Epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures: our institutional experience

Purpose Hip fractures, a common manifestation of fragility fractures, represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population and may have devastating consequences to the patient, their family, and society thereafter. We attempted to define the epidemiology of pertrochanteric fr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) 2014-06, Vol.40 (3), p.225-232
Hauptverfasser: Lamb, J. N., Panteli, M., Pneumaticos, S. G., Giannoudis, P. V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 3
container_start_page 225
container_title European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)
container_volume 40
creator Lamb, J. N.
Panteli, M.
Pneumaticos, S. G.
Giannoudis, P. V.
description Purpose Hip fractures, a common manifestation of fragility fractures, represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population and may have devastating consequences to the patient, their family, and society thereafter. We attempted to define the epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures treated at a large university teaching hospital in the UK and compared our findings with the national and international literature. Methods Between April 2008 and March 2013, we conducted a retrospective cohort study at our institution. All adult patients sustaining a proximal femoral fracture were included in our study. The following parameters were collected and evaluated: (1) demographics, (2) fracture pattern, (3) American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, (4) type of pre-injury mobilization, and (5) method of stabilization. Our findings were then compared to the national data as published in the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Results Over a period of 5 years, 3,036 proximal femoral fractures were managed at our institution, with 916 (30.2 %) being classified as pertrochanteric fractures (250 male; mean age 82.0, SD 11.2). No significant change in the incidence of pertrochanteric fractures was evident during the same period. Between 2012 and 2013, 51,705 proximal femoral fractures were recorded in England, of which 19,569 (37.8 %) were classified as pertrochanteric fractures. Comparison between pertrochanteric and intracapsular fractures with respect to their demographics did not reveal any significant difference. In female patients, the relative incidence of pertrochanteric fractures was shown to increase with age. However, this was not the case in the male population. Conclusions The incidence of pertrochanteric fractures remained unchanged over the last 5 years. The relative incidence of pertrochanteric fractures is higher in elderly females; this may be explained by reduced bone mineral density and reduced trochanteric bone strength. Rigorous preventive treatments of osteoporosis should be considered in high-risk patients, along with improved safety measures to reduce falls.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00068-014-0375-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1761460530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3336641511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-6021f5f61f003fd3f9be4cdbc4b6c5ca1b479a6eb5e14ae1dcb03565676afdba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7_AC9S8OKlmh9NunmTMacw8KLnkKYvM6NtatLC9t-b0TlE8JQH-bzve--D0DXB9wTj_CFgjMU0xSRLMct5uj1BYzIVLJ3NMnJ6rBkboYsQNhHGgtNzNKJiSgTmfIyWi9aWUFtXufUucSZpwXfe6U_VdOCtToxXuus9hMfE9T6xTehs13fWNapKYBtxC42GS3RmVBXg6vBO0Mfz4n3-kq7elq_zp1WqOaFdKjAlhhtBDMbMlMzMCsh0WeisEJprRYosnykBBQeSKSClLjDjgotcKFMWik3Q3ZDbevfVQ-hkbYOGqlINuD5IkguSxdMYjujtH3QTL4hrR4ozISileR4pMlDauxA8GNl6Wyu_kwTLvWU5WJbRstxbltvYc3NI7osaymPHj9YI0AEI8atZg_81-t_Ub1YViW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1536622277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures: our institutional experience</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Lamb, J. N. ; Panteli, M. ; Pneumaticos, S. G. ; Giannoudis, P. V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lamb, J. N. ; Panteli, M. ; Pneumaticos, S. G. ; Giannoudis, P. V.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Hip fractures, a common manifestation of fragility fractures, represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population and may have devastating consequences to the patient, their family, and society thereafter. We attempted to define the epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures treated at a large university teaching hospital in the UK and compared our findings with the national and international literature. Methods Between April 2008 and March 2013, we conducted a retrospective cohort study at our institution. All adult patients sustaining a proximal femoral fracture were included in our study. The following parameters were collected and evaluated: (1) demographics, (2) fracture pattern, (3) American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, (4) type of pre-injury mobilization, and (5) method of stabilization. Our findings were then compared to the national data as published in the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Results