How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching
There is much evidence that the prospect of reward modulates cognitive control in terms of more stable behavior. Increases in expected reward magnitude, however, have been suggested to increase flexible behavior as evidenced by reduced switch costs. In a series of experiments, the authors provide ev...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2016-02, Vol.42 (2), p.285-295 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 295 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 285 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Fröber, Kerstin Dreisbach, Gesine |
description | There is much evidence that the prospect of reward modulates cognitive control in terms of more stable behavior. Increases in expected reward magnitude, however, have been suggested to increase flexible behavior as evidenced by reduced switch costs. In a series of experiments, the authors provide evidence that this increased cognitive flexibility following increases in reward magnitude also promotes deliberate task switching. A modified task switching paradigm with forced- and free-choice trials and varying reward prospects was used. In Experiments 1-3 the prospect of a reward increase as compared to unchanged high reward increased voluntary switching rate (VSR). Experiment 4 showed that the prospect of a reward decrease did not alter VSR as compared to unchanged low reward. Experiment 5 used a standard voluntary task switching procedure and confirmed VSR effects found in Experiments 1-4. These findings are strong evidence for a mechanism that biases the cognitive system either toward stability or flexibility depending on changing reward expectation. Results are discussed within the framework of the adaptive gain theory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/xlm0000166 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762347206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1090035</ericid><sourcerecordid>1701473735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-158385acd3cd94d99a16dd101b8dabccf32f81d9d540acfd6c6ad7dada447fe03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvFCEUgInR2LX14l1D4sXUjIWBGYbezGZrNW2atNXr5C0wWyrDbIHpdv99mWytiQfhQPLel_ce70PoHSVfKGHi6MH1JB9a1y_QjEomC1o21Us0I6VoCsEk20NvYrydIMKa12ivrEsmaipn6O502OArczcanyw4PL8BvzIRW48vzQaCxuew8jaN2uDzQY8OksHzYQrZe4NPnHmwS-ts2h7jxb3VxqscDUOPfw1u9AnCFl9D_I2vNjapG-tXB-hVBy6at0_vPvp5srienxZnF9--z7-eFcAFTQWtGtZUoDRTWnItJdBaa0rostGwVKpjZddQLXXFCahO16oGLTRo4Fx0hrB99GlXdx2G_L2Y2t5GZZwDb4YxtlTkJXBRkjqjH_9Bb4cx-DzdRDWs5EyQ_1OEcsEEqzJ1uKNUGGIMpmvXwfZ5DS0l7aSr_asrwx-eSo7L3uhn9I-fDLzfASZY9Zxe_KBEZpVTt8-7PKyhXcetgpCsciaqMYSsdGrW8rLNt6nYIwWoqaY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1701473735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Fröber, Kerstin ; Dreisbach, Gesine</creator><contributor>Greene, Robert L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fröber, Kerstin ; Dreisbach, Gesine ; Greene, Robert L</creatorcontrib><description>There is much evidence that the prospect of reward modulates cognitive control in terms of more stable behavior. Increases in expected reward magnitude, however, have been suggested to increase flexible behavior as evidenced by reduced switch costs. In a series of experiments, the authors provide evidence that this increased cognitive flexibility following increases in reward magnitude also promotes deliberate task switching. A modified task switching paradigm with forced- and free-choice trials and varying reward prospects was used. In Experiments 1-3 the prospect of a reward increase as compared to unchanged high reward increased voluntary switching rate (VSR). Experiment 4 showed that the prospect of a reward decrease did not alter VSR as compared to unchanged low reward. Experiment 5 used a standard voluntary task switching procedure and confirmed VSR effects found in Experiments 1-4. These findings are strong evidence for a mechanism that biases the cognitive system either toward stability or flexibility depending on changing reward expectation. Results are discussed within the framework of the adaptive gain theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000166</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26237619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adaptive Behavior ; Adult ; Anticipation, Psychological ; Behavior ; Choice Behavior ; Cognition ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Control ; Cognitive Flexibility ; Cognitive Processes ; College Students ; Cues ; Experimental Psychology ; Female ; Foreign Countries ; Germany ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Models, Psychological ; Persistence ; Psychological Tests ; Reaction Time ; Reward ; Rewards ; Task Switching ; Visual Stimuli ; Volition ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2016-02, Vol.42 (2), p.285-295</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-158385acd3cd94d99a16dd101b8dabccf32f81d9d540acfd6c6ad7dada447fe03</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-6060-2837</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1090035$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26237619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Greene, Robert L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fröber, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreisbach, Gesine</creatorcontrib><title>How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>There is much evidence that the prospect of reward modulates cognitive control in terms of more stable behavior. Increases in expected reward magnitude, however, have been suggested to increase flexible behavior as evidenced by reduced switch costs. In a series of experiments, the authors provide evidence that this increased cognitive flexibility following increases in reward magnitude also promotes deliberate task switching. A modified task switching paradigm with forced- and free-choice trials and varying reward prospects was used. In Experiments 1-3 the prospect of a reward increase as compared to unchanged high reward increased voluntary switching rate (VSR). Experiment 4 showed that the prospect of a reward decrease did not alter VSR as compared to unchanged low reward. Experiment 5 used a standard voluntary task switching procedure and confirmed VSR effects found in Experiments 1-4. These findings are strong evidence for a mechanism that biases the cognitive system either toward stability or flexibility depending on changing reward expectation. Results are discussed within the framework of the adaptive gain theory.