A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable

Diabetic foot ulceration poses a heavy burden on the patient and the healthcare system, but prevention thereof receives little attention. For every euro spent on ulcer prevention, ten are spent on ulcer healing, and for every randomized controlled trial conducted on prevention, ten are conducted on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews 2016-01, Vol.32 (S1), p.195-200
Hauptverfasser: Bus, Sicco A., van Netten, Jaap J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 200
container_issue S1
container_start_page 195
container_title Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews
container_volume 32
creator Bus, Sicco A.
van Netten, Jaap J.
description Diabetic foot ulceration poses a heavy burden on the patient and the healthcare system, but prevention thereof receives little attention. For every euro spent on ulcer prevention, ten are spent on ulcer healing, and for every randomized controlled trial conducted on prevention, ten are conducted on healing. In this article, we argue that a shift in priorities is needed. For the prevention of a first foot ulcer, we need more insight into the effect of interventions and practices already applied globally in many settings. This requires systematic recording of interventions and outcomes, and well‐designed randomized controlled trials that include analysis of cost‐effectiveness. After healing of a foot ulcer, the risk of recurrence is high. For the prevention of a recurrent foot ulcer, home monitoring of foot temperature, pressure‐relieving therapeutic footwear, and certain surgical interventions prove to be effective. The median effect size found in a total of 23 studies on these interventions is large, over 60%, and further increases when patients are adherent to treatment. These interventions should be investigated for efficacy as a state‐of‐the‐art integrated foot care approach, where attempts are made to assure treatment adherence. Effect sizes of 75–80% may be expected. If such state‐of‐the‐art integrated foot care is implemented, the majority of problems with foot ulcer recurrence in diabetes can be resolved. It is therefore time to act and to set a new target in diabetic foot care. This target is to reduce foot ulcer incidence with at least 75%. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/dmrr.2738
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1761081389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3933347971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5208-829176e793f1d81dfcd9092c762f2628365998466aa472375265bc060350628e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERT_gwB9AlhASHNKO7fgj3KoW2kpbPioQEhfL60xUl2yy2Elh_z2Ost0DEpxmpHnm0WheQp4zOGYA_KRexXjMtTCPyAGTHAotFTze9ZLvk8OU7gBAlKp8Qva5KiVnCg7I91OabkMz0NDRdQx9DMNm6uvgljgET5u-H6h3EanrahoxoYv-9i3V8hXtm3k8th5johO0jniP3eCWLT4le41rEz7b1iPy9f27L2eXxeLjxdXZ6aLw-TxTGF4xrVBXomG1YXXj6woq7rXiDVfcCCWrypRKOVdqLrTkSi49KBAS8hjFEXk9e9ex_zliGuwqJI9t6zrsx2SznYFhwlQZffkXetePscvXWQ5lFldGlP-jsguYLkGwTL2ZKR_7lCI2Nv9v5eLGMrBTLHaKxU6xZPbF1jguV1jvyIccMnAyA79Ci5t_m-z59c3NVlnMGyEN-Hu34eIPq3T-kv324cIuziuhP-nP9lL8AWTqoYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760174031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bus, Sicco A. ; van Netten, Jaap J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bus, Sicco A. ; van Netten, Jaap J.</creatorcontrib><description>Diabetic foot ulceration poses a heavy burden on the patient and the healthcare system, but prevention thereof receives little attention. For every euro spent on ulcer prevention, ten are spent on ulcer healing, and for every randomized controlled trial conducted on prevention, ten are conducted on healing. In this article, we argue that a shift in priorities is needed. For the prevention of a first foot ulcer, we need more insight into the effect of interventions and practices already applied globally in many settings. This requires systematic recording of interventions and outcomes, and well‐designed randomized controlled trials that include analysis of cost‐effectiveness. After healing of a foot ulcer, the risk of recurrence is high. For the prevention of a recurrent foot ulcer, home monitoring of foot temperature, pressure‐relieving therapeutic footwear, and certain surgical interventions prove to be effective. The median effect size found in a total of 23 studies on these interventions is large, over 60%, and further increases when patients are adherent to treatment. These interventions should be investigated for efficacy as a state‐of‐the‐art integrated foot care approach, where attempts are made to assure treatment adherence. Effect sizes of 75–80% may be expected. If such state‐of‐the‐art integrated foot care is implemented, the majority of problems with foot ulcer recurrence in diabetes can be resolved. It is therefore time to act and to set a new target in diabetic foot care. This target is to reduce foot ulcer incidence with at least 75%. