Risk stratification, management and outcomes in emergency general surgical patients in the UK

Introduction The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) published guidance in 2011 setting standards for the management of emergency surgical patients with the aim of reducing surgical mortality. These suggested the presence of a consultant surgeon and anaesthetist, and transfer to a higher leve...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007) 2014-10, Vol.40 (5), p.617-624
1. Verfasser: MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 624
container_issue 5
container_start_page 617
container_title European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)
container_volume 40
creator MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery
MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery
description Introduction The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) published guidance in 2011 setting standards for the management of emergency surgical patients with the aim of reducing surgical mortality. These suggested the presence of a consultant surgeon and anaesthetist, and transfer to a higher level of care postoperatively for all patients deemed high risk. Objective This prospective multi-institutional study sought to evaluate whether adherence to these standards was associated with reduced mortality. Design Data were prospectively collected on all emergency general surgery operations performed in emergency theatres across Merseyside, UK, during a 30-day period in September–October 2011. Patients were risk assessed using P-POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity). High-risk patients were classified as those with a P-POSSUM predicted mortality of ≥10 %, and moderate-risk patients as those with a P-POSSUM predicted mortality of 5–10 %. Results Some 494 procedures were performed on 471 patients. Twenty-four patients (5 %) died within 30 days of surgery. Mortality in the 65 patients identified as high risk was 27 % (14 patients undergoing 17 procedures), with a consultant surgeon present in 46 of 65 high-risk cases (71 %), a consultant anaesthetist in 43 (66 %), and 46 (71 %) cases were admitted to level 2 or 3 care postoperatively. There was no association between adherence to standards and postoperative mortality in either the whole cohort or specifically the high-risk group. Conclusions There is currently incomplete adherence to the national guidelines, but this does not seem to adversely impact postoperative mortality.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00068-014-0399-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1761460318</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3461861451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-d5f9b3d0cc3b57a70f83bc6d94dd49b108204aab4eef2b7fadb2dbc3425191ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1O3DAURq0KVKZTHqAbZIkNi6a913acZIlGQKuOhITKEln-yzSQOIOdLObtMR2KEFI315Z9zmfrI-QLwjcEqL4nAJB1ASgK4E1TsA9kgbXkRdMIPHjdc35EPqV0n2GQJftIjpisUZQMFuTupksPNE1RT13b2TzH8JUOOuiNH3yYqA6OjvNkx8En2gWaT-PGB7ujefqoe5rmuMlmT7fZzspfbPrj6e2vz-Sw1X3yxy_rktxeXvxe_SjW11c_V-frwgoop8KVbWO4A2u5KStdQVtzY6VrhHOiMQg1A6G1Ed63zFStdoY5Y7lgJTZoPV-Ss33uNo6Ps0-TGrpkfd_r4Mc5KawkCgkc64yevkPvxzmG_DuFEhnKSkiRKdxTNo4pRd-qbewGHXcKQT13r_bdq9y9eu5eseycvCTPZvDu1fhXdgbYHkj5Kmx8fPP0f1OfAH9aj6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1612167464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk stratification, management and outcomes in emergency general surgical patients in the UK</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery ; MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery</creator><creatorcontrib>MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery ; MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) published guidance in 2011 setting standards for the management of emergency surgical patients with the aim of reducing surgical mortality. These suggested the presence of a consultant surgeon and anaesthetist, and transfer to a higher level of care postoperatively for all patients deemed high risk. Objective This prospective multi-institutional study sought to evaluate whether adherence to these standards was associated with reduced mortality. Design Data were prospectively collected on all emergency general surgery operations performed in emergency theatres across Merseyside, UK, during a 30-day period in September–October 2011. Patients were risk assessed using P-POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity). High-risk patients were classified as those with a P-POSSUM predicted mortality of ≥10 %, and moderate-risk patients as those with a P-POSSUM predicted mortality of 5–10 %. Results Some 494 procedures were performed on 471 patients. Twenty-four patients (5 %) died within 30 days of surgery. Mortality in the 65 patients identified as high risk was 27 % (14 patients undergoing 17 procedures), with a consultant surgeon present in 46 of 65 high-risk cases (71 %), a consultant anaesthetist in 43 (66 %), and 46 (71 %) cases were admitted to level 2 or 3 care postoperatively. There was no association between adherence to standards and postoperative mortality in either the whole cohort or specifically the high-risk group. Conclusions There is currently incomplete adherence to the national guidelines, but this does not seem to adversely impact postoperative mortality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-9933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-9941</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00068-014-0399-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26814520</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Critical Care Medicine ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medicine ; Guidelines ; Intensive ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Mortality ; Original Article ; Sports Medicine ; Surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Surgical outcomes ; Traumatic Surgery</subject><ispartof>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007), 2014-10, Vol.40 (5), p.617-624</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-d5f9b3d0cc3b57a70f83bc6d94dd49b108204aab4eef2b7fadb2dbc3425191ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-d5f9b3d0cc3b57a70f83bc6d94dd49b108204aab4eef2b7fadb2dbc3425191ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00068-014-0399-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00068-014-0399-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26814520$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery</creatorcontrib><title>Risk stratification, management and outcomes in emergency general surgical patients in the UK</title><title>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</title><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><description>Introduction