Atmospheric oxidation chemistry and ozone production: Results from SHARP 2009 in Houston, Texas
Ozone (O3) and secondary fine particles come from the atmospheric oxidation chemistry that involves the hydroxyl radical (OH) and hydroperoxyl radical (HO2), which are together called HOx. Radical precursors such as nitrous acid (HONO) and formaldehyde (HCHO) significantly affect the HOx budget in u...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2013-06, Vol.118 (11), p.5770-5780 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5780 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 5770 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Ren, Xinrong van Duin, Diana Cazorla, Maria Chen, Shuang Mao, Jingqiu Zhang, Li Brune, William H. Flynn, James H. Grossberg, Nicole Lefer, Barry L. Rappenglück, Bernhard Wong, Kam W. Tsai, Catalina Stutz, Jochen Dibb, Jack E. Thomas Jobson, B. Luke, Winston T. Kelley, Paul |
description | Ozone (O3) and secondary fine particles come from the atmospheric oxidation chemistry that involves the hydroxyl radical (OH) and hydroperoxyl radical (HO2), which are together called HOx. Radical precursors such as nitrous acid (HONO) and formaldehyde (HCHO) significantly affect the HOx budget in urban environments. These chemical processes connect surface anthropogenic and natural emissions to local and regional air pollution. Using the data collected during the Study of Houston Atmospheric Radical Precursors (SHARP) in spring 2009, we examine atmospheric oxidation chemistry and O3 production in this polluted urban environment. A numerical box model with five different chemical mechanisms was used to simulate the oxidation processes and thus OH and HO2 in this study. In general, the model reproduced the measured OH and HO2 with all five chemical mechanisms producing similar levels of OH and HO2, although midday OH was overpredicted and nighttime OH and HO2 were underpredicted. The calculated HOx production was dominated by HONO photolysis in the early morning and by the photolysis of O3 and oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) in the midday. On average, the daily HOx production rate was 24.6 ppbv d−1, of which 30% was from O3 photolysis, 22% from HONO photolysis, 15% from the photolysis of OVOCs (other than HCHO), 14% from HCHO photolysis, and 13% from O3 reactions with alkenes. The O3 production was sensitive to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the early morning but was sensitive to NOx for most of afternoon. This is similar to the behavior observed in two previous summertime studies in Houston: the Texas Air Quality Study in 2000 (TexAQS 2000) and the TexAQS II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project in 2006 (TRAMP 2006). Ozone production in SHARP exhibits a longer NOx‐sensitive period than TexAQS 2000 and TRAMP 2006, indicating that NOx control may be an efficient approach for the O3 control in springtime for Houston. Results from this study provide additional support for regulatory actions to reduce NOx and reactive VOCs in Houston in order to reduce O3 and other secondary pollutants.
Key Points
The model reproduced the measured OH and HO2 with all five chemical mechanisms.
HOx production was dominated by HONO photolysis in the early morning.
P(O3) was VOC sensitive in the morning and NOx sensitive for most of afternoon. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jgrd.50342 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762138529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1496885664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5652-3b84605a3550b338b881e7bcf822b37a11f39075c9c8dcbc0588ef99a3a1b603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LKzEYhQfxguJ14y8IiCDiePMx-XJXv1pFVGpBdyGTyejU6aQmM9zWX29qtQsXms0byHMOJ-9Jkh0EjxCE-N_4yRdHFJIMryWbGDGZCinZ-urOHzeS7RDGMB4RMZptJqrXTlyYPltfGeBmVaHbyjXAPNtJFVo_B7opgHtzjQVT74rOLJ6PwdCGrm4DKL2bgPtBb3gHMIQSVA0YuC60rjkEIzvT4W_yp9R1sNufcysZXZyPTgfp9W3_8rR3nRrKKE5JLjIGqSaUwpwQkQuBLM9NKTDOCdcIlURCTo00ojC5gVQIW0qpiUY5g2Qr2V_axpCvnQ2tivGNrWvd2JhHIc4wIoJi-TuaSSYEZSyL6O43dOw638R_KCRFJlCMjn6kGBGEUCQXCQ-WlPEuBG9LNfXVRPu5QlAt6lOL-tRHfRHe-7TUwei69LoxVVgpMGccxW1EDi25_1Vt5z84qqv-8OzLO11qYr92ttJo_6IYJ5yqh5u-kvIE4uHFnWLkHW0BtU8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1638335190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Atmospheric oxidation chemistry and ozone production: Results from SHARP 2009 in Houston, Texas</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ren, Xinrong ; van Duin, Diana ; Cazorla, Maria ; Chen, Shuang ; Mao, Jingqiu ; Zhang, Li ; Brune, William H. ; Flynn, James H. ; Grossberg, Nicole ; Lefer, Barry L. ; Rappenglück, Bernhard ; Wong, Kam W. ; Tsai, Catalina ; Stutz, Jochen ; Dibb, Jack E. ; Thomas Jobson, B. ; Luke, Winston T. ; Kelley, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xinrong ; van Duin, Diana ; Cazorla, Maria ; Chen, Shuang ; Mao, Jingqiu ; Zhang, Li ; Brune, William H. ; Flynn, James H. ; Grossberg, Nicole ; Lefer, Barry L. ; Rappenglück, Bernhard ; Wong, Kam W. ; Tsai, Catalina ; Stutz, Jochen ; Dibb, Jack E. ; Thomas Jobson, B. ; Luke, Winston T. ; Kelley, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Ozone (O3) and secondary fine particles come from the atmospheric oxidation chemistry that involves the hydroxyl radical (OH) and hydroperoxyl radical (HO2), which are together called HOx. Radical precursors such as nitrous acid (HONO) and formaldehyde (HCHO) significantly affect the HOx budget in urban environments. These chemical processes connect surface anthropogenic and natural emissions to local and regional air pollution. Using the data collected during the Study of Houston Atmospheric Radical Precursors (SHARP) in spring 2009, we examine atmospheric oxidation chemistry and O3 production in this polluted urban environment. A numerical box model with five different chemical mechanisms was used to simulate the oxidation processes and thus OH and HO2 in this study. In general, the model reproduced the measured OH and HO2 