Neuroendocrine differentiation in breast carcinoma: clinicopathological features and outcome
Aims Primary neuroendocrine (NE) breast carcinoma (BC) is an entity with a wide range of prevalence and poorly defined clinical behaviour. We evaluated the prevalence, clinicopathological features and clinical outcome of NEBC. Methods and results Immunohistochemical staining for synaptophysin and ch...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Histopathology 2016-02, Vol.68 (3), p.422-432 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 432 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 422 |
container_title | Histopathology |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Bogina, Giuseppe Munari, Enrico Brunelli, Matteo Bortesi, Laura Marconi, Marcella Sommaggio, Marco Lunardi, Gianluigi Gori, Stefania Massocco, Alberto Pegoraro, Maria C Zamboni, Giuseppe |
description | Aims
Primary neuroendocrine (NE) breast carcinoma (BC) is an entity with a wide range of prevalence and poorly defined clinical behaviour. We evaluated the prevalence, clinicopathological features and clinical outcome of NEBC.
Methods and results
Immunohistochemical staining for synaptophysin and chromogranin A was performed on whole sections from 1232 consecutive cases of invasive BC. We divided NEBC into focal (10–49% positive cells) and diffuse (≥50% positive cells) and compared the outcome of patients with NEBC with strictly matched non‐NEBC. A total of 128 BC showed NE differentiation (10.4%): 84 diffuse (6.8%) and 44 focal (3.6%). NE differentiation showed a significant association with T4 stage (P = 0.001), solid‐papillary and mucinous histotype (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/his.12766 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760917706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760917706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5276-6eec29d977f1052cde2f330ca2946f9c4241a4fa8904dab0f587710a98c831523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PFTEUhhsjkSu68A-YSdzIYqAf03bqzlyRS0IgfrIxac7tnEpxpr22M1H-PQMXWJh4NmfzvE_evIS8YvSAzXd4GcoB41qpJ2TBhJI1l9I8JQsqqKkpU3qXPC_lilKmBefPyC5XjDWNbhfkxxlOOWHsksshYtUF7zFjHAOMIcUqxGqdEcpYOcguxDTAu8r1IQaXNjBepj79DA76yiOMU8ZSQeyqNI0uDfiC7HjoC768_3vk28ejr8tVfXp-fLJ8f1o7ObeuFaLjpjNae0Yldx1yLwR1wE2jvHENbxg0HlpDmw7W1MtWa0bBtK4VTHKxR95uvZucfk9YRjuE4rDvIWKaimVaUcO0pmpG3_yDXqUpx7ndTEnZUCbvhPtbyuVUSkZvNzkMkK8to_Z2cjtPbu8mn9nX98ZpPWD3SD5sPAOHW-BP6PH6_ya7OvnyoKy3iVBG_PuYgPzLKi20tBdnx3Z18f2T-LBc2c_iBhNRmjo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1755401552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neuroendocrine differentiation in breast carcinoma: clinicopathological features and outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bogina, Giuseppe ; Munari, Enrico ; Brunelli, Matteo ; Bortesi, Laura ; Marconi, Marcella ; Sommaggio, Marco ; Lunardi, Gianluigi ; Gori, Stefania ; Massocco, Alberto ; Pegoraro, Maria C ; Zamboni, Giuseppe</creator><creatorcontrib>Bogina, Giuseppe ; Munari, Enrico ; Brunelli, Matteo ; Bortesi, Laura ; Marconi, Marcella ; Sommaggio, Marco ; Lunardi, Gianluigi ; Gori, Stefania ; Massocco, Alberto ; Pegoraro, Maria C ; Zamboni, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
Primary neuroendocrine (NE) breast carcinoma (BC) is an entity with a wide range of prevalence and poorly defined clinical behaviour. We evaluated the prevalence, clinicopathological features and clinical outcome of NEBC.
