Effectiveness of different irrigation solutions on triple antibiotic paste removal from simulated immature root canal
Summary To evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation solutions and ultrasonic activation of irrigation solutions on removal of triple antibiotic paste (TAP) from root canals of the simulated immature teeth. Fifty single‐rooted teeth were used. TAP was placed into each root canal, and specim...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Scanning 2015-11, Vol.37 (6), p.409-413 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 413 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 409 |
| container_title | Scanning |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Ok, Evren Altunsoy, Mustafa Nur, Bilge Gülsüm Kalkan, Abdussamed |
| description | Summary
To evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation solutions and ultrasonic activation of irrigation solutions on removal of triple antibiotic paste (TAP) from root canals of the simulated immature teeth. Fifty single‐rooted teeth were used. TAP was placed into each root canal, and specimens were stored in distilled water for 4 weeks at 37°C. After 4 weeks, the temporary coronal seal was removed and the samples were randomly divided into five groups as follows: (i) saline; (ii) ultrasonic activation of saline; (iii) NaOCl; (iv) ultrasonic activation of NaOCl; (v) chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX). The amount of remaining TAP on the canal walls was measured under stereomicroscope with 30× magnification. The data were analyzed using a one‐way ANOVA and post‐hoc Tukey test at a significance level of 0.05. There were statistically differences among CHX and ultrasonic activation of NaOCl and other groups (p 0.05). Irrigation solutions and ultrasonic activation of the irrigation solutions could not completely remove the triple antibiotic paste from simulated immature root canals. Ultrasonic activation of the NaOCl gave the best and CHX was the worst results. SCANNING 37:409–413, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sca.21229 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760900492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760900492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5279-a751924a4fe0be473041d89d486e438202ccb1bc33220263564bdb9ddebedd033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1vFSEUBmBiNPZaXfgHDIkbu5iWr4Fh2Vz7YVJrjDVdEgbOGOrMcAtMtf9errftwsQVJ_CcN-QchN5SckgJYUfZ2UNGGdPP0IpqzppOifY5WhEqaUNEq_bQq5xvSLW6oy_RHpNEUqXUCi0nwwCuhDuYIWccB-xDvUkwFxxSCj9sCXHGOY7LtqhixiWFzQjYziX0IZbg8MbmAjjBFO_siIcUJ5zDtIy2gMdhmmxZUn2PsWBnZzu-Ri8GO2Z483Duo--nJ1fr8-biy9mn9fFF41qmdGNVSzUTVgxAehCKE0F9p73oJAjeMcKc62nvOGe1lryVove99h568J5wvo8-7HI3Kd4ukIuZQnYwjnaGuGRDlSSaEKFZpe__oTdxSfWvW9UqKYXo2qoOdsqlmHOCwWxSmGy6N5SY7S5M3YX5u4tq3z0kLv0E_kk-Dr-Cox34FUa4_3-S-bY-foxsdh2hzvv3U4dNP41UXLXm-vLMnH--uhaXH78awf8Apnijug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757664485</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of different irrigation solutions on triple antibiotic paste removal from simulated immature root canal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ok, Evren ; Altunsoy, Mustafa ; Nur, Bilge Gülsüm ; Kalkan, Abdussamed</creator><creatorcontrib>Ok, Evren ; Altunsoy, Mustafa ; Nur, Bilge Gülsüm ; Kalkan, Abdussamed</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
To evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation solutions and ultrasonic activation of irrigation solutions on removal of triple antibiotic paste (TAP) from root canals of the simulated immature teeth. Fifty single‐rooted teeth were used. TAP was placed into each root canal, and specimens were stored in distilled water for 4 weeks at 37°C. After 4 weeks, the temporary coronal seal was removed and the samples were randomly divided into five groups as follows: (i) saline; (ii) ultrasonic activation of saline; (iii) NaOCl; (iv) ultrasonic activation of NaOCl; (v) chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX). The amount of remaining TAP on the canal walls was measured under stereomicroscope with 30× magnification. The data were analyzed using a one‐way ANOVA and post‐hoc Tukey test at a significance level of 0.05. There were statistically differences among CHX and ultrasonic activation of NaOCl and other groups (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences among the ultrasonic activation of saline, NaOCl, and saline groups (p > 0.05). Irrigation solutions and ultrasonic activation of the irrigation solutions could not completely remove the triple antibiotic paste from simulated immature root canals. Ultrasonic activation of the NaOCl gave the best and CHX was the worst results. SCANNING 37:409–413, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-0457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-8745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sca.21229</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26061777</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Debridement - methods ; dentistry ; Humans ; imaging ; Microscopy ; Ointments ; Root Canal Irrigants - administration & dosage ; Root Canal Preparation - methods ; spectroscopy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Scanning, 2015-11, Vol.37 (6), p.409-413</ispartof><rights>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5279-a751924a4fe0be473041d89d486e438202ccb1bc33220263564bdb9ddebedd033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5279-a751924a4fe0be473041d89d486e438202ccb1bc33220263564bdb9ddebedd033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061777$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ok, Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altunsoy, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nur, Bilge Gülsüm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalkan, Abdussamed</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of different irrigation solutions on triple antibiotic paste removal from simulated immature root canal</title><title>Scanning</title><addtitle>Scanning</addtitle><description>Summary
To evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation solutions and ultrasonic activation of irrigation solutions on removal of triple antibiotic paste (TAP) from root canals of the simulated immature teeth. Fifty single‐rooted teeth were used. TAP was placed into each root canal, and specimens were stored in distilled water for 4 weeks at 37°C. After 4 weeks, the temporary coronal seal was removed and the samples were randomly divided into five groups as follows: (i) saline; (ii) ultrasonic activation of saline; (iii) NaOCl; (iv) ultrasonic activation of NaOCl; (v) chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX). The amount of remaining TAP on the canal walls was measured under stereomicroscope with 30× magnification. The data were analyzed using a one‐way ANOVA and post‐hoc Tukey test at a significance level of 0.05. There were statistically differences among CHX and ultrasonic activation of NaOCl and other groups (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences among the ultrasonic activation of saline, NaOCl, and saline groups (p > 0.05). Irrigation solutions and ultrasonic activation of the irrigation solutions could not completely remove the triple antibiotic paste from simulated immature root canals. Ultrasonic activation of the NaOCl gave the best and CHX was the worst results. SCANNING 37:409–413, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Debridement - methods</subject><subject>dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>imaging</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Ointments</subject><subject>Root Canal Irrigants - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - methods</subject><subject>spectroscopy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0161-0457</issn><issn>1932-8745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U1vFSEUBmBiNPZaXfgHDIkbu5iWr4Fh2Vz7YVJrjDVdEgbOGOrMcAtMtf9errftwsQVJ_CcN-QchN5SckgJYUfZ2UNGGdPP0IpqzppOifY5WhEqaUNEq_bQq5xvSLW6oy_RHpNEUqXUCi0nwwCuhDuYIWccB-xDvUkwFxxSCj9sCXHGOY7LtqhixiWFzQjYziX0IZbg8MbmAjjBFO_siIcUJ5zDtIy2gMdhmmxZUn2PsWBnZzu-Ri8GO2Z483Duo--nJ1fr8-biy9mn9fFF41qmdGNVSzUTVgxAehCKE0F9p73oJAjeMcKc62nvOGe1lryVove99h568J5wvo8-7HI3Kd4ukIuZQnYwjnaGuGRDlSSaEKFZpe__oTdxSfWvW9UqKYXo2qoOdsqlmHOCwWxSmGy6N5SY7S5M3YX5u4tq3z0kLv0E_kk-Dr-Cox34FUa4_3-S-bY-foxsdh2hzvv3U4dNP41UXLXm-vLMnH--uhaXH78awf8Apnijug</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Ok, Evren</creator><creator>Altunsoy, Mustafa</creator><creator>Nur, Bilge Gülsüm</creator><creator>Kalkan, Abdussamed</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of different irrigation solutions on triple antibiotic paste removal from simulated immature root canal</title><author>Ok, Evren ; Altunsoy, Mustafa ; Nur, Bilge Gülsüm ; Kalkan, Abdussamed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5279-a751924a4fe0be473041d89d486e438202ccb1bc33220263564bdb9ddebedd033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Debridement - methods</topic><topic>dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>imaging</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Ointments</topic><topic>Root Canal Irrigants - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - methods</topic><topic>spectroscopy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ok, Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altunsoy, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nur, Bilge Gülsüm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalkan, Abdussamed</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scanning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ok, Evren</au><au>Altunsoy, Mustafa</au><au>Nur, Bilge Gülsüm</au><au>Kalkan, Abdussamed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of different irrigation solutions on triple antibiotic paste removal from simulated immature root canal</atitle><jtitle>Scanning</jtitle><addtitle>Scanning</addtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>409</spage><epage>413</epage><pages>409-413</pages><issn>0161-0457</issn><eissn>1932-8745</eissn><abstract>Summary
To evaluate the effectiveness of different irrigation solutions and ultrasonic activation of irrigation solutions on removal of triple antibiotic paste (TAP) from root canals of the simulated immature teeth. Fifty single‐rooted teeth were used. TAP was placed into each root canal, and specimens were stored in distilled water for 4 weeks at 37°C. After 4 weeks, the temporary coronal seal was removed and the samples were randomly divided into five groups as follows: (i) saline; (ii) ultrasonic activation of saline; (iii) NaOCl; (iv) ultrasonic activation of NaOCl; (v) chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX). The amount of remaining TAP on the canal walls was measured under stereomicroscope with 30× magnification. The data were analyzed using a one‐way ANOVA and post‐hoc Tukey test at a significance level of 0.05. There were statistically differences among CHX and ultrasonic activation of NaOCl and other groups (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences among the ultrasonic activation of saline, NaOCl, and saline groups (p > 0.05). Irrigation solutions and ultrasonic activation of the irrigation solutions could not completely remove the triple antibiotic paste from simulated immature root canals. Ultrasonic activation of the NaOCl gave the best and CHX was the worst results. SCANNING 37:409–413, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26061777</pmid><doi>10.1002/sca.21229</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0161-0457 |
| ispartof | Scanning, 2015-11, Vol.37 (6), p.409-413 |
| issn | 0161-0457 1932-8745 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760900492 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Debridement - methods dentistry Humans imaging Microscopy Ointments Root Canal Irrigants - administration & dosage Root Canal Preparation - methods spectroscopy Treatment Outcome |
| title | Effectiveness of different irrigation solutions on triple antibiotic paste removal from simulated immature root canal |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A59%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20different%20irrigation%20solutions%20on%20triple%20antibiotic%20paste%20removal%20from%20simulated%20immature%20root%20canal&rft.jtitle=Scanning&rft.au=Ok,%20Evren&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=409&rft.epage=413&rft.pages=409-413&rft.issn=0161-0457&rft.eissn=1932-8745&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sca.21229&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760900492%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757664485&rft_id=info:pmid/26061777&rfr_iscdi=true |