How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching

There is much evidence that the prospect of reward modulates cognitive control in terms of more stable behavior. Increases in expected reward magnitude, however, have been suggested to increase flexible behavior as evidenced by reduced switch costs. In a series of experiments, the authors provide ev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2016-02, Vol.42 (2), p.285-295
Hauptverfasser: Fröber, Kerstin, Dreisbach, Gesine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 295
container_issue 2
container_start_page 285
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 42
creator Fröber, Kerstin
Dreisbach, Gesine
description There is much evidence that the prospect of reward modulates cognitive control in terms of more stable behavior. Increases in expected reward magnitude, however, have been suggested to increase flexible behavior as evidenced by reduced switch costs. In a series of experiments, the authors provide evidence that this increased cognitive flexibility following increases in reward magnitude also promotes deliberate task switching. A modified task switching paradigm with forced- and free-choice trials and varying reward prospects was used. In Experiments 1-3 the prospect of a reward increase as compared to unchanged high reward increased voluntary switching rate (VSR). Experiment 4 showed that the prospect of a reward decrease did not alter VSR as compared to unchanged low reward. Experiment 5 used a standard voluntary task switching procedure and confirmed VSR effects found in Experiments 1-4. These findings are strong evidence for a mechanism that biases the cognitive system either toward stability or flexibility depending on changing reward expectation. Results are discussed within the framework of the adaptive gain theory.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xlm0000166
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762347206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1090035</ericid><sourcerecordid>1701473735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-158385acd3cd94d99a16dd101b8dabccf32f81d9d540acfd6c6ad7dada447fe03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvFCEUgInR2LX14l1D4sXUjIWBGYbezGZrNW2atNXr5C0wWyrDbIHpdv99mWytiQfhQPLel_ce70PoHSVfKGHi6MH1JB9a1y_QjEomC1o21Us0I6VoCsEk20NvYrydIMKa12ivrEsmaipn6O502OArczcanyw4PL8BvzIRW48vzQaCxuew8jaN2uDzQY8OksHzYQrZe4NPnHmwS-ts2h7jxb3VxqscDUOPfw1u9AnCFl9D_I2vNjapG-tXB-hVBy6at0_vPvp5srienxZnF9--z7-eFcAFTQWtGtZUoDRTWnItJdBaa0rostGwVKpjZddQLXXFCahO16oGLTRo4Fx0hrB99GlXdx2G_L2Y2t5GZZwDb4YxtlTkJXBRkjqjH_9Bb4cx-DzdRDWs5EyQ_1OEcsEEqzJ1uKNUGGIMpmvXwfZ5DS0l7aSr_asrwx-eSo7L3uhn9I-fDLzfASZY9Zxe_KBEZpVTt8-7PKyhXcetgpCsciaqMYSsdGrW8rLNt6nYIwWoqaY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1701473735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Fröber, Kerstin ; Dreisbach, Gesine</creator><contributor>Greene, Robert L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fröber, Kerstin ; Dreisbach, Gesine ; Greene, Robert L</creatorcontrib><description>There is much evidence that the prospect of reward modulates cognitive control in terms of more stable behavior. Increases in expected reward magnitude, however, have been suggested to increase flexible behavior as evidenced by reduced switch costs. In a series of experiments, the authors provide evidence that this increased cognitive flexibility following increases in reward magnitude also promotes deliberate task switching. A modified task switching paradigm with forced- and free-choice trials and varying reward prospects was used. In Experiments 1-3 the prospect of a reward increase as compared to unchanged high reward increased voluntary switching rate (VSR). Experiment 4 showed that the prospect of a reward decrease did not alter VSR as compared to unchanged low reward. Experiment 5 used a standard voluntary task switching procedure and confirmed VSR effects found in Experiments 1-4. These findings are strong evidence for a mechanism that biases the cognitive system either toward stability or flexibility depending on changing reward expectation. Results are discussed within the framework of the adaptive gain theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000166</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26237619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adaptive Behavior ; Adult ; Anticipation, Psychological ; Behavior ; Choice Behavior ; Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Control ; Cognitive Flexibility ; Cognitive Processes ; College Students ; Cues ; Experimental Psychology ; Female ; Foreign Countries ; Germany ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Models, Psychological ; Persistence ; Psychological Tests ; Reaction Time ; Reward ; Rewards ; Task Switching ; Visual Stimuli ; Volition ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2016-02, Vol.42 (2), p.285-295</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-158385acd3cd94d99a16dd101b8dabccf32f81d9d540acfd6c6ad7dada447fe03</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-6060-2837</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1090035$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Greene, Robert L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fröber, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreisbach, Gesine</creatorcontrib><title>How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>There is much evidence that the prospect of reward modulates cognitive control in terms of more stable behavior. Increases in expected reward magnitude, however, have been suggested to increase flexible behavior as evidenced by reduced switch costs. In a series of experiments, the authors provide evidence that this increased cognitive flexibility following increases in reward magnitude also promotes deliberate task switching. A modified task switching paradigm with forced- and free-choice trials and varying reward prospects was used. In Experiments 1-3 the prospect of a reward increase as compared to unchanged high reward increased voluntary switching rate (VSR). Experiment 4 showed that the prospect of a reward decrease did not alter VSR as compared to unchanged low reward. Experiment 5 used a standard voluntary task switching procedure and confirmed VSR effects found in Experiments 1-4. These findings are strong evidence for a mechanism that biases the cognitive system either toward stability or flexibility depending on changing reward expectation. Results are discussed within the framework of the adaptive gain theory.