Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation
Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) dramatically increase in numbers upon infection and inflammation; accordingly, we found that this also occurs during allogeneic responses. Despite their prominence, how emergent moDCs and resident conventional DCs (cDCs) divide their labor as APCs remain unde...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of immunology (1950) 2016-01, Vol.196 (2), p.624-636 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 636 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 624 |
container_title | The Journal of immunology (1950) |
container_volume | 196 |
creator | Chow, Kevin V Lew, Andrew M Sutherland, Robyn M Zhan, Yifan |
description | Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) dramatically increase in numbers upon infection and inflammation; accordingly, we found that this also occurs during allogeneic responses. Despite their prominence, how emergent moDCs and resident conventional DCs (cDCs) divide their labor as APCs remain undefined. Hence, we compared both direct and indirect presentation by murine moDCs versus cDCs. We found that, despite having equivalent MHC class II expression and in vitro survival, moDCs were 20-fold less efficient than cDCs at inducing CD4(+) T cell proliferation through both direct and indirect Ag presentation. Despite this, moDCs were more potent at inducing Th1 and Th17 differentiation (e.g., 8-fold higher IFN-γ and 2-fold higher IL-17A in T cell cocultures), whereas cDCs induced 10-fold higher IL-2 production. Intriguingly, moDCs potently reduced the ability of cDCs to stimulate T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, partially through NO production. We surmise that such division of labor between moDCs and cDCs has implications for their respective roles in the immune response. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4049/jimmunol.1501202 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760878081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760878081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-22eb067f09102342e1554b34c53f4ab0ec6726e30786b96b3d84b55628be2bd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwM6GMDKScP2KnI0r5koroUOYoTi6qqyQudtKq_HpSWhiZTjq9z6u7h5BrCmMBYnK_MnXdNbYa0wgoA3ZChjSKIJQS5CkZAjAWUiXVgFx4vwIACUyckwGTUnLFYEi2b7ax-a7FcIrObLAIptgUzrQmDxKsKh_Mna1ti8FiGcxtlTnzlbXGNnfBdokOMx8kttlgs99l1b-0s5Up0f3gl-SszCqPV8c5Ih9Pj4vkJZy9P78mD7MwF6DakDHUIFUJEwqMC4b9e0JzkUe8FJkGzKViEjmoWOqJ1LyIhY4iyWKNTBecj8jtoXft7GeHvk1r4_P-tKxB2_m0twOxiiGmfRQO0dxZ7x2W6dqZOnO7lEK6153-6k6Punvk5tje6RqLP-DXL_8GnX1-Xw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760878081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chow, Kevin V ; Lew, Andrew M ; Sutherland, Robyn M ; Zhan, Yifan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chow, Kevin V ; Lew, Andrew M ; Sutherland, Robyn M ; Zhan, Yifan</creatorcontrib><description>Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) dramatically increase in numbers upon infection and inflammation; accordingly, we found that this also occurs during allogeneic responses. Despite their prominence, how emergent moDCs and resident conventional DCs (cDCs) divide their labor as APCs remain undefined. Hence, we compared both direct and indirect presentation by murine moDCs versus cDCs. We found that, despite having equivalent MHC class II expression and in vitro survival, moDCs were 20-fold less efficient than cDCs at inducing CD4(+) T cell proliferation through both direct and indirect Ag presentation. Despite this, moDCs were more potent at inducing Th1 and Th17 differentiation (e.g., 8-fold higher IFN-γ and 2-fold higher IL-17A in T cell cocultures), whereas cDCs induced 10-fold higher IL-2 production. Intriguingly, moDCs potently reduced the ability of cDCs to stimulate T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, partially through NO production. We surmise that such division of labor between moDCs and cDCs has implications for their respective roles in the immune response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-6606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501202</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26663720</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antigen Presentation - immunology ; Cell Differentiation - immunology ; Cell Lineage ; Cell Proliferation ; Coculture Techniques ; Dendritic Cells - cytology ; Dendritic Cells - immunology ; Flow Cytometry ; Lymphocyte Activation - immunology ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Mice, Transgenic ; Monocytes - cytology ; T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - cytology ; T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - immunology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of immunology (1950), 2016-01, Vol.196 (2), p.624-636</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-22eb067f09102342e1554b34c53f4ab0ec6726e30786b96b3d84b55628be2bd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-22eb067f09102342e1554b34c53f4ab0ec6726e30786b96b3d84b55628be2bd33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6974-0486</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26663720$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chow, Kevin V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Robyn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Yifan</creatorcontrib><title>Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation</title><title>The Journal of immunology (1950)</title><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><description>Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) dramatically increase in numbers upon infection and inflammation; accordingly, we found that this also occurs during allogeneic responses. Despite their prominence, how emergent moDCs and resident conventional DCs (cDCs) divide their labor as APCs remain undefined. Hence, we compared both direct and indirect presentation by murine moDCs versus cDCs. We found that, despite having equivalent MHC class II expression and in vitro survival, moDCs were 20-fold less efficient than cDCs at inducing CD4(+) T cell proliferation through both direct and indirect Ag presentation. Despite this, moDCs were more potent at inducing Th1 and Th17 differentiation (e.g., 8-fold higher IFN-γ and 2-fold higher IL-17A in T cell cocultures), whereas cDCs induced 10-fold higher IL-2 production. Intriguingly, moDCs potently reduced the ability of cDCs to stimulate T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, partially through NO production. We surmise that such division of labor between moDCs and cDCs has implications for their respective roles in the immune response.