Methods and results
Immunohistochemical staining for synaptophysin and chromogranin A was performed on whole sections from 1232 consecutive cases of invasive BC. We divided NEBC into focal (10–49% positive cells) and diffuse (≥50% positive cells) and compared the outcome of patients with NEBC with strictly matched non‐NEBC. A total of 128 BC showed NE differentiation (10.4%): 84 diffuse (6.8%) and 44 focal (3.6%). NE differentiation showed a significant association with T4 stage (P = 0.001), solid‐papillary and mucinous histotype (P < 0.0001), G2 grading (P = 0.002), positive oestrogen receptor (ER) (P = 0.003) and progesterone receptor (PR) (P = 0.002). Almost 90% of NEBC were ER+/HER2− and more than half ER+/HER2−/Ki67≥14%. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that patients with NEBC showed worse disease‐free survival (DFS) (P = 0.04) compared to matched non‐NEBC. We did not find significant differences regarding clinicopathological features, DFS and CSS between diffuse and focal neuroendocrine BC.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that NEBC represents 7–10% of invasive BC and that NE differentiation does not affect the prognosis of BC in terms of CSS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-0167</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2559</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/his.12766</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26114478</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HISTDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; breast ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; cancer ; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine - pathology ; Chromogranin A - metabolism ; Clinical outcomes ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Medical prognosis ; Middle Aged ; neuroendocrine ; outcome ; Prognosis ; Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism ; Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism ; Synaptophysin - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Histopathology, 2016-02, Vol.68 (3), p.422-432</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5276-6eec29d977f1052cde2f330ca2946f9c4241a4fa8904dab0f587710a98c831523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5276-6eec29d977f1052cde2f330ca2946f9c4241a4fa8904dab0f587710a98c831523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhis.12766$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhis.12766$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26114478$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bogina, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munari, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunelli, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortesi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marconi, Marcella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommaggio, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunardi, Gianluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gori, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massocco, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegoraro, Maria C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamboni, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><title>Neuroendocrine differentiation in breast carcinoma: clinicopathological features and outcome</title><title>Histopathology</title><addtitle>Histopathology</addtitle><description>Aims
Primary neuroendocrine (NE) breast carcinoma (BC) is an entity with a wide range of prevalence and poorly defined clinical behaviour. We evaluated the prevalence, clinicopathological features and clinical outcome of NEBC.
Methods and results
Immunohistochemical staining for synaptophysin and chromogranin A was performed on whole sections from 1232 consecutive cases of invasive BC. We divided NEBC into focal (10–49% positive cells) and diffuse (≥50% positive cells) and compared the outcome of patients with NEBC with strictly matched non‐NEBC. A total of 128 BC showed NE differentiation (10.4%): 84 diffuse (6.8%) and 44 focal (3.6%). NE differentiation showed a significant association with T4 stage (P = 0.001), solid‐papillary and mucinous histotype (P < 0.0001), G2 grading (P = 0.002), positive oestrogen receptor (ER) (P = 0.003) and progesterone receptor (PR) (P = 0.002). Almost 90% of NEBC were ER+/HER2− and more than half ER+/HER2−/Ki67≥14%. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that patients with NEBC showed worse disease‐free survival (DFS) (P = 0.04) compared to matched non‐NEBC. We did not find significant differences regarding clinicopathological features, DFS and CSS between diffuse and focal neuroendocrine BC.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that NEBC represents 7–10% of invasive BC and that NE differentiation does not affect the prognosis of BC in terms of CSS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>breast</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine - pathology</subject><subject>Chromogranin A - metabolism</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>neuroendocrine</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism</subject><subject>Synaptophysin - metabolism</subject><issn>0309-0167</issn><issn>1365-2559</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PFTEUhhsjkSu68A-YSdzIYqAf03bqzlyRS0IgfrIxac7tnEpxpr22M1H-PQMXWJh4NmfzvE_evIS8YvSAzXd4GcoB41qpJ2TBhJI1l9I8JQsqqKkpU3qXPC_lilKmBefPyC5XjDWNbhfkxxlOOWHsksshYtUF7zFjHAOMIcUqxGqdEcpYOcguxDTAu8r1IQaXNjBepj79DA76yiOMU8ZSQeyqNI0uDfiC7HjoC768_3vk28ejr8tVfXp-fLJ8f1o7ObeuFaLjpjNae0Yldx1yLwR1wE2jvHENbxg0HlpDmw7W1MtWa0bBtK4VTHKxR95uvZucfk9YRjuE4rDvIWKaimVaUcO0pmpG3_yDXqUpx7ndTEnZUCbvhPtbyuVUSkZvNzkMkK8to_Z2cjtPbu8mn9nX98ZpPWD3SD5sPAOHW-BP6PH6_ya7OvnyoKy3iVBG_PuYgPzLKi20tBdnx3Z18f2T-LBc2c_iBhNRmjo</recordid><startdate>201602</startdate><enddate>201602</enddate><creator>Bogina, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Munari, Enrico</creator><creator>Brunelli, Matteo</creator><creator>Bortesi, Laura</creator><creator>Marconi, Marcella</creator><creator>Sommaggio, Marco</creator><creator>Lunardi, Gianluigi</creator><creator>Gori, Stefania</creator><creator>Massocco, Alberto</creator><creator>Pegoraro, Maria