with all five chemical mechanisms producing similar levels of OH and HO2, although midday OH was overpredicted and nighttime OH and HO2 were underpredicted. The calculated HOx production was dominated by HONO photolysis in the early morning and by the photolysis of O3 and oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) in the midday. On average, the daily HOx production rate was 24.6 ppbv d−1, of which 30% was from O3 photolysis, 22% from HONO photolysis, 15% from the photolysis of OVOCs (other than HCHO), 14% from HCHO photolysis, and 13% from O3 reactions with alkenes. The O3 production was sensitive to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the early morning but was sensitive to NOx for most of afternoon. This is similar to the behavior observed in two previous summertime studies in Houston: the Texas Air Quality Study in 2000 (TexAQS 2000) and the TexAQS II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project in 2006 (TRAMP 2006). Ozone production in SHARP exhibits a longer NOx‐sensitive period than TexAQS 2000 and TRAMP 2006, indicating that NOx control may be an efficient approach for the O3 control in springtime for Houston. Results from this study provide additional support for regulatory actions to reduce NOx and reactive VOCs in Houston in order to reduce O3 and other secondary pollutants.
Key Points
The model reproduced the measured OH and HO2 with all five chemical mechanisms.
HOx production was dominated by HONO photolysis in the early morning.
P(O3) was VOC sensitive in the morning and NOx sensitive for most of afternoon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50342</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution ; Air quality ; Alkenes ; Anthropogenic factors ; Atmospheric chemistry ; Atmospherics ; Chemistry ; Computer simulation ; Earth, ocean, space ; Emission measurements ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Geophysics ; Houston ; Hydroxyl radicals ; Mathematical models ; Meteorology ; Morning ; Nitric acids ; Nitrogen compounds ; Nitrous acid ; Organic compounds ; Outdoor air quality ; Oxidation ; Oxides ; Ozone ; Ozone Production ; Photochemsitry ; Photolysis ; Pollutants ; Radicals ; SHARP ; Urban environments ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2013-06, Vol.118 (11), p.5770-5780</ispartof><rights>2013. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5652-3b84605a3550b338b881e7bcf822b37a11f39075c9c8dcbc0588ef99a3a1b603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5652-3b84605a3550b338b881e7bcf822b37a11f39075c9c8dcbc0588ef99a3a1b603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjgrd.50342$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjgrd.50342$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27671075$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xinrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Duin, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cazorla, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Jingqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brune, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossberg, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefer, Barry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappenglück, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kam W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Catalina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stutz, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibb, Jack E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas Jobson, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luke, Winston T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Atmospheric oxidation chemistry and ozone production: Results from SHARP 2009 in Houston, Texas</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Atmos</addtitle><description>Ozone (O3) and secondary fine particles come from the atmospheric oxidation chemistry that involves the hydroxyl radical (OH) and hydroperoxyl radical (HO2), which are together called HOx. Radical precursors such as nitrous acid (HONO) and formaldehyde (HCHO) significantly affect the HOx budget in urban environments. These chemical processes connect surface anthropogenic and natural emissions to local and regional air pollution. Using the data collected during the Study of Houston Atmospheric Radical Precursors (SHARP) in spring 2009, we examine atmospheric oxidation chemistry and O3 production in this polluted urban environment. A numerical box model with five different chemical mechanisms was used to simulate the oxidation processes and thus OH and HO2 in this study. In general, the model reproduced the measured OH and HO2 with all five chemical mechanisms producing similar levels of OH and HO2, although midday OH was overpredicted and nighttime OH and HO2 were underpredicted. The calculated HOx production was dominated by HONO photolysis in the early morning and by the photolysis of O3 and oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) in the midday. On average, the daily HOx production rate was 24.6 ppbv d−1, of which 30% was from O3 photolysis, 22% from HONO photolysis, 15% from the photolysis of OVOCs (other than HCHO), 14% from HCHO photolysis, and 13% from O3 reactions with alkenes. The O3 production was sensitive to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the early morning but was sensitive to NOx for most of afternoon. This is similar to the behavior observed in two previous summertime studies in Houston: the Texas Air Quality Study in 2000 (TexAQS 2000) and the TexAQS II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project in 2006 (TRAMP 2006). Ozone production in SHARP exhibits a longer NOx‐sensitive period than TexAQS 2000 and TRAMP 2006, indicating that NOx control may be an efficient approach for the O3 control in springtime for Houston. Results from this study provide additional support for regulatory actions to reduce NOx and reactive VOCs in Houston in order to reduce O3 and other secondary pollutants.
