Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect

The uncertainty of future economic development affects the term structure of discount rates and, thus, the intertemporal weights that are to be used in cost benefit analysis. The U.K. and France have recently adopted a falling term structure to incorporate uncertainty and the U.S. is considering a s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental economics and management 2013-11, Vol.66 (3), p.573-582
1. Verfasser: Traeger, Christian P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 582
container_issue 3
container_start_page 573
container_title Journal of environmental economics and management
container_volume 66
creator Traeger, Christian P.
description The uncertainty of future economic development affects the term structure of discount rates and, thus, the intertemporal weights that are to be used in cost benefit analysis. The U.K. and France have recently adopted a falling term structure to incorporate uncertainty and the U.S. is considering a similar step. A series of publications discusses the following concern: a seemingly analogous argument used to justify falling discount rates can also justify increasing discount rates. We show that increasing and decreasing discount rates mean different things, can coexist, are created by different channels through which risk affects evaluation, and have the same qualitative effect of making long-term payoffs more attractive.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.07.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1761483252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0095069613000612</els_id><sourcerecordid>3145451451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-2f876601177f18171929c9d19adf99b7fff061e83abe914a8f750ec0269c24973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PHDEQhq0IJI4jf4DqJJo0u8zs-fyB0kSQQCQkKIhSWsY7Jl7tecH2IpFfH1-OKkWasTR-Xsvvw9gpQouA4nxoB6Jt2wGuW5AtAP_AFghaNMC5PmALAL1pQGhxxI5zHgBAgRQLdn8VspvmWEJ8Ws2xp1Sno1RsiOXtYlWvKRYbn8YdUH7R6ieF8ntr48rG_u_iehrHUHPkPblywg69HTN9fD-X7Me3rw-XN83t3fX3yy-3jeNclabzSgoBiFJ6VChRd9rpHrXtvdaP0nsPAkmt7SNp5FZ5uQFy0AntOq7lesk-7d99TtPLTLmYbW1C42gjTXM2KAVyte42XUXP_kGHaU6x_s4gF1wqrSRWqttTLk05J_LmOYWtTW8Gwewkm8HsJJudZAPSVMk19Hkfolr1tVow2QWqAvuQqgzTT-F_8T_vFYRz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1464789871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Traeger, Christian P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Traeger, Christian P.</creatorcontrib><description>The uncertainty of future economic development affects the term structure of discount rates and, thus, the intertemporal weights that are to be used in cost benefit analysis. The U.K. and France have recently adopted a falling term structure to incorporate uncertainty and the U.S. is considering a similar step. A series of publications discusses the following concern: a seemingly analogous argument used to justify falling discount rates can also justify increasing discount rates. We show that increasing and decreasing discount rates mean different things, can coexist, are created by different channels through which risk affects evaluation, and have the same qualitative effect of making long-term payoffs more attractive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-0696</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.07.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEEMDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Benefit cost analysis ; Discount rates ; Discounting ; Economic development ; France ; Studies ; Term structure ; Uncertainty ; United Kingdom ; United States ; Weitzman–Gollier puzzle</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental economics and management, 2013-11, Vol.66 (3), p.573-582</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-2f876601177f18171929c9d19adf99b7fff061e83abe914a8f750ec0269c24973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-2f876601177f18171929c9d19adf99b7fff061e83abe914a8f750ec0269c24973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.07.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Traeger, Christian P.</creatorcontrib><title>Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect</title><title>Journal of environmental economics and management</title><description>The uncertainty of future economic development affects the term structure of discount rates and, thus, the intertemporal weights that are to be used in cost benefit analysis. The U.K. and France have recently adopted a falling term structure to incorporate uncertainty and the U.S. is considering a similar step. A series of publications discusses the following concern: a seemingly analogous argument used to justify falling discount rates can also justify increasing discount rates. We show that increasing and decreasing discount rates mean different things, can coexist, are created by different channels through which risk affects evaluation, and have the same qualitative effect of making long-term payoffs more attractive.</description><subject>Benefit cost analysis</subject><subject>Discount rates</subject><subject>Discounting</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Term structure</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Weitzman–Gollier puzzle</subject><issn>0095-0696</issn><issn>1096-0449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PHDEQhq0IJI4jf4DqJJo0u8zs-fyB0kSQQCQkKIhSWsY7Jl7tecH2IpFfH1-OKkWasTR-Xsvvw9gpQouA4nxoB6Jt2wGuW5AtAP_AFghaNMC5PmALAL1pQGhxxI5zHgBAgRQLdn8VspvmWEJ8Ws2xp1Sno1RsiOXtYlWvKRYbn8YdUH7R6ieF8ntr48rG_u_iehrHUHPkPblywg69HTN9fD-X7Me3rw-XN83t3fX3yy-3jeNclabzSgoBiFJ6VChRd9rpHrXtvdaP0nsPAkmt7SNp5FZ5uQFy0AntOq7lesk-7d99TtPLTLmYbW1C42gjTXM2KAVyte42XUXP_kGHaU6x_s4gF1wqrSRWqttTLk05J_LmOYWtTW8Gwewkm8HsJJudZAPSVMk19Hkfolr1tVow2QWqAvuQqgzTT-F_8T_vFYRz</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Traeger, Christian P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect</title><author>Traeger, Christian P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-2f876601177f18171929c9d19adf99b7fff061e83abe914a8f750ec0269c24973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Benefit cost analysis</topic><topic>Discount rates</topic><topic>Discounting</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Term structure</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Weitzman–Gollier puzzle</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Traeger, Christian P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental economics and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Traeger, Christian P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental economics and management</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>573</spage><epage>582</epage><pages>573-582</pages><issn>0095-0696</issn><eissn>1096-0449</eissn><coden>JEEMDI</coden><abstract>The uncertainty of future economic development affects the term structure of discount rates and, thus, the intertemporal weights that are to be used in cost benefit analysis. The U.K. and France have recently adopted a falling term structure to incorporate uncertainty and the U.S. is considering a similar step. A series of publications discusses the following concern: a seemingly analogous argument used to justify falling discount rates can also justify increasing discount rates. We show that increasing and decreasing discount rates mean different things, can coexist, are created by different channels through which risk affects evaluation, and have the same qualitative effect of making long-term payoffs more attractive.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jeem.2013.07.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-0696
ispartof Journal of environmental economics and management, 2013-11, Vol.66 (3), p.573-582
issn 0095-0696
1096-0449
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1761483252
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Benefit cost analysis
Discount rates
Discounting
Economic development
France
Studies
Term structure
Uncertainty
United Kingdom
United States
Weitzman–Gollier puzzle
title Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A50%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discounting%20under%20uncertainty:%20Disentangling%20the%20Weitzman%20and%20the%20Gollier%20effect&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20economics%20and%20management&rft.au=Traeger,%20Christian%20P.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=573&rft.epage=582&rft.pages=573-582&rft.issn=0095-0696&rft.eissn=1096-0449&rft.coden=JEEMDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.07.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3145451451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1464789871&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0095069613000612&rfr_iscdi=true