Outreach for Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Budget Impact Analysis for Community Health Centers

Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an attractive approach for colorectal cancer screening at community health centers. This budget impact analysis investigated benefits and costs of FIT outreach-with FIT kits mailed to patients, followed by reminders and phone calls-compared with point-of-care (P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of preventive medicine 2016-02, Vol.50 (2), p.e54-e61
Hauptverfasser: Liss, David T, French, Dustin D, Buchanan, David R, Brown, Tiffany, Magner, Bridget G, Kollar, Stephanie, Baker, David W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e61
container_issue 2
container_start_page e54
container_title American journal of preventive medicine
container_volume 50
creator Liss, David T
French, Dustin D
Buchanan, David R
Brown, Tiffany
Magner, Bridget G
Kollar, Stephanie
Baker, David W
description Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an attractive approach for colorectal cancer screening at community health centers. This budget impact analysis investigated benefits and costs of FIT outreach-with FIT kits mailed to patients, followed by reminders and phone calls-compared with point-of-care (POC) strategies. Five screening and cost outcomes were simulated over 1 year at a "base case" community health center serving 1000 screening-eligible patients: (1) FIT completion among patients due for screening; (2) proportion up-to-date on screening; (3) cost per patient due for screening; (4) cost per completed FIT; and (5) total organizational cost. Uncertainty analysis investigated potential savings from optimizing staff workflows during FIT outreach. Data were collected in 2012-2014, with analysis conducted 2014-2015. Using POC strategies, 24.0% of patients due for screening completed FIT, versus 42.4% under outreach (18.4% absolute difference). When calculations included patients up-to-date on screening from prior colonoscopy, 41.7% were up-to-date via POC, versus 55.8% for outreach (14.1% absolute difference). POC cost $4.93 per patient, versus $30.43 for outreach ($25.50 difference). Cost per patient screened was $20.60 for POC and $71.84 for outreach ($51.24 difference). Total organizational cost was $3,779 for POC distribution and $23,315 for outreach ($19,536 difference). Outreach costs decreased by approximately one fourth under optimized workflows. Outreach is an effective, practical, relatively low-cost strategy; costs could be reduced further by optimizing staff workflows. Despite its value, outreach costs more than POC distribution and may be difficult for community health centers to implement under current payment models.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760892389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760892389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-ba30eb84b0c069419c759baf147457fa00abffb9337028744e7733f181e897e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kLFOwzAURS0kREvhDxDyyNLwHCexzVYioJUqdQDmyHGf21SJE2xn6N9ToEz3Duee4RJyxyBhwIrHQ6I7HDwmKbA8AZEA8AsyZVLweVqAmJDrEA4AICRTV2SSFrxIM8inxG7G6FGbPbW9pwvnRt3Ssm97jyb-VO0MevpuPKJr3O6JLujzuN1hpKtu0CaeNro9hib8Csq-60bXxCNdom7jnpboIvpwQy6tbgPennNGPl9fPsrlfL15W5WL9XxIJYvzWnPAWmY1GChUxpQRuaq1ZZnIcmE1gK6trRXnAlIpsgyF4NwyyVAqgZzPyMOfd_D914ghVl0TDLatdtiPoWKiAKlSLtUJvT-jY93hthp802l_rP6_4d_x7mWq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760892389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outreach for Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Budget Impact Analysis for Community Health Centers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liss, David T ; French, Dustin D ; Buchanan, David R ; Brown, Tiffany ; Magner, Bridget G ; Kollar, Stephanie ; Baker, David W</creator><creatorcontrib>Liss, David T ; French, Dustin D ; Buchanan, David R ; Brown, Tiffany ; Magner, Bridget G ; Kollar, Stephanie ; Baker, David W</creatorcontrib><description>Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an attractive approach for colorectal cancer screening at community health centers. This budget impact analysis investigated benefits and costs of FIT outreach-with FIT kits mailed to patients, followed by reminders and phone calls-compared with point-of-care (POC) strategies. Five screening and cost outcomes were simulated over 1 year at a "base case" community health center serving 1000 screening-eligible patients: (1) FIT completion among patients due for screening; (2) proportion up-to-date on screening; (3) cost per patient due for screening; (4) cost per completed FIT; and (5) total organizational cost. Uncertainty analysis investigated potential savings from optimizing staff workflows during FIT outreach. Data were collected in 2012-2014, with analysis conducted 2014-2015. Using POC strategies, 24.0% of patients due for screening