Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation

Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) dramatically increase in numbers upon infection and inflammation; accordingly, we found that this also occurs during allogeneic responses. Despite their prominence, how emergent moDCs and resident conventional DCs (cDCs) divide their labor as APCs remain unde...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of immunology (1950) 2016-01, Vol.196 (2), p.624-636
Hauptverfasser: Chow, Kevin V, Lew, Andrew M, Sutherland, Robyn M, Zhan, Yifan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 636
container_issue 2
container_start_page 624
container_title The Journal of immunology (1950)
container_volume 196
creator Chow, Kevin V
Lew, Andrew M
Sutherland, Robyn M
Zhan, Yifan
description Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) dramatically increase in numbers upon infection and inflammation; accordingly, we found that this also occurs during allogeneic responses. Despite their prominence, how emergent moDCs and resident conventional DCs (cDCs) divide their labor as APCs remain undefined. Hence, we compared both direct and indirect presentation by murine moDCs versus cDCs. We found that, despite having equivalent MHC class II expression and in vitro survival, moDCs were 20-fold less efficient than cDCs at inducing CD4(+) T cell proliferation through both direct and indirect Ag presentation. Despite this, moDCs were more potent at inducing Th1 and Th17 differentiation (e.g., 8-fold higher IFN-γ and 2-fold higher IL-17A in T cell cocultures), whereas cDCs induced 10-fold higher IL-2 production. Intriguingly, moDCs potently reduced the ability of cDCs to stimulate T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, partially through NO production. We surmise that such division of labor between moDCs and cDCs has implications for their respective roles in the immune response.
doi_str_mv 10.4049/jimmunol.1501202
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760878081</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760878081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-22eb067f09102342e1554b34c53f4ab0ec6726e30786b96b3d84b55628be2bd33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwM6GMDKScP2KnI0r5koroUOYoTi6qqyQudtKq_HpSWhiZTjq9z6u7h5BrCmMBYnK_MnXdNbYa0wgoA3ZChjSKIJQS5CkZAjAWUiXVgFx4vwIACUyckwGTUnLFYEi2b7ax-a7FcIrObLAIptgUzrQmDxKsKh_Mna1ti8FiGcxtlTnzlbXGNnfBdokOMx8kttlgs99l1b-0s5Up0f3gl-SszCqPV8c5Ih9Pj4vkJZy9P78mD7MwF6DakDHUIFUJEwqMC4b9e0JzkUe8FJkGzKViEjmoWOqJ1LyIhY4iyWKNTBecj8jtoXft7GeHvk1r4_P-tKxB2_m0twOxiiGmfRQO0dxZ7x2W6dqZOnO7lEK6153-6k6Punvk5tje6RqLP-DXL_8GnX1-Xw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760878081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chow, Kevin V ; Lew, Andrew M ; Sutherland, Robyn M ; Zhan, Yifan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chow, Kevin V ; Lew, Andrew M ; Sutherland, Robyn M ; Zhan, Yifan</creatorcontrib><description>Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) dramatically increase in numbers upon infection and inflammation; accordingly, we found that this also occurs during allogeneic responses. Despite their prominence, how emergent moDCs and resident conventional DCs (cDCs) divide their labor as APCs remain undefined. Hence, we compared both direct and indirect presentation by murine moDCs versus cDCs. We found that, despite having equivalent MHC class II expression and in vitro survival, moDCs were 20-fold less efficient than cDCs at inducing CD4(+) T cell proliferation through both direct and indirect Ag presentation. Despite this, moDCs were more potent at inducing Th1 and Th17 differentiation (e.g., 8-fold higher IFN-γ and 2-fold higher IL-17A in T cell cocultures), whereas cDCs induced 10-fold higher IL-2 production. Intriguingly, moDCs potently reduced the ability of cDCs to stimulate T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, partially through NO production. We surmise that such division of labor between moDCs and cDCs has implications for their respective roles in the immune response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-6606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501202</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26663720</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antigen Presentation - immunology ; Cell Differentiation - immunology ; Cell Lineage ; Cell Proliferation ; Coculture Techniques ; Dendritic Cells - cytology ; Dendritic Cells - immunology ; Flow Cytometry ; Lymphocyte Activation - immunology ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred BALB C ; Mice, Inbred C57BL ; Mice, Transgenic ; Monocytes - cytology ; T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - cytology ; T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - immunology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of immunology (1950), 2016-01, Vol.196 (2), p.624-636</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-22eb067f09102342e1554b34c53f4ab0ec6726e30786b96b3d84b55628be2bd33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-22eb067f09102342e1554b34c53f4ab0ec6726e30786b96b3d84b55628be2bd33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6974-0486</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26663720$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chow, Kevin V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Robyn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Yifan</creatorcontrib><title>Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation</title><title>The Journal of immunology (1950)</title><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><description>Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) dramatically increase in numbers upon infection and inflammation; accordingly, we found that this also occurs during allogeneic responses. Despite their prominence, how emergent moDCs and resident conventional DCs (cDCs) divide their labor as APCs remain undefined. Hence, we compared both direct and indirect presentation by murine moDCs versus cDCs. We found that, despite having equivalent MHC class II expression and in vitro survival, moDCs were 20-fold less efficient than cDCs at inducing CD4(+) T cell proliferation through both direct and indirect Ag presentation. Despite this, moDCs were more potent at inducing Th1 and Th17 differentiation (e.g., 8-fold higher IFN-γ and 2-fold higher IL-17A in T cell cocultures), whereas cDCs induced 10-fold higher IL-2 production. Intriguingly, moDCs potently reduced the ability of cDCs to stimulate T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, partially through NO production. We surmise that such division of labor between moDCs and cDCs has implications for their respective roles in the immune response.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antigen Presentation - immunology</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation - immunology</subject><subject>Cell Lineage</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Coculture Techniques</subject><subject>Dendritic Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Dendritic Cells - immunology</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Lymphocyte Activation - immunology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred BALB C</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred C57BL</subject><subject>Mice, Transgenic</subject><subject>Monocytes - cytology</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - cytology</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - immunology</subject><issn>0022-1767</issn><issn>1550-6606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqWwM6GMDKScP2KnI0r5koroUOYoTi6qqyQudtKq_HpSWhiZTjq9z6u7h5BrCmMBYnK_MnXdNbYa0wgoA3ZChjSKIJQS5CkZAjAWUiXVgFx4vwIACUyckwGTUnLFYEi2b7ax-a7FcIrObLAIptgUzrQmDxKsKh_Mna1ti8FiGcxtlTnzlbXGNnfBdokOMx8kttlgs99l1b-0s5Up0f3gl-SszCqPV8c5Ih9Pj4vkJZy9P78mD7MwF6DakDHUIFUJEwqMC4b9e0JzkUe8FJkGzKViEjmoWOqJ1LyIhY4iyWKNTBecj8jtoXft7GeHvk1r4_P-tKxB2_m0twOxiiGmfRQO0dxZ7x2W6dqZOnO7lEK6153-6k6Punvk5tje6RqLP-DXL_8GnX1-Xw</recordid><startdate>20160115</startdate><enddate>20160115</enddate><creator>Chow, Kevin V</creator><creator>Lew, Andrew M</creator><creator>Sutherland, Robyn M</creator><creator>Zhan, Yifan</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-0486</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160115</creationdate><title>Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation</title><author>Chow, Kevin V ; Lew, Andrew M ; Sutherland, Robyn M ; Zhan, Yifan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-22eb067f09102342e1554b34c53f4ab0ec6726e30786b96b3d84b55628be2bd33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antigen Presentation - immunology</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation - immunology</topic><topic>Cell Lineage</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Coculture Techniques</topic><topic>Dendritic Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Dendritic Cells - immunology</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Lymphocyte Activation - immunology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred BALB C</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred C57BL</topic><topic>Mice, Transgenic</topic><topic>Monocytes - cytology</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - cytology</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - immunology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chow, Kevin V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, Robyn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Yifan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chow, Kevin V</au><au>Lew, Andrew M</au><au>Sutherland, Robyn M</au><au>Zhan, Yifan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><date>2016-01-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>624</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>624-636</pages><issn>0022-1767</issn><eissn>1550-6606</eissn><abstract>Monocyte-derived dendritic cells (moDCs) dramatically increase in numbers upon infection and inflammation; accordingly, we found that this also occurs during allogeneic responses. Despite their prominence, how emergent moDCs and resident conventional DCs (cDCs) divide their labor as APCs remain undefined. Hence, we compared both direct and indirect presentation by murine moDCs versus cDCs. We found that, despite having equivalent MHC class II expression and in vitro survival, moDCs were 20-fold less efficient than cDCs at inducing CD4(+) T cell proliferation through both direct and indirect Ag presentation. Despite this, moDCs were more potent at inducing Th1 and Th17 differentiation (e.g., 8-fold higher IFN-γ and 2-fold higher IL-17A in T cell cocultures), whereas cDCs induced 10-fold higher IL-2 production. Intriguingly, moDCs potently reduced the ability of cDCs to stimulate T cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, partially through NO production. We surmise that such division of labor between moDCs and cDCs has implications for their respective roles in the immune response.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26663720</pmid><doi>10.4049/jimmunol.1501202</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-0486</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1767
ispartof The Journal of immunology (1950), 2016-01, Vol.196 (2), p.624-636
issn 0022-1767
1550-6606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760878081
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Antigen Presentation - immunology
Cell Differentiation - immunology
Cell Lineage
Cell Proliferation
Coculture Techniques
Dendritic Cells - cytology
Dendritic Cells - immunology
Flow Cytometry
Lymphocyte Activation - immunology
Mice
Mice, Inbred BALB C
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Mice, Transgenic
Monocytes - cytology
T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - cytology
T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer - immunology
title Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells Promote Th Polarization, whereas Conventional Dendritic Cells Promote Th Proliferation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T21%3A01%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monocyte-Derived%20Dendritic%20Cells%20Promote%20Th%20Polarization,%20whereas%20Conventional%20Dendritic%20Cells%20Promote%20Th%20Proliferation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20immunology%20(1950)&rft.au=Chow,%20Kevin%20V&rft.date=2016-01-15&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=624&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=624-636&rft.issn=0022-1767&rft.eissn=1550-6606&rft_id=info:doi/10.4049/jimmunol.1501202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760878081%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760878081&rft_id=info:pmid/26663720&rfr_iscdi=true