University Students Intend to Eat Better but Lack Coping Self-Efficacy and Knowledge of Dietary Recommendations
Abstract Objective To assess university students’ knowledge, intentions, and coping self-efficacy related to dietary recommendations. Design The study used a cross-sectional online survey. Setting Large university campus. Participants Students (n = 6,638; 22% response). Variables Measured Self-effic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of nutrition education and behavior 2016-01, Vol.48 (1), p.12-19.e1 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 19.e1 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 12 |
| container_title | Journal of nutrition education and behavior |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Matthews, June I., PhD, RD, PHEc Doerr, Lisa, MScFN, RD Dworatzek, Paula D.N., PhD, RD |
| description | Abstract Objective To assess university students’ knowledge, intentions, and coping self-efficacy related to dietary recommendations. Design The study used a cross-sectional online survey. Setting Large university campus. Participants Students (n = 6,638; 22% response). Variables Measured Self-efficacy and intentions were measured using 11-point scales. Students’ perceived dietary recommendations were evaluated as correct or incorrect. Analysis Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square and continuous variables by t tests or ANOVAs. Significance was set at P ≤ .05 and multiple comparisons at P ≤ .01. Results Respondents believed that they need fewer vegetables and fruit and more milk or alternatives servings/d than recommended; eg, males aged ≥ 19 years perceived milk or alternatives recommendations to be 4.3 ± 2.1 servings/d, significantly more than the 2 servings/d recommended ( P < .001). Students in health sciences or with a food or nutrition course were significantly more likely to claim that they met recommendations (eg, 56% with vs 47% without a food or nutrition course for vegetables and fruit; P < .001); however, they were no more likely to identify them correctly. Males aged < 19 years had higher coping self-efficacy than females aged < 19 years to consume vegetables (68.3 ± 24.2 vs 64.0 ± 24.7; P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.08.005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760903328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1499404615006302</els_id><sourcerecordid>3953078071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-8509befa8ce0eaeb47ad4a3510654ed91dae2a37858367fbb50591bd882374903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kkFv1DAQhSMEoqXwBzggS1y4JIztOHEkhATLAhUrIbH0bDnOpHKa2NvYKdp_j6MtIPXAxePD955m5k2WvaRQUKDV26EYHLYFAyoKkAWAeJSdU1nLnFUMHqd_2TR5CWV1lj0LYYAEMmieZmesKlkpOD3P_JWzdzgHG49kH5cOXQzk0kV0HYmebHUkHzFGnEm7RLLT5oZs_MG6a7LHsc-3fW-NNkeiE__N-V8jdtdIfE8-WYx6PpIfaPw0JTsdrXfhefak12PAF_f1Irv6vP25-Zrvvn-53HzY5UZAE3OZ3hZ7LQ0CamzLWnel5oJCJUrsGtppZJrXUkhe1X3bChANbTspGa_LBvhF9ubke5j97YIhqskGg-OoHfolKFpXkDDOZEJfP0AHv8wudbdSgnIhOE8UO1Fm9iHM2KvDbKc0oaKg1jjUoNY41BqHAqlSHEn06t56aSfs_kr-7D8B704Apl3cWZxVMBadwc7OaKLqvP2___sHcjNalxIZb_CI4d8cKjAFar8exHoPVABUHBj_DWtCr8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1765135533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>University Students Intend to Eat Better but Lack Coping Self-Efficacy and Knowledge of Dietary Recommendations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Matthews, June I., PhD, RD, PHEc ; Doerr, Lisa, MScFN, RD ; Dworatzek, Paula D.N., PhD, RD</creator><creatorcontrib>Matthews, June I., PhD, RD, PHEc ; Doerr, Lisa, MScFN, RD ; Dworatzek, Paula D.N., PhD, RD</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Abstract Objective To assess university students’ knowledge, intentions, and coping self-efficacy related to dietary recommendations. Design The study used a cross-sectional online survey. Setting Large university campus. Participants Students (n = 6,638; 22% response). Variables Measured Self-efficacy and intentions were measured using 11-point scales. Students’ perceived dietary recommendations were evaluated as correct or incorrect. Analysis Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square and continuous variables by t tests or ANOVAs. Significance was set at P ≤ .05 and multiple comparisons at P ≤ .01. Results Respondents believed that they need fewer vegetables and fruit and more milk or alternatives servings/d than recommended; eg, males aged ≥ 19 years perceived milk or alternatives recommendations to be 4.3 ± 2.1 servings/d, significantly more than the 2 servings/d recommended ( P < .001). Students in health sciences or with a food or nutrition course were significantly more likely to claim that they met recommendations (eg, 56% with vs 47% without a food or nutrition course for vegetables and fruit; P < .001); however, they were no more likely to identify them correctly. Males aged < 19 years had higher coping self-efficacy than females aged < 19 years to consume vegetables (68.3 ± 24.2 vs 64.0 ± 24.7; P < .01) and avoid high-calorie foods and beverages (HCFB) (56.2 ± 27.2 vs 49.0 ± 25.2; P < .01) when under stress; however, they had significantly lower intentions to consume vegetables (72.1 ± 24.5 vs 80.9 ± 20.3; P < .01) and avoid HCFB (60.5 ± 30.3 vs 77.7 ± 22.8; P < .01). Conclusions and Implications Students do not have adequate knowledge of age- and sex-specific food guide recommendations. Simpler food guide recommendations or age- and sex-targeted campaigns may enhance knowledge. Students intend to consume more vegetables and less HCFB; however, they have low coping self-efficacy, all of which could be targeted in nutrition interventions.