Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect
The uncertainty of future economic development affects the term structure of discount rates and, thus, the intertemporal weights that are to be used in cost benefit analysis. The U.K. and France have recently adopted a falling term structure to incorporate uncertainty and the U.S. is considering a s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental economics and management 2013-11, Vol.66 (3), p.573-582 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 582 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 573 |
container_title | Journal of environmental economics and management |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Traeger, Christian P. |
description | The uncertainty of future economic development affects the term structure of discount rates and, thus, the intertemporal weights that are to be used in cost benefit analysis. The U.K. and France have recently adopted a falling term structure to incorporate uncertainty and the U.S. is considering a similar step. A series of publications discusses the following concern: a seemingly analogous argument used to justify falling discount rates can also justify increasing discount rates. We show that increasing and decreasing discount rates mean different things, can coexist, are created by different channels through which risk affects evaluation, and have the same qualitative effect of making long-term payoffs more attractive. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.07.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1761483252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0095069613000612</els_id><sourcerecordid>3145451451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-2f876601177f18171929c9d19adf99b7fff061e83abe914a8f750ec0269c24973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PHDEQhq0IJI4jf4DqJJo0u8zs-fyB0kSQQCQkKIhSWsY7Jl7tecH2IpFfH1-OKkWasTR-Xsvvw9gpQouA4nxoB6Jt2wGuW5AtAP_AFghaNMC5PmALAL1pQGhxxI5zHgBAgRQLdn8VspvmWEJ8Ws2xp1Sno1RsiOXtYlWvKRYbn8YdUH7R6ieF8ntr48rG_u_iehrHUHPkPblywg69HTN9fD-X7Me3rw-XN83t3fX3yy-3jeNclabzSgoBiFJ6VChRd9rpHrXtvdaP0nsPAkmt7SNp5FZ5uQFy0AntOq7lesk-7d99TtPLTLmYbW1C42gjTXM2KAVyte42XUXP_kGHaU6x_s4gF1wqrSRWqttTLk05J_LmOYWtTW8Gwewkm8HsJJudZAPSVMk19Hkfolr1tVow2QWqAvuQqgzTT-F_8T_vFYRz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1464789871</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Traeger, Christian P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Traeger, Christian P.</creatorcontrib><description>The uncertainty of future economic development affects the term structure of discount rates and, thus, the intertemporal weights that are to be used in cost benefit analysis. The U.K. and France have recently adopted a falling term structure to incorporate uncertainty and the U.S. is considering a similar step. A series of publications discusses the following concern: a seemingly analogous argument used to justify falling discount rates can also justify increasing discount rates. We show that increasing and decreasing discount rates mean different things, can coexist, are created by different channels through which risk affects evaluation, and have the same qualitative effect of making long-term payoffs more attractive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-0696</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0449</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2013.07.004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEEMDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Benefit cost analysis ; Discount rates ; Discounting ; Economic development ; France ; Studies ; Term structure ; Uncertainty ; United Kingdom ; United States ; Weitzman–Gollier puzzle</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental economics and management, 2013-11, Vol.66 (3), p.573-582</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Nov 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-2f876601177f18171929c9d19adf99b7fff061e83abe914a8f750ec0269c24973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-2f876601177f18171929c9d19adf99b7fff061e83abe914a8f750ec0269c24973</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.07.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Traeger, Christian P.</creatorcontrib><title>Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect</title><title>Journal of environmental economics and management</title><description>The uncertainty of future economic development affects the term structure of discount rates and, thus, the intertemporal weights that are to be used in cost benefit analysis. The U.K. and France have recently adopted a falling term structure to incorporate uncertainty and the U.S. is considering a similar step. A series of publications discusses the following concern: a seemingly analogous argument used to justify falling discount rates can also justify increasing discount rates. We show that increasing and decreasing discount rates mean different things, can coexist, are created by different channels through which risk affects evaluation, and have the same qualitative effect of making long-term payoffs more attractive.</description><subject>Benefit cost analysis</subject><subject>Discount rates</subject><subject>Discounting</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Term structure</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Weitzman–Gollier puzzle</subject><issn>0095-0696</issn><issn>1096-0449</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PHDEQhq0IJI4jf4DqJJo0u8zs-fyB0kSQQCQkKIhSWsY7Jl7tecH2IpFfH1-OKkWasTR-Xsvvw9gpQouA4nxoB6Jt2wGuW5AtAP_AFghaNMC5PmALAL1pQGhxxI5zHgBAgRQLdn8VspvmWEJ8Ws2xp1Sno1RsiOXtYlWvKRYbn8YdUH7R6ieF8ntr48rG_u_iehrHUHPkPblywg69HTN9fD-X7Me3rw-XN83t3fX3yy-3jeNclabzSgoBiFJ6VChRd9rpHrXtvdaP0nsPAkmt7SNp5FZ5uQFy0AntOq7lesk-7d99TtPLTLmYbW1C42gjTXM2KAVyte42XUXP_kGHaU6x_s4gF1wqrSRWqttTLk05J_LmOYWtTW8Gwewkm8HsJJudZAPSVMk19Hkfolr1tVow2QWqAvuQqgzTT-F_8T_vFYRz</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Traeger, Christian P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect</title><author>Traeger, Christian P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-2f876601177f18171929c9d19adf99b7fff061e83abe914a8f750ec0269c24973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Benefit cost analysis</topic><topic>Discount rates</topic><topic>Discounting</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Term structure</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Weitzman–Gollier puzzle</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Traeger, Christian P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental economics and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Traeger, Christian P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental economics and management</jtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>573</spage><epage>582</epage><pages>573-582</pages><issn>0095-0696</issn><eissn>1096-0449</eissn><coden>JEEMDI</coden><abstract>The uncertainty of future economic development affects the term structure of discount rates and, thus, the intertemporal weights that are to be used in cost benefit analysis. The U.K. and France have recently adopted a falling term structure to incorporate uncertainty and the U.S. is considering a similar step. A series of publications discusses the following concern: a seemingly analogous argument used to justify falling discount rates can also justify increasing discount rates. We show that increasing and decreasing discount rates mean different things, can coexist, are created by different channels through which risk affects evaluation, and have the same qualitative effect of making long-term payoffs more attractive.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jeem.2013.07.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-0696 |
ispartof | Journal of environmental economics and management, 2013-11, Vol.66 (3), p.573-582 |
issn | 0095-0696 1096-0449 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1761483252 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Benefit cost analysis Discount rates Discounting Economic development France Studies Term structure Uncertainty United Kingdom United States Weitzman–Gollier puzzle |
title | Discounting under uncertainty: Disentangling the Weitzman and the Gollier effect |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A50%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discounting%20under%20uncertainty:%20Disentangling%20the%20Weitzman%20and%20the%20Gollier%20effect&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20economics%20and%20management&rft.au=Traeger,%20Christian%20P.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=573&rft.epage=582&rft.pages=573-582&rft.issn=0095-0696&rft.eissn=1096-0449&rft.coden=JEEMDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jeem.2013.07.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3145451451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1464789871&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0095069613000612&rfr_iscdi=true |