Tibial baseplate positioning in robotic-assisted and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
This study compared tibial baseplate alignment (TBA) between robotic-arm-assisted (RAA) and conventional (CONV) unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). We hypothesized that RAA would increase the percentage of implants within a predetermined safe zone (SZ). We identified 177 CONV and 87 RAA UKA...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology 2016, Vol.26 (1), p.93-98 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 98 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 93 |
| container_title | European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | MacCallum, Katherine P. Danoff, Jonathan R. Geller, Jeffrey A. |
| description | This study compared tibial baseplate alignment (TBA) between robotic-arm-assisted (RAA) and conventional (CONV) unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). We hypothesized that RAA would increase the percentage of implants within a predetermined safe zone (SZ). We identified 177 CONV and 87 RAA UKAs through our center’s patient registry. Two individuals reviewed postoperative knee radiographs and determined TBA. Coronal baseplate positioning was more accurate (i.e., within the SZ) for RAA (2.6° ± 1.5° vs. 3.9° ± 2.4°,
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00590-015-1708-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760904056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2837223323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-8b2bd41b64c17fb04cc7e84072c22e3994740b34949365aedc050c345b7a78ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LHTEUhoO0-HH1B7iRgW7cpD35mswsRbQWhG7sOiSZXI2dScacmYL_vrlcW6FQCCTn5HnfkPMScs7gMwPQXxBA9UCBKco0dBQOyDGTglMGbfehnlshaAetOiIniM9QwZ6pQ3LEWymZ4P0xGR6ii3ZsnMUwj3YJzZwxLjGnmB6bmJqSXV6ipxYx4hKGxqah8Tn9CmlHVemaos_TbMsy1V5t_EwhNLV8Krla4vJ6Sj5u7Yjh7G3fkB-3Nw_Xd_T--9dv11f31AulgXaOu0Ey10rP9NaB9F6HToLmnvMg-l5qCU7IXvaiVTYMHhR4IZXTVnfWiQ253PvOJb-sARczRfRhHG0KeUXDdAs9SFBtRT_9gz7ntdTvoOGd0JwLUdeGsD3lS0YsYWvmEidbXg0Ds4vA7CMwdbJmF4GBqrl4c17dFIa_ij8zrwDfA1iv0mMo70__3_U3ODKR2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2837223323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tibial baseplate positioning in robotic-assisted and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>MacCallum, Katherine P. ; Danoff, Jonathan R. ; Geller, Jeffrey A.</creator><creatorcontrib>MacCallum, Katherine P. ; Danoff, Jonathan R. ; Geller, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared tibial baseplate alignment (TBA) between robotic-arm-assisted (RAA) and conventional (CONV) unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). We hypothesized that RAA would increase the percentage of implants within a predetermined safe zone (SZ). We identified 177 CONV and 87 RAA UKAs through our center’s patient registry. Two individuals reviewed postoperative knee radiographs and determined TBA. Coronal baseplate positioning was more accurate (i.e., within the SZ) for RAA (2.6° ± 1.5° vs. 3.9° ± 2.4°,
p
< 0. 0001). Conversely, sagittal alignment was more accurate for CONV (4.9° ± 2.8° vs. 2.4° ± 1.6°,
p
< 0.0001). RAA was more precise in both planes (
p
< 0.0001). There was no difference in the percentage of implants within the SZ between the two groups (
p
= 1.0).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1633-8065</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00590-015-1708-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26441329</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Humans ; Joint Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Joint Diseases - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Operative Time ; Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY ; Prospective Studies ; Prosthesis Fitting - methods ; Radiography ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Tibia - diagnostic imaging ; Tibia - surgery ; Traumatic Surgery</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology, 2016, Vol.26 (1), p.93-98</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag France 2015</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag France 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-8b2bd41b64c17fb04cc7e84072c22e3994740b34949365aedc050c345b7a78ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-8b2bd41b64c17fb04cc7e84072c22e3994740b34949365aedc050c345b7a78ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00590-015-1708-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00590-015-1708-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26441329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacCallum, Katherine P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danoff, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geller, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><title>Tibial baseplate positioning in robotic-assisted and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty</title><title>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><description>This study compared tibial baseplate alignment (TBA) between robotic-arm-assisted (RAA) and conventional (CONV) unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). We hypothesized that RAA would increase the percentage of implants within a predetermined safe zone (SZ). We identified 177 CONV and 87 RAA UKAs through our center’s patient registry. Two individuals reviewed postoperative knee radiographs and determined TBA. Coronal baseplate positioning was more accurate (i.e., within the SZ) for RAA (2.6° ± 1.5° vs. 3.9° ± 2.4°,