completed FIT, versus 42.4% under outreach (18.4% absolute difference). When calculations included patients up-to-date on screening from prior colonoscopy, 41.7% were up-to-date via POC, versus 55.8% for outreach (14.1% absolute difference). POC cost $4.93 per patient, versus $30.43 for outreach ($25.50 difference). Cost per patient screened was $20.60 for POC and $71.84 for outreach ($51.24 difference). Total organizational cost was $3,779 for POC distribution and $23,315 for outreach ($19,536 difference). Outreach costs decreased by approximately one fourth under optimized workflows. Outreach is an effective, practical, relatively low-cost strategy; costs could be reduced further by optimizing staff workflows. Despite its value, outreach costs more than POC distribution and may be difficult for community health centers to implement under current payment models.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26362405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Community Health Centers - economics ; Community Health Centers - organization &amp; administration ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Early Detection of Cancer - economics ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Feces - chemistry ; Health Promotion - economics ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Point-of-Care Systems - economics</subject><ispartof>American journal of preventive medicine, 2016-02, Vol.50 (2), p.e54-e61</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26362405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liss, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Dustin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magner, Bridget G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kollar, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, David W</creatorcontrib><title>Outreach for Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Budget Impact Analysis for Community Health Centers</title><title>American journal of preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><description>Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an attractive approach for colorectal cancer screening at community health centers. This budget impact analysis investigated benefits and costs of FIT outreach-with FIT kits mailed to patients, followed by reminders and phone calls-compared with point-of-care (POC) strategies. Five screening and cost outcomes were simulated over 1 year at a "base case" community health center serving 1000 screening-eligible patients: (1) FIT completion among patients due for screening; (2) proportion up-to-date on screening; (3) cost per patient due for screening; (4) cost per completed FIT; and (5) total organizational cost. Uncertainty analysis investigated potential savings from optimizing staff workflows during FIT outreach. Data were collected in 2012-2014, with analysis conducted 2014-2015. Using POC strategies, 24.0% of patients due for screening completed FIT, versus 42.4% under outreach (18.4% absolute difference). When calculations included patients up-to-date on screening from prior colonoscopy, 41.7% were up-to-date via POC, versus 55.8% for outreach (14.1% absolute difference). POC cost $4.93 per patient, versus $30.43 for outreach ($25.50 difference). Cost per patient screened was $20.60 for POC and $71.84 for outreach ($51.24 difference). Total organizational cost was $3,779 for POC distribution and $23,315 for outreach ($19,536 difference). Outreach costs decreased by approximately one fourth under optimized workflows. Outreach is an effective, practical, relatively low-cost strategy; costs could be reduced further by optimizing staff workflows. Despite its value, outreach costs more than POC distribution and may be difficult for community health centers to implement under current payment models.</description><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Community Health Centers - economics</subject><subject>Community Health Centers - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - economics</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Feces - chemistry</subject><subject>Health Promotion - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems - economics</subject><issn>1873-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kLFOwzAURS0kREvhDxDyyNLwHCexzVYioJUqdQDmyHGf21SJE2xn6N9ToEz3Duee4RJyxyBhwIrHQ6I7HDwmKbA8AZEA8AsyZVLweVqAmJDrEA4AICRTV2SSFrxIM8inxG7G6FGbPbW9pwvnRt3Ssm97jyb-VO0MevpuPKJr3O6JLujzuN1hpKtu0CaeNro9hib8Csq-60bXxCNdom7jnpboIvpwQy6tbgPennNGPl9fPsrlfL15W5WL9XxIJYvzWnPAWmY1GChUxpQRuaq1ZZnIcmE1gK6trRXnAlIpsgyF4NwyyVAqgZzPyMOfd_D914ghVl0TDLatdtiPoWKiAKlSLtUJvT-jY93hthp802l_rP6_4d_x7mWq</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Liss, David T</creator><creator>French, Dustin D</creator><creator>Buchanan, David R</creator><creator>Brown, Tiffany</creator><creator>Magner, Bridget G</creator><creator>Kollar, Stephanie</creator><creator>Baker, David W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Outreach for Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Budget Impact Analysis for Community Health Centers</title><author>Liss, David T ; French, Dustin D ; Buchanan, David R ; Brown, Tiffany ; Magner, Bridget G ; Kollar, Stephanie ; Baker, David W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-ba30eb84b0c069419c759baf147457fa00abffb9337028744e7733f181e897e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Community Health Centers - economics</topic><topic>Community Health Centers - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - economics</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Feces - chemistry</topic><topic>Health Promotion - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems - economics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liss, David T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Dustin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magner, Bridget G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kollar, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, David W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liss, David T</au><au>French, Dustin D</au><au>Buchanan, David R</au><au>Brown, Tiffany</au><au>Magner, Bridget G</au><au>Kollar, Stephanie</au><au>Baker, David W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outreach for Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Budget Impact Analysis for Community Health Centers</atitle><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e54</spage><epage>e61</epage><pages>e54-e61</pages><eissn>1873-2607</eissn><abstract>Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an attractive approach for colorectal cancer screening at community health centers. This budget impact analysis investigated benefits and costs of FIT outreach-with FIT kits mailed to patients, followed by reminders and phone calls-compared with point-of-care (POC) strategies. Five screening and cost outcomes were simulated over 1 year at a "base case" community health center serving 1000 screening-eligible patients: (1) FIT completion among patients due for screening; (2) proportion up-to-date on screening; (3) cost per patient due for screening; (4) cost per completed FIT; and (5) total organizational cost. Uncertainty analysis investigated potential savings from optimizing staff workflows during FIT outreach. Data were collected in 2012-2014, with analysis conducted 2014-2015. Using POC strategies, 24.0% of patients due for screening completed FIT, versus 42.4% under outreach (18.4% absolute difference). When calculations included patients up-to-date on screening from prior colonoscopy, 41.7% were up-to-date via POC, versus 55.8% for outreach (14.1% absolute difference). POC cost $4.93 per patient, versus $30.43 for outreach ($25.50 difference). Cost per patient screened was $20.60 for POC and $71.84 for outreach ($51.24 difference). Total organizational cost was $3,779 for POC distribution and $23,315 for outreach ($19,536 difference). Outreach costs decreased by approximately one fourth under optimized workflows. Outreach is an effective, practical, relatively low-cost strategy; costs could be reduced further by optimizing staff workflows. Despite its value, outreach costs more than POC distribution and may be difficult for community health centers to implement under current payment models.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>26362405</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.003</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1873-2607
ispartof American journal of preventive medicine, 2016-02, Vol.50 (2), p.e54-e61
issn 1873-2607
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760892389
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Community Health Centers - economics
Community Health Centers - organization & administration
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Early Detection of Cancer - economics
Early Detection of Cancer - methods
Feces - chemistry
Health Promotion - economics
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Point-of-Care Systems - economics
title Outreach for Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Budget Impact Analysis for Community Health Centers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T17%3A58%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outreach%20for%20Annual%20Colorectal%20Cancer%20Screening:%20A%20Budget%20Impact%20Analysis%20for%20Community%20Health%20Centers&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Liss,%20David%20T&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e54&rft.epage=e61&rft.pages=e54-e61&rft.eissn=1873-2607&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1760892389%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760892389&rft_id=info:pmid/26362405&rfr_iscdi=true