Over a period of 5 years, 3,036 proximal femoral fractures were managed at our institution, with 916 (30.2 %) being classified as pertrochanteric fractures (250 male; mean age 82.0, SD 11.2). No significant change in the incidence of pertrochanteric fractures was evident during the same period. Between 2012 and 2013, 51,705 proximal femoral fractures were recorded in England, of which 19,569 (37.8 %) were classified as pertrochanteric fractures. Comparison between pertrochanteric and intracapsular fractures with respect to their demographics did not reveal any significant difference. In female patients, the relative incidence of pertrochanteric fractures was shown to increase with age. However, this was not the case in the male population. Conclusions The incidence of pertrochanteric fractures remained unchanged over the last 5 years. The relative incidence of pertrochanteric fractures is higher in elderly females; this may be explained by reduced bone mineral density and reduced trochanteric bone strength. Rigorous preventive treatments of osteoporosis should be considered in high-risk patients, along with improved safety measures to reduce falls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-9933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-9941</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00068-014-0375-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26816055</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Critical Care Medicine ; Emergency Medicine ; Epidemiology ; Fractures ; Hip joint ; Intensive ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Review Article ; Sports Medicine ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Traumatic Surgery</subject><ispartof>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007), 2014-06, Vol.40 (3), p.225-232</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-6021f5f61f003fd3f9be4cdbc4b6c5ca1b479a6eb5e14ae1dcb03565676afdba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-6021f5f61f003fd3f9be4cdbc4b6c5ca1b479a6eb5e14ae1dcb03565676afdba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00068-014-0375-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00068-014-0375-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816055$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lamb, J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panteli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pneumaticos, S. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannoudis, P. V.</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures: our institutional experience</title><title>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</title><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose Hip fractures, a common manifestation of fragility fractures, represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population and may have devastating consequences to the patient, their family, and society thereafter. We attempted to define the epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures treated at a large university teaching hospital in the UK and compared our findings with the national and international literature. Methods Between April 2008 and March 2013, we conducted a retrospective cohort study at our institution. All adult patients sustaining a proximal femoral fracture were included in our study. The following parameters were collected and evaluated: (1) demographics, (2) fracture pattern, (3) American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, (4) type of pre-injury mobilization, and (5) method of stabilization. Our findings were then compared to the national data as published in the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Results Over a period of 5 years, 3,036 proximal femoral fractures were managed at our institution, with 916 (30.2 %) being classified as pertrochanteric fractures (250 male; mean age 82.0, SD 11.2). No significant change in the incidence of pertrochanteric fractures was evident during the same period. Between 2012 and 2013, 51,705 proximal femoral fractures were recorded in England, of which 19,569 (37.8 %) were classified as pertrochanteric fractures. Comparison between pertrochanteric and intracapsular fractures with respect to their demographics did not reveal any significant difference. In female patients, the relative incidence of pertrochanteric fractures was shown to increase with age. However, this was not the case in the male population. Conclusions The incidence of pertrochanteric fractures remained unchanged over the last 5 years. The relative incidence of pertrochanteric fractures is higher in elderly females; this may be explained by reduced bone mineral density and reduced trochanteric bone strength. Rigorous preventive treatments of osteoporosis should be considered in high-risk patients, along with improved safety measures to reduce falls.