Relationship Between Emotion and Forgetting
A major determinant of forgetting in memory is the presence of interference in the retrieval context. Previous research has shown that proactive interference has less impact for emotional than neutral study material (Levens & Phelps, 2008). However, it is unclear how emotional content affects th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Emotion (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2016-02, Vol.16 (1), p.33-42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 33 |
container_title | Emotion (Washington, D.C.) |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Mızrak, Eda Öztekin, Ilke |
description | A major determinant of forgetting in memory is the presence of interference in the retrieval context. Previous research has shown that proactive interference has less impact for emotional than neutral study material (Levens & Phelps, 2008). However, it is unclear how emotional content affects the impact of interference in memory. Emotional content could directly affect the buildup of interference, leading to reduced levels of interference. Alternatively, emotional content could affect the controlled processes that resolve interference. The present study employed the response deadline speed-accuracy trade-off procedure to independently test these hypotheses. Participants studied 3-item lists consisting of emotional or neutral images, immediately followed by a recognition probe. Results indicated a slower rate of accrual for interfering material (lures from previous study list) and lower levels of interference for emotional than neutral stimuli, suggesting a direct impact of emotion on the buildup of interference. In contrast to this beneficiary effect, resolution of interference for emotional material was less effective than neutral material. These findings can provide insight into the interactions of emotion and memory processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/emo0000069 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760895440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760895440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-96a0a293d6b8bddcf41031a549c972d3662f93435fe53156cddcea5dcacaf1fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkF1LwzAUhoMobn7c-AOk4I0o1Xy3udSxqTAQRK9Dmqazo21qkiL796ZsOvDcnMPh4eHlBeACwTsESXZvWgvH4eIATJEgKEUM8cN4M5ynhFE8ASferyFElAh6DCaYU8JFLqbg9s00KtS28591nzya8G1Ml8xbO_4S1ZXJwrqVCaHuVmfgqFKNN-e7fQo-FvP32XO6fH16mT0sU0UxDKngCiosSMmLvChLXdGYEilGhRYZLgnnuBKEElYZRhDjOjJGsVIrrSpUFeQUXG-9vbNfg_FBtrXXpmlUZ-zgJco4zAWjFEb06h-6toPrYrpIIUFxhmEWqZstpZ313plK9q5uldtIBOVYodxXGOHLnXIoWlP-ob-d7W2qV7L3G61cqHVjvB6cM10YZRJxiSQh5AceAXn3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1719427207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship Between Emotion and Forgetting</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Mızrak, Eda ; Öztekin, Ilke</creator><contributor>DeSteno, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mızrak, Eda ; Öztekin, Ilke ; DeSteno, David</creatorcontrib><description>A major determinant of forgetting in memory is the presence of interference in the retrieval context. Previous research has shown that proactive interference has less impact for emotional than neutral study material (Levens & Phelps, 2008). However, it is unclear how emotional content affects the impact of interference in memory. Emotional content could directly affect the buildup of interference, leading to reduced levels of interference. Alternatively, emotional content could affect the controlled processes that resolve interference. The present study employed the response deadline speed-accuracy trade-off procedure to independently test these hypotheses. Participants studied 3-item lists consisting of emotional or neutral images, immediately followed by a recognition probe. Results indicated a slower rate of accrual for interfering material (lures from previous study list) and lower levels of interference for emotional than neutral stimuli, suggesting a direct impact of emotion on the buildup of interference. In contrast to this beneficiary effect, resolution of interference for emotional material was less effective than neutral material. These findings can provide insight into the interactions of emotion and memory processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-3542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-1516</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/emo0000069</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26436989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Automated Information Retrieval ; Emotional Content ; Emotions ; Emotions - physiology ; Female ; Forgetting ; Human ; Humans ; Interference (Learning) ; Male ; Memory ; Memory - physiology ; Photic Stimulation ; Reaction Time ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2016-02, Vol.16 (1), p.33-42</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2015, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-96a0a293d6b8bddcf41031a549c972d3662f93435fe53156cddcea5dcacaf1fb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26436989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>DeSteno, David</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mızrak, Eda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öztekin, Ilke</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship Between Emotion and Forgetting</title><title>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</title><addtitle>Emotion</addtitle><description>A major determinant of forgetting in memory is the presence of interference in the retrieval context. Previous research has shown that proactive interference has less impact for