Tectonic implications of transpression and transtension: Upper Rhine Graben

Seismic reflection data from the Upper Rhine Graben (URG) show a series of synclines along the linear eastern boundary faults from north of Karlsruhe to the Jura Mountains. Similar structures do not characterize the northern segment of the graben. The synclinal shape is portrayed by inversion relate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tectonics (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2005-12, Vol.24 (6), p.np-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Rotstein, Y., Behrmann, J. H., Lutz, M., Wirsing, G., Luz, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page np
container_title Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)
container_volume 24
creator Rotstein, Y.
Behrmann, J. H.
Lutz, M.
Wirsing, G.
Luz, A.
description Seismic reflection data from the Upper Rhine Graben (URG) show a series of synclines along the linear eastern boundary faults from north of Karlsruhe to the Jura Mountains. Similar structures do not characterize the northern segment of the graben. The synclinal shape is portrayed by inversion related to transpression on the linear boundary faults, coupled with the conserved easterly dip of the sediments farther inside the tilted hanging block. The onset of transpression preceded the known early Burdigalian unconformity but was also an early Miocene event. It suggests that the regional compression axis (σ1) in early Miocene had a trend between 315° and 0°. The continuous transtension in the northern segment suggests that at no time during the history of the URG was the regional σ1 horizontal with a NE‐SW trend. The lack of transpressional structures in the younger Plio‐Pleistocene sediments along the entire eastern boundary of the URG suggests a late change in the regional stress field. The main eastern boundary faults and synclines north and south of Baden‐Baden are all continuous and have the same trend. Kinematically, they form a single graben segment and respond to the regional stress in the same way.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2005TC001797
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762362163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1762362163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4105-fa38795887e1e3bf238caf9e7065a4b5092f0d9eb577556c3a496ac2c399f4ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4wOyZEHAj9iO2UFUCqI8hFLRneW4E2FIk2Cngv49qYIQKzYz0tW5M9JB6JjgM4KpOqcY8zzDmEgld9CIqCSJVT930QhTmcYywXIfHYTw1jMJF2KE7nKwXVM7G7lVWzlrOtfUIWrKqPOmDq2HEPokMvVySDqot8FFNG9b8NHzq6shmnpTQH2I9kpTBTj62WM0v57k2U08e5zeZpez2CQE87g0LJWKp6kEAqwoKUutKRVILLhJCo4VLfFSQcGl5FxYZhIljKWWKVUmsGRjdDLcbX3zsYbQ6ZULFqrK1NCsgyZSUCYoEaxHTwfU-iYED6VuvVsZv9EE660z_ddZj9MB_3QVbP5ldT7J8v4T70vxUHK9nK_fkvHvWkgmuX55mGq6uCIL-ST0PfsGY098cQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1762362163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tectonic implications of transpression and transtension: Upper Rhine Graben</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Rotstein, Y. ; Behrmann, J. H. ; Lutz, M. ; Wirsing, G. ; Luz, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rotstein, Y. ; Behrmann, J. H. ; Lutz, M. ; Wirsing, G. ; Luz, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Seismic reflection data from the Upper Rhine Graben (URG) show a series of synclines along the linear eastern boundary faults from north of Karlsruhe to the Jura Mountains. Similar structures do not characterize the northern segment of the graben. The synclinal shape is portrayed by inversion related to transpression on the linear boundary faults, coupled with the conserved easterly dip of the sediments farther inside the tilted hanging block. The onset of transpression preceded the known early Burdigalian unconformity but was also an early Miocene event. It suggests that the regional compression axis (σ1) in early Miocene had a trend between 315° and 0°. The continuous transtension in the northern segment suggests that at no time during the history of the URG was the regional σ1 horizontal with a NE‐SW trend. The lack of transpressional structures in the younger Plio‐Pleistocene sediments along the entire eastern boundary of the URG suggests a late change in the regional stress field. The main eastern boundary faults and synclines north and south of Baden‐Baden are all continuous and have the same trend. Kinematically, they form a single graben segment and respond to the regional stress in the same way.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9194</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2005TC001797</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>transform faulting ; transpression ; Upper Rhine Graben</subject><ispartof>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.), 2005-12, Vol.24 (6), p.np-n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4105-fa38795887e1e3bf238caf9e7065a4b5092f0d9eb577556c3a496ac2c399f4ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4105-fa38795887e1e3bf238caf9e7065a4b5092f0d9eb577556c3a496ac2c399f4ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2005TC001797$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2005TC001797$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rotstein, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behrmann, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirsing, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luz, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Tectonic implications of transpression and transtension: Upper Rhine Graben</title><title>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</title><addtitle>Tectonics</addtitle><description>Seismic