The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) published guidance in 2011 setting standards for the management of emergency surgical patients with the aim of reducing surgical mortality. These suggested the presence of a consultant surgeon and anaesthetist, and transfer to a higher level of care postoperatively for all patients deemed high risk. Objective This prospective multi-institutional study sought to evaluate whether adherence to these standards was associated with reduced mortality. Design Data were prospectively collected on all emergency general surgery operations performed in emergency theatres across Merseyside, UK, during a 30-day period in September–October 2011. Patients were risk assessed using P-POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity). High-risk patients were classified as those with a P-POSSUM predicted mortality of ≥10 %, and moderate-risk patients as those with a P-POSSUM predicted mortality of 5–10 %. Results Some 494 procedures were performed on 471 patients. Twenty-four patients (5 %) died within 30 days of surgery. Mortality in the 65 patients identified as high risk was 27 % (14 patients undergoing 17 procedures), with a consultant surgeon present in 46 of 65 high-risk cases (71 %), a consultant anaesthetist in 43 (66 %), and 46 (71 %) cases were admitted to level 2 or 3 care postoperatively. There was no association between adherence to standards and postoperative mortality in either the whole cohort or specifically the high-risk group. Conclusions There is currently incomplete adherence to the national guidelines, but this does not seem to adversely impact postoperative mortality.</description><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Sports Medicine</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><issn>1863-9933</issn><issn>1863-9941</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1O3DAURq0KVKZTHqAbZIkNi6a913acZIlGQKuOhITKEln-yzSQOIOdLObtMR2KEFI315Z9zmfrI-QLwjcEqL4nAJB1ASgK4E1TsA9kgbXkRdMIPHjdc35EPqV0n2GQJftIjpisUZQMFuTupksPNE1RT13b2TzH8JUOOuiNH3yYqA6OjvNkx8En2gWaT-PGB7ujefqoe5rmuMlmT7fZzspfbPrj6e2vz-Sw1X3yxy_rktxeXvxe_SjW11c_V-frwgoop8KVbWO4A2u5KStdQVtzY6VrhHOiMQg1A6G1Ed63zFStdoY5Y7lgJTZoPV-Ss33uNo6Ps0-TGrpkfd_r4Mc5KawkCgkc64yevkPvxzmG_DuFEhnKSkiRKdxTNo4pRd-qbewGHXcKQT13r_bdq9y9eu5eseycvCTPZvDu1fhXdgbYHkj5Kmx8fPP0f1OfAH9aj6w</recordid><startdate>20141001</startdate><enddate>20141001</enddate><creator>MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery</creator><creator>MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141001</creationdate><title>Risk stratification, management and outcomes in emergency general surgical patients in the UK</title></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-d5f9b3d0cc3b57a70f83bc6d94dd49b108204aab4eef2b7fadb2dbc3425191ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Sports Medicine</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><aucorp>MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery</aucorp><aucorp>MEnSA study group, on behalf of Mersey Research Group for Surgery</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk stratification, management and outcomes in emergency general surgical patients in the UK</atitle><jtitle>European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007)</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg</addtitle><date>2014-10-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>617</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>617-624</pages><issn>1863-9933</issn><eissn>1863-9941</eissn><abstract>Introduction The Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS) published guidance in 2011 setting standards for the management of emergency surgical patients with the aim of reducing surgical mortality. These suggested the presence of a consultant surgeon and anaesthetist, and transfer to a higher level of care postoperatively for all patients deemed high risk. Objective This prospective multi-institutional study sought to evaluate whether adherence to these standards was associated with reduced mortality. Design Data were prospectively collected on all emergency general surgery operations performed in emergency theatres across Merseyside, UK, during a 30-day period in September–October 2011. Patients were risk assessed using P-POSSUM (Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity). High-risk patients were classified as those with a P-POSSUM predicted mortality of ≥10 %, and moderate-risk patients as those with a P-POSSUM predicted mortality of 5–10 %. Results Some 494 procedures were performed on 471 patients. Twenty-four patients (5 %) died within 30 days of surgery. Mortality in the 65 patients identified as high risk was 27 % (14 patients undergoing 17 procedures), with a consultant surgeon present in 46 of 65 high-risk cases (71 %), a consultant anaesthetist in 43 (66 %), and 46 (71 %) cases were admitted to level 2 or 3 care postoperatively. There was no association between adherence to standards and postoperative mortality in either the whole cohort or specifically the high-risk group. Conclusions There is currently incomplete adherence to the national guidelines, but this does not seem to adversely impact postoperative mortality.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>26814520</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00068-014-0399-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-9933
ispartof European journal of trauma and emergency surgery (Munich : 2007), 2014-10, Vol.40 (5), p.617-624
issn 1863-9933
1863-9941
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1761460318
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Critical Care Medicine
Emergency medical care
Emergency Medicine
Guidelines
Intensive
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mortality
Original Article
Sports Medicine
Surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Surgical outcomes
Traumatic Surgery
title Risk stratification, management and outcomes in emergency general surgical patients in the UK
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T10%3A08%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20stratification,%20management%20and%20outcomes%20in%20emergency%20general%20surgical%20patients%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20trauma%20and%20emergency%20surgery%20(Munich%20:%202007)&rft.aucorp=MEnSA%20study%20group,%20on%20behalf%20of%20Mersey%20Research%20Group%20for%20Surgery&rft.date=2014-10-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=617&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=617-624&rft.issn=1863-9933&rft.eissn=1863-9941&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00068-014-0399-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3461861451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1612167464&rft_id=info:pmid/26814520&rfr_iscdi=true