p
< 0. 0001). Conversely, sagittal alignment was more accurate for CONV (4.9° ± 2.8° vs. 2.4° ± 1.6°,
p
< 0.0001). RAA was more precise in both planes (
p
< 0.0001). There was no difference in the percentage of implants within the SZ between the two groups (
p
= 1.0).</description><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Joint Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prosthesis Fitting - methods</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tibia - surgery</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><issn>1633-8065</issn><issn>1432-1068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LHTEUhoO0-HH1B7iRgW7cpD35mswsRbQWhG7sOiSZXI2dScacmYL_vrlcW6FQCCTn5HnfkPMScs7gMwPQXxBA9UCBKco0dBQOyDGTglMGbfehnlshaAetOiIniM9QwZ6pQ3LEWymZ4P0xGR6ii3ZsnMUwj3YJzZwxLjGnmB6bmJqSXV6ipxYx4hKGxqah8Tn9CmlHVemaos_TbMsy1V5t_EwhNLV8Krla4vJ6Sj5u7Yjh7G3fkB-3Nw_Xd_T--9dv11f31AulgXaOu0Ey10rP9NaB9F6HToLmnvMg-l5qCU7IXvaiVTYMHhR4IZXTVnfWiQ253PvOJb-sARczRfRhHG0KeUXDdAs9SFBtRT_9gz7ntdTvoOGd0JwLUdeGsD3lS0YsYWvmEidbXg0Ds4vA7CMwdbJmF4GBqrl4c17dFIa_ij8zrwDfA1iv0mMo70__3_U3ODKR2g</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>MacCallum, Katherine P.</creator><creator>Danoff, Jonathan R.</creator><creator>Geller, Jeffrey A.</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Tibial baseplate positioning in robotic-assisted and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty</title><author>MacCallum, Katherine P. ; Danoff, Jonathan R. ; Geller, Jeffrey A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-8b2bd41b64c17fb04cc7e84072c22e3994740b34949365aedc050c345b7a78ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Joint Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prosthesis Fitting - methods</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tibia - surgery</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacCallum, Katherine P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danoff, Jonathan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geller, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health Medical collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacCallum, Katherine P.</au><au>Danoff, Jonathan R.</au><au>Geller, Jeffrey A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tibial baseplate positioning in robotic-assisted and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>93-98</pages><issn>1633-8065</issn><eissn>1432-1068</eissn><abstract>This study compared tibial baseplate alignment (TBA) between robotic-arm-assisted (RAA) and conventional (CONV) unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). We hypothesized that RAA would increase the percentage of implants within a predetermined safe zone (SZ). We identified 177 CONV and 87 RAA UKAs through our center’s patient registry. Two individuals reviewed postoperative knee radiographs and determined TBA. Coronal baseplate positioning was more accurate (i.e., within the SZ) for RAA (2.6° ± 1.5° vs. 3.9° ± 2.4°,
p
< 0. 0001). Conversely, sagittal alignment was more accurate for CONV (4.9° ± 2.8° vs. 2.4° ± 1.6°,
p
< 0.0001). RAA was more precise in both planes (
p
< 0.0001). There was no difference in the percentage of implants within the SZ between the two groups (
p
= 1.0).</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><pmid>26441329</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00590-015-1708-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1633-8065 |
| ispartof | European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology, 2016, Vol.26 (1), p.93-98 |
| issn | 1633-8065 1432-1068 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760904056 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
| subjects | Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Humans Joint Diseases - diagnostic imaging Joint Diseases - surgery Knee Prosthesis Medicine Medicine & Public Health Operative Time Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY Prospective Studies Prosthesis Fitting - methods Radiography Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Surgical Orthopedics Tibia - diagnostic imaging Tibia - surgery Traumatic Surgery |
| title | Tibial baseplate positioning in robotic-assisted and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A36%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tibial%20baseplate%20positioning%20in%20robotic-assisted%20and%20conventional%20unicompartmental%20knee%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20&%20traumatology&rft.au=MacCallum,%20Katherine%20P.&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=93-98&rft.issn=1633-8065&rft.eissn=1432-1068&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00590-015-1708-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2837223323%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2837223323&rft_id=info:pmid/26441329&rfr_iscdi=true |