Tobacco Policies in Louisiana: Recommendations for Future Tobacco Control Investment from SimSmoke, a Policy Simulation Model

Despite the presence of tobacco control policies, Louisiana continues to experience a high smoking burden and elevated smoking-attributable deaths. The SimSmoke model provides projections of these health outcomes in the face of existing and expanded (simulated) tobacco control polices. The SimSmoke...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prevention science 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.199-207
Hauptverfasser: Levy, David, Fergus, Cristin, Rudov, Lindsey, McCormick-Ricket, Iben, Carton, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 207
container_issue 2
container_start_page 199
container_title Prevention science
container_volume 17
creator Levy, David
Fergus, Cristin
Rudov, Lindsey
McCormick-Ricket, Iben
Carton, Thomas
description Despite the presence of tobacco control policies, Louisiana continues to experience a high smoking burden and elevated smoking-attributable deaths. The SimSmoke model provides projections of these health outcomes in the face of existing and expanded (simulated) tobacco control polices. The SimSmoke model utilizes population data, smoking rates, and various tobacco control policy measures from Louisiana to predict smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. The model begins in 1993 and estimates are projected through 2054. The model is validated against existing Louisiana smoking prevalence data. The most powerful individual policy measure for reducing smoking prevalence is cigarette excise tax. However, a comprehensive cessation treatment policy is predicted to save the most lives. A combination of tobacco control policies provides the greatest reduction in smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. The existing Louisiana excise tax ranks as one of the lowest in the country and the legislature is against further increases. Alternative policy measures aimed at lowering prevalence and attributable deaths are: cessation treatments, comprehensive smoke-free policies, and limiting youth access. These three policies have a substantial effect on smoking prevalence and attributable deaths and are likely to encounter more favor in the Louisiana legislature than increasing the state excise tax.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11121-015-0587-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760871822</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1760871822</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3d2bc981dfe7f88fed743cceac20f051d78ae2f298b6201782c1464559dd0d473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rFTEUhoMotlZ_QDcScNOFY3Myk4_prlxaLVyx2LoOufkoqTNJm8wIXfjfzTitiOAqh5znPOfAi9AhkA9AiDguAEChIcAawqRo6DO0D0y0Dec9e17rVvZN10u-h16VcksIcNaSl2iP8hY6ycU--nmddtqYhC_TEExwBYeIt2kOJeioT_BXZ9I4umj1FFIs2KeMz-dpzg4_TW5SnHIa8EX84cpU2Qn7nEZ8FcarMX1377Fe7Q_L1zz8NuHPybrhNXrh9VDcm8f3AH07P7vefGq2Xz5ebE63jek6OjWtpTvTS7DeCS-ld1Z0rTFOG0o8YWCF1I562ssdpwSEpAY63jHWW0tsJ9oDdLR673K6n-uVagzFuGHQ0aW5KBCcSAGS0oq--we9TXOO9bpKMUl6xvtFCCtlciolO6_uchh1flBA1JKNWrNRNRu1ZKMW89tH87wbnf0z8RRGBegKlNqKNy7_tfq_1l_WYpo6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1758095697</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tobacco Policies in Louisiana: Recommendations for Future Tobacco Control Investment from SimSmoke, a Policy Simulation Model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Levy, David ; Fergus, Cristin ; Rudov, Lindsey ; McCormick-Ricket, Iben ; Carton, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Levy, David ; Fergus, Cristin ; Rudov, Lindsey ; McCormick-Ricket, Iben ; Carton, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the presence of tobacco control policies, Louisiana continues to experience a high smoking burden and elevated smoking-attributable deaths. The SimSmoke model provides projections of these health outcomes in the face of existing and expanded (simulated) tobacco control polices. The SimSmoke model utilizes population data, smoking rates, and various tobacco control policy measures from Louisiana to predict smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. The model begins in 1993 and estimates are projected through 2054. The model is validated against existing Louisiana smoking prevalence data. The most powerful individual policy measure for reducing smoking prevalence is cigarette excise tax. However, a comprehensive cessation treatment policy is predicted to save the most lives. A combination of tobacco control policies provides the greatest reduction in smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. The existing Louisiana excise tax ranks as one of the lowest in the country and the legislature is against further increases. Alternative policy measures aimed at lowering prevalence and attributable deaths are: cessation treatments, comprehensive smoke-free policies, and limiting youth access. These three policies have a substantial effect on smoking prevalence and attributable deaths and are likely to encounter more favor in the Louisiana legislature than increasing the state excise tax.