Great swamp natural effluent management system – a summary of thirteen years of operations

Beaufort-Jasper Water & Sewer Authority has discharged reclaimed wastewater continuously for thirteen years to a 194ha natural swamp forest in coastal South Carolina (USA). Wastewater inputs have increased from an average of 363m3/d in 1999 to an average of 8823m3/d in 2011. Natural inflows of r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological engineering 2014-12, Vol.73, p.353-366
Hauptverfasser: Knight, R.L., Clarke, R.A., Keller, C.H., Knight, S.L., Petry, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 366
container_issue
container_start_page 353
container_title Ecological engineering
container_volume 73
creator Knight, R.L.
Clarke, R.A.
Keller, C.H.
Knight, S.L.
Petry, C.
description Beaufort-Jasper Water & Sewer Authority has discharged reclaimed wastewater continuously for thirteen years to a 194ha natural swamp forest in coastal South Carolina (USA). Wastewater inputs have increased from an average of 363m3/d in 1999 to an average of 8823m3/d in 2011. Natural inflows of rainfall and runoff to the swamp forest, averaging 9757m3/d exceed anthropogenic inputs. Wastewater inputs have increased the swamp’s inundation frequency in the lowest areas from 43 to 100%. Reclaimed water receives advanced secondary pretreatment with concentrations averaging 2.9mg/L five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), 2.8mg/L total suspended solids (TSS), 0.5mg/L ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N), 6.7mg/L total nitrogen (TN), and 2.2mg/L total phosphorus (TP). A variable percentage of these pollutants are assimilated within the swamp. Concentrations of chlorides, specific conductance, and TP are the only downstream water quality evidence of discharge. The dominant gum (Nyssa spp.) and baldcypress (Taxodium distichum) trees are thriving; however, red maple (Acer rubrum) trees have reduced dominance primarily due to increased hydroperiod. Macroinvertebrate and fish populations in the swamp forest have increasing biomass in response to increased wetted area. The Great Swamp Effluent Management System is an example of adaptive ecological engineering, protecting downstream recreational and shellfish waters by creating a productive interface between reclaimed wastewaters and natural wetlands.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762373602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925857414004157</els_id><sourcerecordid>1762373602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bfd041289c30df02879d122ccb1642e907d00d551bd576d77851e6b58e04d4893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMGKFDEQhoMoOK4-gpCL4KV7K-lOp3MSWdxVWPCiNyFkkuo1Q3d6TKWVufkOvqFPYjcz7NVTFcX318__M_ZaQC1AdNeHGv08YnqoJYi2BlOD6J-wnei1rDpj5FO2AyNV1SvdPmcviA4AoKUyO_btLqMrnH656ciTK0t2I8dhGBdMhU8uuQectpVOVHDif3__4Y7TMk0un_g88PI95oKY-Aldpu0yHzG7EudEL9mzwY2Ery7zin29_fDl5mN1__nu0837-8o3WpZqPwRoheyNbyAMIHttgpDS-73oWokGdAAISol9ULoLWvdKYLdXPUIb2t40V-zt-e8xzz8WpGKnSB7H0SWcF7JCd7LRTQdyRdUZ9XkmyjjYY45bFivAbm3ag720abc2LRi7trnq3lwsHHk3DtklH-lRLA1ICdCu3Lszh2venxGzJR8xeQwxoy82zPE_Tv8Aj5OOkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1762373602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Great swamp natural effluent management system – a summary of thirteen years of operations</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Knight, R.L. ; Clarke, R.A. ; Keller, C.H. ; Knight, S.L. ; Petry, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Knight, R.L. ; Clarke, R.A. ; Keller, C.H. ; Knight, S.L. ; Petry, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Beaufort-Jasper Water &amp; Sewer Authority has discharged reclaimed wastewater continuously for thirteen years to a 194ha natural swamp forest in coastal South Carolina (USA). Wastewater inputs have increased from an average of 363m3/d in 1999 to an average of 8823m3/d in 2011. Natural inflows of rainfall and runoff to the swamp forest, averaging 9757m3/d exceed anthropogenic inputs. Wastewater inputs have increased the swamp’s inundation frequency in the lowest areas from 43 to 100%. Reclaimed water receives advanced secondary pretreatment with concentrations averaging 2.9mg/L five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), 2.8mg/L total suspended solids (TSS), 0.5mg/L ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N), 