emotional than neutral study material (Levens & Phelps, 2008). However, it is unclear how emotional content affects the impact of interference in memory. Emotional content could directly affect the buildup of interference, leading to reduced levels of interference. Alternatively, emotional content could affect the controlled processes that resolve interference. The present study employed the response deadline speed-accuracy trade-off procedure to independently test these hypotheses. Participants studied 3-item lists consisting of emotional or neutral images, immediately followed by a recognition probe. Results indicated a slower rate of accrual for interfering material (lures from previous study list) and lower levels of interference for emotional than neutral stimuli, suggesting a direct impact of emotion on the buildup of interference. In contrast to this beneficiary effect, resolution of interference for emotional material was less effective than neutral material. These findings can provide insight into the interactions of emotion and memory processes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Automated Information Retrieval</subject><subject>Emotional Content</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Emotions - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forgetting</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interference (Learning)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1528-3542</issn><issn>1931-1516</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkF1LwzAUhoMobn7c-AOk4I0o1Xy3udSxqTAQRK9Dmqazo21qkiL796ZsOvDcnMPh4eHlBeACwTsESXZvWgvH4eIATJEgKEUM8cN4M5ynhFE8ASferyFElAh6DCaYU8JFLqbg9s00KtS28591nzya8G1Ml8xbO_4S1ZXJwrqVCaHuVmfgqFKNN-e7fQo-FvP32XO6fH16mT0sU0UxDKngCiosSMmLvChLXdGYEilGhRYZLgnnuBKEElYZRhDjOjJGsVIrrSpUFeQUXG-9vbNfg_FBtrXXpmlUZ-zgJco4zAWjFEb06h-6toPrYrpIIUFxhmEWqZstpZ313plK9q5uldtIBOVYodxXGOHLnXIoWlP-ob-d7W2qV7L3G61cqHVjvB6cM10YZRJxiSQh5AceAXn3</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Mızrak, Eda</creator><creator>Öztekin, Ilke</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Relationship Between Emotion and Forgetting</title><author>Mızrak, Eda ; Öztekin, Ilke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a420t-96a0a293d6b8bddcf41031a549c972d3662f93435fe53156cddcea5dcacaf1fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Automated Information Retrieval</topic><topic>Emotional Content</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Emotions - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forgetting</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interference (Learning)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mızrak, Eda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öztekin, Ilke</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mızrak, Eda</au><au>Öztekin, Ilke</au><au>DeSteno, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationship Between Emotion and Forgetting</atitle><jtitle>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><addtitle>Emotion</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>33</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>33-42</pages><issn>1528-3542</issn><eissn>1931-1516</eissn><abstract>A major determinant of forgetting in memory is the presence of interference in the retrieval context. Previous research has shown that proactive interference has less impact for emotional than neutral study material (Levens & Phelps, 2008). However, it is unclear how emotional content affects the impact of interference in memory. Emotional content could directly affect the buildup of interference, leading to reduced levels of interference. Alternatively, emotional content could affect the controlled processes that resolve interference. The present study employed the response deadline speed-accuracy trade-off procedure to independently test these hypotheses. Participants studied 3-item lists consisting of emotional or neutral images, immediately followed by a recognition probe. Results indicated a slower rate of accrual for interfering material (lures from previous study list) and lower levels of interference for emotional than neutral stimuli, suggesting a direct impact of emotion on the buildup of interference. In contrast to this beneficiary effect, resolution of interference for emotional material was less effective than neutral material. These findings can provide insight into the interactions of emotion and memory processes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>26436989</pmid><doi>10.1037/emo0000069</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1528-3542 |
ispartof | Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2016-02, Vol.16 (1), p.33-42 |
issn | 1528-3542 1931-1516 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760895440 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adult Automated Information Retrieval Emotional Content Emotions Emotions - physiology Female Forgetting Human Humans Interference (Learning) Male Memory Memory - physiology Photic Stimulation Reaction Time Young Adult |
title | Relationship Between Emotion and Forgetting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A24%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20Between%20Emotion%20and%20Forgetting&rft.jtitle=Emotion%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=M%C4%B1zrak,%20Eda&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=33&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=33-42&rft.issn=1528-3542&rft.eissn=1931-1516&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/emo0000069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760895440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1719427207&rft_id=info:pmid/26436989&rfr_iscdi=true |