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-7552</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.2738</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26452160</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DMRRFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>adherence ; classification ; Clinical trials ; Combined Modality Therapy - economics ; Congresses as Topic ; Cost Savings ; costs ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus ; Diabetic Foot - economics ; Diabetic Foot - epidemiology ; Diabetic Foot - prevention &amp; control ; Diabetic Foot - therapy ; Disease prevention ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Feet ; Foot diseases ; foot ulcer ; Global Health ; Health Care Costs ; Health Priorities - trends ; Humans ; Leg ulcers ; Medical research ; Patient Compliance ; Patient Education as Topic - economics ; Patients ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Precision Medicine ; prevention ; Recurrence ; Risk Factors ; Self Care - economics ; Self Care - trends ; Shoes - adverse effects ; Shoes - economics ; Ulcers</subject><ispartof>Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2016-01, Vol.32 (S1), p.195-200</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5208-829176e793f1d81dfcd9092c762f2628365998466aa472375265bc060350628e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5208-829176e793f1d81dfcd9092c762f2628365998466aa472375265bc060350628e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fdmrr.2738$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fdmrr.2738$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26452160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bus, Sicco A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Netten, Jaap J.</creatorcontrib><title>A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable</title><title>Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews</title><addtitle>Diabetes Metab Res Rev</addtitle><description>Diabetic foot ulceration poses a heavy burden on the patient and the healthcare system, but prevention thereof receives little attention. For every euro spent on ulcer prevention, ten are spent on ulcer healing, and for every randomized controlled trial conducted on prevention, ten are conducted on healing. In this article, we argue that a shift in priorities is needed. For the prevention of a first foot ulcer, we need more insight into the effect of interventions and practices already applied globally in many settings. This requires systematic recording of interventions and outcomes, and well‐designed randomized controlled trials that include analysis of cost‐effectiveness. After healing of a foot ulcer, the risk of recurrence is high. For the prevention of a recurrent foot ulcer, home monitoring of foot temperature, pressure‐relieving therapeutic footwear, and certain surgical interventions prove to be effective. The median effect size found in a total of 23 studies on these interventions is large, over 60%, and further increases when patients are adherent to treatment. These interventions should be investigated for efficacy as a state‐of‐the‐art integrated foot care approach, where attempts are made to assure treatment adherence. Effect sizes of 75–80% may be expected. If such state‐of‐the‐art integrated foot care is implemented, the majority of problems with foot ulcer recurrence in diabetes can be resolved. It is therefore time to act and to set a new target in diabetic foot care. This target is to reduce foot ulcer incidence with at least 75%. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>adherence</subject><subject>classification</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy - economics</subject><subject>Congresses as Topic</subject><subject>Cost Savings</subject><subject>costs</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - economics</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - epidemiology</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Diabetic Foot - therapy</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Foot diseases</subject><subject>foot ulcer</subject><subject>Global Health</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health Priorities - trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leg ulcers</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic - economics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Precision Medicine</subject><subject>prevention</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Self Care - economics</subject><subject>Self Care - trends</subject><subject>Shoes - adverse effects</subject><subject>Shoes - economics</subject><subject>Ulcers</subject><issn>1520-7552</issn><issn>1520-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi1ERT_gwB9AlhASHNKO7fgj3KoW2kpbPioQEhfL60xUl2yy2Elh_z2Ost0DEpxmpHnm0WheQp4zOGYA_KRexXjMtTCPyAGTHAotFTze9ZLvk8OU7gBAlKp8Qva5KiVnCg7I91OabkMz0NDRdQx9DMNm6uvgljgET5u-H6h3EanrahoxoYv-9i3V8hXtm3k8th5johO0jniP3eCWLT4le41rEz7b1iPy9f27L2eXxeLjxdXZ6aLw-TxTGF4xrVBXomG1YXXj6woq7rXiDVfcCCWrypRKOVdqLrTkSi49KBAS8hjFEXk9e9ex_zliGuwqJI9t6zrsx2SznYFhwlQZffkXetePscvXWQ5lFldGlP-jsguYLkGwTL2ZKR_7lCI2Nv9v5eLGMrBTLHaKxU6xZPbF1jguV1jvyIccMnAyA79Ci5t_m-z59c3NVlnMGyEN-Hu34eIPq3T-kv324cIuziuhP-nP9lL8AWTqoYg</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Bus, Sicco A.