local adaptation ; Melitaea cinxia ; metapopulation ; Metapopulation ecology ; Oviposition ; oviposition preference ; Physiological aspects ; Plantago lanceolata ; Plants ; plant–insect association ; Population ecology ; Protozoa. Invertebrata ; Veronica spicata</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2000-08, Vol.81 (8), p.2177-2187</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2000 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2000 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Aug 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5537-bf4b70925570472eb8a39f78723a3fddf1c76c131b762e09275f423ca6e246363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5537-bf4b70925570472eb8a39f78723a3fddf1c76c131b762e09275f423ca6e246363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/177106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/177106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574,58016,58249</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1487972$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuussaari, Mikko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanski, Ilkka</creatorcontrib><title>Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>We studied host plant abundance, host use, and oviposition preference in metapopulations of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia within an area of 3500 km2in the Aland islands, southwestern Finland. In the study area, M. cinxia has ∼ 400 small local populations on dry meadows with the larval host plants, Plantago lanceolata and Veronica spicata. Plantago lanceolata occurs in practically all meadows otherwise suitable for the butterfly, whereas the distribution of V. spicata is largely restricted to the northwestern part of the study area. Based on observations of 6500 prediapause larval groups during 1993-1996, we document spatial variation in host plant use in relation to their abundance (electivity). The fraction of larval groups found on V. spicata increased disproportionally with the relative cover of V. spicata in the habitat patches. Additionally, the probability of Veronica use in a population increased with increasing number of larval groups found on Veronica in the surrounding populations but decreased with increasing use of Plantago in the neighborhood. This regional effect on host use at the scale of migrating butterflies could be caused either by spatial variation in the insect (in either preference or performance) or by spatial variation in plants (in resistance to attack by the butterflies). To study the first possibility, we conducted oviposition preference experiments using butterflies from five metapopulations located 2-55 km from each other and characterized by differences in host plant availability and host use. We found clear genetic differences in oviposition preference between the five metapopulations consistent with the observed host use patterns in the field. We conclude that the spatial host use patterns of M. cinxia in the study area are driven both by direct effects of local host abundance and by indirect effects mediated through metapopulation-level adaptation to the regionally more abundant host plant.</description><subject>Adaptation (Biology)</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Butterflies</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>English plantain</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Finland</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>host plant availability</subject><subject>host plant use</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Insect larvae</subject><subject>Insect-plant relationships</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>local adaptation</subject><subject>Melitaea cinxia</subject><subject>metapopulation</subject><subject>Metapopulation ecology</subject><subject>Oviposition</subject><subject>oviposition preference</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Plantago lanceolata</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>plant–insect association</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Protozoa. Invertebrata</subject><subject>Veronica spicata</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkV2LEzEUhgdRsK7-h0FFFJxuPmYmGb0qw7otDPSiLiIiIU1PlpQ06SbTlfXXmzCLiuyVBBJInvPmJE9RnGM0x7xD5whhUnVtw98ShNA7xPE3ghn7MGwWw7D6TuZo3q8_kkfFDHe0qzrM0ONi9rvqafEsxn2qRLjms-LL4JW05eYIykhrfsrReFdKtyuHNEUlj1ANcAu2XDltT-AUlAlY-jiWVxFKk-FyCWFrbn3wp5i4CGp8XjzR0kZ4cb-eFVefLj73y2pYX676xVCppqGs2up6y1BHmoahmhHYckk7zTgjVFK922msWKswxVvWEkgga3RNqJItkLqlLT0r3ky5x-BvThBHcTBRgbXSQepG4FRHO0QS-PIfcO9PwaXeBEn_ypuW5LT3E3QtLQjjtB-DVNfgIEjrHWiTthdtgzvGCU149QCexg4ORj3EX068Cj7GAFocgznIcCcwElmuyJpE1iSyXJHkiixXTHIFEUj0a5Ff8_r-NTI5sjpIp0z8E1dz1rGMbSbsR2rk7n9vExf91wxwzPNxSn01pe7j6MPfqYQilr6cYdTSX0bWyAM</recordid><startdate>200008</startdate><enddate>200008</enddate><creator>Kuussaari, Mikko</creator><creator>Singer, Michael</creator><creator>Hanski, Ilkka</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200008</creationdate><title>Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect</title><author>Kuussaari, Mikko ; Singer, Michael ; Hanski, Ilkka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5537-bf4b70925570472eb8a39f78723a3fddf1c76c131b762e09275f423ca6e246363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adaptation (Biology)</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Butterflies</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>English plantain</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Finland</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>host plant availability</topic><topic>host plant use</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Insect larvae</topic><topic>Insect-plant relationships</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>local adaptation</topic><topic>Melitaea cinxia</topic><topic>metapopulation</topic><topic>Metapopulation ecology</topic><topic>Oviposition</topic><topic>oviposition preference</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Plantago lanceolata</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>plant–insect association</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Protozoa. Invertebrata</topic><topic>Veronica spicata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuussaari, Mikko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanski, Ilkka</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuussaari, Mikko</au><au>Singer, Michael</au><au>Hanski, Ilkka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>2000-08</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2177</spage><epage>2187</epage><pages>2177-2187</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>We studied host plant abundance, host use, and oviposition preference in metapopulations of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia within an area of 3500 km2in the Aland islands, southwestern Finland. In the study area, M. cinxia has ∼ 400 small local populations on dry meadows with the larval host plants, Plantago lanceolata and Veronica spicata. Plantago lanceolata occurs in practically all meadows otherwise suitable for the butterfly, whereas the distribution of V. spicata is largely restricted to the northwestern part of the study area. Based on observations of 6500 prediapause larval groups during 1993-1996, we document spatial variation in host plant use in relation to their abundance (electivity). The fraction of larval groups found on V. spicata increased disproportionally with the relative cover of V. spicata in the habitat patches. Additionally, the probability of Veronica use in a population increased with increasing number of larval groups found on Veronica in the surrounding populations but decreased with increasing use of Plantago in the neighborhood. This regional effect on host use at the scale of migrating butterflies could be caused either by spatial variation in the insect (in either preference or performance) or by spatial variation in plants (in resistance to attack by the butterflies). To study the first possibility, we conducted oviposition preference experiments using butterflies from five metapopulations located 2-55 km from each other and characterized by differences in host plant availability and host use. We found clear genetic differences in oviposition preference between the five metapopulations consistent with the observed host use patterns in the field. We conclude that the spatial host use patterns of M. cinxia in the study area are driven both by direct effects of local host abundance and by indirect effects mediated through metapopulation-level adaptation to the regionally more abundant host plant.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[2177:LSALLI]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2000-08, Vol.81 (8), p.2177-2187
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17623902
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adaptation (Biology)
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Autoecology
Biological and medical sciences
Butterflies
Butterflies & moths
Connectivity
Ecological genetics
Ecology
English plantain
Environmental aspects
Finland
Flowers & plants
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
host plant availability
host plant use
Host plants
Insect ecology
Insect larvae
Insect-plant relationships
Insects
Larvae
local adaptation
Melitaea cinxia
metapopulation
Metapopulation ecology
Oviposition
oviposition preference
Physiological aspects
Plantago lanceolata
Plants
plant–insect association
Population ecology
Protozoa. Invertebrata
Veronica spicata
title Local Specialization and Landscape-Level Influence on Host Use in an Herbivorous Insect
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T15%3A21%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20Specialization%20and%20Landscape-Level%20Influence%20on%20Host%20Use%20in%20an%20Herbivorous%20Insect&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Kuussaari,%20Mikko&rft.date=2000-08&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2177&rft.epage=2187&rft.pages=2177-2187&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081%5B2177:LSALLI%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA65197823%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218985626&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A65197823&rft_jstor_id=177106&rfr_iscdi=true