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antigen Presentation - immunology</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation - immunology</subject><subject>Cell Lineage</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Coculture Techniques</subject><subject>Dendritic Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Dendritic Cells - immunology</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Lymphocyte Activation - immunology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred BALB C</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Mice, Transgenic</subject><subject>Monocytes - cytology</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - cytology</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - immunology</subject><issn>0022-1767</issn><issn>1550-6606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwM6GMDKScP2KnI0r5koroUOYoTi6qqyQudtKq_HpSWhiZTjq9z6u7h5BrCmMBYnK_MnXdNbYa0wgoA3ZChjSKIJQS5CkZAjAWUiXVgFx4vwIACUyckwGTUnLFYEi2b7ax-a7FcIrObLAIptgUzrQmDxKsKh_Mna1ti8FiGcxtlTnzlbXGNnfBdokOMx8kttlgs99l1b-0s5Up0f3gl-SszCqPV8c5Ih9Pj4vkJZy9P78mD7MwF6DakDHUIFUJEwqMC4b9e0JzkUe8FJkGzKViEjmoWOqJ1LyIhY4iyWKNTBecj8jtoXft7GeHvk1r4_P-tKxB2_m0twOxiiGmfRQO0dxZ7x2W6dqZOnO7lEK6153-6k6Punvk5tje6RqLP-DXL_8GnX1-Xw</recordid><startdate>20160115</startdate><enddate>20160115</enddate><creator>Chow, Kevin V</creator><creator>Lew, Andrew M</creator><creator>Sutherland, Robyn M</creator><creator>Zhan, Yifan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-0486</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160115</creationdate><title>Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation</title><author>Chow, Kevin V ; Lew, Andrew M ; Sutherland, Robyn M ; Zhan, Yifan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-22eb067f09102342e1554b34c53f4ab0ec6726e30786b96b3d84b55628be2bd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antigen Presentation - immunology</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation - immunology</topic><topic>Cell Lineage</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Coculture Techniques</topic><topic>Dendritic Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Dendritic Cells - immunology</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Lymphocyte Activation - immunology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred BALB C</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Mice, Transgenic</topic><topic>Monocytes - cytology</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - cytology</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chow, Kevin V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Robyn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Yifan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chow, Kevin V</au><au>Lew, Andrew M</au><au>Sutherland, Robyn M</au><au>Zhan, Yifan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><date>2016-01-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>624</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>624-636</pages><issn>0022-1767</issn><eissn>1550-6606</eissn><abstract>Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) dramatically increase in numbers upon infection and inflammation; accordingly, we found that this also occurs during allogeneic responses. Despite their prominence, how emergent moDCs and resident conventional DCs (cDCs) divide their labor as APCs remain undefined. Hence, we compared both direct and indirect presentation by murine moDCs versus cDCs. We found that, despite having equivalent MHC class II expression and in vitro survival, moDCs were 20-fold less efficient than cDCs at inducing CD4(+) T cell proliferation through both direct and indirect Ag presentation. Despite this, moDCs were more potent at inducing Th1 and Th17 differentiation (e.g., 8-fold higher IFN-γ and 2-fold higher IL-17A in T cell cocultures), whereas cDCs induced 10-fold higher IL-2 production. Intriguingly, moDCs potently reduced the ability of cDCs to stimulate T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, partially through NO production. We surmise that such division of labor between moDCs and cDCs has implications for their respective roles in the immune response.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26663720</pmid><doi>10.4049/jimmunol.1501202</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-0486</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1767 |
ispartof | The Journal of immunology (1950), 2016-01, Vol.196 (2), p.624-636 |
issn | 0022-1767 1550-6606 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760878081 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Antigen Presentation - immunology Cell Differentiation - immunology Cell Lineage Cell Proliferation Coculture Techniques Dendritic Cells - cytology Dendritic Cells - immunology Flow Cytometry Lymphocyte Activation - immunology Mice Mice, Inbred BALB C Mice, Inbred C57BL Mice, Transgenic Monocytes - cytology T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - cytology T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - immunology |
title | Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T21%3A01%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monocyte-Derived%20Dendritic%20Cells%20Promote%20Th%20Polarization,%20whereas%20Conventional%20Dendritic%20Cells%20Promote%20Th%20Proliferation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20immunology%20(1950)&rft.au=Chow,%20Kevin%20V&rft.date=2016-01-15&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=624&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=624-636&rft.issn=0022-1767&rft.eissn=1550-6606&rft_id=info:doi/10.4049/jimmunol.1501202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760878081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760878081&rft_id=info:pmid/26663720&rfr_iscdi=true |