Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy

Objective To evaluate the long‐term outcomes and potential predictors of treatment failure after robotic sacrocolpopexy. Methods We identified 70 consecutive patients from 2002 to 2012 with symptomatic post‐hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse that underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy. Multiple clinical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of urology 2015-12, Vol.22 (12), p.1155-1158
Hauptverfasser: Linder, Brian J, Chow, George K, Elliott, Daniel S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1158
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1155
container_title International journal of urology
container_volume 22
creator Linder, Brian J
Chow, George K
Elliott, Daniel S
description Objective To evaluate the long‐term outcomes and potential predictors of treatment failure after robotic sacrocolpopexy. Methods We identified 70 consecutive patients from 2002 to 2012 with symptomatic post‐hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse that underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy. Multiple clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for potential association with treatment failure, which was defined as any repeat operation for recurrent prolapse or mesh‐related complications. Results The median age at surgery was 67 years (interquartile range 59–74 years) and median follow up was 72 months (interquartile range 39–114 months). Overall, six out of 70 patients (8.6%) underwent a total of six secondary surgeries, including four for recurrent prolapse (two anterior repairs, one posterior repair, one apical) and two mesh complications. No patient‐related factors were associated with the risk of repeat surgery: age (P = 0.45), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.24), tobacco use (P = 0.61) or prior prolapse surgery (P = 0.1) on univariate analysis. Freedom from repeat prolapse surgery or surgery for mesh complication was 98% at 1 year, 95% at 3 years and 90% at 6 years. At last follow up, 80% of patients reported that they would or probably would recommend robotic sacrocolpopexy to a family member or friend. Conclusions Robotic sacrocolpopexy is associated with excellent long‐term outcomes. Recognition of long‐term success is important for preoperative patient counseling.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/iju.12900
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760907708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760907708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4570-a43b03b6b2c4048ac3513248355fe035c647a490c20091718cde376044e17383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtP4zAUha0RaCiPxfwB5CWzCL1-JE6WUDE8VJgRAjE7y3FvUCCpi-0I-u9xKWXH3Vzp6jtH5x5CfjE4ZmnG7dNwzHgF8IOMmJQ84yD5FhlBxaqsZIrvkN0QngCY4Kz8SXZ4IQBEyUfkfurmj1lE39OXwXRtXFLX0K5tkLohWtdjoGY-ox6jRxN7nEfqTVxdm6Si3tUutpYGY72zrlu4Bb4t98l2Y7qAB597j9z9ObubXGTTv-eXk5NpZmWuIDNS1CDqouZWgiyNFXlKKEuR5w2CyG0hlZEVWA7pFcVKO0OhCpASmRKl2CNHa9uFdy8Dhqj7NljsOjNHNwTNEluBUrBCf6_RFDMEj41e-LY3fqkZ6FWJOpWoP0pM7OGn7VD3OPsiN60lYLwGXtsOl9876cur-41ltla0IeLbl8L4Z10ooXL9cHOu2eT03-1_dqWvxTvLzYm_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760907708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Linder, Brian J ; Chow, George K ; Elliott, Daniel S</creator><creatorcontrib>Linder, Brian J ; Chow, George K ; Elliott, Daniel S</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To evaluate the long‐term outcomes and potential predictors of treatment failure after robotic sacrocolpopexy. Methods We identified 70 consecutive patients from 2002 to 2012 with symptomatic post‐hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse that underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy. Multiple clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for potential association with treatment failure, which was defined as any repeat operation for recurrent prolapse or mesh‐related complications. Results The median age at surgery was 67 years (interquartile range 59–74 years) and median follow up was 72 months (interquartile range 39–114 months). Overall, six out of 70 patients (8.6%) underwent a total of six secondary surgeries, including four for recurrent prolapse (two anterior repairs, one posterior repair, one apical) and two mesh complications. No patient‐related factors were associated with the risk of repeat surgery: age (P = 0.45), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.24), tobacco use (P = 0.61) or prior prolapse surgery (P = 0.1) on univariate analysis. Freedom from repeat prolapse surgery or surgery for mesh complication was 98% at 1 year, 95% at 3 years and 90% at 6 years. At last follow up, 80% of patients reported that they would or probably would recommend robotic sacrocolpopexy to a family member or friend. Conclusions Robotic sacrocolpopexy is associated with excellent long‐term outcomes. Recognition of long‐term success is important for preoperative patient counseling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0919-8172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-2042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iju.12900</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26300382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; outcomes ; patient satisfaction ; pelvic organ prolapse ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery ; Quality of Life ; Recurrence ; Reoperation ; robotic ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; sacrocolpopexy ; Surgical Mesh - adverse effects ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of urology, 2015-12, Vol.22 (12), p.1155-1158</ispartof><rights>2015 The Japanese Urological Association</rights><rights>2015 The Japanese Urological Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4570-a43b03b6b2c4048ac3513248355fe035c647a490c20091718cde376044e17383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4570-a43b03b6b2c4048ac3513248355fe035c647a490c20091718cde376044e17383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fiju.12900$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fiju.12900$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linder, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, George K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Daniel S</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy</title><title>International journal of