The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on the size, number, and distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes

Abstract The current therapeutic approach to patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision. We aimed to investigate the number, size, and distribution of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes within the mesorect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of diagnostic pathology 2016-02, Vol.20, p.29-35
Hauptverfasser: Yegen, Gülçin, Keskin, Metin, Büyük, Melek, Kunduz, Enver, Balık, Emre, Sağlam, Esra Kaytan, Kapran, Yersu, Asoğlu, Oktar, Güllüoğlu, Mine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue
container_start_page 29
container_title Annals of diagnostic pathology
container_volume 20
creator Yegen, Gülçin
Keskin, Metin
Büyük, Melek
Kunduz, Enver
Balık, Emre
Sağlam, Esra Kaytan
Kapran, Yersu
Asoğlu, Oktar
Güllüoğlu, Mine
description Abstract The current therapeutic approach to patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision. We aimed to investigate the number, size, and distribution of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes within the mesorectum; whether neoadjuvant therapy has any impact on the number and size of the lymph nodes; and the impact of metastatic lymph node localization on overall and disease-free survival. Specimens from 50 consecutive patients with stage II/III rectal cancer receiving either neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were investigated. Lymph node dissection was carried out by careful visual inspection and palpation. The localization of the each lymph node within the mesorectum and the relation with the tumor site were noted. The size and the number of lymph nodes retrieved decreased significantly with neoadjuvant therapy. Majority of the metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes were located at or proximally to the tumor level and posterior side of the mesorectum. No relation was observed between the overall and disease-free survival, and the localization of the metastatic lymph nodes. Presence of lymph node metastases proximal to the tumor level has no impact on survival compared with the presence of lymph node metastasis only in the peritumoral region of the mesorectum. Although neoadjuvant therapy decreases the size and the number of lymph nodes, reaching an ideal number of lymph nodes for accurate staging is still possible with careful naked eye examination and dissection of perirectal fat. As the majority of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes are located in peritumoral and proximal compartment, and posterior side of the mesorectum, these regions should be the major interest of dissection.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.10.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760914599</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1092913415300198</els_id><sourcerecordid>1760914599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-9ba3ccd1c8bf69385de72bdf75a21c9ed1473399468ff34d4c1052c73b3655de3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtr3TAQhUVpaB7tXyjKrov4Vg-_tAmUS5sUAl0kWQtZGvXKtSVHsgM3vz4yNw2hq640aM7McL6D0DklG0po_bXfKO-NU78nNe82jNAq_28Iad-hE1pxVrRUtO9zTQQrBOXlMTpNqSeE0rJqPqBjVjekbtrqBKm7HWCwFvSMg8UegjL98qj8jOcdRDXtcfBriZN7ggvsl7GDeIGVN9i4NEfXLbPLkjw8QgoxL1IDHvbjtMM-GEgf0ZFVQ4JPL-8Zuv_x_W57Xdz8uvq5_XZT6JKzuRCd4lobqtvO1oK3lYGGdcY2lWJUCzC0bDgXoqxba3lpSk1JxXTDO15XWczP0JfD3imGhwXSLEeXNAyDyqaWJGlTE5H9C5Gl4iDVMaQUwcopulHFvaREroRlL98QlivhtZUJ59nPL2eWbgTzOvkXaRZsDwLIZh8dRJm0A6_BuBWONMH915nLf7bowXmn1fAH9pD6sESfaUoqE5NE3q5Rr0nn-HPMouXPAOKoZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760914599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on the size, number, and distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Yegen, Gülçin ; Keskin, Metin ; Büyük, Melek ; Kunduz, Enver ; Balık, Emre ; Sağlam, Esra Kaytan ; Kapran, Yersu ; Asoğlu, Oktar ; Güllüoğlu, Mine</creator><creatorcontrib>Yegen, Gülçin ; Keskin, Metin ; Büyük, Melek ; Kunduz, Enver ; Balık, Emre ; Sağlam, Esra Kaytan ; Kapran, Yersu ; Asoğlu, Oktar ; Güllüoğlu, Mine</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The current therapeutic approach to patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision. We aimed to investigate the number, size, and distribution of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes within the mesorectum; whether neoadjuvant therapy has any impact on the number and size of the lymph nodes; and the impact of metastatic lymph node localization on overall and disease-free survival. Specimens from 50 consecutive patients with stage II/III rectal cancer receiving either neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were investigated. Lymph node dissection was carried out by careful visual inspection and palpation. The localization of the each lymph node within the mesorectum and the relation with the tumor site were noted. The size and the number of lymph nodes retrieved decreased significantly with neoadjuvant therapy. Majority of the metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes were located at or proximally to the tumor level and posterior side of the mesorectum. No relation was observed between the overall and disease-free survival, and the localization of the metastatic lymph nodes. Presence of lymph node metastases proximal to the tumor level has no impact on survival compared with the presence of lymph node metastasis only in the peritumoral region of the mesorectum. Although neoadjuvant therapy decreases the size and the number of lymph nodes, reaching an ideal number of lymph nodes for accurate staging is still possible with careful naked eye examination and dissection of perirectal fat. As the majority of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes are located in peritumoral and proximal compartment, and posterior side of the mesorectum, these regions should be the major interest of dissection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-9134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.10.