The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach
Purpose In 2011, Germany introduced a new form of drug benefit assessment, linking reimbursement prices to drug benefit and making quality of life (QoL) one of the main benefit criteria. Thus, QoL outcomes co-determine drug prices in Germany. QoL has, however, not been defined in the regulations. Th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality of life research 2016-02, Vol.25 (2), p.447-455 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 455 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 447 |
container_title | Quality of life research |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Lohrberg, David Augustin, Matthias Blome, Christine |
description | Purpose In 2011, Germany introduced a new form of drug benefit assessment, linking reimbursement prices to drug benefit and making quality of life (QoL) one of the main benefit criteria. Thus, QoL outcomes co-determine drug prices in Germany. QoL has, however, not been defined in the regulations. This study analyzed the definition and role of QoL in Germany's drug benefit assessment. It serves as a case study on the complexity of QoL as a parameter of health technology and drug assessments, which have become mandatory in almost all industrialized countries. Methods In a qualitative analysis, the publicly available dossiers (summaries), dossier evaluations, protocols of the oral hearings, the final resolutions of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and its rationale of all benefit assessments completed by 2013 (n = 66) were processed. Additionally, quantitative data on the decision outcomes were collected. Results Only two decisions drew on QoL outcomes as "main justifications" for additional benefit. It was due to a lack of valid and statistically significant QoL results, a deficient presentation of QoL data, or differing understandings of QoL, that QoL benefit was not demonstrated in more than two cases. While manufacturers applied wider definitions of QoL, the assessment institutions questioned evidence if it was not reported with the help of validated QoL questionnaires or deviated from their definition of QoL. Conclusions The German experience with QoL as a drug benefit criterion highlights the importance of a clear QoL definition and according methodological regulations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11136-015-1092-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760915531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44849735</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44849735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4611dd67f9f606266fc4b8a02fb50bd057390b726d2d92d9400cf711d83b35c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctq3DAYRkVoSCZpHqCLFkEWzcbpr6ut7kJoLhDIZvZCtqREgy1PJLswb18NnoTSRUEggc53dPkQ-kLgmgDUPzIhhMkKiKgIKFrJI7QiomYVlVx9QitQklaKcXaKznLeAECjgJ6gUyopp1TACm3Xrw5b50MMUxgjNtHiNPYOjx6_zaYP026_7IN3OER879Jg4u57xs6kfodNzi7nwcVpT9k0v-DWxaKbfmJzEJgp_HbYbLdpNN3rZ3TsTZ_dxWE-R-u7X-vbh-rp-f7x9uap6rjkU8UlIdbK2isvQVIpfcfbxgD1rYDWQnmlgram0lKryuAAna9LpmEtEx07R1eLtpz6Nrs86SHkzvW9iW6csya1BEWEYKSgl_-gm3FOsVyuUKJRDRWCFoosVJfGnJPzepvCYNJOE9D7NvTShi5t6H0bWpbMt4N5bgdnPxLv318AugC5bMUXl_46-j_Wr0tok6cxfUg5b7iqmWB_APuOnaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1758982552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Lohrberg, David ; Augustin, Matthias ; Blome, Christine</creator><creatorcontrib>Lohrberg, David ; Augustin, Matthias ; Blome, Christine</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose In 2011, Germany introduced a new form of drug benefit assessment, linking reimbursement prices to drug benefit and making quality of life (QoL) one of the main benefit criteria. Thus, QoL outcomes co-determine drug prices in Germany. QoL has, however, not been defined in the regulations. This study analyzed the definition and role of QoL in Germany's drug benefit assessment. It serves as a case study on the complexity of QoL as a parameter of health technology and drug assessments, which have become mandatory in almost all industrialized countries. Methods In a qualitative analysis, the publicly available dossiers (summaries), dossier evaluations, protocols of the oral hearings, the final resolutions of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and its rationale of all benefit assessments completed by 2013 (n = 66) were processed. Additionally, quantitative data on the decision outcomes were collected. Results Only two decisions drew on QoL outcomes as "main justifications" for additional benefit. It was due to a lack of valid and statistically significant QoL results, a deficient presentation of QoL data, or differing understandings of QoL, that QoL benefit was not demonstrated in more than two cases. While manufacturers applied wider definitions of QoL, the assessment institutions questioned evidence if it was not reported with the help of validated QoL questionnaires or deviated from their definition of QoL. Conclusions The German experience with QoL as a drug benefit criterion highlights the importance of a clear QoL definition and according methodological regulations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-1092-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26242250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Analysis ; CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS ; Colorectal cancer ; Committees ; Content analysis ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics ; Decision making ; Dermatology ; Drug Industry - economics ; Drug prices ; Germany ; Health care policy ; Health insurance ; Health outcomes ; Health services ; Humans ; Insurance benefits ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - economics ; Prescription drugs ; Prices ; Public Health ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative comparative analysis ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life Research ; Regulation ; Reimbursement ; Side effects ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2016-02, Vol.25 (2), p.447-455</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing 2016</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015</rights><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4611dd67f9f606266fc4b8a02fb50bd057390b726d2d92d9400cf711d83b35c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4611dd67f9f606266fc4b8a02fb50bd057390b726d2d92d9400cf711d83b35c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44849735$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44849735$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26242250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lohrberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blome, Christine</creatorcontrib><title>The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose In 2011, Germany introduced a new form of drug benefit assessment, linking reimbursement prices to drug benefit and making quality of life (QoL) one of the main benefit criteria. Thus, QoL