What do customers want from improved residential electricity services? Evidence from a choice experiment

Improvements in customer satisfaction as well as product/service quality represent a common objective of all businesses, and electricity services are no exception. Using choice experiments and a mixed logit model, this study quantitatively analyzes customers' preferences and their marginal will...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy policy 2015-10, Vol.85, p.410-420
Hauptverfasser: Huh, Sung-Yoon, Woo, JongRoul, Lim, Sesil, Lee, Yong-Gil, Kim, Chang Seob
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 420
container_issue
container_start_page 410
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 85
creator Huh, Sung-Yoon
Woo, JongRoul
Lim, Sesil
Lee, Yong-Gil
Kim, Chang Seob
description Improvements in customer satisfaction as well as product/service quality represent a common objective of all businesses, and electricity services are no exception. Using choice experiments and a mixed logit model, this study quantitatively analyzes customers' preferences and their marginal willingness to pay for improved residential electricity services. The study provides an ex ante evaluation of customers' acceptance of hypothetical electricity services. According to the results, customers consider the electricity bill and the electricity mix as the two most important attributes when choosing their electricity services. Customers are willing to pay 2.2% more in the average electricity bill (an additional monthly electricity bill of KRW 1,064; USD 0.96) for a significant increase in the share of renewable energy, which is far less than the actual cost of achieving this renewable target. Therefore, it is better to maintain the current electricity mix in principle, and the renewable share should be gradually expanded instead of making a sudden change in the electricity mix. In addition, customers are willing to pay KRW 6,793 (USD 6.15) more to reduce blackouts once in a year and KRW 64/year (USD 0.06/year) to reduce a minute of each blackout. •Customers' preferences for improved residential electricity services are analyzed.•Empirical setting is a sample of residents in South Korea.•The electricity bills and electricity mix are important to customers.•Increase in electricity bill of different electricity mix is considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762074802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421515001792</els_id><sourcerecordid>1748859333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-2564d00459694e14de059e5ed1fb9337f6b6eb65206e4949d6e34db7522dc0543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb1uFDEURi0EEsvCE9BYoqGZyfX_uIiiKAoEKRINiNKate9ovZoZL_bshrw9XjYVRZTKhc9n3_sdQj4yaBkwfbFrcd6nseXAVAuyBW5fkRXrjGi0MeY1WYEA1kjO1FvyrpQdAMjOyhXZ_tr2Cw2J-kNZ0oS50Id-XuiQ00TjtM_piIFmLDHgvMR-pDiiX3L0cXmkBfMxeixX9PZ4Ajyegz3121QvKP7ZY45Tjb4nb4Z-LPjh6VyTn19uf9zcNfffv367ub5vvJZmabjSMtThlNVWIpMBQVlUGNiwsUKYQW80brTioFFaaYNGIcPGKM6DByXFmnw-v1tH_33AsrgpFo_j2M-YDsUxozkY2QF_ASq7TtVfxQtQwTtmO9tV9NN_6C4d8lx3rhRjoLms9JqIM-VzKiXj4Pa1pz4_Ogbu5NTt3D-n7uTUgXTVaU1dnlNYGzxGzK74eKo9xFytuJDis_m_dByqtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1711062417</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What do customers want from improved residential electricity services? Evidence from a choice experiment</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Huh, Sung-Yoon ; Woo, JongRoul ; Lim, Sesil ; Lee, Yong-Gil ; Kim, Chang Seob</creator><creatorcontrib>Huh, Sung-Yoon ; Woo, JongRoul ; Lim, Sesil ; Lee, Yong-Gil ; Kim, Chang Seob</creatorcontrib><description>Improvements in customer satisfaction as well as product/service quality represent a common objective of all businesses, and electricity services are no exception. Using choice experiments and a mixed logit model, this study quantitatively analyzes customers' preferences and their marginal willingness to pay for improved residential electricity services. The study provides an ex ante evaluation of customers' acceptance of hypothetical electricity services. According to the results, customers consider the electricity bill and the electricity mix as the two most important attributes when choosing their electricity services. Customers are willing to pay 2.2% more in the average electricity bill (an additional monthly electricity bill of KRW 1,064; USD 0.96) for a significant increase in the share of renewable energy, which is far less than the actual cost of achieving this renewable target. Therefore, it is better to maintain the current electricity mix in principle, and the renewable share should be gradually expanded instead of making a sudden change in the electricity mix. In addition, customers are willing to pay KRW 6,793 (USD 6.15) more to reduce blackouts once in a year and KRW 64/year (USD 0.06/year) to reduce a minute of each blackout. •Customers' preferences for improved residential electricity services are analyzed.