</creator><creator>van Netten, Jaap J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable</title><author>Bus, Sicco A. ; van Netten, Jaap J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5208-829176e793f1d81dfcd9092c762f2628365998466aa472375265bc060350628e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>adherence</topic><topic>classification</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy - economics</topic><topic>Congresses as Topic</topic><topic>Cost Savings</topic><topic>costs</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - economics</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - epidemiology</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Diabetic Foot - therapy</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Foot diseases</topic><topic>foot ulcer</topic><topic>Global Health</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health Priorities - trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leg ulcers</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic - economics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Precision Medicine</topic><topic>prevention</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Self Care - economics</topic><topic>Self Care - trends</topic><topic>Shoes - adverse effects</topic><topic>Shoes - economics</topic><topic>Ulcers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bus, Sicco A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Netten, Jaap J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bus, Sicco A.</au><au>van Netten, Jaap J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Metab Res Rev</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>195-200</pages><issn>1520-7552</issn><eissn>1520-7560</eissn><coden>DMRRFM</coden><abstract>Diabetic foot ulceration poses a heavy burden on the patient and the healthcare system, but prevention thereof receives little attention. For every euro spent on ulcer prevention, ten are spent on ulcer healing, and for every randomized controlled trial conducted on prevention, ten are conducted on healing. In this article, we argue that a shift in priorities is needed. For the prevention of a first foot ulcer, we need more insight into the effect of interventions and practices already applied globally in many settings. This requires systematic recording of interventions and outcomes, and well‐designed randomized controlled trials that include analysis of cost‐effectiveness. After healing of a foot ulcer, the risk of recurrence is high. For the prevention of a recurrent foot ulcer, home monitoring of foot temperature, pressure‐relieving therapeutic footwear, and certain surgical interventions prove to be effective. The median effect size found in a total of 23 studies on these interventions is large, over 60%, and further increases when patients are adherent to treatment. These interventions should be investigated for efficacy as a state‐of‐the‐art integrated foot care approach, where attempts are made to assure treatment adherence. Effect sizes of 75–80% may be expected. If such state‐of‐the‐art integrated foot care is implemented, the majority of problems with foot ulcer recurrence in diabetes can be resolved. It is therefore time to act and to set a new target in diabetic foot care. This target is to reduce foot ulcer incidence with at least 75%. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26452160</pmid><doi>10.1002/dmrr.2738</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-7552
ispartof Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2016-01, Vol.32 (S1), p.195-200
issn 1520-7552
1520-7560
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1761081389
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects adherence
classification
Clinical trials
Combined Modality Therapy - economics
Congresses as Topic
Cost Savings
costs
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetic Foot - economics
Diabetic Foot - epidemiology
Diabetic Foot - prevention & control
Diabetic Foot - therapy
Disease prevention
Evidence-Based Medicine
Feet
Foot diseases
foot ulcer
Global Health
Health Care Costs
Health Priorities - trends
Humans
Leg ulcers
Medical research
Patient Compliance
Patient Education as Topic - economics
Patients
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Precision Medicine
prevention
Recurrence
Risk Factors
Self Care - economics
Self Care - trends
Shoes - adverse effects
Shoes - economics
Ulcers
title A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T15%3A20%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20shift%20in%20priority%20in%20diabetic%20foot%20care%20and%20research:%2075%25%20of%20foot%20ulcers%20are%20preventable&rft.jtitle=Diabetes/metabolism%20research%20and%20reviews&rft.au=Bus,%20Sicco%20A.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=195-200&rft.issn=1520-7552&rft.eissn=1520-7560&rft.coden=DMRRFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/dmrr.2738&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3933347971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760174031&rft_id=info:pmid/26452160&rfr_iscdi=true