Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling

Aim of the present paper is to quantify the ecosystem respiration of a mountain meadow in the Austrian Alps during the vegetation period 2002 by constraining nighttime eddy covariance measurements with ecosystem respiration derived from (i) daytime eddy covariance, (ii) ecosystem chamber and (iii) s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural and forest meteorology 2005-02, Vol.128 (3), p.141-162
Hauptverfasser: Wohlfahrt, Georg, Anfang, Christian, Bahn, Michael, Haslwanter, Alois, Newesely, Christian, Schmitt, Michael, Drösler, Matthias, Pfadenhauer, Jörg, Cernusca, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue 3
container_start_page 141
container_title Agricultural and forest meteorology
container_volume 128
creator Wohlfahrt, Georg
Anfang, Christian
Bahn, Michael
Haslwanter, Alois
Newesely, Christian
Schmitt, Michael
Drösler, Matthias
Pfadenhauer, Jörg
Cernusca, Alexander
description Aim of the present paper is to quantify the ecosystem respiration of a mountain meadow in the Austrian Alps during the vegetation period 2002 by constraining nighttime eddy covariance measurements with ecosystem respiration derived from (i) daytime eddy covariance, (ii) ecosystem chamber and (iii) scaled up leaf and soil chamber measurements. The study showed that the discrimination of valid nighttime eddy covariance measurements based on friction velocity ( u *), the so-called u *-correction, is very sensitive to the imposed quality control criteria. Excluding half-hourly nighttime data, which deviate more than 30% from the stationarity and integral turbulence tests caused the magnitude of the u *-correction to be significantly reduced. Based solely on nighttime eddy covariance data, we are currently unable to decide whether the observed high CO 2 fluxes during intermittent turbulence represent artefacts and should be screened out, or whether these reflect a genuine transport of CO 2 not accounted for by the storage term and must be retained. Evidence against the inclusion of these data is derived from soil respiration rates measured in situ and calculated inversely from the other approaches, which were significantly lower as compared to soil respiration calculated from inversion of the half-hourly nighttime data inclusive of the observations which failed to meet the specified quality control criteria. Seasonal (8 March–8 November 2002) nighttime carbon balances simulated based on the parameters derived from the remaining approaches agreed with each other to within 35%, which is of the order of the uncertainty of each individual approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17612289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168192304003028</els_id><sourcerecordid>17612289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b5d05d2d33a1f88285d08b0e9e130dd787f82b483d9093459b365ce8803692433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMoOK7-hs1FT3ZblfRHclwWv2BBRPcc0kn1bIbpzphkVubfm2EWPXoKBc9beeth7BqhRcDhw6612zTHtFBpBUDXIrYA8hnboBplI0QHz9mmkqpBLeRL9irnHQCKcdQbRt-Pdi1hPoV1y9ewfSglLMTJxXzKhRaeKB9CsiXElceZW76Q9fE3P-Zzgrw_cRcfbQp2dfSeuwe7TJQyt6vnS_S031fuNXsx232mN0_vFbv_9PHn7Zfm7tvnr7c3d43rAEoz9R56L7yUFmelhKqzmoA0oQTvRzXOSkydkl6Dll2vJzn0jpQCOWjRSXnF3l32HlL8daRczBKyqx3sSvGYDY4DCqF0BccL6FLMOdFsDiksNp0MgjlrNTvzV6s5azWIpmqtybdPX9js7H5O9e6Q_8WHHrHrVeWuL9xs43lVZe5_CKiHgFZY21fi5kJQNfIYKJnsAlWLPiRyxfgY_tvmD_N_nDU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17612289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wohlfahrt, Georg ; Anfang, Christian ; Bahn, Michael ; Haslwanter, Alois ; Newesely, Christian ; Schmitt, Michael ; Drösler, Matthias ; Pfadenhauer, Jörg ; Cernusca, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Wohlfahrt, Georg ; Anfang, Christian ; Bahn, Michael ; Haslwanter, Alois ; Newesely, Christian ; Schmitt, Michael ; Drösler, Matthias ; Pfadenhauer, Jörg ; Cernusca, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Aim of the present paper is to quantify the ecosystem respiration of a mountain meadow in the Austrian Alps during the vegetation period 2002 by constraining nighttime eddy covariance measurements with ecosystem respiration derived from (i) daytime eddy covariance, (ii) ecosystem chamber and (iii) scaled up leaf and soil chamber measurements. The study showed that the discrimination of valid nighttime eddy covariance measurements based on friction velocity ( u *), the so-called u *-correction, is very sensitive to the imposed quality control criteria. Excluding half-hourly nighttime data, which deviate more than 30% from the stationarity and integral turbulence tests caused the magnitude of the u *-correction to be significantly reduced. Based solely on nighttime eddy covariance data, we are currently unable to decide whether the observed high CO 2 fluxes during intermittent turbulence represent artefacts and should be screened out, or whether these reflect a genuine transport of CO 2 not accounted for by the storage term and must be retained. Evidence against the inclusion of these data is derived from soil respiration rates measured in situ and calculated inversely from the other approaches, which were