6.7mg/L total nitrogen (TN), and 2.2mg/L total phosphorus (TP). A variable percentage of these pollutants are assimilated within the swamp. Concentrations of chlorides, specific conductance, and TP are the only downstream water quality evidence of discharge. The dominant gum (Nyssa spp.) and baldcypress (Taxodium distichum) trees are thriving; however, red maple (Acer rubrum) trees have reduced dominance primarily due to increased hydroperiod. Macroinvertebrate and fish populations in the swamp forest have increasing biomass in response to increased wetted area. The Great Swamp Effluent Management System is an example of adaptive ecological engineering, protecting downstream recreational and shellfish waters by creating a productive interface between reclaimed wastewaters and natural wetlands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-8574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Effluent disposal ; Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Nonpoint source pollution ; Pollution ; Reclaimed wastewater ; Treatment wetland ; Wastewaters ; Water quality ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Ecological engineering, 2014-12, Vol.73, p.353-366</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bfd041289c30df02879d122ccb1642e907d00d551bd576d77851e6b58e04d4893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bfd041289c30df02879d122ccb1642e907d00d551bd576d77851e6b58e04d4893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=29022004$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knight, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, S.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petry, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Great swamp natural effluent management system – a summary of thirteen years of operations</title><title>Ecological engineering</title><description>Beaufort-Jasper Water &amp; Sewer Authority has discharged reclaimed wastewater continuously for thirteen years to a 194ha natural swamp forest in coastal South Carolina (USA). Wastewater inputs have increased from an average of 363m3/d in 1999 to an average of 8823m3/d in 2011. Natural inflows of rainfall and runoff to the swamp forest, averaging 9757m3/d exceed anthropogenic inputs. Wastewater inputs have increased the swamp’s inundation frequency in the lowest areas from 43 to 100%. Reclaimed water receives advanced secondary pretreatment with concentrations averaging 2.9mg/L five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), 2.8mg/L total suspended solids (TSS), 0.5mg/L ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N), 6.7mg/L total nitrogen (TN), and 2.2mg/L total phosphorus (TP). A variable percentage of these pollutants are assimilated within the swamp. Concentrations of chlorides, specific conductance, and TP are the only downstream water quality evidence of discharge. The dominant gum (Nyssa spp.) and baldcypress (Taxodium distichum) trees are thriving; however, red maple (Acer rubrum) trees have reduced dominance primarily due to increased hydroperiod. Macroinvertebrate and fish populations in the swamp forest have increasing biomass in response to increased wetted area. The Great Swamp Effluent Management System is an example of adaptive ecological engineering, protecting downstream recreational and shellfish waters by creating a productive interface between reclaimed wastewaters and natural wetlands.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Effluent disposal</subject><subject>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Nonpoint source pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Reclaimed wastewater</subject><subject>Treatment wetland</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0925-8574</issn><issn>1872-6992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMGKFDEQhoMoOK4-gpCL4KV7K-lOp3MSWdxVWPCiNyFkkuo1Q3d6TKWVufkOvqFPYjcz7NVTFcX318__M_ZaQC1AdNeHGv08YnqoJYi2BlOD6J-wnei1rDpj5FO2AyNV1SvdPmcviA4AoKUyO_btLqMrnH656ciTK0t2I8dhGBdMhU8uuQectpVOVHDif3__4Y7TMk0un_g88PI95oKY-Aldpu0yHzG7EudEL9mzwY2Ery7zin29_fDl5mN1__nu0837-8o3WpZqPwRoheyNbyAMIHttgpDS-73oWokGdAAISol9ULoLWvdKYLdXPUIb2t40V-zt-e8xzz8WpGKnSB7H0SWcF7JCd7LRTQdyRdUZ9XkmyjjYY45bFivAbm3ag720abc2LRi7trnq3lwsHHk3DtklH-lRLA1ICdCu3Lszh2venxGzJR8xeQwxoy82zPE_Tv8Aj5OOkw</recordid><startdate>20141201</startdate><enddate>20141201</enddate><creator>Knight, R.L.