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26706785</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - therapy ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Lymph node ; Lymph Node Excision - methods ; Lymph Nodes - drug effects ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymph Nodes - radiation effects ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant therapy ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods ; Neoplasm Staging - methods ; Pathology ; Radiotherapy ; Rectal adenocarcinoma ; Rectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><ispartof>Annals of diagnostic pathology, 2016-02, Vol.20, p.29-35</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-9ba3ccd1c8bf69385de72bdf75a21c9ed1473399468ff34d4c1052c73b3655de3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-9ba3ccd1c8bf69385de72bdf75a21c9ed1473399468ff34d4c1052c73b3655de3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.10.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26706785$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yegen, Gülçin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keskin, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büyük, Melek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunduz, Enver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balık, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sağlam, Esra Kaytan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapran, Yersu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asoğlu, Oktar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güllüoğlu, Mine</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on the size, number, and distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes</title><title>Annals of diagnostic pathology</title><addtitle>Ann Diagn Pathol</addtitle><description>Abstract The current therapeutic approach to patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision. We aimed to investigate the number, size, and distribution of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes within the mesorectum; whether neoadjuvant therapy has any impact on the number and size of the lymph nodes; and the impact of metastatic lymph node localization on overall and disease-free survival. Specimens from 50 consecutive patients with stage II/III rectal cancer receiving either neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were investigated. Lymph node dissection was carried out by careful visual inspection and palpation. The localization of the each lymph node within the mesorectum and the relation with the tumor site were noted. The size and the number of lymph nodes retrieved decreased significantly with neoadjuvant therapy. Majority of the metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes were located at or proximally to the tumor level and posterior side of the mesorectum. No relation was observed between the overall and disease-free survival, and the localization of the metastatic lymph nodes. Presence of lymph node metastases proximal to the tumor level has no impact on survival compared with the presence of lymph node metastasis only in the peritumoral region of the mesorectum. Although neoadjuvant therapy decreases the size and the number of lymph nodes, reaching an ideal number of lymph nodes for accurate staging is still possible with careful naked eye examination and dissection of perirectal fat. As the majority of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes are located in peritumoral and proximal compartment, and posterior side of the mesorectum, these regions should be the major interest of dissection.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Lymph node</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - drug effects</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - radiation effects</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant therapy</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - methods</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Rectal adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><issn>1092-9134</issn><issn>1532-8198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtr3TAQhUVpaB7tXyjKrov4Vg-_tAmUS5sUAl0kWQtZGvXKtSVHsgM3vz4yNw2hq640aM7McL6D0DklG0po_bXfKO-NU78nNe82jNAq_28Iad-hE1pxVrRUtO9zTQQrBOXlMTpNqSeE0rJqPqBjVjekbtrqBKm7HWCwFvSMg8UegjL98qj8jOcdRDXtcfBriZN7ggvsl7GDeIGVN9i4NEfXLbPLkjw8QgoxL1IDHvbjtMM-GEgf0ZFVQ4JPL-8Zuv_x_W57Xdz8uvq5_XZT6JKzuRCd4lobqtvO1oK3lYGGdcY2lWJUCzC0bDgXoqxba3lpSk1JxXTDO15XWczP0JfD3imGhwXSLEeXNAyDyqaWJGlTE5H9C5Gl4iDVMaQUwcopulHFvaREroRlL98QlivhtZUJ59nPL2eWbgTzOvkXaRZsDwLIZh8dRJm0A6_BuBWONMH915nLf7bowXmn1fAH9pD6sESfaUoqE5NE3q5Rr0nn-HPMouXPAOKoZw</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Yegen, Gülçin</creator><creator>Keskin, Metin</creator><creator>Büyük, Melek</creator><creator>Kunduz, Enver</creator><creator>Balık, Emre</creator><creator>Sağlam, Esra Kaytan</creator><creator>Kapran, Yersu</creator><creator>Asoğlu, Oktar</creator><creator>Güllüoğlu, Mine</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on the size, number, and distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes</title><author>Yegen, Gülçin ; Keskin, Metin ; Büyük, Melek ; Kunduz, Enver ; Balık, Emre ; Sağlam, Esra Kaytan ; Kapran, Yersu ; Asoğlu, Oktar ; Güllüoğlu, Mine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-9ba3ccd1c8bf69385de72bdf75a21c9ed1473399468ff34d4c1052c73b3655de3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - therapy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Lymph node</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - drug effects</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - radiation effects</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant therapy</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - methods</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Rectal adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yegen, Gülçin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keskin, Metin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büyük, Melek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kunduz, Enver</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balık, Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sağlam, Esra Kaytan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapran, Yersu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asoğlu, Oktar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güllüoğlu, Mine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of diagnostic pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yegen, Gülçin</au><au>Keskin, Metin</au><au>Büyük, Melek</au><au>Kunduz, Enver</au><au>Balık, Emre</au><au>Sağlam, Esra Kaytan</au><au>Kapran, Yersu</au><au>Asoğlu, Oktar</au><au>Güllüoğlu, Mine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on the size, number, and distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes</atitle><jtitle>Annals of diagnostic pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Diagn Pathol</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>20</volume><spage>29</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>29-35</pages><issn>1092-9134</issn><eissn>1532-8198</eissn><abstract>Abstract The current therapeutic approach to patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision. We aimed to investigate the number, size, and distribution of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes within the mesorectum; whether neoadjuvant therapy has any impact on the number and size of the lymph nodes; and the impact of metastatic lymph node localization on overall and disease-free survival. Specimens from 50 consecutive patients with stage II/III rectal cancer receiving either neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy were investigated. Lymph node dissection was carried out by careful visual inspection and palpation. The localization of the each lymph node within the mesorectum and the relation with the tumor site were noted. The size and the number of lymph nodes retrieved decreased significantly with neoadjuvant therapy. Majority of the metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes were located at or proximally to the tumor level and posterior side of the mesorectum. No relation was observed between the overall and disease-free survival, and the localization of the metastatic lymph nodes. Presence of lymph node metastases proximal to the tumor level has no impact on survival compared with the presence of lymph node metastasis only in the peritumoral region of the mesorectum. Although neoadjuvant therapy decreases the size and the number of lymph nodes, reaching an ideal number of lymph nodes for accurate staging is still possible with careful naked eye examination and dissection of perirectal fat. As the majority of metastatic and nonmetastatic lymph nodes are located in peritumoral and proximal compartment, and posterior side of the mesorectum, these regions should be the major interest of dissection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26706785</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.10.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-9134
ispartof Annals of diagnostic pathology, 2016-02, Vol.20, p.29-35
issn 1092-9134
1532-8198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760914599
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adenocarcinoma - mortality
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - therapy
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Chemoradiotherapy
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Lymph node
Lymph Node Excision - methods
Lymph Nodes - drug effects
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymph Nodes - radiation effects
Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant therapy
Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods
Neoplasm Staging - methods
Pathology
Radiotherapy
Rectal adenocarcinoma
Rectal Neoplasms - mortality
Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
Rectal Neoplasms - therapy
title The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on the size, number, and distribution of mesorectal lymph nodes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A06%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20neoadjuvant%20therapy%20on%20the%20size,%20number,%20and%20distribution%20of%20mesorectal%20lymph%20nodes&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20diagnostic%20pathology&rft.au=Yegen,%20G%C3%BCl%C3%A7in&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=20&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=29-35&rft.issn=1092-9134&rft.eissn=1532-8198&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.10.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760914599%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760914599&rft_id=info:pmid/26706785&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1092913415300198&rfr_iscdi=true