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-4986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11121-015-0587-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26314867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Census of Population ; Child and School Psychology ; Datasets ; Disease control ; Disease prevention ; Economic indicators ; Excise taxes ; Female ; Health care policy ; Health Planning Guidelines ; Health Policy ; Health Psychology ; Humans ; Investments ; Legislation ; Legislatures ; Louisiana ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Models, Theoretical ; Policy Making ; Population policy ; Prevalence ; Public Health ; Simulation ; Smoking ; Smoking - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Tax increases ; Taxation ; Trends ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Prevention science, 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.199-207</ispartof><rights>Society for Prevention Research 2015</rights><rights>Society for Prevention Research 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3d2bc981dfe7f88fed743cceac20f051d78ae2f298b6201782c1464559dd0d473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3d2bc981dfe7f88fed743cceac20f051d78ae2f298b6201782c1464559dd0d473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11121-015-0587-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11121-015-0587-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26314867$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levy, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergus, Cristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudov, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick-Ricket, Iben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carton, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Tobacco Policies in Louisiana: Recommendations for Future Tobacco Control Investment from SimSmoke, a Policy Simulation Model</title><title>Prevention science</title><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><description>Despite the presence of tobacco control policies, Louisiana continues to experience a high smoking burden and elevated smoking-attributable deaths. The SimSmoke model provides projections of these health outcomes in the face of existing and expanded (simulated) tobacco control polices. The SimSmoke model utilizes population data, smoking rates, and various tobacco control policy measures from Louisiana to predict smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. The model begins in 1993 and estimates are projected through 2054. The model is validated against existing Louisiana smoking prevalence data. The most powerful individual policy measure for reducing smoking prevalence is cigarette excise tax. However, a comprehensive cessation treatment policy is predicted to save the most lives. A combination of tobacco control policies provides the greatest reduction in smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. The existing Louisiana excise tax ranks as one of the lowest in the country and the legislature is against further increases. Alternative policy measures aimed at lowering prevalence and attributable deaths are: cessation treatments, comprehensive smoke-free policies, and limiting youth access. These three policies have a substantial effect on smoking prevalence and attributable deaths and are likely to encounter more favor in the Louisiana legislature than increasing the state excise tax.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Census of Population</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Economic indicators</subject><subject>Excise taxes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Planning Guidelines</subject><subject>Health Policy</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Louisiana</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Policy Making</subject><subject>Population policy</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Tax increases</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1389-4986</issn><issn>1573-6695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1rFTEUhoMotlZ_QDcScNOFY3Myk4_prlxaLVyx2LoOufkoqTNJm8wIXfjfzTitiOAqh5znPOfAi9AhkA9AiDguAEChIcAawqRo6DO0D0y0Dec9e17rVvZN10u-h16VcksIcNaSl2iP8hY6ycU--nmddtqYhC_TEExwBYeIt2kOJeioT_BXZ9I4umj1FFIs2KeMz-dpzg4_TW5SnHIa8EX84cpU2Qn7nEZ8FcarMX1377Fe7Q_L1zz8NuHPybrhNXrh9VDcm8f3AH07P7vefGq2Xz5ebE63jek6OjWtpTvTS7DeCS-ld1Z0rTFOG0o8YWCF1I562ssdpwSEpAY63jHWW0tsJ9oDdLR673K6n-uVagzFuGHQ0aW5KBCcSAGS0oq--we9TXOO9bpKMUl6xvtFCCtlciolO6_uchh1flBA1JKNWrNRNRu1ZKMW89tH87wbnf0z8RRGBegKlNqKNy7_tfq_1l_WYpo6</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Levy, David</creator><creator>Fergus, Cristin</creator><creator>Rudov, Lindsey</creator><creator>McCormick-Ricket, Iben</creator><creator>Carton, Thomas</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Tobacco