Comparing the endothelialisation of extracellular matrix bioscaffolds with coated synthetic vascular graft materials

Abstract Introduction Existing synthetic vascular grafts have unacceptably high failure rates when replacing below knee arteries. In vitro endothelialisation is a technique, which has been shown to enhance the patency rates of below knee vascular grafts. Synthetic materials are however poor cellular...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of surgery (London, England) England), 2016-01, Vol.25, p.31-37
Hauptverfasser: Coakley, D.N, Shaikh, F.M, O'Sullivan, K, Kavanagh, E.G, Grace, P.A, Walsh, S.R, McGloughlin, T.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue
container_start_page 31
container_title International journal of surgery (London, England)
container_volume 25
creator Coakley, D.N
Shaikh, F.M
O'Sullivan, K
Kavanagh, E.G
Grace, P.A
Walsh, S.R
McGloughlin, T.M
description Abstract Introduction Existing synthetic vascular grafts have unacceptably high failure rates when replacing below knee arteries. In vitro endothelialisation is a technique, which has been shown to enhance the patency rates of below knee vascular grafts. Synthetic materials are however poor cellular substrates and must be combined with coatings to promote cellular growth and attachment. The most common coating clinically is fibrin-coated ePTFE. The aim of our study was to compare the endothelialisation of fibrin-coated ePTFE with novel extracellular matrix (ECM) biomaterials that we hypothesise will provide a superior substrate for cell growth. Methods Human endothelial cells were cultured on ECM scaffolds and fibrin-coated ePTFE. Uncoated Dacron and ePTFE acted as controls. The cells were examined for viability, phenotype, adhesion and proliferation. Cell morphology was accessed using scanning electron microscopy. Results Cells remained viable and produced von Willebrand factor on all substrates tested. ECM scaffolds and fibrin-modified ePTFE achieved statistically higher attachment efficiency when compared to both uncoated synthetic graft materials (p ≤ 0.001). At 90 min 80 ± 3.6% of cells had attached to the ECM scaffold compared to Dacron (30 ± 4.5%, n = 3) and ePTFE (33 ± 2.5%, n = 3). There was no difference in adhesion rates between ECM scaffolds and fibrin-coated ePTFE (p = 1.00). Endothelial cells proliferated fastest on ECM scaffolds when compared to all other materials tested (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762347211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1743919115013126</els_id><sourcerecordid>1762347211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5527aff2583d946a17adb1a4651cd812458e5d63010caceae7a51df70c11f85b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EoqXwBTggH7ls8DhxnJUQElrxT6rEAThbs_akdUjixXba7rfHYUsPHDi9Obz37PkNYy9BVCCgfTNUfkhLJQWoCqASonvEzkE39WYLavv4Yd7CGXuW0iBEIzronrIz2SrdgdDnLO_CdMDo5yuer4nT7ELR0ePoE2YfZh56Tnc5oqVxXEaMfMIc_R3f-5As9n0YXeK3Pl9zGzCT4-k4l4rsLb_BZP9EriL2eQ1SLM3pOXvSF6EX93rBfnz88H33eXP59dOX3fvLjW2UyhulpC4PSNXVbtu0CBrdHrBpFVjXgWxUR8q1tQBhy_eQNCpwvRYWoO_Uvr5gr0-9hxh-LZSymXxa98CZwpIM6FbWjZYAxSpPVhtDSpF6c4h-wng0IMxK2wxmpW1W2gbAFNol9Oq-f9lP5B4if_EWw9uTgcqWN56iSdbTbMn5SDYbF_z_-9_9E7ejn73F8ScdKQ1hiXPhZ8AkaYT5tt57PTcoATXItv4NYX2oxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1762347211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the endothelialisation of extracellular matrix bioscaffolds with coated synthetic vascular graft materials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Coakley, D.N ; Shaikh, F.M ; O'Sullivan, K ; Kavanagh, E.G ; Grace, P.A ; Walsh, S.R ; McGloughlin, T.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Coakley, D.N ; Shaikh, F.M ; O'Sullivan, K ; Kavanagh, E.G ; Grace, P.A ; Walsh, S.R ; McGloughlin, T.M</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Existing synthetic vascular grafts have unacceptably high failure rates when replacing below knee arteries. In vitro endothelialisation is a technique, which has been shown to enhance the patency rates of below knee vascular grafts. Synthetic materials are however poor cellular substrates and must be combined with coatings to promote cellular growth and attachment. The most common coating clinically is fibrin-coated ePTFE. The aim of our study was to compare the endothelialisation of fibrin-coated ePTFE with novel extracellular matrix (ECM) biomaterials that we hypothesise will provide a superior substrate for cell growth. Methods Human endothelial cells were cultured on ECM scaffolds and fibrin-coated ePTFE. Uncoated Dacron and ePTFE acted as controls. The cells were examined for viability, phenotype, adhesion and proliferation. Cell morphology was accessed using scanning electron microscopy. Results Cells remained viable and produced von Willebrand factor on all substrates tested. ECM scaffolds and fibrin-modified ePTFE achieved statistically higher attachment efficiency when compared to both uncoated synthetic graft materials (p ≤ 0.001). At 90 min 80 ± 3.6% of cells had attached to the ECM scaffold compared to Dacron (30 ± 4.5%, n = 3) and ePTFE (33 ± 2.5%, n = 3). There was no difference in adhesion rates between ECM scaffolds and fibrin-coated ePTFE (p = 1.00). Endothelial cells proliferated fastest on ECM scaffolds when compared to all other materials tested (p &lt; 0.001) and reached confluency on day seven. Conclusion ECM bioscaffolds