urology</title><addtitle>Int. J. Urol</addtitle><description>Objective To evaluate the long‐term outcomes and potential predictors of treatment failure after robotic sacrocolpopexy. Methods We identified 70 consecutive patients from 2002 to 2012 with symptomatic post‐hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse that underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy. Multiple clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for potential association with treatment failure, which was defined as any repeat operation for recurrent prolapse or mesh‐related complications. Results The median age at surgery was 67 years (interquartile range 59–74 years) and median follow up was 72 months (interquartile range 39–114 months). Overall, six out of 70 patients (8.6%) underwent a total of six secondary surgeries, including four for recurrent prolapse (two anterior repairs, one posterior repair, one apical) and two mesh complications. No patient‐related factors were associated with the risk of repeat surgery: age (P = 0.45), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.24), tobacco use (P = 0.61) or prior prolapse surgery (P = 0.1) on univariate analysis. Freedom from repeat prolapse surgery or surgery for mesh complication was 98% at 1 year, 95% at 3 years and 90% at 6 years. At last follow up, 80% of patients reported that they would or probably would recommend robotic sacrocolpopexy to a family member or friend. Conclusions Robotic sacrocolpopexy is associated with excellent long‐term outcomes. Recognition of long‐term success is important for preoperative patient counseling.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>patient satisfaction</subject><subject>pelvic organ prolapse</subject><subject>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>robotic</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>sacrocolpopexy</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0919-8172</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtP4zAUha0RaCiPxfwB5CWzCL1-JE6WUDE8VJgRAjE7y3FvUCCpi-0I-u9xKWXH3Vzp6jtH5x5CfjE4ZmnG7dNwzHgF8IOMmJQ84yD5FhlBxaqsZIrvkN0QngCY4Kz8SXZ4IQBEyUfkfurmj1lE39OXwXRtXFLX0K5tkLohWtdjoGY-ox6jRxN7nEfqTVxdm6Si3tUutpYGY72zrlu4Bb4t98l2Y7qAB597j9z9ObubXGTTv-eXk5NpZmWuIDNS1CDqouZWgiyNFXlKKEuR5w2CyG0hlZEVWA7pFcVKO0OhCpASmRKl2CNHa9uFdy8Dhqj7NljsOjNHNwTNEluBUrBCf6_RFDMEj41e-LY3fqkZ6FWJOpWoP0pM7OGn7VD3OPsiN60lYLwGXtsOl9876cur-41ltla0IeLbl8L4Z10ooXL9cHOu2eT03-1_dqWvxTvLzYm_</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Linder, Brian J</creator><creator>Chow, George K</creator><creator>Elliott, Daniel S</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy</title><author>Linder, Brian J ; Chow, George K ; Elliott, Daniel S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4570-a43b03b6b2c4048ac3513248355fe035c647a490c20091718cde376044e17383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>patient satisfaction</topic><topic>pelvic organ prolapse</topic><topic>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>robotic</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>sacrocolpopexy</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linder, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, George K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Daniel S</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linder, Brian J</au><au>Chow, George K</au><au>Elliott, Daniel S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Urol</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1155</spage><epage>1158</epage><pages>1155-1158</pages><issn>0919-8172</issn><eissn>1442-2042</eissn><abstract>Objective To evaluate the long‐term outcomes and potential predictors of treatment failure after robotic sacrocolpopexy. Methods We identified 70 consecutive patients from 2002 to 2012 with symptomatic post‐hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse that underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy. Multiple clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for potential association with treatment failure, which was defined as any repeat operation for recurrent prolapse or mesh‐related complications. Results The median age at surgery was 67 years (interquartile range 59–74 years) and median follow up was 72 months (interquartile range 39–114 months). Overall, six out of 70 patients (8.6%) underwent a total of six secondary surgeries, including four for recurrent prolapse (two anterior repairs, one posterior repair, one apical) and two mesh complications. No patient‐related factors were associated with the risk of repeat surgery: age (P = 0.45), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.24), tobacco use (P = 0.61) or prior prolapse surgery (P = 0.1) on univariate analysis. Freedom from repeat prolapse surgery or surgery for mesh complication was 98% at 1 year, 95% at 3 years and 90% at 6 years. At last follow up, 80% of patients reported that they would or probably would recommend robotic sacrocolpopexy to a family member or friend. Conclusions Robotic sacrocolpopexy is associated with excellent long‐term outcomes. Recognition of long‐term success is important for preoperative patient counseling.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26300382</pmid><doi>10.1111/iju.12900</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0919-8172
ispartof International journal of urology, 2015-12, Vol.22 (12), p.1155-1158
issn 0919-8172
1442-2042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760907708
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Middle Aged
outcomes
patient satisfaction
pelvic organ prolapse
Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery
Quality of Life
Recurrence
Reoperation
robotic
Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
sacrocolpopexy
Surgical Mesh - adverse effects
Time Factors
title Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T15%3A08%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20quality%20of%20life%20outcomes%20and%20retreatment%20rates%20after%20robotic%20sacrocolpopexy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Linder,%20Brian%20J&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1155&rft.epage=1158&rft.pages=1155-1158&rft.issn=0919-8172&rft.eissn=1442-2042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iju.12900&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760907708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760907708&rft_id=info:pmid/26300382&rfr_iscdi=true