Untangling the effects of tinnitus and hypersensitivity to sound (hyperacusis) in the gap detection test
In recent years, there has been increasing use of the gap detection reflex test to demonstrate induction of tinnitus in animals. Animals with tinnitus show weakened gap detection ability for background noise that matches the pitch of the tinnitus. The usual explanation is that the tinnitus ‘fills in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hearing research 2016-01, Vol.331, p.92-100 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 100 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | Hearing research |
container_volume | 331 |
creator | Salloum, R.H. Sandridge, S. Patton, D.J. Stillitano, G. Dawson, G. Niforatos, J. Santiago, L. Kaltenbach, J.A. |
description | In recent years, there has been increasing use of the gap detection reflex test to demonstrate induction of tinnitus in animals. Animals with tinnitus show weakened gap detection ability for background noise that matches the pitch of the tinnitus. The usual explanation is that the tinnitus ‘fills in the gap’. It has recently been shown, however, that tinnitus is commonly associated with hyperacusis-like enhancements of the acoustic startle response, a change which might potentially alter responses in the gap detection test. We hypothesized that such enhancements could lead to an apparent reduction of gap suppression, resembling that caused by tinnitus, by altering responses to the startle stimulus or the background noise. To test this hypothesis, we compared gap detection abilities in 3 subsets of noise-exposed animals with those in unexposed controls. The results showed that exposed animals demonstrated altered gap detection abilities, but these alterations were sometimes explained as consequences of hyper-responsiveness to either the startle stimulus or to the background noise. Two of the three subsets of animals studied, however, displayed weakened gap detection abilities that could not be explained by enhanced responses to these stimuli or by reduced sound sensitivity or a reduction of temporal processing speed, consistent with the induction of tinnitus. These results demonstrate that not only hearing loss but also changes in sensitivity to background noise or to startle stimuli are potential confounds that, when present, can underlie changes in gap detection irrespective of tinnitus. We discuss how such confounds can be recognized and how they can be avoided.
•Sound exposure induces tinnitus and hyperacusis-like enhancement of sound sensitivity.•Such enhancements can affect gap detection performance when screening for tinnitus.•We show how such effects can be isolated and the confounding influences avoided.•With these precautions, the gap detection test can be valuable for tinnitus testing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760893452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378595515301519</els_id><sourcerecordid>1760893452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c048579d2bbd7705c554c81503e7d678be2b94f55f3f7e2228ccbea65f51e1773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9rGzEQxUVpaNwk36AUHdODXUm7s9JeCiX0HwR6Sc5Cqx3ZMrbW1WgD_vaR47THniTevHmP-TH2QYqVFLL7vF1t0GWklRISqrQSAt6whTTaLMH08i1biOb07wEu2XuirajGplXv2KXqQAkwasE2j6m4tN7FtOZlgxxDQF-IT4GXmFIsM3GXRr45HjATJoolPsVy5GXiNM11cvsycn6mSJ94TC8xa3fgI5YaFaeqIJVrdhHcjvDm9b1ij9-_Pdz9XN7__vHr7uv90jedKksvWgO6H9UwjFoL8ACtNxJEg3rstBlQDX0bAEITNCqljPcDug4CSJRaN1fs9px7yNOfuRbbfSSPu51LOM1kpe6E6ZsWVLW2Z6vPE1HGYA857l0-WinsibHd2jNje2J8UivjuvbxtWEe9jj-W_oLtRq-nA1Y73yKmC35iMnjGHMlYscp_r_hGQDzkGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760893452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Untangling the effects of tinnitus and hypersensitivity to sound (hyperacusis) in the gap detection test</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Salloum, R.H. ; Sandridge, S. ; Patton, D.J. ; Stillitano, G. ; Dawson, G. ; Niforatos, J. ; Santiago, L. ; Kaltenbach, J.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salloum, R.H. ; Sandridge, S. ; Patton, D.J. ; Stillitano, G. ; Dawson, G. ; Niforatos, J. ; Santiago, L. ; Kaltenbach, J.A.</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, there has been increasing use of the gap detection reflex test to demonstrate induction of tinnitus in animals. Animals with tinnitus show weakened gap detection ability for background noise that matches the pitch of the tinnitus. The usual explanation is that the tinnitus ‘fills in the gap’. It has recently been shown, however, that tinnitus is commonly associated with hyperacusis-like enhancements of the acoustic startle response, a change which might potentially alter responses in the gap detection test. We hypothesized that such enhancements could lead to an apparent reduction of gap suppression, resembling that caused by tinnitus, by altering responses to the startle stimulus or the background noise. To test this hypothesis, we compared gap detection abilities in 3 subsets of noise-exposed animals with those in unexposed controls. The results showed that exposed animals demonstrated altered gap detection abilities, but these alterations were sometimes explained as consequences of hyper-responsiveness to either the startle stimulus or to the background noise. Two of the three subsets of animals studied, however, displayed weakened gap detection abilities that could not be explained by enhanced responses to these stimuli or by reduced sound sensitivity or a reduction of temporal processing speed, consistent with the induction of tinnitus. These results demonstrate that not only hearing loss but also changes in sensitivity to background noise or to startle stimuli are potential confounds that, when present, can underlie changes in gap detection irrespective of tinnitus. We discuss how such confounds can be recognized and how they can be avoided.