Key Points
The model reproduced the measured OH and HO2 with all five chemical mechanisms.
HOx production was dominated by HONO photolysis in the early morning.
P(O3) was VOC sensitive in the morning and NOx sensitive for most of afternoon.</description><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Alkenes</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Atmospheric chemistry</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Emission measurements</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Houston</subject><subject>Hydroxyl radicals</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Morning</subject><subject>Nitric acids</subject><subject>Nitrogen compounds</subject><subject>Nitrous acid</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxides</subject><subject>Ozone</subject><subject>Ozone Production</subject><subject>Photochemsitry</subject><subject>Photolysis</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Radicals</subject><subject>SHARP</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1LKzEYhQfxguJ14y8IiCDiePMx-XJXv1pFVGpBdyGTyejU6aQmM9zWX29qtQsXms0byHMOJ-9Jkh0EjxCE-N_4yRdHFJIMryWbGDGZCinZ-urOHzeS7RDGMB4RMZptJqrXTlyYPltfGeBmVaHbyjXAPNtJFVo_B7opgHtzjQVT74rOLJ6PwdCGrm4DKL2bgPtBb3gHMIQSVA0YuC60rjkEIzvT4W_yp9R1sNufcysZXZyPTgfp9W3_8rR3nRrKKE5JLjIGqSaUwpwQkQuBLM9NKTDOCdcIlURCTo00ojC5gVQIW0qpiUY5g2Qr2V_axpCvnQ2tivGNrWvd2JhHIc4wIoJi-TuaSSYEZSyL6O43dOw638R_KCRFJlCMjn6kGBGEUCQXCQ-WlPEuBG9LNfXVRPu5QlAt6lOL-tRHfRHe-7TUwei69LoxVVgpMGccxW1EDi25_1Vt5z84qqv-8OzLO11qYr92ttJo_6IYJ5yqh5u-kvIE4uHFnWLkHW0BtU8</recordid><startdate>20130616</startdate><enddate>20130616</enddate><creator>Ren, Xinrong</creator><creator>van Duin, Diana</creator><creator>Cazorla, Maria</creator><creator>Chen, Shuang</creator><creator>Mao, Jingqiu</creator><creator>Zhang, Li</creator><creator>Brune, William H.</creator><creator>Flynn, James H.</creator><creator>Grossberg, Nicole</creator><creator>Lefer, Barry L.</creator><creator>Rappenglück, Bernhard</creator><creator>Wong, Kam W.</creator><creator>Tsai, Catalina</creator><creator>Stutz, Jochen</creator><creator>Dibb, Jack E.</creator><creator>Thomas Jobson, B.</creator><creator>Luke, Winston T.</creator><creator>Kelley, Paul</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7SU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130616</creationdate><title>Atmospheric oxidation chemistry and ozone production: Results from SHARP 2009 in Houston, Texas</title><author>Ren, Xinrong ; van Duin, Diana ; Cazorla, Maria ; Chen, Shuang ; Mao, Jingqiu ; Zhang, Li ; Brune, William H. ; Flynn, James H. ; Grossberg, Nicole ; Lefer, Barry L. ; Rappenglück, Bernhard ; Wong, Kam W. ; Tsai, Catalina ; Stutz, Jochen ; Dibb, Jack E. ; Thomas Jobson, B. ; Luke, Winston T. ; Kelley, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5652-3b84605a3550b338b881e7bcf822b37a11f39075c9c8dcbc0588ef99a3a1b603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Alkenes</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Atmospheric chemistry</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Emission measurements</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Houston</topic><topic>Hydroxyl radicals</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Morning</topic><topic>Nitric acids</topic><topic>Nitrogen compounds</topic><topic>Nitrous acid</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxides</topic><topic>Ozone</topic><topic>Ozone Production</topic><topic>Photochemsitry</topic><topic>Photolysis</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Radicals</topic><topic>SHARP</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ren, Xinrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Duin, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cazorla, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mao, Jingqiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brune, William H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flynn, James H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossberg, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefer, Barry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappenglück, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Kam W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Catalina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stutz, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dibb, Jack E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas Jobson, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luke, Winston T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelley, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ren, Xinrong</au><au>van Duin, Diana</au><au>Cazorla, Maria</au><au>Chen, Shuang</au><au>Mao, Jingqiu</au><au>Zhang, Li</au><au>Brune, William H.