reflection data from the Upper Rhine Graben (URG) show a series of synclines along the linear eastern boundary faults from north of Karlsruhe to the Jura Mountains. Similar structures do not characterize the northern segment of the graben. The synclinal shape is portrayed by inversion related to transpression on the linear boundary faults, coupled with the conserved easterly dip of the sediments farther inside the tilted hanging block. The onset of transpression preceded the known early Burdigalian unconformity but was also an early Miocene event. It suggests that the regional compression axis (σ1) in early Miocene had a trend between 315° and 0°. The continuous transtension in the northern segment suggests that at no time during the history of the URG was the regional σ1 horizontal with a NE‐SW trend. The lack of transpressional structures in the younger Plio‐Pleistocene sediments along the entire eastern boundary of the URG suggests a late change in the regional stress field. The main eastern boundary faults and synclines north and south of Baden‐Baden are all continuous and have the same trend. Kinematically, they form a single graben segment and respond to the regional stress in the same way.</description><subject>transform faulting</subject><subject>transpression</subject><subject>Upper Rhine Graben</subject><issn>0278-7407</issn><issn>1944-9194</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4wOyZEHAj9iO2UFUCqI8hFLRneW4E2FIk2Cngv49qYIQKzYz0tW5M9JB6JjgM4KpOqcY8zzDmEgld9CIqCSJVT930QhTmcYywXIfHYTw1jMJF2KE7nKwXVM7G7lVWzlrOtfUIWrKqPOmDq2HEPokMvVySDqot8FFNG9b8NHzq6shmnpTQH2I9kpTBTj62WM0v57k2U08e5zeZpez2CQE87g0LJWKp6kEAqwoKUutKRVILLhJCo4VLfFSQcGl5FxYZhIljKWWKVUmsGRjdDLcbX3zsYbQ6ZULFqrK1NCsgyZSUCYoEaxHTwfU-iYED6VuvVsZv9EE660z_ddZj9MB_3QVbP5ldT7J8v4T70vxUHK9nK_fkvHvWkgmuX55mGq6uCIL-ST0PfsGY098cQ</recordid><startdate>200512</startdate><enddate>200512</enddate><creator>Rotstein, Y.</creator><creator>Behrmann, J. H.</creator><creator>Lutz, M.</creator><creator>Wirsing, G.</creator><creator>Luz, A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200512</creationdate><title>Tectonic implications of transpression and transtension: Upper Rhine Graben</title><author>Rotstein, Y. ; Behrmann, J. H. ; Lutz, M. ; Wirsing, G. ; Luz, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4105-fa38795887e1e3bf238caf9e7065a4b5092f0d9eb577556c3a496ac2c399f4ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>transform faulting</topic><topic>transpression</topic><topic>Upper Rhine Graben</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rotstein, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behrmann, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wirsing, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luz, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rotstein, Y.</au><au>Behrmann, J. H.</au><au>Lutz, M.</au><au>Wirsing, G.</au><au>Luz, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tectonic implications of transpression and transtension: Upper Rhine Graben</atitle><jtitle>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><addtitle>Tectonics</addtitle><date>2005-12</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>np</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>np-n/a</pages><issn>0278-7407</issn><eissn>1944-9194</eissn><abstract>Seismic reflection data from the Upper Rhine Graben (URG) show a series of synclines along the linear eastern boundary faults from north of Karlsruhe to the Jura Mountains. Similar structures do not characterize the northern segment of the graben. The synclinal shape is portrayed by inversion related to transpression on the linear boundary faults, coupled with the conserved easterly dip of the sediments farther inside the tilted hanging block. The onset of transpression preceded the known early Burdigalian unconformity but was also an early Miocene event. It suggests that the regional compression axis (σ1) in early Miocene had a trend between 315° and 0°. The continuous transtension in the northern segment suggests that at no time during the history of the URG was the regional σ1 horizontal with a NE‐SW trend. The lack of transpressional structures in the younger Plio‐Pleistocene sediments along the entire eastern boundary of the URG suggests a late change in the regional stress field. The main eastern boundary faults and synclines north and south of Baden‐Baden are all continuous and have the same trend. Kinematically, they form a single graben segment and respond to the regional stress in the same way.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2005TC001797</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7407
ispartof Tectonics (Washington, D.C.), 2005-12, Vol.24 (6), p.np-n/a
issn 0278-7407
1944-9194
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762362163
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects transform faulting
transpression
Upper Rhine Graben
title Tectonic implications of transpression and transtension: Upper Rhine Graben
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T11%3A17%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tectonic%20implications%20of%20transpression%20and%20transtension:%20Upper%20Rhine%20Graben&rft.jtitle=Tectonics%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Rotstein,%20Y.&rft.date=2005-12&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=np&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=np-n/a&rft.issn=0278-7407&rft.eissn=1944-9194&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2005TC001797&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1762362163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1762362163&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true