Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy
Objective To evaluate the long‐term outcomes and potential predictors of treatment failure after robotic sacrocolpopexy. Methods We identified 70 consecutive patients from 2002 to 2012 with symptomatic post‐hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse that underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy. Multiple clinical...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of urology 2015-12, Vol.22 (12), p.1155-1158 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1158 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1155 |
container_title | International journal of urology |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Linder, Brian J Chow, George K Elliott, Daniel S |
description | Objective
To evaluate the long‐term outcomes and potential predictors of treatment failure after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Methods
We identified 70 consecutive patients from 2002 to 2012 with symptomatic post‐hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse that underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy. Multiple clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for potential association with treatment failure, which was defined as any repeat operation for recurrent prolapse or mesh‐related complications.
Results
The median age at surgery was 67 years (interquartile range 59–74 years) and median follow up was 72 months (interquartile range 39–114 months). Overall, six out of 70 patients (8.6%) underwent a total of six secondary surgeries, including four for recurrent prolapse (two anterior repairs, one posterior repair, one apical) and two mesh complications. No patient‐related factors were associated with the risk of repeat surgery: age (P = 0.45), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.24), tobacco use (P = 0.61) or prior prolapse surgery (P = 0.1) on univariate analysis. Freedom from repeat prolapse surgery or surgery for mesh complication was 98% at 1 year, 95% at 3 years and 90% at 6 years. At last follow up, 80% of patients reported that they would or probably would recommend robotic sacrocolpopexy to a family member or friend.
Conclusions
Robotic sacrocolpopexy is associated with excellent long‐term outcomes. Recognition of long‐term success is important for preoperative patient counseling. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/iju.12900 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760907708</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760907708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4570-a43b03b6b2c4048ac3513248355fe035c647a490c20091718cde376044e17383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtP4zAUha0RaCiPxfwB5CWzCL1-JE6WUDE8VJgRAjE7y3FvUCCpi-0I-u9xKWXH3Vzp6jtH5x5CfjE4ZmnG7dNwzHgF8IOMmJQ84yD5FhlBxaqsZIrvkN0QngCY4Kz8SXZ4IQBEyUfkfurmj1lE39OXwXRtXFLX0K5tkLohWtdjoGY-ox6jRxN7nEfqTVxdm6Si3tUutpYGY72zrlu4Bb4t98l2Y7qAB597j9z9ObubXGTTv-eXk5NpZmWuIDNS1CDqouZWgiyNFXlKKEuR5w2CyG0hlZEVWA7pFcVKO0OhCpASmRKl2CNHa9uFdy8Dhqj7NljsOjNHNwTNEluBUrBCf6_RFDMEj41e-LY3fqkZ6FWJOpWoP0pM7OGn7VD3OPsiN60lYLwGXtsOl9876cur-41ltla0IeLbl8L4Z10ooXL9cHOu2eT03-1_dqWvxTvLzYm_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760907708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Linder, Brian J ; Chow, George K ; Elliott, Daniel S</creator><creatorcontrib>Linder, Brian J ; Chow, George K ; Elliott, Daniel S</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To evaluate the long‐term outcomes and potential predictors of treatment failure after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Methods
We identified 70 consecutive patients from 2002 to 2012 with symptomatic post‐hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse that underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy. Multiple clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for potential association with treatment failure, which was defined as any repeat operation for recurrent prolapse or mesh‐related complications.
Results
The median age at surgery was 67 years (interquartile range 59–74 years) and median follow up was 72 months (interquartile range 39–114 months). Overall, six out of 70 patients (8.6%) underwent a total of six secondary surgeries, including four for recurrent prolapse (two anterior repairs, one posterior repair, one apical) and two mesh complications. No patient‐related factors were associated with the risk of repeat surgery: age (P = 0.45), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.24), tobacco use (P = 0.61) or prior prolapse surgery (P = 0.1) on univariate analysis. Freedom from repeat prolapse surgery or surgery for mesh complication was 98% at 1 year, 95% at 3 years and 90% at 6 years. At last follow up, 80% of patients reported that they would or probably would recommend robotic sacrocolpopexy to a family member or friend.
Conclusions
Robotic sacrocolpopexy is associated with excellent long‐term outcomes. Recognition of long‐term success is important for preoperative patient counseling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0919-8172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-2042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/iju.12900</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26300382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Middle Aged ; outcomes ; patient satisfaction ; pelvic organ prolapse ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery ; Quality of Life ; Recurrence ; Reoperation ; robotic ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; sacrocolpopexy ; Surgical Mesh - adverse effects ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of urology, 2015-12, Vol.22 (12), p.1155-1158</ispartof><rights>2015 The Japanese Urological Association</rights><rights>2015 The Japanese Urological Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4570-a43b03b6b2c4048ac3513248355fe035c647a490c20091718cde376044e17383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4570-a43b03b6b2c4048ac3513248355fe035c647a490c20091718cde376044e17383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fiju.12900$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fiju.12900$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26300382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linder, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, George K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Daniel S</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy</title><title>International journal of urology</title><addtitle>Int. J. Urol</addtitle><description>Objective
To evaluate the long‐term outcomes and potential predictors of treatment failure after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Methods
We identified 70 consecutive patients from 2002 to 2012 with symptomatic post‐hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse that underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy. Multiple clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for potential association with treatment failure, which was defined as any repeat operation for recurrent prolapse or mesh‐related complications.