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1499-4046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-2620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.08.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26424531</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNUEBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Canada ; College students ; Coping ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Diet ; dietary recommendations ; Effectiveness ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Feeding Behavior - psychology ; Female ; Food ; Fruits ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; intentions ; Internal Medicine ; Knowledge ; Male ; Nutrition ; Nutrition Surveys ; Online Surveys ; Recommended Dietary Allowances ; Self Efficacy ; Self evaluation ; Students ; Students - psychology ; Students - statistics & numerical data ; Universities ; university students ; Vegetables ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2016-01, Vol.48 (1), p.12-19.e1</ispartof><rights>Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior</rights><rights>2016 Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-8509befa8ce0eaeb47ad4a3510654ed91dae2a37858367fbb50591bd882374903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-8509befa8ce0eaeb47ad4a3510654ed91dae2a37858367fbb50591bd882374903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2015.08.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26424531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matthews, June I., PhD, RD, PHEc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerr, Lisa, MScFN, RD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dworatzek, Paula D.N., PhD, RD</creatorcontrib><title>University Students Intend to Eat Better but Lack Coping Self-Efficacy and Knowledge of Dietary Recommendations</title><title>Journal of nutrition education and behavior</title><addtitle>J Nutr Educ Behav</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Abstract Objective To assess university students’ knowledge, intentions, and coping self-efficacy related to dietary recommendations. Design The study used a cross-sectional online survey. Setting Large university campus. Participants Students (n = 6,638; 22% response). Variables Measured Self-efficacy and intentions were measured using 11-point scales. Students’ perceived dietary recommendations were evaluated as correct or incorrect. Analysis Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square and continuous variables by t tests or ANOVAs. Significance was set at P ≤ .05 and multiple comparisons at P ≤ .01. Results Respondents believed that they need fewer vegetables and fruit and more milk or alternatives servings/d than recommended; eg, males aged ≥ 19 years perceived milk or alternatives recommendations to be 4.3 ± 2.1 servings/d, significantly more than the 2 servings/d recommended ( P < .001). Students in health sciences or with a food or nutrition course were significantly more likely to claim that they met recommendations (eg, 56% with vs 47% without a food or nutrition course for vegetables and fruit; P < .001); however, they were no more likely to identify them correctly. Males aged < 19 years had higher coping self-efficacy than females aged < 19 years to consume vegetables (68.3 ± 24.2 vs 64.0 ± 24.7; P < .01) and avoid high-calorie foods and beverages (HCFB) (56.2 ± 27.2 vs 49.0 ± 25.2; P < .01) when under stress; however, they had significantly lower intentions to consume vegetables (72.1 ± 24.5 vs 80.9 ± 20.3; P < .01) and avoid HCFB (60.5 ± 30.3 vs 77.7 ± 22.8; P < .01). Conclusions and Implications Students do not have adequate knowledge of age- and sex-specific food guide recommendations. Simpler food guide recommendations or age- and sex-targeted campaigns may enhance knowledge. Students intend to consume more vegetables and less HCFB; however, they have low coping self-efficacy, all of which could be targeted in nutrition interventions.]]></description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>dietary recommendations</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intentions</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition Surveys</subject><subject>Online Surveys</subject><subject>Recommended Dietary Allowances</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Students - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>university students</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1499-4046</issn><issn>1878-2620</issn><issn>1708-8259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kkFv1DAQhSMEoqXwBzggS1y4JIztOHEkhATLAhUrIbH0bDnOpHKa2NvYKdp_j6MtIPXAxePD955m5k2WvaRQUKDV26EYHLYFAyoKkAWAeJSdU1nLnFUMHqd_2TR5CWV1lj0LYYAEMmieZmesKlkpOD3P_JWzdzgHG49kH5cOXQzk0kV0HYmebHUkHzFGnEm7RLLT5oZs_MG6a7LHsc-3fW-NNkeiE__N-V8jdtdIfE8-WYx6PpIfaPw0JTsdrXfhefak12PAF_f1Irv6vP25-Zrvvn-53HzY5UZAE3OZ3hZ7LQ0CamzLWnel5oJCJUrsGtppZJrXUkhe1X3bChANbTspGa_LBvhF9ubke5j97YIhqskGg-OoHfolKFpXkDDOZEJfP0AHv8wudbdSgnIhOE8UO1Fm9iHM2KvDbKc0oaKg1jjUoNY41BqHAqlSHEn06t56aSfs_kr-7D8B704Apl3cWZxVMBadwc7OaKLqvP2___sHcjNalxIZb_CI4d8cKjAFar8exHoPVABUHBj_DWtCr8Q</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Matthews, June I., PhD, RD, PHEc</creator><creator>Doerr, Lisa, MScFN, RD</creator><creator>Dworatzek, Paula D.N., PhD, RD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>University Students Intend to Eat Better but Lack Coping Self-Efficacy and Knowledge of Dietary Recommendations</title><author>Matthews, June I., PhD, RD, PHEc ; Doerr, Lisa, MScFN, RD ; Dworatzek, Paula D.N., PhD, RD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c509t-8509befa8ce0eaeb47ad4a3510654ed91dae2a37858367fbb50591bd882374903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>dietary recommendations</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intentions</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition Surveys</topic><topic>Online Surveys</topic><topic>Recommended Dietary Allowances</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Students - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>university students</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matthews, June I., PhD, RD, PHEc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doerr, Lisa, MScFN, RD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dworatzek, Paula D.N., PhD, RD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of nutrition education and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matthews, June I., PhD, RD, PHEc</au><au>Doerr, Lisa, MScFN, RD</au><au>Dworatzek, Paula D.N., PhD, RD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>University Students Intend to Eat Better but Lack Coping Self-Efficacy and Knowledge of Dietary Recommendations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nutrition education and behavior</jtitle><addtitle>J Nutr Educ Behav</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>19.e1</epage><pages>12-19.e1</pages><issn>1499-4046</issn><eissn>1878-2620</eissn><eissn>1708-8259</eissn><coden>JNUEBX</coden><abstract><![CDATA[Abstract Objective To assess university students’ knowledge, intentions, and coping self-efficacy related to dietary recommendations. Design The study used a cross-sectional online survey. Setting Large university campus. Participants Students (n = 6,638; 22% response). Variables Measured Self-efficacy and intentions were measured using 11-point scales. Students’ perceived dietary recommendations were evaluated as correct or incorrect. Analysis Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square and continuous variables by t tests or ANOVAs. Significance was set at P ≤ .05 and multiple comparisons at P ≤ .01. Results Respondents believed that they need fewer vegetables and fruit and more milk or alternatives servings/d than recommended; eg, males aged ≥ 19 years perceived milk or alternatives recommendations to be 4.3 ± 2.1 servings/d, significantly more than the 2 servings/d recommended ( P < .001). Students in health sciences or with a food or nutrition course were significantly more likely to claim that they met recommendations (eg, 56% with vs 47% without a food or nutrition course for vegetables and fruit; P < .001); however, they were no more likely to identify them correctly. Males aged < 19 years had higher coping self-efficacy than females aged < 19 years to consume vegetables (68.3 ± 24.2 vs 64.0 ± 24.7; P < .01) and avoid high-calorie foods and beverages (HCFB) (56.2 ± 27.2 vs 49.0 ± 25.2; P < .01) when under stress; however, they had significantly lower intentions to consume vegetables (72.1 ± 24.5 vs 80.9 ± 20.3; P < .01) and avoid HCFB (60.5 ± 30.3 vs 77.7 ± 22.8; P < .01). Conclusions and Implications Students do not have adequate knowledge of age- and sex-specific food guide recommendations. Simpler food guide recommendations or age- and sex-targeted campaigns may enhance knowledge. Students intend to consume more vegetables and less HCFB; however, they have low coping self-efficacy, all of which could be targeted in nutrition interventions.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26424531</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jneb.2015.08.005</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1499-4046 |
| ispartof | Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2016-01, Vol.48 (1), p.12-19.e1 |
| issn | 1499-4046 1878-2620 1708-8259 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760903328 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Adjustment Adolescent Adult Canada College students Coping Cross-Sectional Studies Diet dietary recommendations Effectiveness Feeding Behavior - physiology Feeding Behavior - psychology Female Food Fruits Gastroenterology and Hepatology Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans intentions Internal Medicine Knowledge Male Nutrition Nutrition Surveys Online Surveys Recommended Dietary Allowances Self Efficacy Self evaluation Students Students - psychology Students - statistics & numerical data Universities university students Vegetables Young Adult |
| title | University Students Intend to Eat Better but Lack Coping Self-Efficacy and Knowledge of Dietary Recommendations |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A51%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=University%20Students%20Intend%20to%20Eat%20Better%20but%20Lack%20Coping%20Self-Efficacy%20and%20Knowledge%20of%20Dietary%20Recommendations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nutrition%20education%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Matthews,%20June%20I.,%20PhD,%20RD,%20PHEc&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=19.e1&rft.pages=12-19.e1&rft.issn=1499-4046&rft.eissn=1878-2620&rft.coden=JNUEBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jneb.2015.08.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3953078071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1765135533&rft_id=info:pmid/26424531&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1499404615006302&rfr_iscdi=true |