</description><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Hip joint</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><issn>1863-9933</issn><issn>1863-9941</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7_AC9S8OKlmh9NunmTMacw8KLnkKYvM6NtatLC9t-b0TlE8JQH-bzve--D0DXB9wTj_CFgjMU0xSRLMct5uj1BYzIVLJ3NMnJ6rBkboYsQNhHGgtNzNKJiSgTmfIyWi9aWUFtXufUucSZpwXfe6U_VdOCtToxXuus9hMfE9T6xTehs13fWNapKYBtxC42GS3RmVBXg6vBO0Mfz4n3-kq7elq_zp1WqOaFdKjAlhhtBDMbMlMzMCsh0WeisEJprRYosnykBBQeSKSClLjDjgotcKFMWik3Q3ZDbevfVQ-hkbYOGqlINuD5IkguSxdMYjujtH3QTL4hrR4ozISileR4pMlDauxA8GNl6Wyu_kwTLvWU5WJbRstxbltvYc3NI7osaymPHj9YI0AEI8atZg_81-t_Ub1YViW0</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Lamb, J. N.</creator><creator>Panteli, M.</creator><creator>Pneumaticos, S. G.</creator><creator>Giannoudis, P. V.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures: our institutional experience</title><author>Lamb, J. N. ; Panteli, M. ; Pneumaticos, S. G. ; Giannoudis, P. V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c512t-6021f5f61f003fd3f9be4cdbc4b6c5ca1b479a6eb5e14ae1dcb03565676afdba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Hip joint</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lamb, J. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panteli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pneumaticos, S. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannoudis, P. V.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lamb, J. N.</au><au>Panteli, M.</au><au>Pneumaticos, S. G.</au><au>Giannoudis, P. V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures: our institutional experience</atitle><jtitle>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>225</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>225-232</pages><issn>1863-9933</issn><eissn>1863-9941</eissn><abstract>Purpose Hip fractures, a common manifestation of fragility fractures, represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population and may have devastating consequences to the patient, their family, and society thereafter. We attempted to define the epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures treated at a large university teaching hospital in the UK and compared our findings with the national and international literature. Methods Between April 2008 and March 2013, we conducted a retrospective cohort study at our institution. All adult patients sustaining a proximal femoral fracture were included in our study. The following parameters were collected and evaluated: (1) demographics, (2) fracture pattern, (3) American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, (4) type of pre-injury mobilization, and (5) method of stabilization. Our findings were then compared to the national data as published in the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Results Over a period of 5 years, 3,036 proximal femoral fractures were managed at our institution, with 916 (30.2 %) being classified as pertrochanteric fractures (250 male; mean age 82.0, SD 11.2). No significant change in the incidence of pertrochanteric fractures was evident during the same period. Between 2012 and 2013, 51,705 proximal femoral fractures were recorded in England, of which 19,569 (37.8 %) were classified as pertrochanteric fractures. Comparison between pertrochanteric and intracapsular fractures with respect to their demographics did not reveal any significant difference. In female patients, the relative incidence of pertrochanteric fractures was shown to increase with age. However, this was not the case in the male population. Conclusions The incidence of pertrochanteric fractures remained unchanged over the last 5 years. The relative incidence of pertrochanteric fractures is higher in elderly females; this may be explained by reduced bone mineral density and reduced trochanteric bone strength. Rigorous preventive treatments of osteoporosis should be considered in high-risk patients, along with improved safety measures to reduce falls.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26816055</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00068-014-0375-x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-9933
ispartof European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007), 2014-06, Vol.40 (3), p.225-232
issn 1863-9933
1863-9941
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1761460530
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Critical Care Medicine
Emergency Medicine
Epidemiology
Fractures
Hip joint
Intensive
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Review Article
Sports Medicine
Surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Traumatic Surgery
title Epidemiology of pertrochanteric fractures: our institutional experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A17%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiology%20of%20pertrochanteric%20fractures:%20our%20institutional%20experience&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20trauma%20and%20emergency%20surgery%20(Munich%20:%202007)&rft.au=Lamb,%20J.%20N.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=225&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=225-232&rft.issn=1863-9933&rft.eissn=1863-9941&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00068-014-0375-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3336641511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1536622277&rft_id=info:pmid/26816055&rfr_iscdi=true