•Sound exposure induces tinnitus and hyperacusis-like enhancement of sound sensitivity.•Such enhancements can affect gap detection performance when screening for tinnitus.•We show how such effects can be isolated and the confounding influences avoided.•With these precautions, the gap detection test can be valuable for tinnitus testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5955</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26520582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acoustic startle ; Acoustic Stimulation - adverse effects ; Animals ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Behavior, Animal ; Cricetinae ; Gap detection test ; Gap suppression ; Hearing ; Hearing loss ; Hearing Loss - complications ; Hyperacusis ; Hyperacusis - etiology ; Noise ; Reflex, Startle - drug effects ; Sensory Gating - physiology ; Sound ; Tinnitus ; Tinnitus - etiology ; Tinnitus - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Hearing research, 2016-01, Vol.331, p.92-100</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c048579d2bbd7705c554c81503e7d678be2b94f55f3f7e2228ccbea65f51e1773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c048579d2bbd7705c554c81503e7d678be2b94f55f3f7e2228ccbea65f51e1773</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4157-2833</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595515301519$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520582$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salloum, R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandridge, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stillitano, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niforatos, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiago, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaltenbach, J.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Untangling the effects of tinnitus and hypersensitivity to sound (hyperacusis) in the gap detection test</title><title>Hearing research</title><addtitle>Hear Res</addtitle><description>In recent years, there has been increasing use of the gap detection reflex test to demonstrate induction of tinnitus in animals. Animals with tinnitus show weakened gap detection ability for background noise that matches the pitch of the tinnitus. The usual explanation is that the tinnitus ‘fills in the gap’. It has recently been shown, however, that tinnitus is commonly associated with hyperacusis-like enhancements of the acoustic startle response, a change which might potentially alter responses in the gap detection test. We hypothesized that such enhancements could lead to an apparent reduction of gap suppression, resembling that caused by tinnitus, by altering responses to the startle stimulus or the background noise. To test this hypothesis, we compared gap detection abilities in 3 subsets of noise-exposed animals with those in unexposed controls. The results showed that exposed animals demonstrated altered gap detection abilities, but these alterations were sometimes explained as consequences of hyper-responsiveness to either the startle stimulus or to the background noise. Two of the three subsets of animals studied, however, displayed weakened gap detection abilities that could not be explained by enhanced responses to these stimuli or by reduced sound sensitivity or a reduction of temporal processing speed, consistent with the induction of tinnitus. These results demonstrate that not only hearing loss but also changes in sensitivity to background noise or to startle stimuli are potential confounds that, when present, can underlie changes in gap detection irrespective of tinnitus. We discuss how such confounds can be recognized and how they can be avoided.
•Sound exposure induces tinnitus and hyperacusis-like enhancement of sound sensitivity.•Such enhancements can affect gap detection performance when screening for tinnitus.•We show how such effects can be isolated and the confounding influences avoided.•With these precautions, the gap detection test can be valuable for tinnitus testing.</description><subject>Acoustic startle</subject><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal</subject><subject>Cricetinae</subject><subject>Gap detection test</subject><subject>Gap suppression</subject><subject>Hearing</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - complications</subject><subject>Hyperacusis</subject><subject>Hyperacusis - etiology</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Reflex, Startle - drug effects</subject><subject>Sensory Gating - physiology</subject><subject>Sound</subject><subject>Tinnitus</subject><subject>Tinnitus - etiology</subject><subject>Tinnitus - physiopathology</subject><issn>0378-5955</issn><issn>1878-5891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9rGzEQxUVpaNwk36AUHdODXUm7s9JeCiX0HwR6Sc5Cqx3ZMrbW1WgD_vaR47THniTevHmP-TH2QYqVFLL7vF1t0GWklRISqrQSAt6whTTaLMH08i1biOb07wEu2XuirajGplXv2KXqQAkwasE2j6m4tN7FtOZlgxxDQF-IT4GXmFIsM3GXRr45HjATJoolPsVy5GXiNM11cvsycn6mSJ94TC8xa3fgI5YaFaeqIJVrdhHcjvDm9b1ij9-_Pdz9XN7__vHr7uv90jedKksvWgO6H9UwjFoL8ACtNxJEg3rstBlQDX0bAEITNCqljPcDug4CSJRaN1fs9px7yNOfuRbbfSSPu51LOM1kpe6E6ZsWVLW2Z6vPE1HGYA857l0-WinsibHd2jNje2J8UivjuvbxtWEe9jj-W_oLtRq-nA1Y73yKmC35iMnjGHMlYscp_r_hGQDzkGw</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Salloum, R.H.</creator><creator>Sandridge, S.</creator><creator>Patton, D.J.</creator><creator>Stillitano, G.</creator><creator>Dawson, G.</creator><creator>Niforatos, J.</creator><creator>Santiago, L.</creator><creator>Kaltenbach, J.A.