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adaptive Behavior</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anticipation, Psychological</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Control</subject><subject>Cognitive Flexibility</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Experimental Psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Persistence</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Rewards</subject><subject>Task Switching</subject><subject>Visual Stimuli</subject><subject>Volition</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFvFCEUgInR2LX14l1D4sXUjIWBGYbezGZrNW2atNXr5C0wWyrDbIHpdv99mWytiQfhQPLel_ce70PoHSVfKGHi6MH1JB9a1y_QjEomC1o21Us0I6VoCsEk20NvYrydIMKa12ivrEsmaipn6O502OArczcanyw4PL8BvzIRW48vzQaCxuew8jaN2uDzQY8OksHzYQrZe4NPnHmwS-ts2h7jxb3VxqscDUOPfw1u9AnCFl9D_I2vNjapG-tXB-hVBy6at0_vPvp5srienxZnF9--z7-eFcAFTQWtGtZUoDRTWnItJdBaa0rostGwVKpjZddQLXXFCahO16oGLTRo4Fx0hrB99GlXdx2G_L2Y2t5GZZwDb4YxtlTkJXBRkjqjH_9Bb4cx-DzdRDWs5EyQ_1OEcsEEqzJ1uKNUGGIMpmvXwfZ5DS0l7aSr_asrwx-eSo7L3uhn9I-fDLzfASZY9Zxe_KBEZpVTt8-7PKyhXcetgpCsciaqMYSsdGrW8rLNt6nYIwWoqaY</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Fröber, Kerstin</creator><creator>Dreisbach, Gesine</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-2837</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching</title><author>Fröber, Kerstin ; Dreisbach, Gesine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-158385acd3cd94d99a16dd101b8dabccf32f81d9d540acfd6c6ad7dada447fe03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adaptive Behavior</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anticipation, Psychological</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Control</topic><topic>Cognitive Flexibility</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Experimental Psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Persistence</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Rewards</topic><topic>Task Switching</topic><topic>Visual Stimuli</topic><topic>Volition</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fröber, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreisbach, Gesine</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fröber, Kerstin</au><au>Dreisbach, Gesine</au><au>Greene, Robert L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1090035</ericid><atitle>How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>285</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>285-295</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>There is much evidence that the prospect of reward modulates cognitive control in terms of more stable behavior. Increases in expected reward magnitude, however, have been suggested to increase flexible behavior as evidenced by reduced switch costs. In a series of experiments, the authors provide evidence that this increased cognitive flexibility following increases in reward magnitude also promotes deliberate task switching. A modified task switching paradigm with forced- and free-choice trials and varying reward prospects was used. In Experiments 1-3 the prospect of a reward increase as compared to unchanged high reward increased voluntary switching rate (VSR). Experiment 4 showed that the prospect of a reward decrease did not alter VSR as compared to unchanged low reward. Experiment 5 used a standard voluntary task switching procedure and confirmed VSR effects found in Experiments 1-4. These findings are strong evidence for a mechanism that biases the cognitive system either toward stability or flexibility depending on changing reward expectation. Results are discussed within the framework of the adaptive gain theory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>26237619</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0000166</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6060-2837</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2016-02, Vol.42 (2), p.285-295 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762347206 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Adaptive Behavior Adult Anticipation, Psychological Behavior Choice Behavior Cognition Cognitive ability Cognitive Control Cognitive Flexibility Cognitive Processes College Students Cues Experimental Psychology Female Foreign Countries Germany Human Humans Male Models, Psychological Persistence Psychological Tests Reaction Time Reward Rewards Task Switching Visual Stimuli Volition Young Adult |
title | How Sequential Changes in Reward Magnitude Modulate Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence From Voluntary Task Switching |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A17%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Sequential%20Changes%20in%20Reward%20Magnitude%20Modulate%20Cognitive%20Flexibility:%20Evidence%20From%20Voluntary%20Task%20Switching&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Fr%C3%B6ber,%20Kerstin&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=285-295&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0000166&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1701473735%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1701473735&rft_id=info:pmid/26237619&rft_ericid=EJ1090035&rfr_iscdi=true |