C</creator><creator>Zamboni, Giuseppe</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201602</creationdate><title>Neuroendocrine differentiation in breast carcinoma: clinicopathological features and outcome</title><author>Bogina, Giuseppe ; Munari, Enrico ; Brunelli, Matteo ; Bortesi, Laura ; Marconi, Marcella ; Sommaggio, Marco ; Lunardi, Gianluigi ; Gori, Stefania ; Massocco, Alberto ; Pegoraro, Maria C ; Zamboni, Giuseppe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5276-6eec29d977f1052cde2f330ca2946f9c4241a4fa8904dab0f587710a98c831523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>breast</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine - pathology</topic><topic>Chromogranin A - metabolism</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>neuroendocrine</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism</topic><topic>Synaptophysin - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bogina, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munari, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunelli, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bortesi, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marconi, Marcella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sommaggio, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lunardi, Gianluigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gori, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massocco, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegoraro, Maria C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamboni, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Histopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bogina, Giuseppe</au><au>Munari, Enrico</au><au>Brunelli, Matteo</au><au>Bortesi, Laura</au><au>Marconi, Marcella</au><au>Sommaggio, Marco</au><au>Lunardi, Gianluigi</au><au>Gori, Stefania</au><au>Massocco, Alberto</au><au>Pegoraro, Maria C</au><au>Zamboni, Giuseppe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neuroendocrine differentiation in breast carcinoma: clinicopathological features and outcome</atitle><jtitle>Histopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Histopathology</addtitle><date>2016-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>432</epage><pages>422-432</pages><issn>0309-0167</issn><eissn>1365-2559</eissn><coden>HISTDD</coden><abstract>Aims
Primary neuroendocrine (NE) breast carcinoma (BC) is an entity with a wide range of prevalence and poorly defined clinical behaviour. We evaluated the prevalence, clinicopathological features and clinical outcome of NEBC.
Methods and results
Immunohistochemical staining for synaptophysin and chromogranin A was performed on whole sections from 1232 consecutive cases of invasive BC. We divided NEBC into focal (10–49% positive cells) and diffuse (≥50% positive cells) and compared the outcome of patients with NEBC with strictly matched non‐NEBC. A total of 128 BC showed NE differentiation (10.4%): 84 diffuse (6.8%) and 44 focal (3.6%). NE differentiation showed a significant association with T4 stage (P = 0.001), solid‐papillary and mucinous histotype (P < 0.0001), G2 grading (P = 0.002), positive oestrogen receptor (ER) (P = 0.003) and progesterone receptor (PR) (P = 0.002). Almost 90% of NEBC were ER+/HER2− and more than half ER+/HER2−/Ki67≥14%. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that patients with NEBC showed worse disease‐free survival (DFS) (P = 0.04) compared to matched non‐NEBC. We did not find significant differences regarding clinicopathological features, DFS and CSS between diffuse and focal neuroendocrine BC.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that NEBC represents 7–10% of invasive BC and that NE differentiation does not affect the prognosis of BC in terms of CSS.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26114478</pmid><doi>10.1111/his.12766</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-0167 |
ispartof | Histopathology, 2016-02, Vol.68 (3), p.422-432 |
issn | 0309-0167 1365-2559 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760917706 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism breast Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - metabolism Breast Neoplasms - pathology cancer Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine - metabolism Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine - pathology Chromogranin A - metabolism Clinical outcomes Disease-Free Survival Female Humans Immunohistochemistry Kaplan-Meier Estimate Medical prognosis Middle Aged neuroendocrine outcome Prognosis Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism Synaptophysin - metabolism |
title | Neuroendocrine differentiation in breast carcinoma: clinicopathological features and outcome |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T16%3A22%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neuroendocrine%20differentiation%20in%20breast%20carcinoma:%20clinicopathological%20features%20and%20outcome&rft.jtitle=Histopathology&rft.au=Bogina,%20Giuseppe&rft.date=2016-02&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=432&rft.pages=422-432&rft.issn=0309-0167&rft.eissn=1365-2559&rft.coden=HISTDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/his.12766&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760917706%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1755401552&rft_id=info:pmid/26114478&rfr_iscdi=true |