The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Comparative, Observational Study
Receiving Workers' Compensation benefits has been associated with inferior outcomes after lumbar fusion. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty between patients receiving and those not receiving Workers' Compensation. Patient-reported outcomes, r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2016-01, Vol.98 (2), p.93-99 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 99 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 93 |
| container_title | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume |
| container_volume | 98 |
| creator | Gornet, Matthew F. Schranck, Francine W. Copay, Anne G. Kopjar, Branko |
| description | Receiving Workers' Compensation benefits has been associated with inferior outcomes after lumbar fusion. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty between patients receiving and those not receiving Workers' Compensation.
Patient-reported outcomes, reoperations, complications, and return-to-work status were analyzed at one year after surgery in an observational cohort of consecutive patients who underwent single-level or multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty for symptomatic cervical disc conditions, including radiculopathy or discogenic pain with or without radiculopathy, exclusive of myelopathy.
Of the 189 patients who underwent cervical disc arthroplasty, 144 received Workers' Compensation and forty-five did not. The mean scores on all patient-reported measures improved significantly from preoperative baseline to one year after surgery (p < 0.001), and the improvement in patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between the Workers' Compensation and the non-Workers' Compensation group (respectively, 22.7 compared with 25.0 for the Neck Disability Index; 8.3 compared with 9.6 for the Short Form (SF)-36 physical component summary; 7.9 compared with 9.6 for the SF-36 mental component summary; 3.5 compared with 3.7 for neck pain; and 2.6 compared with 2.8 for arm pain). The two groups also did not differ significantly in the rate of reoperations (7.6% for those receiving Workers' Compensation compared with 13.3% for those not receiving Workers' Compensation) and complications (2.8% compared with 4.4%, respectively). At one year after surgery, the proportion of patients who had returned to work was comparable (77.7% in the Workers' Compensation group and 79.4% in the non-Workers' Compensation group); however, the patients receiving Workers' Compensation had significantly more days off before returning to work (a mean of 145.2 compared with 61.9 days; p = 0.001).
After cervical disc arthroplasty, patients receiving Workers' Compensation had outcomes that were similar to those of patients not receiving Workers' Compensation in terms of patient-reported outcomes, surgery-related complications, reoperations, and return-to-work status. Patients receiving Workers' Compensation remained off work for a longer interval than did patients not receiving Workers' Compensation.
Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2106/JBJS.O.00324 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760918927</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760918927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2932-4391091d9e516a5bc4be2ed69bdd5b04ba35998912b9f1f0a17f48090090c0fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kc9uEzEQhy0EoqFw44x85NANY3v_xNxCKIWq0lZKEUfL6x0rS3fjxfa2yo0bz8Dr9UlwklLJkj3WN5_GPxPylsGcMyg_XH66XM_rOYDg-TMyY4UoMiYW5XMyA-Ask6IoTsirEH4CQJ5D9ZKc8LKSDLickT83G6Tn1qKJ1Fn6w_lb9OHh91-6csOI26Bj57Z0HXWcAk2neorGDRj29Ar9XWd0Tz93wdCljxvvxl6HuPtIl_TauzAmb3eHZweb9vpY1E1InQdzal7Hqd29Ji-s7gO-edxPyfcv5zerr9lVffFttbzKDJeCZ7lIc0vWSixYqYvG5A1ybEvZtG3RQN5oUUi5kIw30jILmlU2X4CEtAxYI07J-6N39O7XhCGqIc2Ofa-36KagWFUm_0LyKqFnR9SkhwSPVo2-G7TfKQZqH73aR69qdYg-4e8ezVMzYPsE_886AfkRuHd9TCHf9tM9erVB3cdNkqTfKbnIOLASGAfI9ldc_ANLvZBZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760918927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Comparative, Observational Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gornet, Matthew F. ; Schranck, Francine W. ; Copay, Anne G. ; Kopjar, Branko</creator><creatorcontrib>Gornet, Matthew F. ; Schranck, Francine W. ; Copay, Anne G. ; Kopjar, Branko</creatorcontrib><description>Receiving Workers' Compensation benefits has been associated with inferior outcomes after lumbar fusion. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty between patients receiving and those not receiving Workers' Compensation.
Patient-reported outcomes, reoperations, complications, and return-to-work status were analyzed at one year after surgery in an observational cohort of consecutive patients who underwent single-level or multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty for symptomatic cervical disc conditions, including radiculopathy or discogenic pain with or without radiculopathy, exclusive of myelopathy.