significantly lower as compared to soil respiration calculated from inversion of the half-hourly nighttime data inclusive of the observations which failed to meet the specified quality control criteria. Seasonal (8 March–8 November 2002) nighttime carbon balances simulated based on the parameters derived from the remaining approaches agreed with each other to within 35%, which is of the order of the uncertainty of each individual approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFMEEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emission ; Friction velocity ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gas exchange ; General agronomy. Plant production ; grasslands ; measurement ; metrology ; mountains ; night respiration ; nighttime eddy covariance measurements ; Parameter inversion ; plant physiology ; seasonal variation ; simulation models ; soil respiration ; soil-plant-atmosphere interactions ; Stationarity ; turbulent flow</subject><ispartof>Agricultural and forest meteorology, 2005-02, Vol.128 (3), p.141-162</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b5d05d2d33a1f88285d08b0e9e130dd787f82b483d9093459b365ce8803692433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b5d05d2d33a1f88285d08b0e9e130dd787f82b483d9093459b365ce8803692433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16511458$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wohlfahrt, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anfang, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahn, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslwanter, Alois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newesely, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drösler, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cernusca, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling</title><title>Agricultural and forest meteorology</title><description>Aim of the present paper is to quantify the ecosystem respiration of a mountain meadow in the Austrian Alps during the vegetation period 2002 by constraining nighttime eddy covariance measurements with ecosystem respiration derived from (i) daytime eddy covariance, (ii) ecosystem chamber and (iii) scaled up leaf and soil chamber measurements. The study showed that the discrimination of valid nighttime eddy covariance measurements based on friction velocity ( u *), the so-called u *-correction, is very sensitive to the imposed quality control criteria. Excluding half-hourly nighttime data, which deviate more than 30% from the stationarity and integral turbulence tests caused the magnitude of the u *-correction to be significantly reduced. Based solely on nighttime eddy covariance data, we are currently unable to decide whether the observed high CO 2 fluxes during intermittent turbulence represent artefacts and should be screened out, or whether these reflect a genuine transport of CO 2 not accounted for by the storage term and must be retained. Evidence against the inclusion of these data is derived from soil respiration rates measured in situ and calculated inversely from the other approaches, which were significantly lower as compared to soil respiration calculated from inversion of the half-hourly nighttime data inclusive of the observations which failed to meet the specified quality control criteria. Seasonal (8 March–8 November 2002) nighttime carbon balances simulated based on the parameters derived from the remaining approaches agreed with each other to within 35%, which is of the order of the uncertainty of each individual approach.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emission</subject><subject>Friction velocity</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gas exchange</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>grasslands</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>metrology</subject><subject>mountains</subject><subject>night respiration</subject><subject>nighttime eddy covariance measurements</subject><subject>Parameter inversion</subject><subject>plant physiology</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>soil respiration</subject><subject>soil-plant-atmosphere interactions</subject><subject>Stationarity</subject><subject>turbulent flow</subject><issn>0168-1923</issn><issn>1873-2240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMoOK7-hs1FT3ZblfRHclwWv2BBRPcc0kn1bIbpzphkVubfm2EWPXoKBc9beeth7BqhRcDhw6612zTHtFBpBUDXIrYA8hnboBplI0QHz9mmkqpBLeRL9irnHQCKcdQbRt-Pdi1hPoV1y9ewfSglLMTJxXzKhRaeKB9CsiXElceZW76Q9fE3P-Zzgrw_cRcfbQp2dfSeuwe7TJQyt6vnS_S031fuNXsx232mN0_vFbv_9PHn7Zfm7tvnr7c3d43rAEoz9R56L7yUFmelhKqzmoA0oQTvRzXOSkydkl6Dll2vJzn0jpQCOWjRSXnF3l32HlL8daRczBKyqx3sSvGYDY4DCqF0BccL6FLMOdFsDiksNp0MgjlrNTvzV6s5azWIpmqtybdPX9js7H5O9e6Q_8WHHrHrVeWuL9xs43lVZe5_CKiHgFZY21fi5kJQNfIYKJnsAlWLPiRyxfgY_tvmD_N_nDU</recordid><startdate>20050228</startdate><enddate>20050228</enddate><creator>Wohlfahrt, Georg</creator><creator>Anfang, Christian</creator><creator>Bahn, Michael</creator><creator>Haslwanter, Alois</creator><creator>Newesely, Christian</creator><creator>Schmitt, Michael</creator><creator>Drösler, Matthias</creator><creator>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</creator><creator>Cernusca, Alexander</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050228</creationdate><title>Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling</title><author>Wohlfahrt, Georg ; Anfang, Christian ; Bahn, Michael ; Haslwanter, Alois ; Newesely, Christian ; Schmitt, Michael ; Drösler, Matthias ; Pfadenhauer, Jörg ; Cernusca, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b5d05d2d33a1f88285d08b0e9e130dd787f82b483d9093459b365ce8803692433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emission</topic><topic>Friction velocity</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gas exchange</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>grasslands</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>metrology</topic><topic>mountains</topic><topic>night respiration</topic><topic>nighttime eddy covariance measurements</topic><topic>Parameter inversion</topic><topic>plant physiology</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>soil respiration</topic><topic>soil-plant-atmosphere interactions</topic><topic>Stationarity</topic><topic>turbulent flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wohlfahrt, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anfang, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahn, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslwanter, Alois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newesely, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drösler, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cernusca, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Agricultural and forest meteorology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wohlfahrt, Georg</au><au>Anfang, Christian</au><au>Bahn, Michael</au><au>Haslwanter, Alois</au><au>Newesely, Christian</au><au>Schmitt, Michael</au><au>Drösler, Matthias</au><au>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</au><au>Cernusca, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural and forest meteorology</jtitle><date>2005-02-28</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>141-162</pages><issn>0168-1923</issn><eissn>1873-2240</eissn><coden>AFMEEB</coden><abstract>Aim of the present paper is to quantify the ecosystem respiration of a mountain meadow in the Austrian Alps during the vegetation period 2002 by constraining nighttime eddy covariance measurements with ecosystem respiration derived from (i) daytime eddy covariance, (ii) ecosystem chamber and (iii) scaled up leaf and soil chamber measurements. The study showed that the discrimination of valid nighttime eddy covariance measurements based on friction velocity ( u *), the so-called u *-correction, is very sensitive to the imposed quality control criteria. Excluding half-hourly nighttime data, which deviate more than 30% from the stationarity and integral turbulence tests caused the magnitude of the u *-correction to be significantly reduced. Based solely on nighttime eddy covariance data, we are currently unable to decide whether the observed high CO 2 fluxes during intermittent turbulence represent artefacts and should be screened out, or whether these reflect a genuine transport of CO 2 not accounted for by the storage term and must be retained. Evidence against the inclusion of these data is derived from soil respiration rates measured in situ and calculated inversely from the other approaches, which were significantly lower as compared to soil respiration calculated from inversion of the half-hourly nighttime data inclusive of the observations which failed to meet the specified quality control criteria. Seasonal (8 March–8 November 2002) nighttime carbon balances simulated based on the parameters derived from the remaining approaches agreed with each other to within 35%, which is of the order of the uncertainty of each individual approach.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.003</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1923
ispartof Agricultural and forest meteorology, 2005-02, Vol.128 (3), p.141-162
issn 0168-1923
1873-2240
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17612289
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emission
Friction velocity
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
gas exchange
General agronomy. Plant production
grasslands
measurement
metrology
mountains
night respiration
nighttime eddy covariance measurements
Parameter inversion
plant physiology
seasonal variation
simulation models
soil respiration
soil-plant-atmosphere interactions
Stationarity
turbulent flow
title Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A47%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20nighttime%20ecosystem%20respiration%20of%20a%20meadow%20using%20eddy%20covariance,%20chambers%20and%20modelling&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20and%20forest%20meteorology&rft.au=Wohlfahrt,%20Georg&rft.date=2005-02-28&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=141-162&rft.issn=0168-1923&rft.eissn=1873-2240&rft.coden=AFMEEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17612289%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17612289&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168192304003028&rfr_iscdi=true