Why and how to subsidise energy R+D: Lessons from the collapse and recovery of electricity innovation in the UK
The UK electricity sector liberalisation was a pioneer in the worldwide reform trend and its reform model and outcomes have been the subject of many studies. However, lesser known are the effects of privatisation, market based reforms, and incentive regulation of networks on research and development...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Energy policy 2015-08, Vol.83, p.197-205 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 205 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 197 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Jamasb, Tooraj Pollitt, Michael G. |
description | The UK electricity sector liberalisation was a pioneer in the worldwide reform trend and its reform model and outcomes have been the subject of many studies. However, lesser known are the effects of privatisation, market based reforms, and incentive regulation of networks on research and development as well as patenting activities in the sector. This paper updates our previous studies of this subject and discusses the recent developments in the innovative activities in the UK electricity sector. We find that, in recent years, the initial absence of support policies and the subsequent decline in innovation efforts in the aftermath of the reform has resulted in efforts towards forming an energy technology and innovation policy. Although we already observe some positive outcomes from these efforts, we discuss whether the balance of the innovation efforts are calibrated appropriately and whether the institutional framework can be further improved to promote long term progress.
•We discuss the impact of electricity market reforms on innovation in the UK.•We show that both R+D expenditure and innovation output have recovered sharply.•We discuss some of the new institutional arrangements which have support this.•We conclude that new ways of supporting R+D are needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.041 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762065433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301421515000609</els_id><sourcerecordid>3708706721</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-cf97204c1b0cf4774a6f0b64451d2bd9ab2d69709e689f1d0a6e20823099eed63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc-L1DAUgIu44LjrX-Al4EWQ1vfSNGkFD7LrLxwQll08hjZ5dTJ0kjHpjPS_N7PjyYPsKSF8X8jLVxQvESoElG-3Ffl9mCoO2FSAFQh8UqywVXUplVJPixXUgKXg2Dwrnqe0BQDRdmJVhB-bhfXesk34zebA0mFIzrpEjDzFnwu7fXPzjq0ppeATG2PYsXlDzIRp6veZOqmRTDhSXFgYGU1k5uiMmxfmvA_HfnbB5-2Ddv_tqrgY-ynRi7_rZXH_6ePd9Zdy_f3z1-sP69IIpbA0Y6c4CIMDmDGfiF6OMEghGrR8sF0_cCs7BR3JthvRQi-JQ8tr6DoiK-vL4vX53n0Mvw6UZr1zyVB-tadwSBqV5CAbUdePQEXbSgDER6AIvGlAQEZf_YNuwyH6PLNG2coWJAiVqfpMmRhSijTqfXS7Pi4aQZ_S6q1-SKtPaTWgzmmz9f5sUf7Bo6Ook3HkDVmXW8zaBvdf_w8sPqu8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1686806047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why and how to subsidise energy R+D: Lessons from the collapse and recovery of electricity innovation in the UK</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Jamasb, Tooraj ; Pollitt, Michael G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jamasb, Tooraj ; Pollitt, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><description>The UK electricity sector liberalisation was a pioneer in the worldwide reform trend and its reform model and outcomes have been the subject of many studies. However, lesser known are the effects of privatisation, market based reforms, and incentive regulation of networks on research and development as well as patenting activities in the sector. This paper updates our previous studies of this subject and discusses the recent developments in the innovative activities in the UK electricity sector. We find that, in recent years, the initial absence of support policies and the subsequent decline in innovation efforts in the aftermath of the reform has resulted in efforts towards forming an energy technology and innovation policy. Although we already observe some positive outcomes from these efforts, we discuss whether the balance of the innovation efforts are calibrated appropriately and whether the institutional framework can be further improved to promote long term progress.
•We discuss the impact of electricity market reforms on innovation in the UK.•We show that both R+D expenditure and innovation output have recovered sharply.•We discuss some of the new institutional arrangements which have support this.•We conclude that new ways of supporting R+D are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.041</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENPYAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Balancing ; Calibration ; Clean technology ; Control ; Electric power ; Electric utilities ; Electricity ; Electricity industry ; Energy policy ; Energy technology ; Free enterprise ; Government subsidies ; Incentives ; Innovation ; Innovations ; Liberalisation ; Privatization ; R&D ; Regulation ; Research & development ; Research and development ; Studies ; Technology ; United Kingdom ; Western Europe</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2015-08, Vol.83, p.197-205</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-cf97204c1b0cf4774a6f0b64451d2bd9ab2d69709e689f1d0a6e20823099eed63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-cf97204c1b0cf4774a6f0b64451d2bd9ab2d69709e689f1d0a6e20823099eed63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421515000609$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27842,27843,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jamasb, Tooraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollitt, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><title>Why and how to subsidise energy R+D: Lessons from the collapse and recovery of electricity innovation in the UK</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>The UK electricity sector liberalisation was a pioneer in the worldwide reform trend and its reform model and outcomes have been the subject of many studies. However, lesser known are the effects of privatisation, market based reforms, and incentive regulation of networks on research and development as well as patenting activities in the sector. This paper updates our previous studies of this subject and discusses the recent developments in the innovative activities in the UK electricity sector. We find that, in recent years, the initial absence of support policies and the subsequent decline in innovation efforts in the aftermath of the reform has resulted in efforts towards forming an energy technology and innovation policy. Although we already observe some positive outcomes from these efforts, we discuss whether the balance of the innovation efforts are calibrated appropriately and whether the institutional framework can be further improved to promote long term progress.