•Empirical setting is a sample of residents in South Korea.•The electricity bills and electricity mix are important to customers.•Increase in electricity bill of different electricity mix is considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.029</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptance tests ; Acceptances ; Alternative energy ; Bills ; Blackout ; Blackouts ; Business ; Choice experiment ; Cost ; Customer acceptance ; Customer satisfaction ; Customers ; Decision making models ; Electric industries ; Electric power ; Electricity ; Electricity services ; Energy policy ; Logit models ; Marginal willingness to pay ; Mixed logit model ; Residential energy ; Studies ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2015-10, Vol.85, p.410-420</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-2564d00459694e14de059e5ed1fb9337f6b6eb65206e4949d6e34db7522dc0543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-2564d00459694e14de059e5ed1fb9337f6b6eb65206e4949d6e34db7522dc0543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27865,27866,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huh, Sung-Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, JongRoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sesil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yong-Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chang Seob</creatorcontrib><title>What do customers want from improved residential electricity services? Evidence from a choice experiment</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Improvements in customer satisfaction as well as product/service quality represent a common objective of all businesses, and electricity services are no exception. Using choice experiments and a mixed logit model, this study quantitatively analyzes customers' preferences and their marginal willingness to pay for improved residential electricity services. The study provides an ex ante evaluation of customers' acceptance of hypothetical electricity services. According to the results, customers consider the electricity bill and the electricity mix as the two most important attributes when choosing their electricity services. Customers are willing to pay 2.2% more in the average electricity bill (an additional monthly electricity bill of KRW 1,064; USD 0.96) for a significant increase in the share of renewable energy, which is far less than the actual cost of achieving this renewable target. Therefore, it is better to maintain the current electricity mix in principle, and the renewable share should be gradually expanded instead of making a sudden change in the electricity mix. In addition, customers are willing to pay KRW 6,793 (USD 6.15) more to reduce blackouts once in a year and KRW 64/year (USD 0.06/year) to reduce a minute of each blackout. •Customers' preferences for improved residential electricity services are analyzed.•Empirical setting is a sample of residents in South Korea.•The electricity bills and electricity mix are important to customers.•Increase in electricity bill of different electricity mix is considered.</description><subject>Acceptance tests</subject><subject>Acceptances</subject><subject>Alternative energy</subject><subject>Bills</subject><subject>Blackout</subject><subject>Blackouts</subject><subject>Business</subject><subject>Choice experiment</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Customer acceptance</subject><subject>Customer satisfaction</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Electric industries</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity services</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Logit models</subject><subject>Marginal willingness to pay</subject><subject>Mixed logit model</subject><subject>Residential energy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkb1uFDEURi0EEsvCE9BYoqGZyfX_uIiiKAoEKRINiNKate9ovZoZL_bshrw9XjYVRZTKhc9n3_sdQj4yaBkwfbFrcd6nseXAVAuyBW5fkRXrjGi0MeY1WYEA1kjO1FvyrpQdAMjOyhXZ_tr2Cw2J-kNZ0oS50Id-XuiQ00TjtM_piIFmLDHgvMR-pDiiX3L0cXmkBfMxeixX9PZ4Ajyegz3121QvKP7ZY45Tjb4nb4Z-LPjh6VyTn19uf9zcNfffv367ub5vvJZmabjSMtThlNVWIpMBQVlUGNiwsUKYQW80brTioFFaaYNGIcPGKM6DByXFmnw-v1tH_33AsrgpFo_j2M-YDsUxozkY2QF_ASq7TtVfxQtQwTtmO9tV9NN_6C4d8lx3rhRjoLms9JqIM-VzKiXj4Pa1pz4_Ogbu5NTt3D-n7uTUgXTVaU1dnlNYGzxGzK74eKo9xFytuJDis_m_dByqtg</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Huh, Sung-Yoon</creator><creator>Woo, JongRoul</creator><creator>Lim, Sesil</creator><creator>Lee, Yong-Gil</creator><creator>Kim, Chang