Policies in Louisiana: Recommendations for Future Tobacco Control Investment from SimSmoke, a Policy Simulation Model</title><author>Levy, David ; Fergus, Cristin ; Rudov, Lindsey ; McCormick-Ricket, Iben ; Carton, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-3d2bc981dfe7f88fed743cceac20f051d78ae2f298b6201782c1464559dd0d473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Census of Population</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Economic indicators</topic><topic>Excise taxes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Planning Guidelines</topic><topic>Health Policy</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Louisiana</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Policy Making</topic><topic>Population policy</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Tax increases</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levy, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergus, Cristin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rudov, Lindsey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick-Ricket, Iben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carton, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levy, David</au><au>Fergus, Cristin</au><au>Rudov, Lindsey</au><au>McCormick-Ricket, Iben</au><au>Carton, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tobacco Policies in Louisiana: Recommendations for Future Tobacco Control Investment from SimSmoke, a Policy Simulation Model</atitle><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle><stitle>Prev Sci</stitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>199-207</pages><issn>1389-4986</issn><eissn>1573-6695</eissn><abstract>Despite the presence of tobacco control policies, Louisiana continues to experience a high smoking burden and elevated smoking-attributable deaths. The SimSmoke model provides projections of these health outcomes in the face of existing and expanded (simulated) tobacco control polices. The SimSmoke model utilizes population data, smoking rates, and various tobacco control policy measures from Louisiana to predict smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. The model begins in 1993 and estimates are projected through 2054. The model is validated against existing Louisiana smoking prevalence data. The most powerful individual policy measure for reducing smoking prevalence is cigarette excise tax. However, a comprehensive cessation treatment policy is predicted to save the most lives. A combination of tobacco control policies provides the greatest reduction in smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths. The existing Louisiana excise tax ranks as one of the lowest in the country and the legislature is against further increases. Alternative policy measures aimed at lowering prevalence and attributable deaths are: cessation treatments, comprehensive smoke-free policies, and limiting youth access. These three policies have a substantial effect on smoking prevalence and attributable deaths and are likely to encounter more favor in the Louisiana legislature than increasing the state excise tax.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>26314867</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11121-015-0587-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-4986
ispartof Prevention science, 2016-02, Vol.17 (2), p.199-207
issn 1389-4986
1573-6695
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760871822
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Cancer
Census of Population
Child and School Psychology
Datasets
Disease control
Disease prevention
Economic indicators
Excise taxes
Female
Health care policy
Health Planning Guidelines
Health Policy
Health Psychology
Humans
Investments
Legislation
Legislatures
Louisiana
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Models, Theoretical
Policy Making
Population policy
Prevalence
Public Health
Simulation
Smoking
Smoking - legislation & jurisprudence
Tax increases
Taxation
Trends
Youth
title Tobacco Policies in Louisiana: Recommendations for Future Tobacco Control Investment from SimSmoke, a Policy Simulation Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T06%3A01%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tobacco%20Policies%20in%20Louisiana:%20Recommendations%20for%20Future%20Tobacco%20Control%20Investment%20from%20SimSmoke,%20a%20Policy%20Simulation%20Model&rft.jtitle=Prevention%20science&rft.au=Levy,%20David&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=199-207&rft.issn=1389-4986&rft.eissn=1573-6695&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11121-015-0587-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760871822%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1758095697&rft_id=info:pmid/26314867&rfr_iscdi=true