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adaptive Behavior</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anticipation, Psychological</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Control</subject><subject>Cognitive Flexibility</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Persistence</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Rewards</subject><subject>Task Switching</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><subject>Volition</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFvFCEUgInR2LX14l1D4sXUjIWBGYbezGZrNW2atNXr5C0wWyrDbIHpdv99mWytiQfhQPLel_ce70PoHSVfKGHi6MH1JB9a1y_QjEomC1o21Us0I6VoCsEk20NvYrydIMKa12ivrEsmaipn6O502OArczcanyw4PL8BvzIRW48vzQaCxuew8jaN2uDzQY8OksHzYQrZe4NPnHmwS-ts2h7jxb3VxqscDUOPfw1u9AnCFl9D_I2vNjapG-tXB-hVBy6at0_vPvp5srienxZnF9--z7-eFcAFTQWtGtZUoDRTWnItJdBaa0rostGwVKpjZddQLXXFCahO16oGLTRo4Fx0hrB99GlXdx2G_L2Y2t5GZZwDb4YxtlTkJXBRkjqjH_9Bb4cx-DzdRDWs5EyQ_1OEcsEEqzJ1uKNUGGIMpmvXwfZ5DS0l7aSr_asrwx-eSo7L3uhn9I-fDLzfASZY9Zxe_KBEZpVTt8-7PKyhXcetgpCsciaqMYSsdGrW8rLNt6nYIwWoqaY</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Fröber, Kerstin</creator><creator>Dreisbach, Gesine</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-2837</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching</title><author>Fröber, Kerstin ; Dreisbach, Gesine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-158385acd3cd94d99a16dd101b8dabccf32f81d9d540acfd6c6ad7dada447fe03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adaptive Behavior</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anticipation, Psychological</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Control</topic><topic>Cognitive Flexibility</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Persistence</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Rewards</topic><topic>Task Switching</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><topic>Volition</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fröber, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreisbach, Gesine</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fröber, Kerstin</au><au>Dreisbach, Gesine</au><au>Greene, Robert L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1090035</ericid><atitle>How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>285-295</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>There is much evidence that the prospect of reward modulates cognitive control in terms of more stable behavior. Increases in expected reward magnitude, however, have been suggested to increase flexible behavior as evidenced by reduced switch costs. In a series of experiments, the authors provide evidence that this increased cognitive flexibility following increases in reward magnitude also promotes deliberate task switching. A modified task switching paradigm with forced- and free-choice trials and varying reward prospects was used. In Experiments 1-3 the prospect of a reward increase as compared to unchanged high reward increased voluntary switching rate (VSR). Experiment 4 showed that the prospect of a reward decrease did not alter VSR as compared to unchanged low reward. Experiment 5 used a standard voluntary task switching procedure and confirmed VSR effects found in Experiments 1-4. These findings are strong evidence for a mechanism that biases the cognitive system either toward stability or flexibility depending on changing reward expectation. Results are discussed within the framework of the adaptive gain theory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>26237619</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0000166</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-2837</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2016-02, Vol.42 (2), p.285-295
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762347206
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adaptation, Psychological
Adaptive Behavior
Adult
Anticipation, Psychological
Behavior
Choice Behavior
Cognition
Cognitive ability
Cognitive Control
Cognitive Flexibility
Cognitive Processes
College Students
Cues
Experimental Psychology
Female
Foreign Countries
Germany
Human
Humans
Male
Models, Psychological
Persistence
Psychological Tests
Reaction Time
Reward
Rewards
Task Switching
Visual Stimuli
Volition
Young Adult
title How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A17%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Sequential%20Changes%20in%20Reward%20Magnitude%20Modulate%20Cognitive%20Flexibility:%20Evidence%20From%20Voluntary%20Task%20Switching&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Fr%C3%B6ber,%20Kerstin&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=285-295&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0000166&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1701473735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1701473735&rft_id=info:pmid/26237619&rft_ericid=EJ1090035&rfr_iscdi=true