The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach

Purpose In 2011, Germany introduced a new form of drug benefit assessment, linking reimbursement prices to drug benefit and making quality of life (QoL) one of the main benefit criteria. Thus, QoL outcomes co-determine drug prices in Germany. QoL has, however, not been defined in the regulations. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality of life research 2016-02, Vol.25 (2), p.447-455
Hauptverfasser: Lohrberg, David, Augustin, Matthias, Blome, Christine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 455
container_issue 2
container_start_page 447
container_title Quality of life research
container_volume 25
creator Lohrberg, David
Augustin, Matthias
Blome, Christine
description Purpose In 2011, Germany introduced a new form of drug benefit assessment, linking reimbursement prices to drug benefit and making quality of life (QoL) one of the main benefit criteria. Thus, QoL outcomes co-determine drug prices in Germany. QoL has, however, not been defined in the regulations. This study analyzed the definition and role of QoL in Germany's drug benefit assessment. It serves as a case study on the complexity of QoL as a parameter of health technology and drug assessments, which have become mandatory in almost all industrialized countries. Methods In a qualitative analysis, the publicly available dossiers (summaries), dossier evaluations, protocols of the oral hearings, the final resolutions of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and its rationale of all benefit assessments completed by 2013 (n = 66) were processed. Additionally, quantitative data on the decision outcomes were collected. Results Only two decisions drew on QoL outcomes as "main justifications" for additional benefit. It was due to a lack of valid and statistically significant QoL results, a deficient presentation of QoL data, or differing understandings of QoL, that QoL benefit was not demonstrated in more than two cases. While manufacturers applied wider definitions of QoL, the assessment institutions questioned evidence if it was not reported with the help of validated QoL questionnaires or deviated from their definition of QoL. Conclusions The German experience with QoL as a drug benefit criterion highlights the importance of a clear QoL definition and according methodological regulations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11136-015-1092-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760915531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44849735</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44849735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4611dd67f9f606266fc4b8a02fb50bd057390b726d2d92d9400cf711d83b35c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctq3DAYRkVoSCZpHqCLFkEWzcbpr6ut7kJoLhDIZvZCtqREgy1PJLswb18NnoTSRUEggc53dPkQ-kLgmgDUPzIhhMkKiKgIKFrJI7QiomYVlVx9QitQklaKcXaKznLeAECjgJ6gUyopp1TACm3Xrw5b50MMUxgjNtHiNPYOjx6_zaYP026_7IN3OER879Jg4u57xs6kfodNzi7nwcVpT9k0v-DWxaKbfmJzEJgp_HbYbLdpNN3rZ3TsTZ_dxWE-R-u7X-vbh-rp-f7x9uap6rjkU8UlIdbK2isvQVIpfcfbxgD1rYDWQnmlgram0lKryuAAna9LpmEtEx07R1eLtpz6Nrs86SHkzvW9iW6csya1BEWEYKSgl_-gm3FOsVyuUKJRDRWCFoosVJfGnJPzepvCYNJOE9D7NvTShi5t6H0bWpbMt4N5bgdnPxLv318AugC5bMUXl_46-j_Wr0tok6cxfUg5b7iqmWB_APuOnaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1758982552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Lohrberg, David ; Augustin, Matthias ; Blome, Christine</creator><creatorcontrib>Lohrberg, David ; Augustin, Matthias ; Blome, Christine</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose In 2011, Germany introduced a new form of drug benefit assessment, linking reimbursement prices to drug benefit and making quality of life (QoL) one of the main benefit criteria. Thus, QoL outcomes co-determine drug prices in Germany. QoL has, however, not been defined in the regulations. This study analyzed the definition and role of QoL in Germany's drug benefit assessment. It serves as a case study on the complexity of QoL as a parameter of health technology and drug assessments, which have become mandatory in almost all industrialized countries. Methods In a qualitative analysis, the publicly available dossiers (summaries), dossier evaluations, protocols of the oral hearings, the final resolutions of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and its rationale of all benefit assessments completed by 2013 (n = 66) were processed. Additionally, quantitative data on the decision outcomes were collected. Results Only two decisions drew on QoL outcomes as "main justifications" for additional benefit. It was due to a lack of valid and statistically significant QoL results, a deficient presentation of QoL data, or differing understandings of QoL, that QoL benefit was not demonstrated in more than two cases. While manufacturers applied wider definitions of QoL, the assessment institutions questioned evidence if it was not reported with the help of validated QoL questionnaires or deviated from their definition of QoL. Conclusions The German experience with QoL as a drug benefit criterion highlights the importance of a clear QoL definition and according methodological regulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1092-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26242250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Analysis ; CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS ; Colorectal cancer ; Committees ; Content analysis ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics ; Decision making ; Dermatology ; Drug Industry - economics ; Drug prices ; Germany ; Health care policy ; Health insurance ; Health outcomes ; Health services ; Humans ; Insurance benefits ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - economics ; Prescription drugs ; Prices ; Public Health ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative comparative analysis ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life Research ; Regulation ; Reimbursement ; Side effects ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2016-02, Vol.25 (2), p.447-455</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing 2016</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4611dd67f9f606266fc4b8a02fb50bd057390b726d2d92d9400cf711d83b35c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4611dd67f9f606266fc4b8a02fb50bd057390b726d2d92d9400cf711d83b35c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44849735$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44849735$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26242250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lohrberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blome, Christine</creatorcontrib><title>The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose In 2011, Germany introduced a new form of drug benefit assessment, linking reimbursement prices to drug benefit