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4157-2833</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Untangling the effects of tinnitus and hypersensitivity to sound (hyperacusis) in the gap detection test</title><author>Salloum, R.H. ; Sandridge, S. ; Patton, D.J. ; Stillitano, G. ; Dawson, G. ; Niforatos, J. ; Santiago, L. ; Kaltenbach, J.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-c048579d2bbd7705c554c81503e7d678be2b94f55f3f7e2228ccbea65f51e1773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acoustic startle</topic><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal</topic><topic>Cricetinae</topic><topic>Gap detection test</topic><topic>Gap suppression</topic><topic>Hearing</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - complications</topic><topic>Hyperacusis</topic><topic>Hyperacusis - etiology</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Reflex, Startle - drug effects</topic><topic>Sensory Gating - physiology</topic><topic>Sound</topic><topic>Tinnitus</topic><topic>Tinnitus - etiology</topic><topic>Tinnitus - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salloum, R.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandridge, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patton, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stillitano, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niforatos, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santiago, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaltenbach, J.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salloum, R.H.</au><au>Sandridge, S.</au><au>Patton, D.J.</au><au>Stillitano, G.</au><au>Dawson, G.</au><au>Niforatos, J.</au><au>Santiago, L.</au><au>Kaltenbach, J.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Untangling the effects of tinnitus and hypersensitivity to sound (hyperacusis) in the gap detection test</atitle><jtitle>Hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>Hear Res</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>331</volume><spage>92</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>92-100</pages><issn>0378-5955</issn><eissn>1878-5891</eissn><abstract>In recent years, there has been increasing use of the gap detection reflex test to demonstrate induction of tinnitus in animals. Animals with tinnitus show weakened gap detection ability for background noise that matches the pitch of the tinnitus. The usual explanation is that the tinnitus ‘fills in the gap’. It has recently been shown, however, that tinnitus is commonly associated with hyperacusis-like enhancements of the acoustic startle response, a change which might potentially alter responses in the gap detection test. We hypothesized that such enhancements could lead to an apparent reduction of gap suppression, resembling that caused by tinnitus, by altering responses to the startle stimulus or the background noise. To test this hypothesis, we compared gap detection abilities in 3 subsets of noise-exposed animals with those in unexposed controls. The results showed that exposed animals demonstrated altered gap detection abilities, but these alterations were sometimes explained as consequences of hyper-responsiveness to either the startle stimulus or to the background noise. Two of the three subsets of animals studied, however, displayed weakened gap detection abilities that could not be explained by enhanced responses to these stimuli or by reduced sound sensitivity or a reduction of temporal processing speed, consistent with the induction of tinnitus. These results demonstrate that not only hearing loss but also changes in sensitivity to background noise or to startle stimuli are potential confounds that, when present, can underlie changes in gap detection irrespective of tinnitus. We discuss how such confounds can be recognized and how they can be avoided.
•Sound exposure induces tinnitus and hyperacusis-like enhancement of sound sensitivity.•Such enhancements can affect gap detection performance when screening for tinnitus.•We show how such effects can be isolated and the confounding influences avoided.•With these precautions, the gap detection test can be valuable for tinnitus testing.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26520582</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.005</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4157-2833</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-5955 |
ispartof | Hearing research, 2016-01, Vol.331, p.92-100 |
issn | 0378-5955 1878-5891 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760893452 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acoustic startle Acoustic Stimulation - adverse effects Animals Auditory Threshold - physiology Behavior, Animal Cricetinae Gap detection test Gap suppression Hearing Hearing loss Hearing Loss - complications Hyperacusis Hyperacusis - etiology Noise Reflex, Startle - drug effects Sensory Gating - physiology Sound Tinnitus Tinnitus - etiology Tinnitus - physiopathology |
title | Untangling the effects of tinnitus and hypersensitivity to sound (hyperacusis) in the gap detection test |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A50%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Untangling%20the%20effects%20of%20tinnitus%20and%20hypersensitivity%20to%20sound%20(hyperacusis)%20in%20the%20gap%20detection%20test&rft.jtitle=Hearing%20research&rft.au=Salloum,%20R.H.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=331&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=92-100&rft.issn=0378-5955&rft.eissn=1878-5891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760893452%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760893452&rft_id=info:pmid/26520582&rft_els_id=S0378595515301519&rfr_iscdi=true |