</creator><creator>Clarke, R.A.</creator><creator>Keller, C.H.</creator><creator>Knight, S.L.</creator><creator>Petry, C.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141201</creationdate><title>Great swamp natural effluent management system – a summary of thirteen years of operations</title><author>Knight, R.L. ; Clarke, R.A. ; Keller, C.H. ; Knight, S.L. ; Petry, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bfd041289c30df02879d122ccb1642e907d00d551bd576d77851e6b58e04d4893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Effluent disposal</topic><topic>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Nonpoint source pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Reclaimed wastewater</topic><topic>Treatment wetland</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knight, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keller, C.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, S.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petry, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knight, R.L.</au><au>Clarke, R.A.</au><au>Keller, C.H.</au><au>Knight, S.L.</au><au>Petry, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Great swamp natural effluent management system – a summary of thirteen years of operations</atitle><jtitle>Ecological engineering</jtitle><date>2014-12-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>73</volume><spage>353</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>353-366</pages><issn>0925-8574</issn><eissn>1872-6992</eissn><abstract>Beaufort-Jasper Water &amp; Sewer Authority has discharged reclaimed wastewater continuously for thirteen years to a 194ha natural swamp forest in coastal South Carolina (USA). Wastewater inputs have increased from an average of 363m3/d in 1999 to an average of 8823m3/d in 2011. Natural inflows of rainfall and runoff to the swamp forest, averaging 9757m3/d exceed anthropogenic inputs. Wastewater inputs have increased the swamp’s inundation frequency in the lowest areas from 43 to 100%. Reclaimed water receives advanced secondary pretreatment with concentrations averaging 2.9mg/L five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), 2.8mg/L total suspended solids (TSS), 0.5mg/L ammonium nitrogen (NH4-N), 6.7mg/L total nitrogen (TN), and 2.2mg/L total phosphorus (TP). A variable percentage of these pollutants are assimilated within the swamp. Concentrations of chlorides, specific conductance, and TP are the only downstream water quality evidence of discharge. The dominant gum (Nyssa spp.) and baldcypress (Taxodium distichum) trees are thriving; however, red maple (Acer rubrum) trees have reduced dominance primarily due to increased hydroperiod. Macroinvertebrate and fish populations in the swamp forest have increasing biomass in response to increased wetted area. The Great Swamp Effluent Management System is an example of adaptive ecological engineering, protecting downstream recreational and shellfish waters by creating a productive interface between reclaimed wastewaters and natural wetlands.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.018</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-8574
ispartof Ecological engineering, 2014-12, Vol.73, p.353-366
issn 0925-8574
1872-6992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762373602
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Effluent disposal
Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Nonpoint source pollution
Pollution
Reclaimed wastewater
Treatment wetland
Wastewaters
Water quality
Water treatment and pollution
title Great swamp natural effluent management system – a summary of thirteen years of operations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A02%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Great%20swamp%20natural%20effluent%20management%20system%20%E2%80%93%20a%20summary%20of%20thirteen%20years%20of%20operations&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20engineering&rft.au=Knight,%20R.L.&rft.date=2014-12-01&rft.volume=73&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=353-366&rft.issn=0925-8574&rft.eissn=1872-6992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1762373602%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1762373602&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0925857414004157&rfr_iscdi=true