</au><au>Flynn, James H.</au><au>Grossberg, Nicole</au><au>Lefer, Barry L.</au><au>Rappenglück, Bernhard</au><au>Wong, Kam W.</au><au>Tsai, Catalina</au><au>Stutz, Jochen</au><au>Dibb, Jack E.</au><au>Thomas Jobson, B.</au><au>Luke, Winston T.</au><au>Kelley, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Atmospheric oxidation chemistry and ozone production: Results from SHARP 2009 in Houston, Texas</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Atmos</addtitle><date>2013-06-16</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>5770</spage><epage>5780</epage><pages>5770-5780</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>Ozone (O3) and secondary fine particles come from the atmospheric oxidation chemistry that involves the hydroxyl radical (OH) and hydroperoxyl radical (HO2), which are together called HOx. Radical precursors such as nitrous acid (HONO) and formaldehyde (HCHO) significantly affect the HOx budget in urban environments. These chemical processes connect surface anthropogenic and natural emissions to local and regional air pollution. Using the data collected during the Study of Houston Atmospheric Radical Precursors (SHARP) in spring 2009, we examine atmospheric oxidation chemistry and O3 production in this polluted urban environment. A numerical box model with five different chemical mechanisms was used to simulate the oxidation processes and thus OH and HO2 in this study. In general, the model reproduced the measured OH and HO2 with all five chemical mechanisms producing similar levels of OH and HO2, although midday OH was overpredicted and nighttime OH and HO2 were underpredicted. The calculated HOx production was dominated by HONO photolysis in the early morning and by the photolysis of O3 and oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOCs) in the midday. On average, the daily HOx production rate was 24.6 ppbv d−1, of which 30% was from O3 photolysis, 22% from HONO photolysis, 15% from the photolysis of OVOCs (other than HCHO), 14% from HCHO photolysis, and 13% from O3 reactions with alkenes. The O3 production was sensitive to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the early morning but was sensitive to NOx for most of afternoon. This is similar to the behavior observed in two previous summertime studies in Houston: the Texas Air Quality Study in 2000 (TexAQS 2000) and the TexAQS II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project in 2006 (TRAMP 2006). Ozone production in SHARP exhibits a longer NOx‐sensitive period than TexAQS 2000 and TRAMP 2006, indicating that NOx control may be an efficient approach for the O3 control in springtime for Houston. Results from this study provide additional support for regulatory actions to reduce NOx and reactive VOCs in Houston in order to reduce O3 and other secondary pollutants.
Key Points
The model reproduced the measured OH and HO2 with all five chemical mechanisms.
HOx production was dominated by HONO photolysis in the early morning.
P(O3) was VOC sensitive in the morning and NOx sensitive for most of afternoon.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jgrd.50342</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-897X |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2013-06, Vol.118 (11), p.5770-5780 |
issn | 2169-897X 2169-8996 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762138529 |
source | Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Air pollution Air quality Alkenes Anthropogenic factors Atmospheric chemistry Atmospherics Chemistry Computer simulation Earth, ocean, space Emission measurements Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Geophysics Houston Hydroxyl radicals Mathematical models Meteorology Morning Nitric acids Nitrogen compounds Nitrous acid Organic compounds Outdoor air quality Oxidation Oxides Ozone Ozone Production Photochemsitry Photolysis Pollutants Radicals SHARP Urban environments VOCs Volatile organic compounds |
title | Atmospheric oxidation chemistry and ozone production: Results from SHARP 2009 in Houston, Texas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T05%3A03%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Atmospheric%20oxidation%20chemistry%20and%20ozone%20production:%20Results%20from%20SHARP%202009%20in%20Houston,%20Texas&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Ren,%20Xinrong&rft.date=2013-06-16&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=5770&rft.epage=5780&rft.pages=5770-5780&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jgrd.50342&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1496885664%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1638335190&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |