Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling
Aim of the present paper is to quantify the ecosystem respiration of a mountain meadow in the Austrian Alps during the vegetation period 2002 by constraining nighttime eddy covariance measurements with ecosystem respiration derived from (i) daytime eddy covariance, (ii) ecosystem chamber and (iii) s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agricultural and forest meteorology 2005-02, Vol.128 (3), p.141-162 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 162 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Agricultural and forest meteorology |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | Wohlfahrt, Georg Anfang, Christian Bahn, Michael Haslwanter, Alois Newesely, Christian Schmitt, Michael Drösler, Matthias Pfadenhauer, Jörg Cernusca, Alexander |
description | Aim of the present paper is to quantify the ecosystem respiration of a mountain meadow in the Austrian Alps during the vegetation period 2002 by constraining nighttime eddy covariance measurements with ecosystem respiration derived from (i) daytime eddy covariance, (ii) ecosystem chamber and (iii) scaled up leaf and soil chamber measurements. The study showed that the discrimination of valid nighttime eddy covariance measurements based on friction velocity (
u
*), the so-called
u
*-correction, is very sensitive to the imposed quality control criteria. Excluding half-hourly nighttime data, which deviate more than 30% from the stationarity and integral turbulence tests caused the magnitude of the
u
*-correction to be significantly reduced. Based solely on nighttime eddy covariance data, we are currently unable to decide whether the observed high CO
2 fluxes during intermittent turbulence represent artefacts and should be screened out, or whether these reflect a genuine transport of CO
2 not accounted for by the storage term and must be retained. Evidence against the inclusion of these data is derived from soil respiration rates measured in situ and calculated inversely from the other approaches, which were significantly lower as compared to soil respiration calculated from inversion of the half-hourly nighttime data inclusive of the observations which failed to meet the specified quality control criteria. Seasonal (8 March–8 November 2002) nighttime carbon balances simulated based on the parameters derived from the remaining approaches agreed with each other to within 35%, which is of the order of the uncertainty of each individual approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17612289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168192304003028</els_id><sourcerecordid>17612289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b5d05d2d33a1f88285d08b0e9e130dd787f82b483d9093459b365ce8803692433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMoOK7-hs1FT3ZblfRHclwWv2BBRPcc0kn1bIbpzphkVubfm2EWPXoKBc9beeth7BqhRcDhw6612zTHtFBpBUDXIrYA8hnboBplI0QHz9mmkqpBLeRL9irnHQCKcdQbRt-Pdi1hPoV1y9ewfSglLMTJxXzKhRaeKB9CsiXElceZW76Q9fE3P-Zzgrw_cRcfbQp2dfSeuwe7TJQyt6vnS_S031fuNXsx232mN0_vFbv_9PHn7Zfm7tvnr7c3d43rAEoz9R56L7yUFmelhKqzmoA0oQTvRzXOSkydkl6Dll2vJzn0jpQCOWjRSXnF3l32HlL8daRczBKyqx3sSvGYDY4DCqF0BccL6FLMOdFsDiksNp0MgjlrNTvzV6s5azWIpmqtybdPX9js7H5O9e6Q_8WHHrHrVeWuL9xs43lVZe5_CKiHgFZY21fi5kJQNfIYKJnsAlWLPiRyxfgY_tvmD_N_nDU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17612289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wohlfahrt, Georg ; Anfang, Christian ; Bahn, Michael ; Haslwanter, Alois ; Newesely, Christian ; Schmitt, Michael ; Drösler, Matthias ; Pfadenhauer, Jörg ; Cernusca, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Wohlfahrt, Georg ; Anfang, Christian ; Bahn, Michael ; Haslwanter, Alois ; Newesely, Christian ; Schmitt, Michael ; Drösler, Matthias ; Pfadenhauer, Jörg ; Cernusca, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Aim of the present paper is to quantify the ecosystem respiration of a mountain meadow in the Austrian Alps during the vegetation period 2002 by constraining nighttime eddy covariance measurements with ecosystem respiration derived from (i) daytime eddy covariance, (ii) ecosystem chamber and (iii) scaled up leaf and soil chamber measurements. The study showed that the discrimination of valid nighttime eddy covariance measurements based on friction velocity (
u
*), the so-called
u
*-correction, is very sensitive to the imposed quality control criteria. Excluding half-hourly nighttime data, which deviate more than 30% from the stationarity and integral turbulence tests caused the magnitude of the
u
*-correction to be significantly reduced. Based solely on nighttime eddy covariance data, we are currently unable to decide whether the observed high CO
2 fluxes during intermittent turbulence represent artefacts and should be screened out, or whether these reflect a genuine transport of CO
2 not accounted for by the storage term and must be retained. Evidence against the inclusion of these data is derived from soil respiration rates measured in situ and calculated inversely from the other approaches, which were significantly lower as compared to soil respiration calculated from inversion of the half-hourly nighttime data inclusive of the observations which failed to meet the specified quality control criteria. Seasonal (8 March–8 November 2002) nighttime carbon balances simulated based on the parameters derived from the remaining approaches agreed with each other to within 35%, which is of the order of the uncertainty of each individual approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AFMEEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emission ; Friction velocity ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gas exchange ; General agronomy. Plant production ; grasslands ; measurement ; metrology ; mountains ; night respiration ; nighttime eddy covariance measurements ; Parameter inversion ; plant physiology ; seasonal variation ; simulation models ; soil respiration ; soil-plant-atmosphere interactions ; Stationarity ; turbulent flow</subject><ispartof>Agricultural and forest meteorology, 2005-02, Vol.128 (3), p.141-162</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b5d05d2d33a1f88285d08b0e9e130dd787f82b483d9093459b365ce8803692433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b5d05d2d33a1f88285d08b0e9e130dd787f82b483d9093459b365ce8803692433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16511458$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wohlfahrt, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anfang, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahn, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslwanter, Alois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newesely, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drösler, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cernusca, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling</title><title>Agricultural and forest meteorology</title><description>Aim of the present paper is to quantify the ecosystem respiration of a mountain meadow in the Austrian Alps during the vegetation period 2002 by constraining nighttime eddy covariance measurements with ecosystem respiration derived from (i) daytime eddy covariance, (ii) ecosystem chamber and (iii) scaled up leaf and soil chamber measurements. The study showed that the discrimination of valid nighttime eddy covariance measurements based on friction velocity (
u
*), the so-called
u
*-correction, is very sensitive to the imposed quality control criteria. Excluding half-hourly nighttime data, which deviate more than 30% from the stationarity and integral turbulence tests caused the magnitude of the
u
*-correction to be significantly reduced. Based solely on nighttime eddy covariance data, we are currently unable to decide whether the observed high CO
2 fluxes during intermittent turbulence represent artefacts and should be screened out, or whether these reflect a genuine transport of CO
2 not accounted for by the storage term and must be retained. Evidence against the inclusion of these data is derived from soil respiration rates measured in situ and calculated inversely from the other approaches, which were significantly lower as compared to soil respiration calculated from inversion of the half-hourly nighttime data inclusive of the observations which failed to meet the specified quality control criteria. Seasonal (8 March–8 November 2002) nighttime carbon balances simulated based on the parameters derived from the remaining approaches agreed with each other to within 35%, which is of the order of the uncertainty of each individual approach.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emission</subject><subject>Friction velocity</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gas exchange</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>grasslands</subject><subject>measurement</subject><subject>metrology</subject><subject>mountains</subject><subject>night respiration</subject><subject>nighttime eddy covariance measurements</subject><subject>Parameter inversion</subject><subject>plant physiology</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>soil respiration</subject><subject>soil-plant-atmosphere interactions</subject><subject>Stationarity</subject><subject>turbulent flow</subject><issn>0168-1923</issn><issn>1873-2240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMoOK7-hs1FT3ZblfRHclwWv2BBRPcc0kn1bIbpzphkVubfm2EWPXoKBc9beeth7BqhRcDhw6612zTHtFBpBUDXIrYA8hnboBplI0QHz9mmkqpBLeRL9irnHQCKcdQbRt-Pdi1hPoV1y9ewfSglLMTJxXzKhRaeKB9CsiXElceZW76Q9fE3P-Zzgrw_cRcfbQp2dfSeuwe7TJQyt6vnS_S031fuNXsx232mN0_vFbv_9PHn7Zfm7tvnr7c3d43rAEoz9R56L7yUFmelhKqzmoA0oQTvRzXOSkydkl6Dll2vJzn0jpQCOWjRSXnF3l32HlL8daRczBKyqx3sSvGYDY4DCqF0BccL6FLMOdFsDiksNp0MgjlrNTvzV6s5azWIpmqtybdPX9js7H5O9e6Q_8WHHrHrVeWuL9xs43lVZe5_CKiHgFZY21fi5kJQNfIYKJnsAlWLPiRyxfgY_tvmD_N_nDU</recordid><startdate>20050228</startdate><enddate>20050228</enddate><creator>Wohlfahrt, Georg</creator><creator>Anfang, Christian</creator><creator>Bahn, Michael</creator><creator>Haslwanter, Alois</creator><creator>Newesely, Christian</creator><creator>Schmitt, Michael</creator><creator>Drösler, Matthias</creator><creator>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</creator><creator>Cernusca, Alexander</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050228</creationdate><title>Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling</title><author>Wohlfahrt, Georg ; Anfang, Christian ; Bahn, Michael ; Haslwanter, Alois ; Newesely, Christian ; Schmitt, Michael ; Drösler, Matthias ; Pfadenhauer, Jörg ; Cernusca, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-b5d05d2d33a1f88285d08b0e9e130dd787f82b483d9093459b365ce8803692433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emission</topic><topic>Friction velocity</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gas exchange</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>grasslands</topic><topic>measurement</topic><topic>metrology</topic><topic>mountains</topic><topic>night respiration</topic><topic>nighttime eddy covariance measurements</topic><topic>Parameter inversion</topic><topic>plant physiology</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>soil respiration</topic><topic>soil-plant-atmosphere interactions</topic><topic>Stationarity</topic><topic>turbulent flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wohlfahrt, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anfang, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahn, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslwanter, Alois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newesely, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drösler, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cernusca, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Agricultural and forest meteorology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wohlfahrt, Georg</au><au>Anfang, Christian</au><au>Bahn, Michael</au><au>Haslwanter, Alois</au><au>Newesely, Christian</au><au>Schmitt, Michael</au><au>Drösler, Matthias</au><au>Pfadenhauer, Jörg</au><au>Cernusca, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural and forest meteorology</jtitle><date>2005-02-28</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>141-162</pages><issn>0168-1923</issn><eissn>1873-2240</eissn><coden>AFMEEB</coden><abstract>Aim of the present paper is to quantify the ecosystem respiration of a mountain meadow in the Austrian Alps during the vegetation period 2002 by constraining nighttime eddy covariance measurements with ecosystem respiration derived from (i) daytime eddy covariance, (ii) ecosystem chamber and (iii) scaled up leaf and soil chamber measurements. The study showed that the discrimination of valid nighttime eddy covariance measurements based on friction velocity (
u
*), the so-called
u
*-correction, is very sensitive to the imposed quality control criteria. Excluding half-hourly nighttime data, which deviate more than 30% from the stationarity and integral turbulence tests caused the magnitude of the
u
*-correction to be significantly reduced. Based solely on nighttime eddy covariance data, we are currently unable to decide whether the observed high CO
2 fluxes during intermittent turbulence represent artefacts and should be screened out, or whether these reflect a genuine transport of CO
2 not accounted for by the storage term and must be retained. Evidence against the inclusion of these data is derived from soil respiration rates measured in situ and calculated inversely from the other approaches, which were significantly lower as compared to soil respiration calculated from inversion of the half-hourly nighttime data inclusive of the observations which failed to meet the specified quality control criteria. Seasonal (8 March–8 November 2002) nighttime carbon balances simulated based on the parameters derived from the remaining approaches agreed with each other to within 35%, which is of the order of the uncertainty of each individual approach.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.003</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-1923 |
ispartof | Agricultural and forest meteorology, 2005-02, Vol.128 (3), p.141-162 |
issn | 0168-1923 1873-2240 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17612289 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences carbon dioxide Carbon dioxide emission Friction velocity Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology gas exchange General agronomy. Plant production grasslands measurement metrology mountains night respiration nighttime eddy covariance measurements Parameter inversion plant physiology seasonal variation simulation models soil respiration soil-plant-atmosphere interactions Stationarity turbulent flow |
title | Quantifying nighttime ecosystem respiration of a meadow using eddy covariance, chambers and modelling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A47%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20nighttime%20ecosystem%20respiration%20of%20a%20meadow%20using%20eddy%20covariance,%20chambers%20and%20modelling&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20and%20forest%20meteorology&rft.au=Wohlfahrt,%20Georg&rft.date=2005-02-28&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=141-162&rft.issn=0168-1923&rft.eissn=1873-2240&rft.coden=AFMEEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17612289%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17612289&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168192304003028&rfr_iscdi=true |