Results
The median age at surgery was 67 years (interquartile range 59–74 years) and median follow up was 72 months (interquartile range 39–114 months). Overall, six out of 70 patients (8.6%) underwent a total of six secondary surgeries, including four for recurrent prolapse (two anterior repairs, one posterior repair, one apical) and two mesh complications. No patient‐related factors were associated with the risk of repeat surgery: age (P = 0.45), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.24), tobacco use (P = 0.61) or prior prolapse surgery (P = 0.1) on univariate analysis. Freedom from repeat prolapse surgery or surgery for mesh complication was 98% at 1 year, 95% at 3 years and 90% at 6 years. At last follow up, 80% of patients reported that they would or probably would recommend robotic sacrocolpopexy to a family member or friend.
Conclusions
Robotic sacrocolpopexy is associated with excellent long‐term outcomes. Recognition of long‐term success is important for preoperative patient counseling.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>patient satisfaction</subject><subject>pelvic organ prolapse</subject><subject>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>robotic</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>sacrocolpopexy</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0919-8172</issn><issn>1442-2042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtP4zAUha0RaCiPxfwB5CWzCL1-JE6WUDE8VJgRAjE7y3FvUCCpi-0I-u9xKWXH3Vzp6jtH5x5CfjE4ZmnG7dNwzHgF8IOMmJQ84yD5FhlBxaqsZIrvkN0QngCY4Kz8SXZ4IQBEyUfkfurmj1lE39OXwXRtXFLX0K5tkLohWtdjoGY-ox6jRxN7nEfqTVxdm6Si3tUutpYGY72zrlu4Bb4t98l2Y7qAB597j9z9ObubXGTTv-eXk5NpZmWuIDNS1CDqouZWgiyNFXlKKEuR5w2CyG0hlZEVWA7pFcVKO0OhCpASmRKl2CNHa9uFdy8Dhqj7NljsOjNHNwTNEluBUrBCf6_RFDMEj41e-LY3fqkZ6FWJOpWoP0pM7OGn7VD3OPsiN60lYLwGXtsOl9876cur-41ltla0IeLbl8L4Z10ooXL9cHOu2eT03-1_dqWvxTvLzYm_</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Linder, Brian J</creator><creator>Chow, George K</creator><creator>Elliott, Daniel S</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy</title><author>Linder, Brian J ; Chow, George K ; Elliott, Daniel S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4570-a43b03b6b2c4048ac3513248355fe035c647a490c20091718cde376044e17383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>patient satisfaction</topic><topic>pelvic organ prolapse</topic><topic>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>robotic</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>sacrocolpopexy</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh - adverse effects</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linder, Brian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, George K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Daniel S</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linder, Brian J</au><au>Chow, George K</au><au>Elliott, Daniel S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy</atitle><jtitle>International journal of urology</jtitle><addtitle>Int. J. Urol</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1155</spage><epage>1158</epage><pages>1155-1158</pages><issn>0919-8172</issn><eissn>1442-2042</eissn><abstract>Objective
To evaluate the long‐term outcomes and potential predictors of treatment failure after robotic sacrocolpopexy.
Methods
We identified 70 consecutive patients from 2002 to 2012 with symptomatic post‐hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse that underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy. Multiple clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for potential association with treatment failure, which was defined as any repeat operation for recurrent prolapse or mesh‐related complications.
Results
The median age at surgery was 67 years (interquartile range 59–74 years) and median follow up was 72 months (interquartile range 39–114 months). Overall, six out of 70 patients (8.6%) underwent a total of six secondary surgeries, including four for recurrent prolapse (two anterior repairs, one posterior repair, one apical) and two mesh complications. No patient‐related factors were associated with the risk of repeat surgery: age (P = 0.45), diabetes mellitus (P = 0.24), tobacco use (P = 0.61) or prior prolapse surgery (P = 0.1) on univariate analysis. Freedom from repeat prolapse surgery or surgery for mesh complication was 98% at 1 year, 95% at 3 years and 90% at 6 years. At last follow up, 80% of patients reported that they would or probably would recommend robotic sacrocolpopexy to a family member or friend.
Conclusions
Robotic sacrocolpopexy is associated with excellent long‐term outcomes. Recognition of long‐term success is important for preoperative patient counseling.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26300382</pmid><doi>10.1111/iju.12900</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0919-8172 |
ispartof | International journal of urology, 2015-12, Vol.22 (12), p.1155-1158 |
issn | 0919-8172 1442-2042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760907708 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Laparoscopy - adverse effects Middle Aged outcomes patient satisfaction pelvic organ prolapse Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery Quality of Life Recurrence Reoperation robotic Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects sacrocolpopexy Surgical Mesh - adverse effects Time Factors |
title | Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T15%3A08%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20quality%20of%20life%20outcomes%20and%20retreatment%20rates%20after%20robotic%20sacrocolpopexy&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Linder,%20Brian%20J&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1155&rft.epage=1158&rft.pages=1155-1158&rft.issn=0919-8172&rft.eissn=1442-2042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/iju.12900&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760907708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760907708&rft_id=info:pmid/26300382&rfr_iscdi=true |