Of the 189 patients who underwent cervical disc arthroplasty, 144 received Workers' Compensation and forty-five did not. The mean scores on all patient-reported measures improved significantly from preoperative baseline to one year after surgery (p < 0.001), and the improvement in patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between the Workers' Compensation and the non-Workers' Compensation group (respectively, 22.7 compared with 25.0 for the Neck Disability Index; 8.3 compared with 9.6 for the Short Form (SF)-36 physical component summary; 7.9 compared with 9.6 for the SF-36 mental component summary; 3.5 compared with 3.7 for neck pain; and 2.6 compared with 2.8 for arm pain). The two groups also did not differ significantly in the rate of reoperations (7.6% for those receiving Workers' Compensation compared with 13.3% for those not receiving Workers' Compensation) and complications (2.8% compared with 4.4%, respectively). At one year after surgery, the proportion of patients who had returned to work was comparable (77.7% in the Workers' Compensation group and 79.4% in the non-Workers' Compensation group); however, the patients receiving Workers' Compensation had significantly more days off before returning to work (a mean of 145.2 compared with 61.9 days; p = 0.001).
After cervical disc arthroplasty, patients receiving Workers' Compensation had outcomes that were similar to those of patients not receiving Workers' Compensation in terms of patient-reported outcomes, surgery-related complications, reoperations, and return-to-work status. Patients receiving Workers' Compensation remained off work for a longer interval than did patients not receiving Workers' Compensation.
Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00324</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26791029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Arthroplasty - adverse effects ; Arthroplasty - methods ; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Cohort Studies ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnosis ; Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data ; Prospective Studies ; Recovery of Function ; Return to Work - statistics & numerical data ; Risk Assessment ; Self Report ; Severity of Illness Index ; Spinal Fusion - adverse effects ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Treatment Outcome ; Workers' Compensation - economics ; Workers' Compensation - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2016-01, Vol.98 (2), p.93-99</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2932-4391091d9e516a5bc4be2ed69bdd5b04ba35998912b9f1f0a17f48090090c0fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26791029$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gornet, Matthew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schranck, Francine W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copay, Anne G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopjar, Branko</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Comparative, Observational Study</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>Receiving Workers' Compensation benefits has been associated with inferior outcomes after lumbar fusion. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty between patients receiving and those not receiving Workers' Compensation.
Patient-reported outcomes, reoperations, complications, and return-to-work status were analyzed at one year after surgery in an observational cohort of consecutive patients who underwent single-level or multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty for symptomatic cervical disc conditions, including radiculopathy or discogenic pain with or without radiculopathy, exclusive of myelopathy.
Of the 189 patients who underwent cervical disc arthroplasty, 144 received Workers' Compensation and forty-five did not. The mean scores on all patient-reported measures improved significantly from preoperative baseline to one year after surgery (p < 0.001), and the improvement in patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between the Workers' Compensation and the non-Workers' Compensation group (respectively, 22.7 compared with 25.0 for the Neck Disability Index; 8.3 compared with 9.6 for the Short Form (SF)-36 physical component summary; 7.9 compared with 9.6 for the SF-36 mental component summary; 3.5 compared with 3.7 for neck pain; and 2.6 compared with 2.8 for arm pain). The two groups also did not differ significantly in the rate of reoperations (7.6% for those receiving Workers' Compensation compared with 13.3% for those not receiving Workers' Compensation) and complications (2.8% compared with 4.4%, respectively). At one year after surgery, the proportion of patients who had returned to work was comparable (77.7% in the Workers' Compensation group and 79.4% in the non-Workers' Compensation group); however, the patients receiving Workers' Compensation had significantly more days off before returning to work (a mean of 145.2 compared with 61.9 days; p = 0.001).
After cervical disc arthroplasty, patients receiving Workers' Compensation had outcomes that were similar to those of patients not receiving Workers' Compensation in terms of patient-reported outcomes, surgery-related complications, reoperations, and return-to-work status. Patients receiving Workers' Compensation remained off work for a longer interval than did patients not receiving Workers' Compensation.
Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Arthroplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Arthroplasty - methods</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnosis</subject><subject>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Return to Work - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - adverse effects</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Workers' Compensation - economics</subject><subject>Workers' Compensation - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kc9uEzEQhy0EoqFw44x85NANY3v_xNxCKIWq0lZKEUfL6x0rS3fjxfa2yo0bz8Dr9UlwklLJkj3WN5_GPxPylsGcMyg_XH66XM_rOYDg-TMyY4UoMiYW5XMyA-Ask6IoTsirEH4CQJ5D9ZKc8LKSDLickT83G6Tn1qKJ1Fn6w_lb9OHh91-6csOI26Bj57Z0HXWcAk2neorGDRj29Ar9XWd0Tz93wdCljxvvxl6HuPtIl_TauzAmb3eHZweb9vpY1E1InQdzal7Hqd29Ji-s7gO-edxPyfcv5zerr9lVffFttbzKDJeCZ7lIc0vWSixYqYvG5A1ybEvZtG3RQN5oUUi5kIw30jILmlU2X4CEtAxYI07J-6N39O7XhCGqIc2Ofa-36KagWFUm_0LyKqFnR9SkhwSPVo2-G7TfKQZqH73aR69qdYg-4e8ezVMzYPsE_886AfkRuHd9TCHf9tM9erVB3cdNkqTfKbnIOLASGAfI9ldc_ANLvZBZ</recordid><startdate>20160120</startdate><enddate>20160120</enddate><creator>Gornet, Matthew F.</creator><creator>Schranck, Francine W.</creator><creator>Copay, Anne G.</creator><creator>Kopjar, Branko</creator><general>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160120</creationdate><title>The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Comparative, Observational Study</title><author>Gornet, Matthew F. ; Schranck, Francine W. ; Copay, Anne G. ; Kopjar, Branko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2932-4391091d9e516a5bc4be2ed69bdd5b04ba35998912b9f1f0a17f48090090c0fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Arthroplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Arthroplasty - methods</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnosis</topic><topic>Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Return to Work - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - adverse effects</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Workers' Compensation - economics</topic><topic>Workers' Compensation - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gornet, Matthew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schranck, Francine W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copay, Anne G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopjar, Branko</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gornet, Matthew F.</au><au>Schranck, Francine W.</au><au>Copay, Anne G.</au><au>Kopjar, Branko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Comparative, Observational Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2016-01-20</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>93-99</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>Receiving Workers' Compensation benefits has been associated with inferior outcomes after lumbar fusion. The purpose of our study was to compare the outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty between patients receiving and those not receiving Workers' Compensation.
Patient-reported outcomes, reoperations, complications, and return-to-work status were analyzed at one year after surgery in an observational cohort of consecutive patients who underwent single-level or multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty for symptomatic cervical disc conditions, including radiculopathy or discogenic pain with or without radiculopathy, exclusive of myelopathy.
Of the 189 patients who underwent cervical disc arthroplasty, 144 received Workers' Compensation and forty-five did not. The mean scores on all patient-reported measures improved significantly from preoperative baseline to one year after surgery (p < 0.001), and the improvement in patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between the Workers' Compensation and the non-Workers' Compensation group (respectively, 22.7 compared with 25.0 for the Neck Disability Index; 8.3 compared with 9.6 for the Short Form (SF)-36 physical component summary; 7.9 compared with 9.6 for the SF-36 mental component summary; 3.5 compared with 3.7 for neck pain; and 2.6 compared with 2.8 for arm pain). The two groups also did not differ significantly in the rate of reoperations (7.6% for those receiving Workers' Compensation compared with 13.3% for those not receiving Workers' Compensation) and complications (2.8% compared with 4.4%, respectively). At one year after surgery, the proportion of patients who had returned to work was comparable (77.7% in the Workers' Compensation group and 79.4% in the non-Workers' Compensation group); however, the patients receiving Workers' Compensation had significantly more days off before returning to work (a mean of 145.2 compared with 61.9 days; p = 0.001).
After cervical disc arthroplasty, patients receiving Workers' Compensation had outcomes that were similar to those of patients not receiving Workers' Compensation in terms of patient-reported outcomes, surgery-related complications, reoperations, and return-to-work status. Patients receiving Workers' Compensation remained off work for a longer interval than did patients not receiving Workers' Compensation.
Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>26791029</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.O.00324</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-9355 |
| ispartof | Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2016-01, Vol.98 (2), p.93-99 |
| issn | 0021-9355 1535-1386 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760918927 |
| source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Arthroplasty - adverse effects Arthroplasty - methods Cervical Vertebrae - surgery Chi-Square Distribution Cohort Studies Disability Evaluation Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Intervertebral Disc Displacement - diagnosis Intervertebral Disc Displacement - surgery Male Middle Aged Pain Measurement Patient Satisfaction - statistics & numerical data Prospective Studies Recovery of Function Return to Work - statistics & numerical data Risk Assessment Self Report Severity of Illness Index Spinal Fusion - adverse effects Spinal Fusion - methods Treatment Outcome Workers' Compensation - economics Workers' Compensation - statistics & numerical data |
| title | The Effect of Workers’ Compensation Status on Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Comparative, Observational Study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A22%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Workers%E2%80%99%20Compensation%20Status%20on%20Outcomes%20of%20Cervical%20Disc%20Arthroplasty:%20A%20Prospective,%20Comparative,%20Observational%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Gornet,%20Matthew%20F.&rft.date=2016-01-20&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=93-99&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.O.00324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760918927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760918927&rft_id=info:pmid/26791029&rfr_iscdi=true |