Seob</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>What do customers want from improved residential electricity services? Evidence from a choice experiment</title><author>Huh, Sung-Yoon ; Woo, JongRoul ; Lim, Sesil ; Lee, Yong-Gil ; Kim, Chang Seob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-2564d00459694e14de059e5ed1fb9337f6b6eb65206e4949d6e34db7522dc0543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acceptance tests</topic><topic>Acceptances</topic><topic>Alternative energy</topic><topic>Bills</topic><topic>Blackout</topic><topic>Blackouts</topic><topic>Business</topic><topic>Choice experiment</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Customer acceptance</topic><topic>Customer satisfaction</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Electric industries</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity services</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Logit models</topic><topic>Marginal willingness to pay</topic><topic>Mixed logit model</topic><topic>Residential energy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huh, Sung-Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, JongRoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sesil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yong-Gil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Chang Seob</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huh, Sung-Yoon</au><au>Woo, JongRoul</au><au>Lim, Sesil</au><au>Lee, Yong-Gil</au><au>Kim, Chang Seob</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What do customers want from improved residential electricity services? Evidence from a choice experiment</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>85</volume><spage>410</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>410-420</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>Improvements in customer satisfaction as well as product/service quality represent a common objective of all businesses, and electricity services are no exception. Using choice experiments and a mixed logit model, this study quantitatively analyzes customers' preferences and their marginal willingness to pay for improved residential electricity services. The study provides an ex ante evaluation of customers' acceptance of hypothetical electricity services. According to the results, customers consider the electricity bill and the electricity mix as the two most important attributes when choosing their electricity services. Customers are willing to pay 2.2% more in the average electricity bill (an additional monthly electricity bill of KRW 1,064; USD 0.96) for a significant increase in the share of renewable energy, which is far less than the actual cost of achieving this renewable target. Therefore, it is better to maintain the current electricity mix in principle, and the renewable share should be gradually expanded instead of making a sudden change in the electricity mix. In addition, customers are willing to pay KRW 6,793 (USD 6.15) more to reduce blackouts once in a year and KRW 64/year (USD 0.06/year) to reduce a minute of each blackout. •Customers' preferences for improved residential electricity services are analyzed.•Empirical setting is a sample of residents in South Korea.•The electricity bills and electricity mix are important to customers.•Increase in electricity bill of different electricity mix is considered.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.029</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2015-10, Vol.85, p.410-420
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762074802
source PAIS Index; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Acceptance tests
Acceptances
Alternative energy
Bills
Blackout
Blackouts
Business
Choice experiment
Cost
Customer acceptance
Customer satisfaction
Customers
Decision making models
Electric industries
Electric power
Electricity
Electricity services
Energy policy
Logit models
Marginal willingness to pay
Mixed logit model
Residential energy
Studies
Willingness to pay
title What do customers want from improved residential electricity services? Evidence from a choice experiment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A22%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20do%20customers%20want%20from%20improved%20residential%20electricity%20services?%20Evidence%20from%20a%20choice%20experiment&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Huh,%20Sung-Yoon&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=85&rft.spage=410&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=410-420&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1748859333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1711062417&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421515001792&rfr_iscdi=true