offer an improved substrate for promoting rapid endothelialisation compared to fibrin-coated ePTFE by combining firm cellular anchorage and superior cell expansion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-9191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26578107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Biomaterials ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis ; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods ; Cell Adhesion ; Cell Proliferation ; Cells, Cultured ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible ; Endothelial Cells - cytology ; Endothelialisation ; Endothelium, Vascular - cytology ; Extracellular matrix (ECM) ; Extracellular Matrix - physiology ; Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells ; Humans ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Polytetrafluoroethylene ; Surgery ; Swine ; Tissue engineering ; Tissue Scaffolds ; Vascular grafts ; Vascular Patency</subject><ispartof>International journal of surgery (London, England), 2016-01, Vol.25, p.31-37</ispartof><rights>IJS Publishing Group Limited</rights><rights>2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5527aff2583d946a17adb1a4651cd812458e5d63010caceae7a51df70c11f85b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5527aff2583d946a17adb1a4651cd812458e5d63010caceae7a51df70c11f85b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743919115013126$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26578107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coakley, D.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, F.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, E.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grace, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGloughlin, T.M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the endothelialisation of extracellular matrix bioscaffolds with coated synthetic vascular graft materials</title><title>International journal of surgery (London, England)</title><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Existing synthetic vascular grafts have unacceptably high failure rates when replacing below knee arteries. In vitro endothelialisation is a technique, which has been shown to enhance the patency rates of below knee vascular grafts. Synthetic materials are however poor cellular substrates and must be combined with coatings to promote cellular growth and attachment. The most common coating clinically is fibrin-coated ePTFE. The aim of our study was to compare the endothelialisation of fibrin-coated ePTFE with novel extracellular matrix (ECM) biomaterials that we hypothesise will provide a superior substrate for cell growth. Methods Human endothelial cells were cultured on ECM scaffolds and fibrin-coated ePTFE. Uncoated Dacron and ePTFE acted as controls. The cells were examined for viability, phenotype, adhesion and proliferation. Cell morphology was accessed using scanning electron microscopy. Results Cells remained viable and produced von Willebrand factor on all substrates tested. ECM scaffolds and fibrin-modified ePTFE achieved statistically higher attachment efficiency when compared to both uncoated synthetic graft materials (p ≤ 0.001). At 90 min 80 ± 3.6% of cells had attached to the ECM scaffold compared to Dacron (30 ± 4.5%, n = 3) and ePTFE (33 ± 2.5%, n = 3). There was no difference in adhesion rates between ECM scaffolds and fibrin-coated ePTFE (p = 1.00). Endothelial cells proliferated fastest on ECM scaffolds when compared to all other materials tested (p &lt; 0.001) and reached confluency on day seven. Conclusion ECM bioscaffolds offer an improved substrate for promoting rapid endothelialisation compared to fibrin-coated ePTFE by combining firm cellular anchorage and superior cell expansion.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomaterials</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</subject><subject>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Cell Adhesion</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</subject><subject>Endothelial Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Endothelialisation</subject><subject>Endothelium, Vascular - cytology</subject><subject>Extracellular matrix (ECM)</subject><subject>Extracellular Matrix - physiology</subject><subject>Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Polytetrafluoroethylene</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds</subject><subject>Vascular grafts</subject><subject>Vascular Patency</subject><issn>1743-9191</issn><issn>1743-9159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EoqXwBTggH7ls8DhxnJUQElrxT6rEAThbs_akdUjixXba7rfHYUsPHDi9Obz37PkNYy9BVCCgfTNUfkhLJQWoCqASonvEzkE39WYLavv4Yd7CGXuW0iBEIzronrIz2SrdgdDnLO_CdMDo5yuer4nT7ELR0ePoE2YfZh56Tnc5oqVxXEaMfMIc_R3f-5As9n0YXeK3Pl9zGzCT4-k4l4rsLb_BZP9EriL2eQ1SLM3pOXvSF6EX93rBfnz88H33eXP59dOX3fvLjW2UyhulpC4PSNXVbtu0CBrdHrBpFVjXgWxUR8q1tQBhy_eQNCpwvRYWoO_Uvr5gr0-9hxh-LZSymXxa98CZwpIM6FbWjZYAxSpPVhtDSpF6c4h-wng0IMxK2wxmpW1W2gbAFNol9Oq-f9lP5B4if_EWw9uTgcqWN56iSdbTbMn5SDYbF_z_-9_9E7ejn73F8ScdKQ1hiXPhZ8AkaYT5tt57PTcoATXItv4NYX2oxw</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Coakley, D.N</creator><creator>Shaikh, F.M</creator><creator>O'Sullivan, K</creator><creator>Kavanagh, E.G</creator><creator>Grace, P.A</creator><creator>Walsh, S.R</creator><creator>McGloughlin, T.M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Comparing the endothelialisation of extracellular matrix bioscaffolds with coated synthetic vascular graft materials</title><author>Coakley, D.N ; Shaikh, F.M ; O'Sullivan, K ; Kavanagh, E.G ; Grace, P.A ; Walsh, S.R ; McGloughlin, T.