and making quality of life (QoL) one of the main benefit criteria. Thus, QoL outcomes co-determine drug prices in Germany. QoL has, however, not been defined in the regulations. This study analyzed the definition and role of QoL in Germany's drug benefit assessment. It serves as a case study on the complexity of QoL as a parameter of health technology and drug assessments, which have become mandatory in almost all industrialized countries. Methods In a qualitative analysis, the publicly available dossiers (summaries), dossier evaluations, protocols of the oral hearings, the final resolutions of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and its rationale of all benefit assessments completed by 2013 (n = 66) were processed. Additionally, quantitative data on the decision outcomes were collected. Results Only two decisions drew on QoL outcomes as "main justifications" for additional benefit. It was due to a lack of valid and statistically significant QoL results, a deficient presentation of QoL data, or differing understandings of QoL, that QoL benefit was not demonstrated in more than two cases. While manufacturers applied wider definitions of QoL, the assessment institutions questioned evidence if it was not reported with the help of validated QoL questionnaires or deviated from their definition of QoL. Conclusions The German experience with QoL as a drug benefit criterion highlights the importance of a clear QoL definition and according methodological regulations.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Drug Industry - economics</subject><subject>Drug prices</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health outcomes</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance benefits</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - economics</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative comparative analysis</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctq3DAYRkVoSCZpHqCLFkEWzcbpr6ut7kJoLhDIZvZCtqREgy1PJLswb18NnoTSRUEggc53dPkQ-kLgmgDUPzIhhMkKiKgIKFrJI7QiomYVlVx9QitQklaKcXaKznLeAECjgJ6gUyopp1TACm3Xrw5b50MMUxgjNtHiNPYOjx6_zaYP026_7IN3OER879Jg4u57xs6kfodNzi7nwcVpT9k0v-DWxaKbfmJzEJgp_HbYbLdpNN3rZ3TsTZ_dxWE-R-u7X-vbh-rp-f7x9uap6rjkU8UlIdbK2isvQVIpfcfbxgD1rYDWQnmlgram0lKryuAAna9LpmEtEx07R1eLtpz6Nrs86SHkzvW9iW6csya1BEWEYKSgl_-gm3FOsVyuUKJRDRWCFoosVJfGnJPzepvCYNJOE9D7NvTShi5t6H0bWpbMt4N5bgdnPxLv318AugC5bMUXl_46-j_Wr0tok6cxfUg5b7iqmWB_APuOnaI</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Lohrberg, David</creator><creator>Augustin, Matthias</creator><creator>Blome, Christine</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach</title><author>Lohrberg, David ; Augustin, Matthias ; Blome, Christine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4611dd67f9f606266fc4b8a02fb50bd057390b726d2d92d9400cf711d83b35c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Drug Industry - economics</topic><topic>Drug prices</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health outcomes</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance benefits</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - economics</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative comparative analysis</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lohrberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blome, Christine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lohrberg, David</au><au>Augustin, Matthias</au><au>Blome, Christine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>455</epage><pages>447-455</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose In 2011, Germany introduced a new form of drug benefit assessment, linking reimbursement prices to drug benefit and making quality of life (QoL) one of the main benefit criteria. Thus, QoL outcomes co-determine drug prices in Germany. QoL has, however, not been defined in the regulations. This study analyzed the definition and role of QoL in Germany's drug benefit assessment. It serves as a case study on the complexity of QoL as a parameter of health technology and drug assessments, which have become mandatory in almost all industrialized countries. Methods In a qualitative analysis, the publicly available dossiers (summaries), dossier evaluations, protocols of the oral hearings, the final resolutions of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and its rationale of all benefit assessments completed by 2013 (n = 66) were processed. Additionally, quantitative data on the decision outcomes were collected. Results Only two decisions drew on QoL outcomes as "main justifications" for additional benefit. It was due to a lack of valid and statistically significant QoL results, a deficient presentation of QoL data, or differing understandings of QoL, that QoL benefit was not demonstrated in more than two cases. While manufacturers applied wider definitions of QoL, the assessment institutions questioned evidence if it was not reported with the help of validated QoL questionnaires or deviated from their definition of QoL. Conclusions The German experience with QoL as a drug benefit criterion highlights the importance of a clear QoL definition and according methodological regulations.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>26242250</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-015-1092-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-9343
ispartof Quality of life research, 2016-02, Vol.25 (2), p.447-455
issn 0962-9343
1573-2649
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760915531
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Analysis
CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS
Colorectal cancer
Committees
Content analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics
Decision making
Dermatology
Drug Industry - economics
Drug prices
Germany
Health care policy
Health insurance
Health outcomes
Health services
Humans
Insurance benefits
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Morbidity
Mortality
Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmaceutical Preparations - economics
Prescription drugs
Prices
Public Health
Qualitative analysis
Qualitative comparative analysis
Quality of Life
Quality of Life Research
Regulation
Reimbursement
Side effects
Sociology
title The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A56%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20definition%20and%20role%20of%20quality%20of%20life%20in%20Germany's%20early%20assessment%20of%20drug%20benefit:%20a%20qualitative%20approach&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Lohrberg,%20David&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=455&rft.pages=447-455&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-015-1092-6&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44849735%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1758982552&rft_id=info:pmid/26242250&rft_jstor_id=44849735&rfr_iscdi=true