•We discuss the impact of electricity market reforms on innovation in the UK.•We show that both R+D expenditure and innovation output have recovered sharply.•We discuss some of the new institutional arrangements which have support this.•We conclude that new ways of supporting R+D are needed.</description><subject>Balancing</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Clean technology</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electric utilities</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity industry</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Energy technology</subject><subject>Free enterprise</subject><subject>Government subsidies</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Liberalisation</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Western Europe</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc-L1DAUgIu44LjrX-Al4EWQ1vfSNGkFD7LrLxwQll08hjZ5dTJ0kjHpjPS_N7PjyYPsKSF8X8jLVxQvESoElG-3Ffl9mCoO2FSAFQh8UqywVXUplVJPixXUgKXg2Dwrnqe0BQDRdmJVhB-bhfXesk34zebA0mFIzrpEjDzFnwu7fXPzjq0ppeATG2PYsXlDzIRp6veZOqmRTDhSXFgYGU1k5uiMmxfmvA_HfnbB5-2Ddv_tqrgY-ynRi7_rZXH_6ePd9Zdy_f3z1-sP69IIpbA0Y6c4CIMDmDGfiF6OMEghGrR8sF0_cCs7BR3JthvRQi-JQ8tr6DoiK-vL4vX53n0Mvw6UZr1zyVB-tadwSBqV5CAbUdePQEXbSgDER6AIvGlAQEZf_YNuwyH6PLNG2coWJAiVqfpMmRhSijTqfXS7Pi4aQZ_S6q1-SKtPaTWgzmmz9f5sUf7Bo6Ook3HkDVmXW8zaBvdf_w8sPqu8</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Jamasb, Tooraj</creator><creator>Pollitt, Michael G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Why and how to subsidise energy R+D: Lessons from the collapse and recovery of electricity innovation in the UK</title><author>Jamasb, Tooraj ; Pollitt, Michael G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4771-cf97204c1b0cf4774a6f0b64451d2bd9ab2d69709e689f1d0a6e20823099eed63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Balancing</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Clean technology</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electric utilities</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity industry</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Energy technology</topic><topic>Free enterprise</topic><topic>Government subsidies</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Liberalisation</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Western Europe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jamasb, Tooraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pollitt, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jamasb, Tooraj</au><au>Pollitt, Michael G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why and how to subsidise energy R+D: Lessons from the collapse and recovery of electricity innovation in the UK</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>83</volume><spage>197</spage><epage>205</epage><pages>197-205</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><coden>ENPYAC</coden><abstract>The UK electricity sector liberalisation was a pioneer in the worldwide reform trend and its reform model and outcomes have been the subject of many studies. However, lesser known are the effects of privatisation, market based reforms, and incentive regulation of networks on research and development as well as patenting activities in the sector. This paper updates our previous studies of this subject and discusses the recent developments in the innovative activities in the UK electricity sector. We find that, in recent years, the initial absence of support policies and the subsequent decline in innovation efforts in the aftermath of the reform has resulted in efforts towards forming an energy technology and innovation policy. Although we already observe some positive outcomes from these efforts, we discuss whether the balance of the innovation efforts are calibrated appropriately and whether the institutional framework can be further improved to promote long term progress.
•We discuss the impact of electricity market reforms on innovation in the UK.•We show that both R+D expenditure and innovation output have recovered sharply.•We discuss some of the new institutional arrangements which have support this.•We conclude that new ways of supporting R+D are needed.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.041</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2015-08, Vol.83, p.197-205 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762065433 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; PAIS Index |
subjects | Balancing Calibration Clean technology Control Electric power Electric utilities Electricity Electricity industry Energy policy Energy technology Free enterprise Government subsidies Incentives Innovation Innovations Liberalisation Privatization R&D Regulation Research & development Research and development Studies Technology United Kingdom Western Europe |
title | Why and how to subsidise energy R+D: Lessons from the collapse and recovery of electricity innovation in the UK |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T11%3A41%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20and%20how%20to%20subsidise%20energy%20R+D:%20Lessons%20from%20the%20collapse%20and%20recovery%20of%20electricity%20innovation%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Jamasb,%20Tooraj&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=83&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=205&rft.pages=197-205&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft.coden=ENPYAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.01.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3708706721%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1686806047&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0301421515000609&rfr_iscdi=true |