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-5527aff2583d946a17adb1a4651cd812458e5d63010caceae7a51df70c11f85b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomaterials</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis</topic><topic>Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Cell Adhesion</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</topic><topic>Endothelial Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Endothelialisation</topic><topic>Endothelium, Vascular - cytology</topic><topic>Extracellular matrix (ECM)</topic><topic>Extracellular Matrix - physiology</topic><topic>Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Polytetrafluoroethylene</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds</topic><topic>Vascular grafts</topic><topic>Vascular Patency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coakley, D.N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaikh, F.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kavanagh, E.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grace, P.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGloughlin, T.M</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coakley, D.N</au><au>Shaikh, F.M</au><au>O'Sullivan, K</au><au>Kavanagh, E.G</au><au>Grace, P.A</au><au>Walsh, S.R</au><au>McGloughlin, T.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the endothelialisation of extracellular matrix bioscaffolds with coated synthetic vascular graft materials</atitle><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><spage>31</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>31-37</pages><issn>1743-9191</issn><eissn>1743-9159</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Existing synthetic vascular grafts have unacceptably high failure rates when replacing below knee arteries. In vitro endothelialisation is a technique, which has been shown to enhance the patency rates of below knee vascular grafts. Synthetic materials are however poor cellular substrates and must be combined with coatings to promote cellular growth and attachment. The most common coating clinically is fibrin-coated ePTFE. The aim of our study was to compare the endothelialisation of fibrin-coated ePTFE with novel extracellular matrix (ECM) biomaterials that we hypothesise will provide a superior substrate for cell growth. Methods Human endothelial cells were cultured on ECM scaffolds and fibrin-coated ePTFE. Uncoated Dacron and ePTFE acted as controls. The cells were examined for viability, phenotype, adhesion and proliferation. Cell morphology was accessed using scanning electron microscopy. Results Cells remained viable and produced von Willebrand factor on all substrates tested. ECM scaffolds and fibrin-modified ePTFE achieved statistically higher attachment efficiency when compared to both uncoated synthetic graft materials (p ≤ 0.001). At 90 min 80 ± 3.6% of cells had attached to the ECM scaffold compared to Dacron (30 ± 4.5%, n = 3) and ePTFE (33 ± 2.5%, n = 3). There was no difference in adhesion rates between ECM scaffolds and fibrin-coated ePTFE (p = 1.00). Endothelial cells proliferated fastest on ECM scaffolds when compared to all other materials tested (p &lt; 0.001) and reached confluency on day seven. Conclusion ECM bioscaffolds offer an improved substrate for promoting rapid endothelialisation compared to fibrin-coated ePTFE by combining firm cellular anchorage and superior cell expansion.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26578107</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-9191
ispartof International journal of surgery (London, England), 2016-01, Vol.25, p.31-37
issn 1743-9191
1743-9159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762347211
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Analysis of Variance
Animals
Biomaterials
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - methods
Cell Adhesion
Cell Proliferation
Cells, Cultured
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Endothelial Cells - cytology
Endothelialisation
Endothelium, Vascular - cytology
Extracellular matrix (ECM)
Extracellular Matrix - physiology
Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells
Humans
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Surgery
Swine
Tissue engineering
Tissue Scaffolds
Vascular grafts
Vascular Patency
title Comparing the endothelialisation of extracellular matrix bioscaffolds with coated synthetic vascular graft materials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T23%3A22%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20endothelialisation%20of%20extracellular%20matrix%20bioscaffolds%20with%20coated%20synthetic%20vascular%20graft%20materials&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20surgery%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Coakley,%20D.N&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=31-37&rft.issn=1743-9191&rft.eissn=1743-9159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1762347211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1762347211&rft_id=info:pmid/26578107&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1743919115013126&rfr_iscdi=true