outcomes co-determine drug prices in Germany. QoL has, however, not been defined in the regulations. This study analyzed the definition and role of QoL in Germany's drug benefit assessment. It serves as a case study on the complexity of QoL as a parameter of health technology and drug assessments, which have become mandatory in almost all industrialized countries. Methods In a qualitative analysis, the publicly available dossiers (summaries), dossier evaluations, protocols of the oral hearings, the final resolutions of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and its rationale of all benefit assessments completed by 2013 (n = 66) were processed. Additionally, quantitative data on the decision outcomes were collected. Results Only two decisions drew on QoL outcomes as "main justifications" for additional benefit. It was due to a lack of valid and statistically significant QoL results, a deficient presentation of QoL data, or differing understandings of QoL, that QoL benefit was not demonstrated in more than two cases. While manufacturers applied wider definitions of QoL, the assessment institutions questioned evidence if it was not reported with the help of validated QoL questionnaires or deviated from their definition of QoL. Conclusions The German experience with QoL as a drug benefit criterion highlights the importance of a clear QoL definition and according methodological regulations.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Drug Industry - economics</subject><subject>Drug prices</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health outcomes</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance benefits</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - economics</subject><subject>Prescription drugs</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative comparative analysis</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctq3DAYRkVoSCZpHqCLFkEWzcbpr6ut7kJoLhDIZvZCtqREgy1PJLswb18NnoTSRUEggc53dPkQ-kLgmgDUPzIhhMkKiKgIKFrJI7QiomYVlVx9QitQklaKcXaKznLeAECjgJ6gUyopp1TACm3Xrw5b50MMUxgjNtHiNPYOjx6_zaYP026_7IN3OER879Jg4u57xs6kfodNzi7nwcVpT9k0v-DWxaKbfmJzEJgp_HbYbLdpNN3rZ3TsTZ_dxWE-R-u7X-vbh-rp-f7x9uap6rjkU8UlIdbK2isvQVIpfcfbxgD1rYDWQnmlgram0lKryuAAna9LpmEtEx07R1eLtpz6Nrs86SHkzvW9iW6csya1BEWEYKSgl_-gm3FOsVyuUKJRDRWCFoosVJfGnJPzepvCYNJOE9D7NvTShi5t6H0bWpbMt4N5bgdnPxLv318AugC5bMUXl_46-j_Wr0tok6cxfUg5b7iqmWB_APuOnaI</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Lohrberg, David</creator><creator>Augustin, Matthias</creator><creator>Blome, Christine</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach</title><author>Lohrberg, David ; Augustin, Matthias ; Blome, Christine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-4611dd67f9f606266fc4b8a02fb50bd057390b726d2d92d9400cf711d83b35c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Drug Industry - economics</topic><topic>Drug prices</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health outcomes</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance benefits</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - economics</topic><topic>Prescription drugs</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative comparative analysis</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lohrberg, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augustin, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blome, Christine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lohrberg, David</au><au>Augustin, Matthias</au><au>Blome, Christine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>455</epage><pages>447-455</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose In 2011, Germany introduced a new form of drug benefit assessment, linking reimbursement prices to drug benefit and making quality of life (QoL) one of the main benefit criteria. Thus, QoL outcomes co-determine drug prices in Germany. QoL has, however, not been defined in the regulations. This study analyzed the definition and role of QoL in Germany's drug benefit assessment. It serves as a case study on the complexity of QoL as a parameter of health technology and drug assessments, which have become mandatory in almost all industrialized countries. Methods In a qualitative analysis, the publicly available dossiers (summaries), dossier evaluations, protocols of the oral hearings, the final resolutions of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) and its rationale of all benefit assessments completed by 2013 (n = 66) were processed. Additionally, quantitative data on the decision outcomes were collected. Results Only two decisions drew on QoL outcomes as "main justifications" for additional benefit. It was due to a lack of valid and statistically significant QoL results, a deficient presentation of QoL data, or differing understandings of QoL, that QoL benefit was not demonstrated in more than two cases. While manufacturers applied wider definitions of QoL, the assessment institutions questioned evidence if it was not reported with the help of validated QoL questionnaires or deviated from their definition of QoL. Conclusions The German experience with QoL as a drug benefit criterion highlights the importance of a clear QoL definition and according methodological regulations.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>26242250</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-015-1092-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-9343 |
ispartof | Quality of life research, 2016-02, Vol.25 (2), p.447-455 |
issn | 0962-9343 1573-2649 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760915531 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Analysis CLINICAL AND POLICY APPLICATIONS Colorectal cancer Committees Content analysis Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics Decision making Dermatology Drug Industry - economics Drug prices Germany Health care policy Health insurance Health outcomes Health services Humans Insurance benefits Medicine Medicine & Public Health Morbidity Mortality Pharmaceutical industry Pharmaceutical Preparations - economics Prescription drugs Prices Public Health Qualitative analysis Qualitative comparative analysis Quality of Life Quality of Life Research Regulation Reimbursement Side effects Sociology |
title | The definition and role of quality of life in Germany's early assessment of drug benefit: a qualitative approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A56%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20definition%20and%20role%20of%20quality%20of%20life%20in%20Germany's%20early%20assessment%20of%20drug%20benefit:%20a%20qualitative%20approach&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Lohrberg,%20David&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=455&rft.pages=447-455&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-015-1092-6&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44849735%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1758982552&rft_id=info:pmid/26242250&rft_jstor_id=44849735&rfr_iscdi=true |